No Forest, I placed the line BELOW the horizon so others could see that the horizon is NOT DISTORTED.
Except several people who have also looked at the photo and state without equivocation or mental reservation that not only do the towers nearer the horizon begin to appear more distorted the closer they are to the horizon line, the horizon also displays distortion and is not really a crisp, clear sharp line.
Just like the lines NEXT to the towers prove that the towers are NOT DISTORTED.
Yeah, not there but the ones closer to the horizon line are.
In other words, your silly lie about lense(sic) distortion has been proven wrong.
Lense is not a spelling error, doofus...and it is lense distortion.
Now how about wiping all that egg off of your face and try again?
You are wearing the egg, making all these baseless claims.
And your act of superimposing lines on the picture?
Demonstrates top -notch skills learned in kindergarten. But serves no useful purpose...
I love it when a Flatter shoots himself in the foot, but unlike you most flee after doing so. You seem to have an endless supply of ammo and enjoy the pain.
Perhaps the reason maybe I have not shot myself, "in the foot."
Not to mention the logic of starting a thread with a picture that proves the planet a sphere in the first place.
Ask any fellow RE-tard and even they will tell you the Earth is TOO BIG to make an informed decision about the shape based on visual evidence obtained at ground level.
So this photo proves nothing!
Now hobble back to that keyboard and give us some more!
You're the best argument for a spherical earth I've seen. This thread should be a sticky.
I am not hobbling (at least due to you and other RE-tards).