Exoplanets

  • 36 Replies
  • 4976 Views
Re: Exoplanets
« Reply #30 on: February 04, 2018, 01:18:33 PM »
Though crazy people like you will deny its existance for some bizzare reason,
You posted 2000+ posts over here and still know shit about what flatearthers in general think !!!!
The photograph is real....nobody denies there is a fancy looking thing at display !!!!
Contrary to the outerspace CGI garbage that we dismiss and you space lovers accept as reality !!
Quote
that only you could explain’ it’s due to be launched some time next June. The images it will produce will be something else you can get your knickers in a twist about.
You know that the SOFIA flying observatory takes images from the universe that are at times indistinguishable from those supposedly taken by the Hubble telescope ?

Yeah,....a rocket will be launched next year,......but that's all you and i can know for sure......Just like the Saturn 5 rocket was launched in 1969, but the world finally found out the rest at display was the biggest scam in the history of mankind  ;D So i wouldn't hold my breath over that thing going into some magical orbit.. ..::)

Your correct I do think flat earther thinking is shit, but I still don’t understand why they think the way they do! You say this is a scam, and that’s CGi, without thinking through the implications nor having a shred of evidence to back it up. Everything you say is delusional.
You use the internet that relies on satellite communications, and that fact is pretty ironic in itself. At the end of the day you believe in your delusions if you wish, but it does not change reality.
http://thestockmarketwatch.com/stock/?stock=SPACEX

Here is the current price of space X stock.....do you think it’s fake?

Lol lonegranger lives in a world where financial fraud does not exist...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enron_scandal

And it calls dutchy delusional and a shit thinker?

For which I'm reporting it btw.

Where did I say fraud doesn’t exist? That’s you making shit up again. Let me set the record straight, I think your a total fraud for a start.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doublethink

http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/2016/07/31/Pentagon-s-Sloppy-Bookkeeping-Means-65-Trillion-Can-t-Pass-Audit

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_to_defraud

Wow you can do Wikipedia, I hope you contribute to their fund.

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: Exoplanets
« Reply #31 on: February 04, 2018, 01:27:59 PM »
Though crazy people like you will deny its existance for some bizzare reason,
You posted 2000+ posts over here and still know shit about what flatearthers in general think !!!!
The photograph is real....nobody denies there is a fancy looking thing at display !!!!
Contrary to the outerspace CGI garbage that we dismiss and you space lovers accept as reality !!
Quote
that only you could explain’ it’s due to be launched some time next June. The images it will produce will be something else you can get your knickers in a twist about.
You know that the SOFIA flying observatory takes images from the universe that are at times indistinguishable from those supposedly taken by the Hubble telescope ?

Yeah,....a rocket will be launched next year,......but that's all you and i can know for sure......Just like the Saturn 5 rocket was launched in 1969, but the world finally found out the rest at display was the biggest scam in the history of mankind  ;D So i wouldn't hold my breath over that thing going into some magical orbit.. ..::)

Your correct I do think flat earther thinking is shit, but I still don’t understand why they think the way they do! You say this is a scam, and that’s CGi, without thinking through the implications nor having a shred of evidence to back it up. Everything you say is delusional.
You use the internet that relies on satellite communications, and that fact is pretty ironic in itself. At the end of the day you believe in your delusions if you wish, but it does not change reality.
http://thestockmarketwatch.com/stock/?stock=SPACEX

Here is the current price of space X stock.....do you think it’s fake?

Lol lonegranger lives in a world where financial fraud does not exist...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enron_scandal

And it calls dutchy delusional and a shit thinker?

For which I'm reporting it btw.

Where did I say fraud doesn’t exist? That’s you making shit up again. Let me set the record straight, I think your a total fraud for a start.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doublethink

http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/2016/07/31/Pentagon-s-Sloppy-Bookkeeping-Means-65-Trillion-Can-t-Pass-Audit

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_to_defraud

Wow you can do Wikipedia, I hope you contribute to their fund.

https://medium.com/artificial-intelligence-policy-laws-and-ethics/artificial-intelligence-chatbots-will-overwhelm-human-speech-online-the-rise-of-madcoms-e007818f31a1
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

Re: Exoplanets
« Reply #32 on: February 04, 2018, 01:31:03 PM »
Though crazy people like you will deny its existance for some bizzare reason,
You posted 2000+ posts over here and still know shit about what flatearthers in general think !!!!
The photograph is real....nobody denies there is a fancy looking thing at display !!!!
Contrary to the outerspace CGI garbage that we dismiss and you space lovers accept as reality !!
Quote
that only you could explain’ it’s due to be launched some time next June. The images it will produce will be something else you can get your knickers in a twist about.
You know that the SOFIA flying observatory takes images from the universe that are at times indistinguishable from those supposedly taken by the Hubble telescope ?

Yeah,....a rocket will be launched next year,......but that's all you and i can know for sure......Just like the Saturn 5 rocket was launched in 1969, but the world finally found out the rest at display was the biggest scam in the history of mankind  ;D So i wouldn't hold my breath over that thing going into some magical orbit.. ..::)

Your correct I do think flat earther thinking is shit, but I still don’t understand why they think the way they do! You say this is a scam, and that’s CGi, without thinking through the implications nor having a shred of evidence to back it up. Everything you say is delusional.
You use the internet that relies on satellite communications, and that fact is pretty ironic in itself. At the end of the day you believe in your delusions if you wish, but it does not change reality.
http://thestockmarketwatch.com/stock/?stock=SPACEX

Here is the current price of space X stock.....do you think it’s fake?

Lol lonegranger lives in a world where financial fraud does not exist...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enron_scandal

And it calls dutchy delusional and a shit thinker?

For which I'm reporting it btw.

Where did I say fraud doesn’t exist? That’s you making shit up again. Let me set the record straight, I think your a total fraud for a start.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doublethink

http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/2016/07/31/Pentagon-s-Sloppy-Bookkeeping-Means-65-Trillion-Can-t-Pass-Audit

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_to_defraud

Wow you can do Wikipedia, I hope you contribute to their fund.

https://medium.com/artificial-intelligence-policy-laws-and-ethics/artificial-intelligence-chatbots-will-overwhelm-human-speech-online-the-rise-of-madcoms-e007818f31a1

Sorry I’m at a loss what has this got to do with exoplanets? Please explain.

*

rabinoz

  • 26528
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: Exoplanets
« Reply #33 on: February 04, 2018, 01:44:03 PM »
You know that the SOFIA flying observatory takes images from the universe that are at times indistinguishable from those supposedly taken by the Hubble telescope ?
Yes, the crucial part of what you say is, "that are at times indistinguishable from those supposedly taken by the Hubble telescope

They are quite different instruments.
Quote
Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy
The telescope

SOFIA uses a 2.5 m (8.2 ft) reflector telescope, which has an oversized, 2.7 m (8.9 ft) diameter primary mirror, as is common with most large infrared telescopes.
. . . . .
The telescope looks out of a large door in the port side of the fuselage near the airplane's tail, and initially carried nine instruments for infrared astronomy at wavelengths from 1–655 micrometres (μm) and high-speed optical astronomy at wavelengths from 0.3–1.1 μm.

From: Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy
SOFIA is primarily an infrared telescope, though it can observe over the visible range.
Quote
Hubble Space Telescope
With a 2.4-meter (7.9 ft) mirror, Hubble's four main instruments observe in the near ultraviolet, visible, and near infrared spectra. Hubble's orbit outside the distortion of Earth's atmosphere allows it to take extremely high-resolution images, with substantially lower background light than ground-based telescopes. Hubble has recorded some of the most detailed visible-light images ever, allowing a deep view into space and time.

From: Hubble Space Telescope
The primary mirrors are a similar size and SOFIA observes from above most of the earth's atmosphere, so it can take excellent short exposure visible light images.

SOFIA does not provide the long-term stable platform that Hubble does, so SOFIA cannot be used for very long exposure deep-space photographs.
Hence some SOFIA photographs might be comparable with some Hubble photographs, there is a vast difference in capability.

?

dutchy

  • 2366
Re: Exoplanets
« Reply #34 on: February 04, 2018, 01:53:12 PM »
SOFIA does not provide the long-term stable platform that Hubble does, so SOFIA cannot be used for very long exposure deep-space photographs.
Hence some SOFIA photographs might be comparable with some Hubble photographs, there is a vast difference in capability.
Are you really of the opinion that no one knows how to execute a google search ???
Do you really think i did not, or cannot look up the things that are in your posts 97,4 % of the time (rough estimation)

Is that really the boundary of your thinking abilities ? do a Google search, trust the outcome when it has a mainstream media or scientific reliable source, copy paste, present it as facts at the flatearth forums ?

Truly amazing and fascinating......

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: Exoplanets
« Reply #35 on: February 04, 2018, 01:56:56 PM »
You know that the SOFIA flying observatory takes images from the universe that are at times indistinguishable from those supposedly taken by the Hubble telescope ?
Yes, the crucial part of what you say is, "that are at times indistinguishable from those supposedly taken by the Hubble telescope

They are quite different instruments.
Quote
Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy
The telescope

SOFIA uses a 2.5 m (8.2 ft) reflector telescope, which has an oversized, 2.7 m (8.9 ft) diameter primary mirror, as is common with most large infrared telescopes.
. . . . .
The telescope looks out of a large door in the port side of the fuselage near the airplane's tail, and initially carried nine instruments for infrared astronomy at wavelengths from 1–655 micrometres (μm) and high-speed optical astronomy at wavelengths from 0.3–1.1 μm.

From: Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy
SOFIA is primarily an infrared telescope, though it can observe over the visible range.
Quote
Hubble Space Telescope
With a 2.4-meter (7.9 ft) mirror, Hubble's four main instruments observe in the near ultraviolet, visible, and near infrared spectra. Hubble's orbit outside the distortion of Earth's atmosphere allows it to take extremely high-resolution images, with substantially lower background light than ground-based telescopes. Hubble has recorded some of the most detailed visible-light images ever, allowing a deep view into space and time.

From: Hubble Space Telescope
The primary mirrors are a similar size and SOFIA observes from above most of the earth's atmosphere, so it can take excellent short exposure visible light images.

SOFIA does not provide the long-term stable platform that Hubble does, so SOFIA cannot be used for very long exposure deep-space photographs.
Hence some SOFIA photographs might be comparable with some Hubble photographs, there is a vast difference in capability.

Hubble is allegedly travelling at 17,000mph round the Earth, which means it cannot focus on anything for long.

You know, what with the ludicrous speed and the Earth getting in the way all the time...

So not very stable or capable at all.

Stupid idea when you think about it...
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

Re: Exoplanets
« Reply #36 on: February 04, 2018, 02:43:19 PM »
You know that the SOFIA flying observatory takes images from the universe that are at times indistinguishable from those supposedly taken by the Hubble telescope ?
Yes, the crucial part of what you say is, "that are at times indistinguishable from those supposedly taken by the Hubble telescope

They are quite different instruments.
Quote
Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy
The telescope

SOFIA uses a 2.5 m (8.2 ft) reflector telescope, which has an oversized, 2.7 m (8.9 ft) diameter primary mirror, as is common with most large infrared telescopes.
. . . . .
The telescope looks out of a large door in the port side of the fuselage near the airplane's tail, and initially carried nine instruments for infrared astronomy at wavelengths from 1–655 micrometres (μm) and high-speed optical astronomy at wavelengths from 0.3–1.1 μm.

From: Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy
SOFIA is primarily an infrared telescope, though it can observe over the visible range.
Quote
Hubble Space Telescope
With a 2.4-meter (7.9 ft) mirror, Hubble's four main instruments observe in the near ultraviolet, visible, and near infrared spectra. Hubble's orbit outside the distortion of Earth's atmosphere allows it to take extremely high-resolution images, with substantially lower background light than ground-based telescopes. Hubble has recorded some of the most detailed visible-light images ever, allowing a deep view into space and time.

From: Hubble Space Telescope
The primary mirrors are a similar size and SOFIA observes from above most of the earth's atmosphere, so it can take excellent short exposure visible light images.

SOFIA does not provide the long-term stable platform that Hubble does, so SOFIA cannot be used for very long exposure deep-space photographs.
Hence some SOFIA photographs might be comparable with some Hubble photographs, there is a vast difference in capability.

Hubble is allegedly travelling at 17,000mph round the Earth, which means it cannot focus on anything for long.

You know, what with the ludicrous speed and the Earth getting in the way all the time...

So not very stable or capable at all.

Stupid idea when you think about it...

You really have no understanding about how Hubble operates. Now that you have mastered Wikipedia, why not go and look it up and dispel your ignorance regarding the operation of this soon to be replaced space telescope’
Here let me help you
https://mashable.com/2013/03/04/how-hubble-space-telescope-works/#yC_WnsSl6GqE