PHEW Calculation that Makes You Phew ^_^

I have no issue with pi. Take it up with Dang-it. I was trying to help prevent his head from exploding because he cannot wrap his brain around transcendental numbers having infinite digits after the decimal point.

The numbers still map perfectly well between systems.

But for all those who are comfortable with pi being 3.14159... there's no reason to adopt the ridiculous suggestion I made before. Who TF would want to do that? Binary representation of symbols added together 1 pi-sized unit at a time?? I don't even like it.

PHEW wins. Case closed. ~

PHEW wins. Case closed. ~

No, it's had its ass handed to it repeatedly. It is no where near winning. Try again.

Quote from: Danang on December 08, 2017, 12:09:52 AM

PHEW wins. Case closed. ~

No, it's had its ass handed to it repeatedly. It is no where near winning. Try again.

Do you still wanna another equation? Should I?
But it needs brain above your level.

Okay, here it is:

If you put a marbel on the coordinate (0,-1), and then you tie the marble with a rope, let the rope expand till the edge of X coordinate, (1,-1) which mean its length is "1".
Draw the line till the marble reach the coordinate (1,-1). You got length of "1".
Do it the same at another side. Put the marble there (at coordinate (1,0).
Tie the marble and stick it to the perimeter. Draw the marble down and the you got 1-0.4142=0.5858.

¼C = 1 + 0.5858 = 1.5858.

Good luck

Quote from: JackBlack on December 08, 2017, 02:13:37 AM

Quote from: Danang on December 08, 2017, 12:09:52 AM

PHEW wins. Case closed. ~

No, it's had its ass handed to it repeatedly. It is no where near winning. Try again.

Do you still wanna another equation? Should I?
But it needs brain above your level.

Okay, here it is:

If you put a marbel on the coordinate (0,-1), and then you tie the marble with a rope, let the rope expand till the edge of X coordinate, (1,-1) which mean its length is "1".
Draw the line till the marble reach the coordinate (1,-1). You got length of "1".
Do it the same at another side. Put the marble there (at coordinate (1,0).
Tie the marble and stick it to the perimeter. Draw the marble down and the you got 1-0.4142=0.5858.

¼C = 1 + 0.5858 = 1.5858.

Good luck

1. I have editted about coordinate.
2. As to "brain" stuff, don't take it seriously. Just kidding maaan

Do you still wanna another equation? Should I?

No. I have never wanted that from you.
I WANT AN EXPLANATION!!!
You need to justify your equation. You need to show what each part is and how it gives you pi (or something related to pi).

Until you do you may as well go:

&=1+rt5g5+354

It makes just as much sense.

But it needs brain above your level.

I highly doubt that.

If you put a marbel on the coordinate (0,-1), and then you tie the marble with a rope, let the rope expand till the edge of X coordinate, (1,-1) which mean its length is "1".
Draw the line till the marble reach the coordinate (1,-1). You got length of "1".
Do it the same at another side. Put the marble there (at coordinate (1,0).
Tie the marble and stick it to the perimeter. Draw the marble down and the you got 1-0.4142=0.5858.

And what is this meant to represent?

Why would "drawing the marble down" (whatever the hell that is meant to mean) give you 0.5858?

Quote from: Danang on December 08, 2017, 02:40:29 AM

Do you still wanna another equation? Should I?

No. I have never wanted that from you.
I WANT AN EXPLANATION!!!
You need to justify your equation. You need to show what each part is and how it gives you pi (or something related to pi).

Until you do you may as well go:

&=1+rt5g5+354

It makes just as much sense.

Quote from: Danang on December 08, 2017, 02:40:29 AM

But it needs brain above your level.

I highly doubt that.

Quote from: Danang on December 08, 2017, 02:40:29 AM

If you put a marbel on the coordinate (0,-1), and then you tie the marble with a rope, let the rope expand till the edge of X coordinate, (1,-1) which mean its length is "1".
Draw the line till the marble reach the coordinate (1,-1). You got length of "1".
Do it the same at another side. Put the marble there (at coordinate (1,0).
Tie the marble and stick it to the perimeter. Draw the marble down and the you got 1-0.4142=0.5858.

And what is this meant to represent?

Why would "drawing the marble down" (whatever the hell that is meant to mean) give you 0.5858?

No difference if 0.5858 is resulted from X coordinate, to be exactly: by 315° or -45° drawing.
That's acceleration part.
X coordinate drawing represents Velocity gain, -45° drawing represents acceleration gain.
¼C is made of those two components.

Curve has both horizontal gain (velocity gain) as well as vertical gain (acceleration gain).

Something going curve gets higher length than something going pure straight trajectory.

No difference if 0.5858 is resulted from X coordinate, to be exactly: by 315° or -45° drawing.

What difference?

That's acceleration part.

We are discussing a static picture. There is no acceleration.

X coordinate drawing represents Velocity gain, -45° drawing represents acceleration gain.
¼C is made of those two components.

No, 1/4C is made up of the length along the circular path.
It has nothing to do with velocity or acceleration.

And it isn't a simple sum of the x and y components.

Quote from: Danang on December 08, 2017, 04:48:51 AM

No difference if 0.5858 is resulted from X coordinate, to be exactly: by 315° or -45° drawing.

What difference?

Quote from: Danang on December 08, 2017, 04:48:51 AM

That's acceleration part.

We are discussing a static picture. There is no acceleration.

Quote from: Danang on December 08, 2017, 04:48:51 AM

X coordinate drawing represents Velocity gain, -45° drawing represents acceleration gain.
¼C is made of those two components.

No, 1/4C is made up of the length along the circular path.
It has nothing to do with velocity or acceleration.

And it isn't a simple sum of the x and y components.

If you wouldn't go to out of the globe, I meant : "out of the box", you'll get nothing when searching the value of Phew.

If you wouldn't go to out of the globe, I meant : "out of the box", you'll get nothing when searching the value of Phew.

I'm willing to go outside the box, I'm just taking my brain with me. That means you need to be able to provide an explanation.

Quote from: Danang on December 08, 2017, 01:13:19 PM

If you wouldn't go to out of the globe, I meant : "out of the box", you'll get nothing when searching the value of Phew.

I'm willing to go outside the box, I'm just taking my brain with me. That means you need to be able to provide an explanation.

Within area of 1/4 frame (1×1)...

While r is growing longer, there is other lines growing longer too, i.e. Frame & Diagonal.
r accomplishes 1 times r
Frame accomplishes 2 times r, Diagonal accomplished 1.4142 times r.

r rules over Frame & Diagonal. If r grows, frame & diagonal will grow too in line with r's growing.

This is about length production.

r gets full production, while Frame & Diagonal competes and ended up that Frame always leads by 2r-1.4142r which results a gap of 0.5858 times r.

This is additional gain for r.
Total gain for the curve=r+(2r-1.4152r)=r+0.5858r= r times 1.5858.

Afterwards you can define either PHEW (3.1716) & TAHU (6.3431).

That's it. :')

Jack n other globers..
In case you didn't get the point of above explanation, please re-read n before doing it, I suggest you to firstly do some 'brain exercise'.

While r is growing longer, there is other lines growing longer too, i.e. Frame & Diagonal.

r is not growing.
r remains the same.
It is the radius of the circle.

Unless you mean the entire figure enlarges, in which case they all grow proportionally.

Total gain for the curve=r+(2r-1.4152r)=r+0.5858r= r times 1.5858.

No it isn't.
The final size of the curve will still be pi*r/4, just like at the start.
What you are doing has no relation to the curve.

You have no basis at all for your formula.

Forget about trying to make it grow or any nonsense like that, it is irrelevant.
All you can do by having it "grow" is show that it is linearly proportional to r.

But that's it.
You have no basis to claim the curve will be r+(2r-1.4152r)
Why add some? Why subtract some?
What does any of it have to with the curve?

That's it. :')

Then you have nothing.

Jack n other globers..
In case you didn't get the point of above explanation, please re-read n before doing it, I suggest you to firstly do some 'brain exercise'.

How about you stop treating people like morons for realising your crap doesn't make any sense.

Do you still wanna another equation? Should I?
 

No thanks.   Your attempts so far have made no sense.

Quote from: Danang on December 08, 2017, 02:40:29 AM

Do you still wanna another equation? Should I?
 

No thanks.   Your attempts so far have made no sense.

Saying "no thanks" but stealthily applying da phew. #ThumbsUp ~