Nasa has never sent a single rocket into outer space: the experimental data simply does not exist to support the free stream pressure equation.

Good job providing a quote which shows the problem with yourself.

Forget all the math.

There is plenty of evidence that NASA has sent a rocket into space, such as the funcitoning GPS system, based upon satellites in space, sat phones, and numerous satellite photos of Earth.

It is very easy to prove that each and every NASA space mission was faked.

Yet you have been completely unable to do so.

it shows, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that rockets cannot work in full vacuum:

It shows no such thing.

The ring shaped exhaust will use only ETHER WAVES to propel the rocket: without the ether, no thrust is possible.

No. The exhaust is leaving the rocket. This requires a force to push it out the back of the rocket, even in a vacuum. This needs to be balanced by an equal and opposite force which is pushing the rocket forwards.

For rockets to not work in a vacuum you need to be capable of magically having gasses trapped with nothing holding them in place.

The Nasa equation has never been tested in real life experiments in the assumed outer space vacuum: each and every space mission was faked.

No, all the evidence indicates it is real, and you are substituting math and nonsense in the place of experiment.

Let's now take a closer look at the equation provided by Nasa:

https://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/k-12/airplane/rockth.html

https://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/k-12/airplane/Images/rockth.gif

The first term says Force = Mass x Velocity whereas NASA web sites say that

Force = Mass x Acceleration (Newton’s 2nd law of motion):

No it doesn't.

Perhaps you should try reading again.

The first term in the force equation is mass flow rate times velocity.

There are numerous relations linking force to other variables, not just Newton's second law.

Impulse is force times time, which equates to a momentum change.

The exhaust needs a certain impulse to reach a certain velocity.

Each unit of time, a certain amount of exhaust is reaching this velocity.

This is why they use the mass flow rate.

The second term (Pressure Difference between inside the rocket and the vacuum of space) x Nozzle Area violates the “free expansion” effect, part of the first law of thermodynamics by which pressurized gas moves into a vacuum without any work being done.

No it doesn't.

The gas does no work on the vacuum.

What this is actually looking at is the pressure of the exhaust and the pressure at the front of the rocket.

If the 2 are equal, there is no pressure differential across the rocket and thus no force due to the pressure differential.

However, if the pressure is not equal, then the pressure of the exhaust exerts a force on the rocket while the pressure of the "atmosphere" exerts a different force. This results in a net force which is proportional to the pressure differential times the area of the rocket exhaust (specifically the area it is pressing against the rocket, in a direction parallel to the rocket/not cancelled out by the exhaust).

The NASA space rocket equation has two terms the first of which is incorrect and so is the second."

No, as per usual, both terms are correct and you have no idea what you are talking about.

It is being described as the mass flow rate, but the terms in the m dot expression are: mass and velocity.

Stop lying.

You have clearly indicated you know it is saying MASS FLOW RATE!!

This means the terms are not mass and velocity, they are mass flow rate (i.e. mass per unit time) and velocity.

A clear contradiction.

Yes, by you.

You clearly accept it says mass flow rate, but then claim it says mass.

As for Nasa having faked all of its space missions, it is very simply to prove this: the Allais effect, the DePalma spinning ball experiment, the Biefeld-Brown effect show that there is no such thing as the law of universal gravitation, supposedly used by Nasa to compute the trajectories.

So you have nothing showing that NASA faked anything. Got it.

Please explain how the Nasa space missions took place without using the law of universal gravitation.

Who cares how they took place? You provided quote complaining about using math instead of experiment.

We have plenty of experiments which show that space travel is real.

Now perhaps you can address the OP and explain what causes the curve in the image?