Flat Mars Society

I remember when kids from here started the flat mars society.

Reported for pedophelia.

The pictures from mars are pure nonsense. Does anybody else remember the gopher they found in one of the shots?

If people can find penis shaped rocks on earth, then why shouldn't NASA be able to find gopher shaped rocks on mars?

The pictures from mars are pure nonsense. Does anybody else remember the gopher they found in one of the shots?

No, it's a case of how ignorant people interpret the pictures from Mars that is pure nonsense.

'Virgin Mary' toast fetches $28,000  A piece of cheese on toast purportedly showing the Virgin Mary A decade-old toasted cheese sandwich said to bear an image of the Virgin Mary has sold on the eBay auction website for $28,000. From: 'Virgin Mary' toast fetches $28,000

So you've never heard of Pareidolia?
And who is this sitting on Mars.

John, I am certain that you do not believe any of the rubbish that you post!

The photos of Mars are fake. It's all shot here on Earth. Here is some evidence





But do you need anything more than this gem

Here are the technicians in-between the photoshoots

The pictures from mars are pure nonsense. Does anybody else remember the gopher they found in one of the shots?

No. I do remember some people saying they thought a rock in some picture kinda sorta resembled a gopher if you imagined real hard, though.

How about when they found life.... ten different times?

How about when they found life.... ten different times?

When did they "find" life? Can you cite any actual unequivocal declarations?

Tom Bishop, on a related note, had a wonderful thread where he debunked the mars photos.

Quote from: John Davis on December 05, 2017, 07:16:03 PM

How about when they found life.... ten different times?

When did they "find" life? Can you cite any actual unequivocal declarations?

Tom Bishop, on a related note, had a wonderful thread where he debunked the mars photos.

Yeah, sure... I'll bet he did. Maybe it was even convincing to him, and you. Link?

Getting back to the previous, any progress on those citations?

Flat mars society means "Flat Canada Society!"

Mars seems always flat. Because, NASA is taking the Mars photos from Devon Island, Canada and Canada is flat. So Mars seem as flat.



Devon Island, Canada. (called Mars)



Surely, Mars (Canada) is flat!

So;

Flat mars society means "Flat Canada Society!"

I don't use the twitter but I hope somebody show him this photo and suggest "The Flat Canada Society" is the better idea than flat Mars society! (somebody should do that to this s.o.w.)

So are you intentionally lying or are you just ignorant?

"The two hills can be the same because you won’t find this photo “of Mars” in the NASA rover images. It isn’t there and no one ever said it was taken on Mars. This “Mars” photo was created by Danny Wilten to demonstrate that earth locations could be made to look like Mars."
https://truestrange.com/2017/08/20/images-show-mars-rover-photos-shot-on-earth-no-heres-proof/

Right, because no one would ever fake the second image in order to make NASA look bad or troll conspiracy theorists. 

No, but it demonstrates a good point. That is, not to believe anything you see. Had I not been shown the original, I could have easily been conned to thinking this was a photo from 'a rover 361 million km away'

No, but it demonstrates a good point. That is, not to believe anything you see.

Now I'm confused.  Should I trust my 5 senses or not believe anything I see?

Is the world flat because it looks flat or should I not believe anything I see?

Could we strive for some semblance of an internally consistent message?

Flat mars society means "Flat Canada Society!"

Mars seems always flat. Because, NASA is taking the Mars photos from Devon Island, Canada and Canada is flat. So Mars seem as flat.



Devon Island, Canada. (called Mars)



Surely, Mars (Canada) is flat!

So;

Flat mars society means "Flat Canada Society!"

I don't use the twitter but I hope somebody show him this photo and suggest "The Flat Canada Society" is the better idea than flat Mars society! (somebody should do that to this s.o.w.)

Nice job. Either the earth image is fake as these rabble rousers would have us believe and we can't trust photographic evidence, or the NASA picture is fake and we can't trust photographic evidence; especially from untrustworthy sources like the cocaine fiends at NASA.

No, but it demonstrates a good point. That is, not to believe anything you see. Had I not been shown the original, I could have easily been conned to thinking this was a photo from 'a rover 361 million km away'

The vegetation is kind of a giveaway, but maybe you're easily conned.

How about when they found life.... ten different times?

I wonder if this is one of the ten. Along with "the gopher", only eight more for John or someone to pony up.

Still nothing showing scientific claims to have found life, though. I do recall some hypotheses that certain observations might possibly be evidence of previously existing life. Maybe those are what he's referring to. It's hard to tell since he seldom (if ever) provides anything more than vague allegations about stuff like this.

Tom Bishop, on a related note, had a wonderful thread where he debunked the mars photos.

If Tom Bishop's wonderful thread debunking the Mars photos was any good, surely you would have posted a link to it!

I suppose you mean the thread with this OP?

Look at the computer screens behind this NASA scientist. The martian skies are blue!
#ws" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Real Mars Sky?
Here is a video showing how NASA faked the shots of its most recent rover missions (excuse the bad music):
#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">NASA Mars expedition fraud
I believe the above evidence is particularly damning and demonstrates that the shots are fake and were really shot on earth in a desert somewhere.

Now that is so wonderfully informative. I guess the first video is this one:And you, Tom Bishop and Myles O'Howe all just jump to the conclusion that the video must be faked!

And like most flat-earthers you are all too blinkered to look at the real story. Look at this:Like to rethink your position yet?

The next video claims "NASA Mars expedition fraud" then shows a fabricated headline reading If you believe that an ignoramous that could start his video with a meaningless MARS PHOTO'S TEMPERED you're even more gullible than Tom Bishop. Anyway judge for yourself:
Take a look at that video from 1:40 where it claims that because two colours on the sun-dial have changed the video must be Photoshopped.
Really! What do the colours green and red look like when viewed under a very reddish light?
Then the video claims that the "The blue rubbers have changed to pink on Mars". Big deal!

Yes, the whole Curiosity Rover has been "photoshopped" by moving from the light on earth to the light on Mars.

John, are you really taken in by these ignorant flat earther YouTube makers?
I would have thought that one of your undoubted intelligence would see through this sort of thing, but
I guess one can be very ignorant and still quite ignorant on many topics.

But what do others think?

Nice job. Either the earth image is fake as these rabble rousers would have us believe and we can't trust photographic evidence, or the NASA picture is fake and we can't trust photographic evidence; especially from untrustworthy sources like the cocaine fiends at NASA.

Or the Earth image is real, and the "NASA picture" isn't a NASA picture at all.  Like the article I linked explains. 

No, but it demonstrates a good point. That is, not to believe anything you see. Had I not been shown the original, I could have easily been conned to thinking this was a photo from 'a rover 361 million km away'

It should also demonstrate the importance of knowing the source of the image in question before passing judgement.  If you can't trace the image's origin back to a known NASA source, then you should be wary of any claims of deception.

Quote from: Shifter on December 06, 2017, 12:53:49 PM

No, but it demonstrates a good point. That is, not to believe anything you see. Had I not been shown the original, I could have easily been conned to thinking this was a photo from 'a rover 361 million km away'

It should also demonstrate the importance of knowing the source of the image in question before passing judgement.  If you can't trace the image's origin back to a known NASA source, then you should be wary of any claims of deception.

But for those that believe in conspiracies, having NASA as a source is all the evidence they need to believe it has been faked

Quote from: markjo on December 06, 2017, 03:44:24 PM

Quote from: Shifter on December 06, 2017, 12:53:49 PM

No, but it demonstrates a good point. That is, not to believe anything you see. Had I not been shown the original, I could have easily been conned to thinking this was a photo from 'a rover 361 million km away'

It should also demonstrate the importance of knowing the source of the image in question before passing judgement.  If you can't trace the image's origin back to a known NASA source, then you should be wary of any claims of deception.

But for those that believe in conspiracies, having NASA as a source is all the evidence they need to believe it has been faked

And read this to see what ignorant and biased conspiritards can be conned into believing:
Flat Mars Society « Reply #47 on: Today at 07:59:28 AM »

Those ignorant of a few facts rave on about a blue sky on Mars proving a faked photo! Mars does have blue skies!

Quote from: markjo on December 06, 2017, 03:44:24 PM

Quote from: Shifter on December 06, 2017, 12:53:49 PM

No, but it demonstrates a good point. That is, not to believe anything you see. Had I not been shown the original, I could have easily been conned to thinking this was a photo from 'a rover 361 million km away'

It should also demonstrate the importance of knowing the source of the image in question before passing judgement.  If you can't trace the image's origin back to a known NASA source, then you should be wary of any claims of deception.

But for those that believe in conspiracies, having NASA as a source is all the evidence they need to believe it has been faked

Oh, I know full well that conspiracy theorists think that all NASA images are faked.  All I'm saying is that you need to be able to prove that it's NASA doing the faking and not someone trolling the conspiracy theorists.

Actually, NASA needs to prove they are legitimate pictures. Until they can do this, we have no reason to put any weight into them at all.

Perhaps FE'ers should send their own lander to mars to see how those real pictures compare to those alleged fakes from NASA.  It's the only way to be sure.

Perhaps FE'ers should send their own lander to mars to see how those real pictures compare to those alleged fakes from NASA.  It's the only way to be sure.

A flat earther recently put a lot of effort building a personal rocket that wasn't even to go very high and was shut down by the government recently. Also the US has monopolised space and you need to get clearance through them first which is unlikely if your reasons for going would conflict with their agenda. So why would people invest billions of dollars, only to be shut down for 'reasons' later on? North Korea was heavily sanctioned for simply putting their own satellite in orbit. Apparently, other sovereign nations need 'permission' from the almighty US to do anything

Perhaps FE'ers should send their own lander to mars to see how those real pictures compare to those alleged fakes from NASA.  It's the only way to be sure.

Unfortunately, we don't have equal access to the funds they siphon off the working class from their ivory tower.

Quote from: markjo on December 07, 2017, 01:18:35 PM

Perhaps FE'ers should send their own lander to mars to see how those real pictures compare to those alleged fakes from NASA.  It's the only way to be sure.

Unfortunately, we don't have equal access to the funds they siphon off the working class from their ivory tower.

Fortunately, you think Mars is much closer than NASA says it is, so you shouldn't need near as much money as they say it takes! The rapper B.o.B. has already raised almost $7,000 (in only 2 1/2 months!) toward launching weather balloons and satellites. Maybe see if you can convince him to repurpose one of those satellites to land on Mars if you kick in a few bucks!

Well, at least some of you think Mars is close by. Others might not agree, which could be a problem since it's hard to go where you want to go if you're not sure where it is.

Quote from: markjo on December 07, 2017, 01:18:35 PM

Perhaps FE'ers should send their own lander to mars to see how those real pictures compare to those alleged fakes from NASA.  It's the only way to be sure.

Unfortunately, we don't have equal access to the funds they siphon off the working class from their ivory tower.

So that means that you can't honestly say that NASA's pictures of mars are fake because you don't know what real pictures from mars should look like.

The filming sites are well known: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrestrial_analogue_sites