NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)

  • 159 Replies
  • 66637 Views
*

rvlvr

  • 2148
  • +0/-0
Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
« Reply #60 on: January 25, 2018, 12:32:54 AM »
Yea right, you're gonna see my face soon, and I'm going to challenge you to bring it. But I suspect that I'll be confronted by a big fat coward. You already made it too easy.
Really? Cool!

?

Aophos

  • 49
  • +0/-0
Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
« Reply #61 on: January 25, 2018, 12:35:10 AM »
You wouldn't dare show your faces. You're snakes.

?

Aophos

  • 49
  • +0/-0
Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
« Reply #62 on: January 25, 2018, 12:37:24 AM »
 You can spout all you want here. You wouldn't dare challenge me face to face. Because you know you're liars.

*

rvlvr

  • 2148
  • +0/-0
Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
« Reply #63 on: January 25, 2018, 12:39:08 AM »
I feel safe and cozy in knowing what you claim is utter rubbish.

?

Aophos

  • 49
  • +0/-0
Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
« Reply #64 on: January 25, 2018, 12:42:37 AM »
And most of you are probably nasty little trolls...

?

Aophos

  • 49
  • +0/-0
Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
« Reply #65 on: January 25, 2018, 12:45:06 AM »
I feel safe and cozy in knowing what you claim is utter rubbish.

You are probably sucked into your device and not capable of discussion. Is there one of you who isn't a nasty disgusting looking troll?

*

rvlvr

  • 2148
  • +0/-0
Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
« Reply #66 on: January 25, 2018, 12:50:16 AM »
Hey! I've been told I am quite easy on the eyes! And not just by my mom!

Also, my personal super power is I never stink. I can wear a t-shirt for a week, easy, and it still smells clean!

?

Aophos

  • 49
  • +0/-0
Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
« Reply #67 on: January 25, 2018, 12:52:09 AM »
Wouldn't it suck if you were ugly AND dumb? ANYONE?

*

rvlvr

  • 2148
  • +0/-0
Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
« Reply #68 on: January 25, 2018, 12:54:41 AM »
I can answer for others.

Yes, it would suck to be ugly and stupid!

?

Aophos

  • 49
  • +0/-0
Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
« Reply #69 on: January 25, 2018, 12:59:15 AM »
Cool. If anyone would like to debate me in person regarding the fraudulent nature of the way the conversation has shifted, I'd be happy to. In person. Otherwise I will just suspect that you are both ugly and dumb. [A Nasty person] See, I'm willing to confront, they are not. If they do, we will exchange information so as to do so immediately. I will not put up with liars. I am willing to face you. Are you? If not, that means you're not willing to face your self.

*

rvlvr

  • 2148
  • +0/-0
Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
« Reply #70 on: January 25, 2018, 01:05:09 AM »
I have to admit you do not sounds like a person I'd like to have beers with. I am quite sure others feel the same. It means it can prove difficult for you to get to talk to people face to face.

?

Aophos

  • 49
  • +0/-0
Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
« Reply #71 on: January 25, 2018, 01:17:47 AM »
Or maybe. You can't show your face because you're a government troll. I dare you to challenge me face to face.

?

Aophos

  • 49
  • +0/-0
Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
« Reply #72 on: January 25, 2018, 01:19:50 AM »
Wanna sit here and tell me garbage over the internet without a face... tell me in person. I dare you.

?

Aophos

  • 49
  • +0/-0
Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
« Reply #73 on: January 25, 2018, 01:34:27 AM »
See...? You spout off nonsense all day long but when it comes to a face to face challenge you cannot show your face because you know I busted you.

?

Aophos

  • 49
  • +0/-0
Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
« Reply #74 on: January 25, 2018, 01:36:58 AM »
You can't risk that I will expose you even more! So just shut your mouth. You know I've checkmated you.

?

Aophos

  • 49
  • +0/-0
Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
« Reply #75 on: January 25, 2018, 01:53:53 AM »
Suddenly the trolls disappear, when they are confronted with a face to face opportunity, don't they? SHOCKER! Not. Don't Trust these people! They are liars and can't even discuss the blatant lies on here and then try to change the subject. They will NEVER do a face chat because LIARS hide in the dark.

?

Aophos

  • 49
  • +0/-0
Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
« Reply #76 on: January 25, 2018, 02:00:38 AM »
Most of you don't even believe the Earth is flat, and you're pretending. But the evidence seeps out. Pretenders.

?

dutchy

  • 2366
  • +0/-0
Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
« Reply #77 on: January 25, 2018, 02:09:02 AM »
You can spout all you want here. You wouldn't dare challenge me face to face. Because you know you're liars.
Don't let them bother you...... numerology is very real.
The secret societies like freemasonry  are using numerology because they happen to know it actually makes sense.
The whole visible world is made of organisms that honor the golden ratio (sunflowers) in an amazing way.
It's hard to wrap your head around the masterpiece this creation really is.

They created a society that believes everything is a mere coincidence and things like numerology and the golden ratio are simply flawed believes of ancient times.
Most hidden societies are well known with the hidden occult powers, numerology and secret math, therefor they use bits of it in the open as demonstration and correspondence.
Like the old freemasons used hidden signs in cathedrals  that only other freemasons could 'read' ..... they still communicate through signs, symbols and more.
Since modern society does not notice the patterns ( like your topic proofs) their correspondence has been increased the last decades.

The sad thing is that those promoting the godless universe themselves are convicted luciferians and understand far more about the real knowledge behind creation than the placebo scientific reality that was created.
Of course they can only redicule, they have to......but i do hope some of them go to a library one day and try to understand what has been known by secret societies for very long.
God and satan are real...... and in the end everyone has to make a choice.

« Last Edit: January 25, 2018, 02:11:49 AM by dutchy »

*

Macarios

  • 2094
  • +1/-0
Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
« Reply #78 on: January 25, 2018, 03:33:34 AM »
You are so desperate. I believe in Jesus Christ as our Lord and Savior. I see the 666 fingerprint as a key to understanding. If you are so against it, then you should reconsider, in my opinion, but the choice is your own. I will not budge. Jesus is our savior. I know you guys want to associate him with Egyptian solar mythology, but Horus was not crucified. It's a lie. I'm disgusted that so many would promote this Zeitgeist garbarge... I think that's the main thing holding many of you back. And the reason that so many of you would try so hard to fight my numbers. My numbers are correct.

Jesus Christ lived in time when Earth was already known to be Globe.
Plato, Aristotle, Eratosthenes, Ptolemy and others observed and measured Earth's dimensions.
Jesus didn't flatten it.
Church was adopted as state religion and adapted by Emperor Constantine I.
They created Bible at First Council of Nicaea, 325 AD.
Church also never said the Earth is flat.
(Church did say the Earth was static, until Galileo, Bruno, Copernicus, ... shown it is not. But "static" and "flat" are two different things.)

God is giving us new and better knowledge only when we are ready for it.
Some of us don't accept it and remain in comfort of old one.
"There is no growth in comfort, and no comfort in growth."

What was holding the whole humanity back was thousand years of Christian Dark Ages, but Church, and we all, evolved beyond that.
Why couldn't you?
Please join us in progress.
I don't have to fight about anything.
These things are not about me.
When one points facts out, they speak for themselves.
The main goal in all that is simplicity.

*

rabinoz

  • 26528
  • +0/-0
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
« Reply #79 on: January 25, 2018, 03:43:40 AM »
You can spout all you want here. You wouldn't dare challenge me face to face. Because you know you're liars.
And why wouldn't I dare challenge you face to face. Because I know I am not a liar.

"Judge not that ye be not judged!"

I doubt I've seen many others showing real hate the way you do.

You came here claiming "Most people are familiar with a few of the 666s, like the tilt of the Earth, but I searched all of NASA's data and 'maths', for weeks and maybe even months, and I found that it comes up like a fingerprint - 33 times!"

But very few items in your list have the slightest connection with NASA, with was started in 1958, I believe.

Then most of you 666s are the result of very artificially choosing "suitable" units.
You use English/American units, but many of the values you claim to give 666s were originally determined in quite different units.
Yet the early Greeks measured distances in stadia, the early Muslim surveyors used Arabic miles and many different units used in early Europe.

So really, just who is being deceptive here?

*

Crutchwater

  • 2151
  • +0/-0
  • Stop Indoctrinating me!
Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
« Reply #80 on: January 25, 2018, 03:54:46 AM »
Couple things...

The Earth isn't flat,
There really is no god,
There really is no Satan,
The number of the beast is just a number,
Capitalizing a proper noun doesn't really confirm belief in an entity.
You may be a paranoid delusional,
NASA Rocks!
I will always be Here To Laugh At You.

?

dutchy

  • 2366
  • +0/-0
Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
« Reply #81 on: January 25, 2018, 04:02:37 AM »
Couple things...

The Earth isn't flat,
There really is no god,
There really is no Satan,
The number of the beast is just a number,
Capitalizing a proper noun doesn't really confirm belief in an entity.
You may be a paranoid delusional,
NASA Rocks!
I know you believe in McGod !!
And it's obvious that the ingredients they put into a burger are damaging for the brains.

*

rvlvr

  • 2148
  • +0/-0
Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
« Reply #82 on: January 25, 2018, 04:09:28 AM »

*

rabinoz

  • 26528
  • +0/-0
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
« Reply #83 on: January 25, 2018, 04:30:39 AM »
I knew it! You are trying to inundate us with the Zeitgeist! The fact of the matter is that there may be symbolism in Christianity that resembles solar mythology, but that doesn't mean that Christianity is a rip-off of Egypt. Horus was NOT crucified. And Jesus Christ took those symbols and owned them - because they belong to HIM, now and forever. He is the owner of those old symbols, not your "devil-god." Anyway, I'm still waiting for one of you to state how my number of 66,600 MPH is wrong, when it's right. You are a den of vipers and you will not because you know very well that you are a den of vipers, and that is why you will not even TOUCH the subject. So that's that. You know very well that you are not capable of even discussing it.
Where did I say anything that caused that irrational outburst? How can I be "trying to inundate us with the Zeitgeist" when I have no idea what Zeitgeist even is. 

I won't even touch the subject because I've no idea what you're saying most of the time, you're totally irrational.

In Australia we'd say that you're a few 'roos short in the top paddock - though in your case it's a whole mob of big white boomers!

I have not the slightest idea what you are talking about, but since you totally ignore my arguments, I guess I should ignore you!

*

EvolvedMantisShrimp

  • 928
  • +0/-0
  • Physical Comedian
Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
« Reply #84 on: January 25, 2018, 04:33:09 AM »
You can't risk that I will expose you even more! So just shut your mouth. You know I've checkmated you.

I like you. You're silly.
Nullius in Verba

?

dutchy

  • 2366
  • +0/-0
Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
« Reply #85 on: January 25, 2018, 04:45:48 AM »
I guess this thread is as good as any for this link.

https://arstechnica.com/science/2018/01/rocket-lab-launched-a-secret-payload-into-space-last-weekend/
Fake !!!!!! CGI !!!!!!! Payed shills !!!!! Project blue beam !!!!!
Hahahahahaha
Since every scientist still claim we went to the moon and control a rover on mars ( without Adam Stelzner knowing HOW) is reason enough to dismiss any claims about orbiting human constructs in space.
When they are able to convince humans about the absurd, those same humans will just about believe everything ... and while gazing upwards will ‘see’ whatever they think they see. Stars, no stars, UFO’s, the ISS, tiny lights, balloons........
Many insiders have seen UFO’s and confirm aliens have visited us.Even former Apollo astronaut Edgar Mitchell has claimed Roswell techniques are used by the government since the early fifties .

Bottom line, i have no intention to look upwards, because i can draw no conclusion whatsoever about what is really ‘up’ there..... and it seems everyone is of another opinion !
« Last Edit: January 25, 2018, 04:51:24 AM by dutchy »

*

rvlvr

  • 2148
  • +0/-0
Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
« Reply #86 on: January 25, 2018, 04:52:38 AM »
Bottom line, i have no intention to look upwards, because i can draw no conclusion whatsoever about what is really ‘up’ there..... and it seems everyone is of another opinion !
Rrright. Better keep at it, then.

*

EvolvedMantisShrimp

  • 928
  • +0/-0
  • Physical Comedian
Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
« Reply #87 on: January 25, 2018, 05:05:04 AM »

Bottom line, i have no intention to look upwards, because i can draw no conclusion whatsoever about what is really ‘up’ there..... and it seems everyone is of another opinion !

Of course you don't. That would indicate intellectual honesty and scientific curiosity.
Nullius in Verba

?

dutchy

  • 2366
  • +0/-0
Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
« Reply #88 on: January 25, 2018, 05:26:22 AM »

Bottom line, i have no intention to look upwards, because i can draw no conclusion whatsoever about what is really ‘up’ there..... and it seems everyone is of another opinion !

Of course you don't. That would indicate intellectual honesty and scientific curiosity.
Honesty is that all money spend on space nonsense could have been used to distribute fresh water all around the globe by a clever pipeline and even better techniques, so that every local can at least be sure of a reasonable successfull harvest each year.

Scientific curiosity is the psychological analysis why people still haven't invested in such a water network on earth, but rather go to hell hole mars to see if there is water !!!!!!!!!!!!

Gazing upwards is like a drug........ you forget your duties as human species and can fantasise about any dream 'up there'.

*

JimmyTheCrab

  • 10340
  • +0/-5
Re: NASA's 33 666s (Banned by IFERS)
« Reply #89 on: January 25, 2018, 05:38:41 AM »
Wouldn't it suck if you were ugly AND dumb?
It's good to see you here spreading Christ's message of forgiveness and understanding.
Quote from: mikeman7918
a single photon can pass through two sluts

Quote from: Chicken Fried Clucker
if Donald Trump stuck his penis in me after trying on clothes I would have that date and time burned in my head.