Cmon google, stop the lie! How Rejkavik and Iqaluit stay same latitude?

According to our flat projection, Iqaluit stays about 1.300kms north of the Rejkavik.



And according to google, these two cities are in the same latitude.



So, their weather conditions may be near if google true. Because both are sea side cities has same altitude. And in same latitudes. They must be near.

Ok. Lets look to weather.

This is Rejklavik.



Average 0 degrees celcius.

And this is Iqaluit, which city that google claims on same latitude with Rejkavik:



This is deadly cold man. They can't be on same latitude. Google, stop to lying the people!

Gulf Stream.

My suggestion Brotherhood, is to look up other map sites, get screenshots of lat/lon data, and post them here.  You must find all available data regarding this.  Also, you should post all the data you can find pertaining to ocean currents, wind currents, geographic differences, and historical data on local climate for these two cities.

My suggestion Brotherhood, is to look up other map sites, get screenshots of lat/lon data, and post them here.  You must find all available data regarding this.  Also, you should post all the data you can find pertaining to ocean currents, wind currents, geographic differences, and historical data on local climate for these two cities.

I have made a working about weather differences between North and South side of the earth in past year. Then I proved a relationship between: "distance to the center, distance to the sea and altitude". These 3 parameters are main parameters of the weather. I got you but I have not enough time to do that. Even so thanks for suggest.

You've proven that latitude is not the only factor in a city’s weather.  This should not be a surprise.

Yakutsk is the nearest place to the center of the earth. Also closer than some cities shown in its north.

udachny for disprove the google map

udachny in the google map is in the North of the Yakutsk.

But we know that Yakutsk is very cold as -42. Today Udachny is just -34 degrees centigrad. So as a mentality, Yakutsk may be in the north related to Udachny. But google says opposite:



Ok.

udachny

I'll use google map values for this city.

Udachny   Yakutsk 968 corrected as same!
Udachny   Harbin 2.441 corrected as same!
Udachny   Yekaterinburg 2.832 corrected as 1.338 (No flight. Just google's wrong estimation)
Udachny   Novosibirsk 2004 corrected as same!
Udachny   Astana 2818 corrected as same!



Corrected. Yahutsk is a bit more North than Udachny. This is the reason of why Yakutsk is -42 degrees and Udachny just -34 degrees centigrad.



Google is still deceiving us!

Anyway.

Udachny is added in the aim of attack the center from Russian side. But it is not more north than Yakutsk. Yakutsk still is the leader of nearest city to the center.

This place is found by measurements, not by temperatures! But it proves the temperatures!

Google is still trying to deceive us!

Sam Hill still trying to deceive us. Sam stop to lying people! Stop to be dishonest man and start to be a honest one! Now!

Shame on you Sam, shame on you!

According to our flat projection, Iqaluit stays about 1.300kms north of the Rejkavik.

We have already established your "projection" is compeltely wrong.
Perhaps you should stop telling google to stop lying and stop lying yourself?

So, their weather conditions may be near if google true. Because both are sea side cities has same altitude. And in same latitudes. They must be near.

No. There are a multitude of factors which influence weather, not just latitude.
Any more pathetic strawmen you wish to throw around?

Iqaluit got 7.04 hours of daylight today:

http://jan.moesen.nu/daylight-calculator/?location=Iqaluit%2C+NU%2C+Canada&latitude=63.74669300000001&longitude=-68.5169669

Reykjavík got 6.58 hours:

http://jan.moesen.nu/daylight-calculator/?location=Reykjav%C3%ADk%2C+Iceland&latitude=64.12652059999999&longitude=-21.817439199999


Maybe you should base your latitudes on this rather than what the weather happens to be each day?  Otherwise you'll find cities moving latitudes as the seasons change.

Iqaluit got 7.04 hours of daylight today:



Reykjavík got 6.58 hours:
[url=http://jan.moesen.nu/daylight-calculator/?location=Reykjav%C3%ADk%2C+Iceland&latitude=64.12652059999999&longitude=-21.817439199999967]http://jan.moesen.nu/daylight-calculator/?location=Iqaluit%2C+NU%2C+Canada&latitude=63.74669300000001&longitude=-68.5169669[/ur]

Reykjavík got 6.58 hours:
[url]http://jan.moesen.nu/daylight-calculator/?location=Reykjav%C3%ADk%2C+Iceland&latitude=64.12652059999999&longitude=-21.817439199999967]http://jan.moesen.nu/daylight-calculator/?location=Reykjav%C3%ADk%2C+Iceland&latitude=64.12652059999999&longitude=-21.817439199999967]http://jan.moesen.nu/daylight-calculator/?location=Iqaluit%2C+NU%2C+Canada&latitude=63.74669300000001&longitude=-68.5169669[/ur]

Reykjavík got 6.58 hours:
[url]http://jan.moesen.nu/daylight-calculator/?location=Reykjav%C3%ADk%2C+Iceland&latitude=64.12652059999999&longitude=-21.817439199999967

Maybe you should base your latitudes on this rather than what the weather happens to be each day?  Otherwise you'll find cities moving latitudes as the seasons change.

Wait a minute...maybe you're on to something here.  What if the cities ARE changing latitudes with the seasons?  Maybe that could somehow explain away any number of abject failures in the FE models.  I don't know how or why, but nobody has proven that a city changing latitudes couldn't explain the way the sun sets so that's basically definitive proof that it works. 

Moving cities could be a revolution in FE.