Revisiting a commonly presented image...

  • 436 Replies
  • 23207 Views
*

rabinoz

  • Ranters
  • 22366
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: Revisiting a commonly presented image...
« Reply #420 on: February 18, 2018, 03:59:12 AM »
No, the equation that was based upon the conservation of momentum, which was not false in any way.

Now answer the question:
What causes the curve in the image in the OP?
Not starting all your sentences with the word 'no' would make you look less like a mad lying AI algorithm, Negatron.
Irrelevant as JackBlack only started one sentence with "No".
But, your only sentence started with "Not", so Not starting all your sentences with the word 'Not' would make you look less like a mad lying AI algorithm, Negatron.
Not much less, though!

Now answer the question:
What causes the curve in the image in the OP?

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: Revisiting a commonly presented image...
« Reply #421 on: February 18, 2018, 04:06:23 AM »
No.
Not starting all your sentences with the word 'no' would make you look less like a mad lying AI algorithm, Negatron.
Irrelevant as JackBlack only started one sentence with "No".
But, your only sentence started with "Not", so Not starting all your sentences with the word 'Not' would make you look less like a mad lying AI algorithm, Negatron.
Not much less, though!

Now answer the question:
What causes the curve in the image in the OP?


Mad lying AI algorithm discovers sophism whilst desperately trying to change the subject from its string of mad lies...

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/sophism

Nobody surprised.

P.s. I notice the rabbibot altered my quote here, so I edited it back to how it was.

Bad bot!
« Last Edit: February 18, 2018, 04:27:31 AM by Papa Legba »
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

*

NAZA

  • 594
Re: Revisiting a commonly presented image...
« Reply #422 on: February 18, 2018, 04:15:30 AM »
No, the equation that was based upon the conservation of momentum, which was not false in any way.

Now answer the question:
What causes the curve in the image in the OP?
Not starting all your sentences with the word 'no' would make you look less like a mad lying AI algorithm, Negatron.
Irrelevant as JackBlack only started one sentence with "No".
But, your only sentence started with "Not", so Not starting all your sentences with the word 'Not' would make you look less like a mad lying AI algorithm, Negatron.
Not much less, though!

Now answer the question:
What causes the curve in the image in the OP?


Mad lying AI algorithm discovers sophism whilst desperately trying to change the subject from its string of mad lies...

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/sophism

Nobody surprised.

Why are you too cowardly to address the subject of this thread?

What causes the curve?


You have proven your ignorance on rocketry now stop changing the subject to avoid answering the question pussy.

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: Revisiting a commonly presented image...
« Reply #423 on: February 18, 2018, 04:23:01 AM »
No, the equation that was based upon the conservation of momentum, which was not false in any way.

Now answer the question:
What causes the curve in the image in the OP?
Not starting all your sentences with the word 'no' would make you look less like a mad lying AI algorithm, Negatron.
Irrelevant as JackBlack only started one sentence with "No".
But, your only sentence started with "Not", so Not starting all your sentences with the word 'Not' would make you look less like a mad lying AI algorithm, Negatron.
Not much less, though!

Now answer the question:
What causes the curve in the image in the OP?


Mad lying AI algorithm discovers sophism whilst desperately trying to change the subject from its string of mad lies...

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/sophism

Nobody surprised.
stop changing the subject to avoid answering the question pussy.

What is a 'question pussy'?

Some kind of lol-cat?

Are you a question pussy?

Perhaps you are one of these:

http://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Furfag

Are you yiffing as we speak?

If so please stop.
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

*

NAZA

  • 594
Re: Revisiting a commonly presented image...
« Reply #424 on: February 18, 2018, 04:34:18 AM »
Too much of a coward to even address your fear of the original subject I see.

Why is this powerline curved coward?


*

NAZA

  • 594
Re: Revisiting a commonly presented image...
« Reply #425 on: February 18, 2018, 04:41:34 AM »
A quick review:

John Davis thinks the bottom of the lake causes the curve.

Lackey claims magical lenses.

Spamdokhan provided even more evidence for the curve.

Papa Moron is too much of a pussy to even attempt an answer so he derails the thread.

This is the best the FES can do?

No wonder they are the laughing stock of the world.

*

rabinoz

  • Ranters
  • 22366
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: Revisiting a commonly presented image...
« Reply #426 on: February 18, 2018, 04:46:19 AM »
No.
Not starting all your sentences with the word 'no' would make you look less like a mad lying AI algorithm, Negatron.
Irrelevant as JackBlack only started one sentence with "No".
But, your only sentence started with "Not", so Not starting all your sentences with the word 'Not' would make you look less like a mad lying AI algorithm, Negatron.
Not much less, though!

Now answer the question:
What causes the curve in the image in the OP?


Mad lying AI algorithm discovers sophism whilst desperately trying to change the subject from its string of mad lies...
You mean, while I vainly tried to return the debate to the OP that YOU had derailed it from with, Re: Revisiting a commonly presented image... Reply #212 on: February 10, 2018, 07:51:17 PM

So, let's delete the rest of your trash and get back to the OP!

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: Revisiting a commonly presented image...
« Reply #427 on: February 18, 2018, 06:08:16 AM »
No.
Not starting all your sentences with the word 'no' would make you look less like a mad lying AI algorithm, Negatron.
Irrelevant as JackBlack only started one sentence with "No".
But, your only sentence started with "Not", so Not starting all your sentences with the word 'Not' would make you look less like a mad lying AI algorithm, Negatron.
Not much less, though!

Now answer the question:
What causes the curve in the image in the OP?


Mad lying AI algorithm discovers sophism whilst desperately trying to change the subject from its string of mad lies...
So, let's delete the rest of your trash and get back to the OP!

I am sure you would love to delete all the many posts on this thread that prove you are a mad lying AI algorithm.

Kind of a theme with you...

Deletion, censorship, lying, madness, time wasting, computerised ranting...

Or do you really think sane people cannot recognise this?
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

Re: Revisiting a commonly presented image...
« Reply #428 on: February 18, 2018, 12:31:30 PM »
Not starting all your sentences with the word 'no' would make you look less like a mad lying AI algorithm, Negatron.
Meanwhile continually stripping out large sections of a post which show you to be completley wrong would make you look like a pathetic troll that needs to repeatedly lie.

In that post there were 3 sentences. One started with no.
In the prior post of mine there were 7 sentences, none of which started with no.


lying, madness, time wasting, computerised ranting...
Or do you really think sane people cannot recognise this?
Those last few describe you quite well.

Now quit with the BS and answer the question:
What causes the curve in the image in the OP?

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: Revisiting a commonly presented image...
« Reply #429 on: February 18, 2018, 01:45:10 PM »
Not starting all your sentences with the word 'no' would make you look less like a mad lying AI algorithm, Negatron.
Meanwhile continually stripping out large sections of a post which show you to be completley wrong would make you look like a pathetic troll that needs to repeatedly lie.

In that post there were 3 sentences. One started with no.
In the prior post of mine there were 7 sentences, none of which started with no.


lying, madness, time wasting, computerised ranting...
Or do you really think sane people cannot recognise this?
Those last few describe you quite well.

Now quit with the BS and answer the question:
What causes the  curve in the image in the OP?

Don't care.

You protect paedos:

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=71550.msg1941932#msg1941932

You are scum.
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

*

NAZA

  • 594
Re: Revisiting a commonly presented image...
« Reply #430 on: February 18, 2018, 01:53:11 PM »
Not starting all your sentences with the word 'no' would make you look less like a mad lying AI algorithm, Negatron.
Meanwhile continually stripping out large sections of a post which show you to be completley wrong would make you look like a pathetic troll that needs to repeatedly lie.

In that post there were 3 sentences. One started with no.
In the prior post of mine there were 7 sentences, none of which started with no.


lying, madness, time wasting, computerised ranting...
Or do you really think sane people cannot recognise this?
Those last few describe you quite well.

Now quit with the BS and answer the question:
What causes the  curve in the image in the OP?

Don't care.

You protect paedos:

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=71550.msg1941932#msg1941932

You are scum.



Translation: He is a pussified troll too cowardly to address the topic of this thread.

Why is this powerline curved?





?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: Revisiting a commonly presented image...
« Reply #431 on: February 18, 2018, 02:00:33 PM »
Not starting all your sentences with the word 'no' would make you look less like a mad lying AI algorithm, Negatron.
Meanwhile continually stripping out large sections of a post which show you to be completley wrong would make you look like a pathetic troll that needs to repeatedly lie.

In that post there were 3 sentences. One started with no.
In the prior post of mine there were 7 sentences, none of which started with no.


lying, madness, time wasting, computerised ranting...
Or do you really think sane people cannot recognise this?
Those last few describe you quite well.

Now quit with the BS and answer the question:
What causes the  curve in the image in the OP?

Don't care.

You protect paedos:

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=71550.msg1941932#msg1941932

You are scum.
Translation: He is a pussified troll too cowardly to address the topic of this thread.

Translation: you protect paedos:

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=71550.msg1941932#msg1941932

If you were human you would agree the above comment is vile.

You are not, so you don't.

QED.
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

*

NAZA

  • 594
Re: Revisiting a commonly presented image...
« Reply #432 on: February 18, 2018, 02:18:09 PM »
Why is this powerline curved moron?



*

gotham

  • Planar Moderator
  • 3329
Re: Revisiting a commonly presented image...
« Reply #433 on: February 18, 2018, 02:37:33 PM »
Oh, this photo again.

Sorry to inform round Earth believers but the OP image has nothing to do with Earth shape but it is most amusing to see attempts at making the connection.

The why...atmospheric arcing is just the beginning but already blows your claim out of the water and fyi, the arcing angle that day is quite severe and your ball would end up being less than a few hundred meters if you continued its path in a full circle. 

If you want some attention with such a fantasy image I recommend you show it to Disney. They would perhaps be interested in making an Earth amusement ride using your model.       

Re: Revisiting a commonly presented image...
« Reply #434 on: February 18, 2018, 03:14:23 PM »
Don't care.
You protect paedos:
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=71550.msg1941932#msg1941932
You are scum.
No I don't. You just lie about people. You are the scum here.

Now tell me what causes the curve in the image in the OP?

Re: Revisiting a commonly presented image...
« Reply #435 on: February 18, 2018, 03:15:44 PM »
The why...atmospheric arcing is just the beginning but already blows your claim out of the water and fyi, the arcing angle that day is quite severe and your ball would end up being less than a few hundred meters if you continued its path in a full circle.
Care to elaborate on this magical atmospheric arcing?
What is it?
What causes it?

Also, it is quite clear your claim is pure garbage.
The power lines are already several km, so it would be impossible to have Earth magically be a ball that is a few hundred meters or less.

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: Revisiting a commonly presented image...
« Reply #436 on: February 18, 2018, 03:19:30 PM »
Why is this powerline curved moron?

What's a curved moron?

Is it like a question pussy?

Or a paedo REtard?

You seem to love all three.
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!