Flat Earth Map Grids Should Be Curved

This is the wrong exemplar for map. http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-bwUcUuOYAbU/TqDrcqQLD3I/AAAAAAAAAAY/eaXNRy4gJEM/s1600/Lingkaran+Warna.gif

It should be curved in line with SUN'S LIGHT accepted at the same time (6.00 AM) by the places everywhere, from southern hemisplane to northern hemisplane.

This applies for Reverse Flat Earth Map.

RE & FE maps with straight grids are all wrong. Even though it is claimed 'right' by..... SHILLS... Oops!

Sun at 6.00 PM or before it, or sun's appearance visible from various areas, whatever, one thing for sure: The Grids should be Curved.

This will guarantee its reliability for any use.

And no corruption in area magnitude at any places within 2000 km × 2000 km fields.

Totally valid points my good sir.

However, if you orchestrate dynamically, you may have to embrace non-sombular equalization to demonstrate particulate correctly. The power to disintermediate extensibly leads to the ability to establish next-generation, scalable performance isolation and user-proof configuration, don't you agree?

Hyperglobularization is always considered a remarkable achievement. I strongly believe that to cultivate the aptitude of media sourcing to transition highly noteworthy, is also potato.

You dig??

Totally valid points my good sir.

However, if you orchestrate dynamically, you may have to embrace non-sombular equalization to demonstrate particulate correctly. The power to disintermediate extensibly leads to the ability to establish next-generation, scalable performance isolation and user-proof configuration, don't you agree?

Hyperglobularization is always considered a remarkable achievement. I strongly believe that to cultivate the aptitude of media sourcing to transition highly noteworthy, is also potato.

You dig??

Of course, Prof. We all must be independent to reach betterment, no matter current establihment still rejects.
Freedom is always the key point.

Let see next. One thing for sure, every generation always takes only things applicable, in the end.

America eclipse a few months ago revealed the trajectory of the sun & moon above the earth. It is not straight line, not even horizontally. It is curve shaped with some higher inclination at the west part of America.
Globers even couldn't explain why sun's trajectory goes 'zig zag'. It is supposed to be straight, according to their theory.

No, the sun just goes with circular path with South Pole as its center. (It is being shifting now).

Globe assumption made as if the sun's path were 'zig zag'. That's a wrong assumption then.

Can you explain how "globers" were able to predict the exact path and timing of the recent eclipse?

Then go on and tell us how it could have even been possible on a flat earth?

Can you explain how "globers" were able to predict the exact path and timing of the recent eclipse?

Then go on and tell us how it could have even been possible on a flat earth?

Google

Can you explain how "globers" were able to predict the exact path and timing of the recent eclipse?

Then go on and tell us how it could have even been possible on a flat earth?

The first question: It is easy to copy ancient Babylon scientist. Mechanical system of celestial bodies can be put in definite math.

The second: FE can give propotionality of the distance of celestial bodies in respect to their implication on earth, such as the shadows. The assumpted distance of the sun & moon are illogical to create such phenomenon. The shadow cannot that big if refered to the globe theory. Sun and rahu are close. Rahu? Of course, it is a solid body. Moon cannot block sun's ray coz it is a transparent body.

FE even can show details of sun & moon path, correcting the existing theory.

Quote from: Here to laugh at you on December 03, 2017, 08:11:28 PM

Can you explain how "globers" were able to predict the exact path and timing of the recent eclipse?

Then go on and tell us how it could have even been possible on a flat earth?

Google

Good reply

Like I thought, you need to fabricate some additional celestial body, (Rahu), that ONLY presents itself during an eclipse.

Sorry Bullwinkle...

There is no way the Google building is large enough, nor sufficient in altitude to cause an eclipse.

Like I thought, you need to fabricate some additional celestial body, (Rahu), that ONLY presents itself during an eclipse.

Sorry Bullwinkle...

There is no way the Google building is large enough, nor sufficient in altitude to cause an eclipse.

"Only presents during an eclipse = Fabrication" How come you concluded this?

What ever the name, or the shape, position etc., there must be a solid body that is able to block sun's ray.

Again, the moon cannot block sun's rays. Its transparency can be seen during day time. The sky's blue light can penetrate the moon's body.

What ever the name, or the shape, position etc., there must be a solid body that is able to block sun's ray.

Again, the moon cannot block sun's rays. Its transparency can be seen during day time. The sky's blue light can penetrate the moon's body.

That cannot be true since even flat-earthers claim that the moon is about 5000 km above the earth and the blue of the sky is due to roughly the equivalent of 9 kilometres of air.

Hence the moon's looking blue in the daytime is simply the blue of the sky putting a blue haze over the moon.

Quote from: Danang on December 04, 2017, 12:12:04 PM

What ever the name, or the shape, position etc., there must be a solid body that is able to block sun's ray.

Again, the moon cannot block sun's rays. Its transparency can be seen during day time. The sky's blue light can penetrate the moon's body.

That cannot be true since even flat-earthers claim that the moon is about 5000 km above the earth and the blue of the sky is due to roughly the equivalent of 9 kilometres of air.

Hence the moon's looking blue in the daytime is simply the blue of the sky putting a blue haze over the moon.

Who put it? Aliens? ^_^

Again, the moon cannot block sun's rays. Its transparency can be seen during day time. The sky's blue light can penetrate the moon's body.

Sorry sir, but that statement is completely false.

The sky does not generate blue light.

Have you EVER been outside?

Quote from: Danang on December 04, 2017, 12:12:04 PM

Again, the moon cannot block sun's rays. Its transparency can be seen during day time. The sky's blue light can penetrate the moon's body.

Sorry sir, but that statement is completely false.

The sky does not generate blue light.

Have you EVER been outside?

The sky reflects light with blue color as much as sea does. When going into non solid body like moon, the blue light penetrates it and the color still looks blue.