NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)

Quote from: EvolvedMantisShrimp on January 25, 2018, 05:05:04 AM

Quote from: dutchy on January 25, 2018, 04:45:48 AM

Bottom line, i have no intention to look upwards, because i can draw no conclusion whatsoever about what is really ‘up’ there..... and it seems everyone is of another opinion !

Of course you don't. That would indicate intellectual honesty and scientific curiosity.

Honesty is that all money spend on space nonsense could have been used to distribute fresh water all around the globe by a clever pipeline and even better techniques, so that every local can at least be sure of a reasonable successfull harvest each year.

Scientific curiosity is the psychological analysis why people still haven't invested in such a water network on earth, but rather go to hell hole mars to see if there is water !!!!!!!!!!!!

Gazing upwards is like a drug........ you forget your duties as human species and can fantasise about any dream 'up there'.

Scientific curiosity is the reason we don't have an average life expectancy of 35. It's the reason most people who have access to clean water do. It's the reason we're having this conversation.

For someone who claims to love Jesus, you sure do have a lot of bile, vile words and hate coming off of you.

Couple things...

The Earth isn't flat,
There really is no god,
There really is no Satan,
The number of the beast is just a number,
Capitalizing a proper noun doesn't really confirm belief in an entity.
You may be a paranoid delusional,
NASA Rocks!

FYI, if you're going to capitalize proper nouns, then you should also capitalize God, regardless of whether you believe in Him or not.

Quote from: dutchy on January 25, 2018, 05:26:22 AM

Quote from: EvolvedMantisShrimp on January 25, 2018, 05:05:04 AM

Quote from: dutchy on January 25, 2018, 04:45:48 AM

Bottom line, i have no intention to look upwards, because i can draw no conclusion whatsoever about what is really ‘up’ there..... and it seems everyone is of another opinion !

Of course you don't. That would indicate intellectual honesty and scientific curiosity.

Honesty is that all money spend on space nonsense could have been used to distribute fresh water all around the globe by a clever pipeline and even better techniques, so that every local can at least be sure of a reasonable successfull harvest each year.

Scientific curiosity is the psychological analysis why people still haven't invested in such a water network on earth, but rather go to hell hole mars to see if there is water !!!!!!!!!!!!

Gazing upwards is like a drug........ you forget your duties as human species and can fantasise about any dream 'up there'.

Scientific curiosity is the reason we don't have an average life expectancy of 35. It's the reason most people who have access to clean water do. It's the reason we're having this conversation.

Scientific dishonesty means we have no excuse whatsoever why water isn't distributed around earth, all resources are shared, medicine is for free and ''we are the world'' is more than an excuse used by some pop idols to create yet another platform.

And let's not speak of what we do and do to the wildlife during large scale deforestation and the mass murdering for outragious consumption of meat in the western world...plastic in the seas...and more.....
When will the scientific community show some curioustity in how to solve and distribute earth's shortages and resources ?
Or is making an A-bomb, going to the moon and mars...simply so much more excitement that satisfies the type of curiosity we exhibit ?
I think the answer is a big fat YES...we suck at understanding what our real puppose on earth is..........

... damaging for the brains.

I'm not the stupid fuck who thinks the Earth is flat, and that every space agency is %100 lies...

So, you can suck the McCock, ya paranoid little man.

Tell us all what you think about Jesus Christ...

Jesus had a really bad weekend for our sins.

What's his name here? The one with the red snake for his logo... who I proved to be totally wrong... Actually cut and pasted a part of what I said but not the whole thing as if it actually mattered. So if it's 666.1, instead? It doesn't matter! It's still a 666, and you didn't even acknowledge that you LIED. You said the speed of sound, blah blah blah, but didn't answer that I called you out on your LIE. You claimed the Earth was going at 67,111 MPH, and I used a different Scientific Literature that shows the mean velocity at 66,600, and you IGNORED that you LIED. You are a deceiver, and guess what? Nobody is buying it! You're a liar!

Do post the source which edidyouknow used for their article on Earth's orbital speed.

Scientific dishonesty means we have no excuse whatsoever why water isn't distributed around earth, all resources are shared, medicine is for free and ''we are the world'' is more than an excuse used by some pop idols to create yet another platform.

And let's not speak of what we do and do to the wildlife during large scale deforestation and the mass murdering for outragious consumption of meat in the western world...plastic in the seas...and more.....
When will the scientific community show some curioustity in how to solve and distribute earth's shortages and resources ?
Or is making an A-bomb, going to the moon and mars...simply so much more excitement that satisfies the type of curiosity we exhibit ?
I think the answer is a big fat YES...we suck at understanding what our real puppose on earth is..........

Please don't confuse science with economics or politics.

Quote from: dutchy on January 25, 2018, 06:49:17 AM

Scientific dishonesty means we have no excuse whatsoever why water isn't distributed around earth, all resources are shared, medicine is for free and ''we are the world'' is more than an excuse used by some pop idols to create yet another platform.

And let's not speak of what we do and do to the wildlife during large scale deforestation and the mass murdering for outragious consumption of meat in the western world...plastic in the seas...and more.....
When will the scientific community show some curioustity in how to solve and distribute earth's shortages and resources ?
Or is making an A-bomb, going to the moon and mars...simply so much more excitement that satisfies the type of curiosity we exhibit ?
I think the answer is a big fat YES...we suck at understanding what our real puppose on earth is..........

Please don't confuse science with economics or politics.

Uhhhh...then why does every globeling claims ''outstanding scientist this...'' ''the whole scientific community that..''...as if they are an independent genuine group of people ?
It seems this so called ''scientific community'' has no problems in develloping A-bombs knowing they can only kill on a huge scale.......
Politicians are to dumb to create anything at all other than to guide certain political processes.And the large companies are to greedy to invent anything but models that benefits themselves.

If scientist are so gullible to invent ''death and destruction'' for assholes like politicians and big companies, then it is no strech whatsoever than you can manupilate this so called scientific community in every thinkable way.
The latest example :

The device that detected a gravitational wave the length of 1/1000 of a proton's diameter was rewarded with the nobel price.
The device that measured a particle exceeding the speed of light was dismissed due to a supposed measurement irregularity !!

The former supports our current cosmic manure...the latter throws Einstein's GR in the trashcan.....

If only the scientific community would present rightious and noble men and women.........problem is they are full of men and women that can be pressurised in any direction imaginable.
And i think i skip the NAZI rocket scientists that should be before an international war tribunal instead of a fancy office at NASA this time around, because all of you will complain i am a NASAphobic..again.
And i will try to minimise my anti NASA rebutals if that makes you all happy.......

Quote from: dutchy

... damaging for the brains.

I'm not the stupid fuck who thinks the Earth is flat, and that every space agency is %100 lies...

So, you can suck the McCock, ya paranoid little man.

Your burgers are full of bull's cocks...you know that don't you ?
Partly meat, partly mashed cocks, organs, and other trash from the bull....McDonalds will recycle everything now that they have become ''green'' ! Less waiste,....same taste

Think about that tomorrow when you eat your daily burger little green man.........sorry for the pun,....but it is way to easy to make fun of your simpleminded take on today's society !

Quote from: markjo on January 25, 2018, 08:51:52 AM

Quote from: dutchy on January 25, 2018, 06:49:17 AM

Scientific dishonesty means we have no excuse whatsoever why water isn't distributed around earth, all resources are shared, medicine is for free and ''we are the world'' is more than an excuse used by some pop idols to create yet another platform.

And let's not speak of what we do and do to the wildlife during large scale deforestation and the mass murdering for outragious consumption of meat in the western world...plastic in the seas...and more.....
When will the scientific community show some curioustity in how to solve and distribute earth's shortages and resources ?
Or is making an A-bomb, going to the moon and mars...simply so much more excitement that satisfies the type of curiosity we exhibit ?
I think the answer is a big fat YES...we suck at understanding what our real puppose on earth is..........

Please don't confuse science with economics or politics.

Uhhhh...then why does every globeling claims ''outstanding scientist this...'' ''the whole scientific community that..''...as if they are an independent genuine group of people ?

Non-sequitur.

It seems this so called ''scientific community'' has no problems in develloping A-bombs knowing they can only kill on a huge scale.......

The A-bomb was developed during and because of World War II. You may not be familiar with it, but at that particular time a lot of resources were being poured into technology for the purpose of killing on a huge scale. You might want to check on the "no problems" assertion if you decide to look into it.

Politicians are to dumb to create anything at all other than to guide certain political processes.

That thought may have some merit.

And the large companies are [too] greedy to invent anything but models that benefits themselves.

This in not true. Obviously, commercial businesses ultimately operate for their own benefit (or hope to), but to be successful they invent, develop, and manufacture things that benefit others. Mobile drilling rigs, drilling bits and pipe, completion equipment and techniques, and water treatment processes, equipment, and supplies providing clean water for many people is just one example.

Some businesses do nothing more than develop schemes that benefit only themselves, but these are  typically exposed as fraudulent, or simply fail under their own weight, often in short order.

If scientist are so gullible to invent ''death and destruction'' for assholes like politicians and big companies, then it is no strech whatsoever than you can manupilate this so called scientific community in every thinkable way.
The latest example :

The device that detected a gravitational wave the length of 1/1000 of a proton's diameter was rewarded with the [Nobel Prize].
The device that measured a particle exceeding the speed of light was dismissed due to a supposed measurement irregularity !!

The former supports our current cosmic manure...the latter throws Einstein's GR in the trashcan.....

There were errors in the latter. They should get a prize anyway? How is this manipulation?

If only the scientific community would present rightious and noble men and women.........problem is they are full of men and women that can be pressurised in any direction imaginable.

Gosh... it sounds like scientists might be actual people after all! Who would ever have expected that?

And i think i skip the NAZI rocket scientists that should be before an international war tribunal instead of a fancy office at NASA this time around, because all of you will complain i am a NASAphobic..again.
And i will try to minimise my anti NASA rebutals if that makes you all happy.......

You failed at that, too.

Your burgers are full of bull's cocks...you know that don't you ?
Partly meat, partly mashed cocks, organs, and other trash from the bull....McDonalds will recycle everything now that they have become ''green'' ! Less waiste,....same taste

Think about that tomorrow when you eat your daily burger little green man.........sorry for the pun,....but it is way to easy to make fun of your simpleminded take on today's society !

My goodness! So angry! If you're frustrated because your arguments get nowhere, maybe you should consider better arguments.

Let's look at this post again in the "cold (it's sure not cold here) hard light of day".
Mind you, I don't know why I bother to even write this as you take no notice of anyone else's thoughts.

You are so desperate. I believe in Jesus Christ as our Lord and Savior.

No argument there.

I see the 666 fingerprint as a key to understanding. If you are so against it, then you should reconsider, in my opinion, but the choice is your own. I will not budge. Jesus is our savior. I know you guys want to associate him with Egyptian solar mythology,

But, just who is "to associate him with Egyptian solar mythology"? You brought that in not I, nor anyone else.

but Horus was not crucified. It's a lie. I'm disgusted that so many would promote this Zeitgeist garbarge... I think that's the main thing holding many of you back. And the reason that so many of you would try so hard to fight my numbers.

Who here suggested that "Horus was not crucified"? Nobody! And you talk of "Zeitgeist garbarge" - I had no idea what you meant till I looked it up, but:

zeitgeist
noun
the defining spirit or mood of a particular period of history as shown by the ideas and beliefs of the time.

You talk of "the ideas and beliefs of the time", but if you mean the shape of the earth, the Western and Middle Eastern world seems to have believed the earth to be a globe for millenia.
The early Church certainly seems to accept that the earth was a Globe without question. Just look up the writings of:
The 13th century Iohannes de Sacrobosco (a French scholar, monk and astronomer) wrote his treatise "De Sphaera" on the spheres, the earth and the celestial. He wrote

THE EARTH A SPHERE. -- That the earth, too, is round is shown thus. The signs and stars do not rise and set the same for all men everywhere but rise and set sooner for those in the east than for those in the west; and of this there is no other cause than the bulge of the earth. Moreover, celestial phenomena evidence that they rise sooner for Orientals than for westerners. For one and the same eclipse of the moon which appears to us in the first hour of the night appears to Orientals about the third hour of the night, which proves that they had night and sunset before we did, of which setting the bulge of the earth is the cause.

"De Sphaera"  was regarded as one of the most definitive treatments of Ptolemaic cosmology. Iohannes de Sacrobosco most assuredly believed the earth to be a Globe and with very distant sun, moon and stars.

Or the earlier work by the English monk Bede (c. 672–735), who wrote in his influential treatise on computus, The Reckoning of Time, that the Earth was round. He explained the unequal length of daylight from "the roundness of the Earth, for not without reason is it called 'the orb of the world' on the pages of Holy Scripture and of ordinary literature. It is, in fact, set like a sphere in the middle of the whole universe." (De temporum ratione,). The large number of surviving manuscripts of The Reckoning of Time, copied to meet the Carolingian requirement that all priests should study the computus, indicates that many, if not most, priests were exposed to the idea of the sphericity of the Earth.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bede was lucid about earth's sphericity, writing "We call the earth a globe, not as if the shape of a sphere were expressed in the diversity of plains and mountains, but because, if all things are included in the outline, the earth's circumference will represent the figure of a perfect globe... For truly it is an orb placed in the centre of the universe; in its width it is like a circle, and not circular like a shield but rather like a ball, and it extends from its centre with perfect roundness on all sides."
From: Spherical Earth

Mind you, I don't know why I bother to even write this as you take no notice of anyone else's thoughts.

Let's look your OP again:

Most people are familiar with a few of the 666s, like the tilt of the Earth, but I searched all of NASA's data and "maths," for weeks and maybe even months, and I found that it comes up like a fingerprint - 33 times!

I posted it to IFERS, and was immediately banned. Like, why? Anyway he sounds exactly like Marilyn Manson or any other Satanist with videos like "Jesus Never Existed!" and then saying "Don't be turned off by the title!" Are you freaking kidding me?

My numbers are correct.

Sure many of your numbers might be correct, but most have nothing at all to do with your nemesis NASA.
Most of the others so artificially depend on the units chosen, that in the opinion any reasonable person they are meaningless!

So let's look again at one or two to show what I mean:

• 33: The Earth’s Axis, it’s Orbital Inclination around the Sun is 66.6 Degrees
  1) It's nothing to do with NASA - predating NASA by an unknown number of centuries!
  And the "Earth’s . . . Orbital Inclination around the Sun" is zero - the earth's orbit is theecliptic from which we measure the inclination of other orbits.
  
  
• 32: The Earth Orbits the Sun at 66,600 Miles Per Hour
  Let's accept your 66,600 Miles Per Hour, but:
  1) It's nothing to do with NASA - predating NASA by an unknown time!
  The length of the year was known to sufficient accuracy for well over a millennia.
  The distance to the sun has a long history:
       one of the earliest approaching sufficient accuracy was Christiaan Huygens (1659) but
       the first one which certainly had sufficient accuracy was Simon Newcomb (1895),
       who still pre-dated NASA by so much that it is ridiculous the blame NASA for your 66,600!
  2) It's only 66,600 to users of English/American units - I and most people today do not so to me it is 107,200.
  
  
• 31: The Earth’s Circumference is 600x6x6 Nautical Miles
  
  • The definition of the Nautical Mile:
    Quote

    History[edit]
    In 1617 the Dutch scientist Willebrord Snell assessed the circumference of the Earth at 24,630 Roman miles (24,024 statute miles). Around that time British mathematician Edmund Gunter improved navigational tools including a new quadrant to determine latitude at sea. He reasoned that the lines of latitude could be used as the basis for a unit of measurement for distance and proposed the nautical mile as one minute or one-sixtieth (1/60) of one degree of latitude. As one degree is 1/360 of a circle, one minute of arc is 1/21600 of a circle (or, in radians, π/10800).

    There is your magic 21,600, originating in the early 1600s! When did your NASA start again? Certainly NOT before 1617!
  • Now your nemesis NASA has refined the size of the earth, so that the
          earth's polar circumference 39,941 km, which boils down to 599x6x6 Nautical Miles and the
          earth's equatorial circumference 40,075 km, which boils down to 601x6x6 Nautical Miles.
    What happened to your magic "600x6x6 Nautical Miles"? Ooops, NASA killed it!
    
• 30: The Speed of Sound is 666 Knots Per Second
  29: The Force of Gravity on Earth is 666 Newtons
  28: The Curvature of A Square Mile is .666 Feet... in 10 Miles: 66.6 Ft... in 20 Miles: 266.6 Ft... 40M: 1,066.6 Ft... 50M: 1,666 Ft… 70M: 3,266.6 Ft… 80M: 4,266.6 Ft… 100M: 6,666.6Ft… The Heliocentric Curvature Math is Based on 666
  These are totally meaningless statements - so let's forget them!
  
  
• 27: The Arctic & Antarctic Circles are at exactly 66.6°
  
  • No, they are NOT at exactly 66.6°! At present
    Quote

    Arctic Circle
    The Arctic Circle parallel that is currently positioned at 66° 33’ 46” in the Northern Hemisphere (or 66.5628°).

    That is certainly not "at exactly 66.6°"!
  • These latitudes has nothing whatsoever to do with NASA, there are simply real measurements on the real earth!
• 26: Astro-Notnaut Peggy Whitson Spent 666 Days in Space
  Bingo, it's connected with NASA, but so what?
  
  
• Let's stop wasting time!
  25: The Distance to the Moon is 6 x 60 x 666 Miles
  24: The Diameter of the Moon is 6 x 6 x 60 Miles
  23: Sunset is Divided by 3 Degrees (6° + 6° + 6°) aka: “Civil, Nautical, and Astronomical Twilight”
  22: From Mercury, the Sun is 666 Times Brighter, Using the Inverse Square Law
  Where is the connect to NASA?
  
  
• 12: The Speed of Light is `670,`616,`629 MPH. The Middle Number 616, Some have Claimed Is the Accurate Number of the Beast, instead of 666. The Common Rounded Form... 670,000,000 x .6 x .6 x .6 is also interesting… 144,720,000, because 144 and 72 are Important Biblical Numbers (144,000 Elect and 72 Steps of Jacob’s Ladder to Heaven aka the Stars) 144 Cubits is 216 Feet (6 x 6 x 6) 
  What has this to do with NASA?
  And, how artificial can you get? Fancy choosing the middle numbers from the velocity of light expressed in miles per hour!
  Almost invariable the velocity of light is expressed as
            2.99792458 x 10⁸ m/s, 299,792 km/s or 186282 miles/sec and rounded to 300,000 km/s or 186,000 miles/sec.
  
  
• 10: A Day is 23 Hours and 56 Minutes, but We Round it to 60 Seconds, 60 Minutes, and 24 Hours (& 2+4 in Numerology is 6), Because Father Time is Saturn aka Cronos (or Crono-logy) the Greco-Roman God of Time, Chaos, and Death
  09: Kepler’s 3rd Law Calculates a Planet’s Mean Distance From the Sun, giving the Planet’s Orbital Period Raised to the Power of .666666
  08: On the Globe model, the Distance From the Tip of South America, to the Tip of Africa, is 6,660 Kilometers
  07: North America is 66.66° Wide on a Globe - from The Furthest Tip to the Other (Key Largo, Florida, to Yesterday Island, Alaska)
  06: Eurasia On the Globe Model, From the Lighthouse in Cape St. Vincent, Portugal, Straight Across to the other side of the land mass at the Haicang Bridge in China, 6,066 Nautical Miles
  05: South America, on the Globular Map, From the Northern Most Point to the Southern Most Point, is 66.6° Long, and the Line Passes directly Through the continent’s Highest Peak, Mt. Aconcagua
  04: On The Globular Map, Africa is 66.6° Wide From its Western Most Point in Dakar to the Easternmost Projection of Somalia. Forming a perfect cross, it is 66.6° High From its Southernmost Point to the Place Where the Line Running due North Hits the Mediterranean, near Benghazi[/i][/b]
  Absolutely no connection to NASA!
  
  
• 03: The Logos of Both Google’s GPS system through Chrome and CERN, Both of Which Work With NASA, We Find 666 hidden in plain sight
  We Find 666 hidden in plain sight 
  Oh, really!
  
  
• 01: Earthlings and Life Itself are Made of Carbon, Which has 6 Protons, 6 Neutrons, and 6 Electrons. Revelations 13:16 “And he causes all, the small and the great, and the rich and the poor, and the free men and the slaves, to be given a mark on their right hand or on their forehead.” (NASA: Number of man, Bible: Number of A man).
  
  I thought that you believed that:
  Quote

  Genesis 1:1
  In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

  Now you seem to blaming NASA for making:
  
  "Life Itself of Carbon, Which has 6 Protons, 6 Neutrons, and 6 Electrons."

That is the rock bottom of stupidity!

I guess you blame NASA for destroying your nice pretty flat earth (that doesn't work)!

Quote from: dutchy on January 25, 2018, 12:07:20 PM

Your burgers are full of bull's cocks...you know that don't you ?
Partly meat, partly mashed cocks, organs, and other trash from the bull....McDonalds will recycle everything now that they have become ''green'' ! Less waiste,....same taste

Think about that tomorrow when you eat your daily burger little green man.........sorry for the pun,....but it is way to easy to make fun of your simpleminded take on today's society !

My goodness! So angry! If you're frustrated because your arguments get nowhere, maybe you should consider better arguments.

Seems to be hung up on male genitalia as well...

Quote from: Alpha2Omega on January 25, 2018, 04:14:45 PM

Quote from: dutchy on January 25, 2018, 12:07:20 PM

Your burgers are full of bull's cocks...you know that don't you ?
Partly meat, partly mashed cocks, organs, and other trash from the bull....McDonalds will recycle everything now that they have become ''green'' ! Less waiste,....same taste

Think about that tomorrow when you eat your daily burger little green man.........sorry for the pun,....but it is way to easy to make fun of your simpleminded take on today's society !

My goodness! So angry! If you're frustrated because your arguments get nowhere, maybe you should consider better arguments.

Seems to be hung up on male genitalia as well...

See ? my post was a reaction to the green guy who said i could suck the McCock !!!
He loves McDonalds so it is a theme between us......

But what happens ? Two globelings forget the whole context and accuse me for being angree and hung up to genitalia, while my post was a simple answer to the green man's 'suck the McCock'

And you wonder why they could so easily indoctrinate you from youth
Every detail escapes you completely, no nuance whatsoever, just blindly following your masters and accuse flatearthers for no reason at all......and defend the likes of 'here to laugh at you'
Thank you both for displaying your true characters once again !!

The Earth is FLAT. And the number 666 is a fingerprint that keeps "popping up," coincidentally. You can move your numbers around to be exacting, but the point is, they constantly use that number as "examples." For instance, NASA says that "Mercury is 666 times brighter than Earth from the Sun using the inverse square law." Why not use Venus instead? The reason they presented Mercury, instead of ANY OTHER planet, is because they need to TELL YOU that they are Satanists. It's a psychopathic trait, like we see all the time with serial killers and the clues they leave behind. My numbers are correct. I'm not budging.

The first guy, red snake, said the Earth was revolving at 67,111, while my video is correct, the mean velocity is 66,600. He either lied, or was ignorant. Therefore, I suggest that he not be taken seriously, whatsoever. You guys wanna talk about burgers and distract from the math. Anyone who knows the Earth is flat can refute you very simply. Another guy, stated that the tip of S. America, to the tip of S. Africa is not 6,066 miles, but instead 6, 027 miles, because he moved his pointer from the tip to the middle of the nearest city. It's like this with all of you guys who want to claim I'm lying with your misrepresentation of the math trying to get away with lies. You know what you're doing, or you're not smart. A third guy said that I need to get a calculator, that 100 minus 23 is 76.6, not 66.6, but a circle has 360 degrees, and divided by 4 is 90, not 100. My numbers are correct, I'm not budging. I will not be lectured by liars and deceivers in a den infested by vipers. The obviousness of the pathetic attempt to discredit the math is profusely absurd, and will not be tolerated.

It seems this so called ''scientific community'' has no problems in develloping A-bombs knowing they can only kill on a huge scale.......

And non A-bombs and other war technology are pretty deadly and very dirty too.

World War II casualties
World War II was the deadliest military conflict in history in absolute terms of total casualties. Over 60 million people were killed, which was about 3% of the 1940 world population (est. 2.3 billion). Statistics of military wounded are available for the major combatants. The tables below give a detailed country-by-country count of human losses. World War II fatality statistics vary, with estimates of total deaths ranging from 50 million to more than 80 million.[2] The higher figure of over 80 million includes deaths from war-related disease and famine. Civilians killed totalled 50 to 55 million, including 19 to 28 million from war-related disease and famine. Military deaths from all causes totalled 21 to 25 million, including deaths in captivity of about 5 million prisoners of war. Statistics on the number of military wounded are included whenever available.

From: World War II casualties

Your Netherlands (with 8,729,000 population had 6,700 militar and 700 civilian deaths) had very many civilian deaths,  Australia (with 6,968,000 population had 39,700 military and 700 civilian deaths) and New Zealand (with 1,629,000 population had 11,700 military and no civilian deaths) had high military deaths, but few civilian deaths.

Yes, nuclear weapons are terrible but
       Japan had 2,120,000 military and 2,600,000-3,100,000 civilian deaths.
And of those,
        90,000–146,000 died in Hiroshima, with about half on the first day and
        39,000–80,000 died in Nagasaki, again about half on the first day.
The A-bombs were horrendous, but were a small part of even Japan's total deaths.
We will never know if the A-bomb shortened the war much nor whether they reduced or added to the total casualties.

War is terrible, but what would suggest that Britain, Australia, New Zealand and the US should have done in 1939 and 1941?
Leave Poland, Norway, the rest Europe and Russia to be devastated by Germsny in Europe and by Japan in the Pacific?

I guess that with your hatred of all things American, you will say that the USA should have stayed out of it and left the Netherlands under the control of the NAZIS.

For someone who claims to love Jesus, you sure do have a lot of bile, vile words and hate coming off of you.

Jesus was not nice. He called the Synagogue of Satan (The Rabbis) a Den of Vipers. He kicked over the tables of the money-changers and started a war. Who ever said that Jesus was nice? Nice doesn't work when dealing with liars.

I didn't read everything Rabinoz said, because it's clearly NONSENSE, but one thing that struck out was when he said:

26: Astro-Notnaut Peggy Whitson Spent 666 Days in Space
Bingo, it's connected with NASA, but so what?

So what?! Are you fucking kidding me?! Your attempt at belittlement is pathetic. It DOES matter. What is the point of spending that exact number of days in "space," and it was planned... Get real.

Then he said: These are totally meaningless statements - so let's forget them!

30: The Speed of Sound is 666 Knots Per Second
29: The Force of Gravity on Earth is 666 Newtons
28: The Curvature of A Square Mile is .666 Feet... in 10 Miles: 66.6 Ft... in 20 Miles: 266.6 Ft... 40M: 1,066.6 Ft... 50M: 1,666 Ft… 70M: 3,266.6 Ft… 80M: 4,266.6 Ft… 100M: 6,666.6Ft… The Heliocentric Curvature Math is Based on 666


Are you out of your mind? They are not meaningless just because you said so... I'm not arguing with someone like you and not granting you any more address, because you are clearly delusional. You can't just dismiss something because you say so as though it doesn't mean anything. That's ridiculous and absurd.

Quote from: dutchy on January 25, 2018, 11:58:57 AM

It seems this so called ''scientific community'' has no problems in develloping A-bombs knowing they can only kill on a huge scale.......

And non A-bombs and other war technology are pretty deadly and very dirty too.

Quote

World War II casualties
World War II was the deadliest military conflict in history in absolute terms of total casualties. Over 60 million people were killed, which was about 3% of the 1940 world population (est. 2.3 billion). Statistics of military wounded are available for the major combatants. The tables below give a detailed country-by-country count of human losses. World War II fatality statistics vary, with estimates of total deaths ranging from 50 million to more than 80 million.[2] The higher figure of over 80 million includes deaths from war-related disease and famine. Civilians killed totalled 50 to 55 million, including 19 to 28 million from war-related disease and famine. Military deaths from all causes totalled 21 to 25 million, including deaths in captivity of about 5 million prisoners of war. Statistics on the number of military wounded are included whenever available.

From: World War II casualties

Your Netherlands (with 8,729,000 population had 6,700 militar and 700 civilian deaths) had very many civilian deaths,  Australia (with 6,968,000 population had 39,700 military and 700 civilian deaths) and New Zealand (with 1,629,000 population had 11,700 military and no civilian deaths) had high military deaths, but few civilian deaths.

Yes, nuclear weapons are terrible but
       Japan had 2,120,000 military and 2,600,000-3,100,000 civilian deaths.
And of those,
        90,000–146,000 died in Hiroshima, with about half on the first day and
        39,000–80,000 died in Nagasaki, again about half on the first day.
The A-bombs were horrendous, but were a small part of even Japan's total deaths.
We will never know if the A-bomb shortened the war much nor whether they reduced or added to the total casualties.

War is terrible, but what would suggest that Britain, Australia, New Zealand and the US should have done in 1939 and 1941?
Leave Poland, Norway, the rest Europe and Russia to be devastated by Germsny in Europe and by Japan in the Pacific?

I guess that with your hatred of all things American, you will say that the USA should have stayed out of it and left the Netherlands under the control of the NAZIS.

Hi Rabinoz, once again you don’t fail to amaze me....
I simply said that scientists, like other humans, can be manipulated in whatever the rulers of this current world want.
Contrary to false claims that indicate that scientists all over the world are some independent group that has agreed upon only doing objectieve and neutral science.
They do whatever they are ordered to do....like the rest of us

No it wasn’t about the USA nor politics. You have clearly earned some vacation RAB.......i don’t mind a hard confrontation, but your last post is really to much to handle ...... so much bias....

03: The Logos of Both Google’s GPS system through Chrome and CERN, Both of Which Work With NASA, We Find 666 hidden in plain sight
We Find 666 hidden in plain sight 
Oh, really!


Yes. Really. You really are a serpent-kind of individual to question something so blatant. That kind of self-doubt indoctrination... it doesn't work anymore. It's over for you guys. We know. We are the future. You are the past.

The only reason that you nay-sayers are here... is because you are government shills. Normal people are just trying to figure it out - but YOU, are triggered. All of you who get on these forums and constantly attack, are just a bunch of trolls. Nobody else would try SO hard to defend the Globe. You are making it obvious that you are DESPERATE. And we are going to destroy you. Your psychological crap doesn't work on us.

It's non-stop. Why are you even here? At the epi-center? You are here to use trolling techniques. Normal people don't expose that they have an agenda to discredit and belittle every single little thing that a pro-flat Earther says. You guys are here attacking EVERY SINGLE LITTLE POST that a Flat-Earther makes. That makes it blatantly obvious that you have an agenda and a reason for always being here obsessively and it's pathetic, or it's an operation. Normal people just think about it. You guys make it a point to attack anyone who exposes it at every single little thing they say, and it's psychological. But we're privy. We know what you're doing, and it isn't going to work anymore.

You are damage control. And you need to be fired.

It's non-stop. Why are you even here? At the epi-center? You are here to use trolling techniques. Normal people don't expose that they have an agenda to discredit and belittle every single little thing that a pro-flat Earther says. You guys are here attacking EVERY SINGLE LITTLE POST that a Flat-Earther makes. That makes it blatantly obvious that you have an agenda and a reason for always being here obsessively and it's pathetic, or it's an operation. Normal people just think about it. You guys make it a point to attack anyone who exposes it at every single little thing they say, and it's psychological. But we're privy. We know what you're doing, and it isn't going to work anymore.

What do you think the "normal people" think when they see what you have been writing? Do you teach people of all the 666s of NASA in real life, too?

The Bible teaches us through the words of Jesus Christ - if you want to know what kind of seed you have, plant it, and it's fruits shall be known. The fruitage of this "tree" is that of discord. The normal people say WOW. They certainly don't get on here all day long and attack every single little thing that a Flat Earther says. That's NOT normal. It doesn't matter if what the Flat-Earther says is something big or small, numerical or grammatical, you guys will be right there to twist it into something negative and to make us question ourselves (that is precisely what your question is intended to do), because you know that we are aware of the Truth. You cannot stop this. The cat is out of the bag and it is over.

I disagree. I am 100% certain Earth will not prove to be flat, and what you write here will be dismissed by said "normal people" as drivel not worth paying attention to.

But what happens ? Two globelings forget the whole context and accuse me for being angree and hung up to genitalia, while my post was a simple answer to the green man's 'suck the McCock'

You want to talk context, you paranoid piece of shit? Do you?

This McDonalds bullshit started when I said something like " dutchy can't even load the napkin dispenser correctly at his McDonalds job".
YOU are the dumbass that took the context ball and ran with it, assuming (incorrectly) that I "love McDonalds" and eat hamburgers constantly.
Yes, I do love a good hamburger. No, I do not eat McDonalds hamburgers often, in fact, rarely.

Now that you have that straight, go back to sucking your tofu sausage you stupid little man.