I'd also like to know how we know this isn't a dip underground. We already see the towers are not level.
Underground???
The bottom of the lake is irrelevant, in fact it's best describes as when the muddy water gets thick enough to hold up your anchor. It's 10 to 20 feet of muck.
Power lines, and anything else that doesn't float, are built using friction pilings. Concrete and steel "posts" that are 100+ feet hammered into the mud until friction is sufficient to hold up the load. Only the top matters.
No, but I understand what you are trying to say. This was not my point; they are not even level to an altitude. Why would they be? That would be gross over-engineering.
If you actually took the time to learn a little bit about surveying you would realize just how stupid your comment is and how delusional your flat earth claims are.
I'll make it simple for you.
You start at tower one, at X distance above sea level.
You shoot a level line to tower two to determine its height.
From tower two, not tower one, you shoot a level line to tower three.
From three to four, from four to five, etc.
This is NOT over-engineering, it is the simplest way to do it shy of measuring up from the water. Which of course is infeasible because of waves. It automatically insures that the curve of the earth is followed and all will be the same height.
If the earth were flat all points could be shot from tower one but in reality that doesn't work.
This is why there are no surveyors who believe your BS and also why you accuse them of being dishonest members of the grand conspiracy.
No, but I understand what you are trying to say. This was not my point; they are not even level to an altitude. Why would they be? That would be gross over-engineering.
Well now we can say that you've seen the curve of the earth.
I expect your resignation letter will be posted soon in the announcement forum?