Q: "What about satellites? How do they orbit the Earth?

Quote from: "yop69g"

You apparently need to learn about physics : acceleration IS DUE to gravity. No gravity = no acceleration. There's no other possible answers. There can be speed without acceleration if the object had an initial speed, but there can't be acceleration without gravity in space.

Wait a minute, it seems as though you're implying here that the acceleration produced by a rocket traveling through space producess the same effect as gravity (it does). Which would still mean that gravity=acceleration.

Well... I'm trying to tell you why we can't separate gravity from acceleration.

Well... I'm trying to tell you why we can't separate gravity from acceleration.

We cannot separate the two because they are the same thing.

Quote from: "yop69g"

Well... I'm trying to tell you why we can't separate gravity from acceleration.

We cannot separate the two because they are the same thing.

No, they aren't the same thing.

Gravity : attraction to the center of a massive object (like the Earth).

Acceleration : the rate at which the object attracted will go towards the center of the massive object.

No, they aren't the same thing.

Gravity : attraction to the center of a massive object (like the Earth).

Acceleration : the rate at which the object attracted will go towards the center of the massive object.

Attraction is still acceleration. :roll:

Quote from: "yop69g"

No, they aren't the same thing.

Gravity : attraction to the center of a massive object (like the Earth).

Acceleration : the rate at which the object attracted will go towards the center of the massive object.

Attraction is still acceleration. :roll:

I hate discussing science with retards.

Go study a little bit, do what I've done in science and maybe you'll understand something, monkey brain.

Attraction creates acceleration. You can create shit. Does this mean that you're shit ? Well, maybe... bad example.

Quote from: "yop69g"

No, they aren't the same thing.

Gravity : attraction to the center of a massive object (like the Earth).

Acceleration : the rate at which the object attracted will go towards the center of the massive object.

Attraction is still acceleration. :roll:

Attraction isn't acceleration. Acceleration comes from attraction.

I hate discussing science with retards.

Ditto.

There is no possible way to tell if objects are accelerating towards Earth, or the Earth is accelerating toward the objects. Retard.

Quote from: "yop69g"

I hate discussing science with retards.

Ditto.

There is no possible way to tell if objects are accelerating towards Earth, or the Earth is accelerating toward the objects. Retard.

Hahaha it's funny how you change your position when you're not true. Hahaha.

When you're a retard that believes that telescopes are being traficated by the government, it's impossible, indeed. But when you're rational, intelligent and you believe that saying that there's a conspiracy is not satisfying, you'll come up with the idea that the Moon attracts a LOT of meteorits or rocks to it, which explains all of its crateria (I don't know what it is in English... well holes).

 :arrow: Someone else (intelligent) for the answer on my post ?

:arrow: Someone else (intelligent) for the answer on my post ?

Intelligence has nothing to do with knowledge. You can live under a rock for your whole life and still have an IQ of 500 when you come out, it doesn't mean you automatically knows science. Well.. Sorry for breaking the subject. Just know the difference between intelligence and knowledge. -_-

Hahaha it's funny how you change your position when you're not true. Hahaha.

I didn't. I explained it differently.

When you're a retard that believes that telescopes are being traficated by the government, it's impossible, indeed. But when you're rational, intelligent and you believe that saying that there's a conspiracy is not satisfying, you'll come up with the idea that the Moon attracts a LOT of meteorits or rocks to it, which explains all of its crateria (I don't know what it is in English... well holes).

The moon is not the Earth. You make the mistake of assuming that the Earth follows the same rules as the moon.

You also make the mistake of assuming that everyone here arguing for the flat Earth actually believes that the Earth is flat. Retard.

Quote from: "yop69g"

:arrow: Someone else (intelligent) for the answer on my post ?

Intelligence has nothing to do with knowledge. You can live under a rock for your whole life and still have an IQ of 500 when you come out, it doesn't mean you automatically knows science. Well.. Sorry for breaking the subject. Just know the difference between intelligence and knowledge. -_-

You need intelligence to understand knowledge.

You need intelligence to understand knowledge.

Wow, really?

Quote from: "yop69g"

Hahaha it's funny how you change your position when you're not true. Hahaha.

I didn't. I explained it differently.

Quote

When you're a retard that believes that telescopes are being traficated by the government, it's impossible, indeed. But when you're rational, intelligent and you believe that saying that there's a conspiracy is not satisfying, you'll come up with the idea that the Moon attracts a LOT of meteorits or rocks to it, which explains all of its crateria (I don't know what it is in English... well holes).

The moon is not the Earth. You make the mistake of assuming that the Earth follows the same rules as the moon.

You also make the mistake of assuming that everyone here arguing for the flat Earth actually believes that the Earth is flat. Retard.

Well, I assume this because I'm not expecting much more from a southern retard.

So, explain this (on Earth, in USA) : http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Meteor.jpg

It works the same way that it does on the Moon. Retard.

Quote from: "yop69g"

You need intelligence to understand knowledge.

Wow, really?

Yup, and the retard apparently doesn't understand knowledge, which surely means something...

Wow I cite wikipedia I'm so smart.

Yup, and the retard apparently doesn't understand knowledge, which surely means something...

Yeah, it means he doesn't have the knowledge.

Wow I cite wikipedia I'm so smart.

I don't cite Wikipedia. I take one of its photo.

Quote from: "yop69g"

Yup, and the retard apparently doesn't understand knowledge, which surely means something...

Yeah, it means he doesn't have the knowledge.

Which means that he doesn't have any credibility when arguying against me.

Quote from: "Steve Irwin"

Wow I cite wikipedia I'm so smart.

I don't cite Wikipedia. I take one of its photo.

You obviouly didn't visit the section on proper English.  ZING!

Which means that he doesn't have any credibility when arguying against me.

No, it means intelligence never had anything to do with it in the first place. He simply didn't have the knowledge, whether he is a retard or a genious.

Well, I assume this because I'm not expecting much more from a southern retard.

I'm not from the south you fucking idiot.

So, explain this (on Earth, in USA) : http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Meteor.jpg

It works the same way that it does on the Moon. Retard.

The Earth is accelerating upwards, while a meteor is standing still, or moving downwards.

The Earth is accelerating upwards, while a meteor is standing still, or moving downwards.

So meteors exist?

Quote from: "Masterchief2219"

The Earth is accelerating upwards, while a meteor is standing still, or moving downwards.

So meteors exist?

Hello Captain Obvious.

Hello Captain Obvious.

FE'ers claim meteors doesn't exist.

Quote from: "yop69g"

Well, I assume this because I'm not expecting much more from a southern retard.

I'm not from the south you fucking idiot.

Quote

So, explain this (on Earth, in USA) : http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Meteor.jpg

It works the same way that it does on the Moon. Retard.

The Earth is accelerating upwards, while a meteor is standing still, or moving downwards.

There's no upwards in the Universe.

I won't say retard. I'll say : maybe-intelligent-guy-that-does-not-have-the-knowledge-in-order-to-argue-with-me.

You belong to the South, with your retard mean of arguying on something you don't freaking know.

Quote from: "Steve Irwin"

Hello Captain Obvious.

FE'ers claim meteors doesn't exist.

You actually listen to this?

You actually listen to this?

No, that's why I asked if they do exist. The one moment they dont exist, the next they do. Which is it?

Quote from: "Steve Irwin"

You actually listen to this?

No, that's why I asked if they do exist. The one moment they dont exist, the next they do. Which is it?

Uhhh let's see.....believe some guy on the internet or centuries of established science huh......

There's no upwards in the Universe.

I won't say retard. I'll say : maybe-intelligent-guy-that-does-not-have-the-knowledge-in-order-to-argue-with-me.

You belong to the South, with your retard mean of arguying on something you don't freaking know.

Upwards relative to us, moron. Its funny how you ignore the obvious meaning of my posts just so you can convince yourself that you are smarter than me. :lol:

Uhhh let's see.....believe some guy on the internet or centuries of established science huh......

I'm RE, so shut the fuck up, idiot.