F=ma may be nonsense

According to the equation, everything throughout the universe that has mass is all attracted to each other to some measurable degree. Now while at a stretch, I could understand that some super hot alien babe with 3 breasts outside of the observable universe perhaps 100 billion light years away is attracted to me a little bit, I utterly refuse to believe that the likes of this guy



Has babes even on this planet attracted to him

In all seriousness, theoretically what would someone like me, weighing around 80kg have in terms of a gravitational attraction to an alien babe of the same mass 100 billion light years away (946,073,047,258,080,000,000,000 Kilometers). Is there a way to use F=ma to work it out?

Careful, some alien babes are dudes.

According to the equation, everything throughout the universe that has mass is all attracted to each other to some measurable degree.

No, that isn't what the equation says.

G*U*Babe/d²

6.673 x 10¹¹*80*80/9.46*10²⁶= 4.5*10^-12N

G*U*Babe/d²

6.673 x 10¹¹*80*80/9.46*10²⁶= 4.5*10^-12N

mind = blown

Quote from: Boots on December 14, 2017, 09:32:44 PM

G*U*Babe/d²

6.673 x 10¹¹*80*80/9.46*10²⁶= 4.5*10^-12N

mind = blown

I made a mistake. It's even less. I'll fix it.

6.673 x 10^-11*80*80/(9.46*10²⁶)²= 4.77*10^-61N

Quote from: Shifter on December 14, 2017, 08:57:18 PM

According to the equation, everything throughout the universe that has mass is all attracted to each other to some measurable degree.

No, that isn't what the equation says.

What if I throw in F=G(Mm/r˛)?

Actually take a look in here https://www.orange.k12.nj.us/cms/lib/NJ01000601/Centricity/Domain/15/Universal_Gravitation_v_1-1.3.pdf

Take your pick of whatever string of letters and numbers takes your fancy. I know there's something in there which alludes to an alien babe being attracted to me 100 billion light years away.

Careful, some alien babes are dudes.

I hope there is something in his laws which allows me to selectively repel these dudes. Otherwise I guess I have to take the good with the bad.

Generally law of conservation of energy is a nonsence, because the damping of opposing waves from the top refutes this law. We passed the speed of light by using internet. You may refute about everything about physics. so it is unnecessary to talk about physical laws. everything is based on observing in physics. create the theory, then multiply it with a constant number to verify this theory. if the result is not always valid, specify the exception as "exception" and re-observe. This is all what the so called scientists do. They are nothing but a pack of idiots.

Careful, some alien babes are dudes.

What about pornstars?

Generally law of conservation of energy is a nonsence, because the damping of opposing waves from the top refutes this law. We passed the speed of light by using internet. You may refute about everything about physics. so it is unnecessary to talk about physical laws. everything is based on observing in physics. create the theory, then multiply it with a constant number to verify this theory. if the result is not always valid, specify the exception as "exception" and re-observe. This is all what the so called scientists do. They are nothing but a pack of idiots.

What?

Quote from: brotherhood of the dome on December 14, 2017, 11:40:52 PM

Generally law of conservation of energy is a nonsence, because the damping of opposing waves from the top refutes this law. We passed the speed of light by using internet. You may refute about everything about physics. so it is unnecessary to talk about physical laws. everything is based on observing in physics. create the theory, then multiply it with a constant number to verify this theory. if the result is not always valid, specify the exception as "exception" and re-observe. This is all what the so called scientists do. They are nothing but a pack of idiots.

What?

Turkey has really slow light. That's why Inticam is dim.

Quote from: brotherhood of the dome on December 14, 2017, 11:40:52 PM

Generally law of conservation of energy is a nonsence, because the damping of opposing waves from the top refutes this law. We passed the speed of light by using internet. You may refute about everything about physics. so it is unnecessary to talk about physical laws. everything is based on observing in physics. create the theory, then multiply it with a constant number to verify this theory. if the result is not always valid, specify the exception as "exception" and re-observe. This is all what the so called scientists do. They are nothing but a pack of idiots.

What?

Nevermind. Don't think on somethings you never understand.

Quote from: Definitely Not Official on December 15, 2017, 04:44:15 AM

Quote from: brotherhood of the dome on December 14, 2017, 11:40:52 PM

Generally law of conservation of energy is a nonsence, because the damping of opposing waves from the top refutes this law. We passed the speed of light by using internet. You may refute about everything about physics. so it is unnecessary to talk about physical laws. everything is based on observing in physics. create the theory, then multiply it with a constant number to verify this theory. if the result is not always valid, specify the exception as "exception" and re-observe. This is all what the so called scientists do. They are nothing but a pack of idiots.

What?

Nevermind. Don't think on somethings you never understand.

I hope you realize that most of the things you say don't make any sense to anyone else other than you, which is why people often joke about you.

Quote from: Definitely Not Official on December 15, 2017, 05:26:50 AM

Quote from: brotherhood of the dome on December 15, 2017, 05:24:04 AM

Quote from: Definitely Not Official on December 15, 2017, 04:44:15 AM

Quote from: brotherhood of the dome on December 14, 2017, 11:40:52 PM

Generally law of conservation of energy is a nonsence, because the damping of opposing waves from the top refutes this law. We passed the speed of light by using internet. You may refute about everything about physics. so it is unnecessary to talk about physical laws. everything is based on observing in physics. create the theory, then multiply it with a constant number to verify this theory. if the result is not always valid, specify the exception as "exception" and re-observe. This is all what the so called scientists do. They are nothing but a pack of idiots.

What?

Nevermind. Don't think on somethings you never understand.

I hope you realize that most of the things you say don't make any sense to anyone else other than you, which is why people often joke about you.

Stop mocking him, he's way smarter than you could ever be!
I hope he bams you for constant disrespectings.

You are a disrespecting.

Quote from: Definitely Not Official on December 15, 2017, 05:26:50 AM

Quote from: brotherhood of the dome on December 15, 2017, 05:24:04 AM

Quote from: Definitely Not Official on December 15, 2017, 04:44:15 AM

Quote from: brotherhood of the dome on December 14, 2017, 11:40:52 PM

Generally law of conservation of energy is a nonsence, because the damping of opposing waves from the top refutes this law. We passed the speed of light by using internet. You may refute about everything about physics. so it is unnecessary to talk about physical laws. everything is based on observing in physics. create the theory, then multiply it with a constant number to verify this theory. if the result is not always valid, specify the exception as "exception" and re-observe. This is all what the so called scientists do. They are nothing but a pack of idiots.

What?

Nevermind. Don't think on somethings you never understand.

I hope you realize that most of the things you say don't make any sense to anyone else other than you, which is why people often joke about you.

Stop mocking him, he's way smarter than you could ever be!
I hope he bams you for constant disrespectings.

You can't have a constant disrespect. Just ask sceptitank.

Generally law of conservation of energy is a nonsence.

Incorrect and totaly irrelevant.

Quote from: markjo on December 14, 2017, 09:16:34 PM

Quote from: Shifter on December 14, 2017, 08:57:18 PM

According to the equation, everything throughout the universe that has mass is all attracted to each other to some measurable degree.

No, that isn't what the equation says.

What if I throw in F=G(Mm/r˛)?

Actually take a look in here https://www.orange.k12.nj.us/cms/lib/NJ01000601/Centricity/Domain/15/Universal_Gravitation_v_1-1.3.pdf

Take your pick of whatever string of letters and numbers takes your fancy. I know there's something in there which alludes to an alien babe being attracted to me 100 billion light years away.

Quote from: Bullwinkle on December 14, 2017, 09:03:13 PM

Careful, some alien babes are dudes.

I hope there is something in his laws which allows me to selectively repel these dudes. Otherwise I guess I have to take the good with the bad.

I wouldn't worry. It you ask Boots nicely he might calculate how many billion years this irresistible attraction will need to bring you together.

I suspect the attraction you have for the earth and she has for her planet will swamp you miniscule mutual attraction.
You might be better falling for someone about 100 billion light years closer.

You might be better falling for someone about 100 billion light years closer.

Dude, take it to PM.   

Get a room already! lol

Generally law of conservation of energy is a nonsence, because the damping of opposing waves from the top refutes this law. We passed the speed of light by using internet. You may refute about everything about physics. so it is unnecessary to talk about physical laws. everything is based on observing in physics. create the theory, then multiply it with a constant number to verify this theory. if the result is not always valid, specify the exception as "exception" and re-observe. This is all what the so called scientists do. They are nothing but a pack of idiots.

And you are the number 1 expert on idiots.

Quote from: brotherhood of the dome on December 14, 2017, 11:40:52 PM

Generally law of conservation of energy is a nonsence, because the damping of opposing waves from the top refutes this law. We passed the speed of light by using internet. You may refute about everything about physics. so it is unnecessary to talk about physical laws. everything is based on observing in physics. create the theory, then multiply it with a constant number to verify this theory. if the result is not always valid, specify the exception as "exception" and re-observe. This is all what the so called scientists do. They are nothing but a pack of idiots.

And you are the number 1 expert on idiots.

Perhaps, I have gained this experience from the idiots over here. now I can recognize an idiot from 500 meters away.

Quote from: Nightsky on December 22, 2017, 04:16:30 AM

And you are the number 1 expert on idiots.

Perhaps, I have gained this experience from the idiots over here. now I can recognize an idiot from 500 meters away.

Are you by any chance looking in a big mirror 250 metres away? Does this idiot look like ?

ha HAAAA ha ha !!!!!

ha HAAAA ha ha !!!!!

Disrespecting you be, ignored to infiniti you'll get.

Quote from: Bullwinkle on December 29, 2017, 08:51:47 PM

ha HAAAA ha ha !!!!!

Disrespecting you be, ignored to infiniti you'll get.

I am as you are.