You're not only pushing up. Your body is pushing in every way it's shaped against all of the atmosphere that envelopes it and trying to crush it.
So why do we only get pushed down?
There's no such thing as pull in the grand scheme of things, so no cigar for your gravity.
You are yet to justify that at all. You couldn't even explain how a rope holds itself together without appealing to pulling.
Have a serious think about what you're saying.
If you dig a hole by taking out one spade full of soil and place that soil that was in that hole to the side of it, that soil pushes the exact same amount of atmosphere as what gets pushed into the hole it came out of.
Perhaps you should start reading what I have said.
The air isn't just allowed to float in. It is pumped in to keep it pressurised.
You need to pump in more air than that spade full of soil to keep it pressurised.
Air is compressible.
You take 1 cup (better unit of measure) of soil and place it in air at 1 atm.
Which displaces 1 cup of air at 1 atm.
But taking the soil's place is 1 cup of air at 4.4 atm.
That equates to 4.4 cups of air at 1 atm.
As such, you have 4.4. cups of air to replace the 1 cup of soil.
Someone please help him.
Again, I'm not the one that needs help.
How would they be able to walk and work?
With difficulty and is why they do it in small shifts.
Not with difficulty.
It would be impossible.
Try carrying 3 people your own weight. See if you can do anything.
No they don't.
It all depends upon what type of scale you are using.
If you are using a simple beam balance with a reference mass, then yes, it suffers from the same change.
If you are using a spring, with a specific spring constant, it does not suffer the same change.
If you are using an electronic balance based upon emf, it does not suffer the same change.
We can measure weight independently of gravity.
The mere fact we can measure pressure by using weight, such as with a mercury barometer, shows that the weight does not change, but the pressure does.
The weights are already calculated but they factor in gravity as cause and effect and people just accept it.
No. People accept it because it is what works. It is what all the evidence points to.
Denspressure doesn't work at all.
It works fine when you get rid of the nonsense and the duping.
No it doesn't.
If it could you would addressed those issues rather than just ignoring them and saying it works fine.
Nowhere near what we were told.
And what makes you say that?
Because it doesn't fit in with your delusions?
It proves it rather than destroys it.
How does it prove it?
It shows that the weight of an object does not depend upon its volume, as you would expect if it was due to displacing air.
That sure sounds like it is DISPROVING it.
It depends on what the object displaces in atmosphere.
The volume is what makes the difference between density and the atmosphere it displaces against a scale plate.
The volume is the atmosphere it displaces, which has nothing to do with the weight unless related by the density.
You can have 2 objects with the same volume, yet weigh completely different amounts.
You can never have the same volume and different mass/density. Understand what volume means and then understand denpressure to see why.
But we do, frequently.
Understand what volume and mass mean.
And there you go with your circular garbage again.
You are assuming denspressure is true to dismiss anything which goes against denspressure.
Yes, according to denspressure a specific volume would only every have 1 weight. But reality shows that is not the case, refuting denspressure.
Nothing refutes it. It is what it is and works just fine .
Again, that does refute it.
You ignoring the refutation doesn't magically mean it isn't refuted.
It does not work.
Numerous problems have been pointed out to you which you are unable to provide a rational answer to.
This shows it doesn't work.
Theoretically you could jump higher at a higher altitude but as we all know, the body would expand all of it's cells to equalise the lower pressure at altitude, meaning massive loss of ability to function the muscles.
Nope.
There would be equalisation of pressure, but your muscles will still function basically the same. So no, there is no inability to sustain the energy required.
Have a serious think about what you're saying.
I have. Perhaps you should come up with a better dismissal tactic.
So, if I was to place you inside a tube on a scale plate and you were sat at the bottom of it and I pushed down on a plunger from the top....are you saying that your weight reading would not change?
Not by any significant amount.
It would be slightly reduced due to the increase in buoyant force.
The reading on the scale may change depending upon how you push on the plunger and if it records that, but that wont be my weight.
Imagine driving down the road in your new syringe on wheels with the plunger facing the front.
How about we seal it first, as the windscreen does with the car.
The plunger does not move.
Or to make the comparison valid, remove the windscreen of the car.
Now you can feel the air against you.
The issue is in not being able to push a vacuum to measure anything.
Yet we can still measure the weight, even in a vacuum.
Yes and it will show in some things but not in others depending on how dense, due to not being able to push a real vacuum.
Nope. Things still weigh basically the same. There is a slight increase due to the lack of buoyant force.
There is nothing impossible about this environment, and the scales do function.
There's plenty of skewing of stuff regarding this.
Yes, by you, to try and ignore things which refute your model.
It depends on what's being tested that can verify low pressure.
The centrifugal/centripetal force is a classic clear cut experiment that proves it doesn't work in a very low pressure.
Nope. The centrifugal force still works in low pressure as does inertia in general.
We can get to a very low pressure and understanding why will also ensure you understand why the density of any object still has atmosphere in, whether it's clearly understandable or in the metal ball scenario, not accepted as having any.
No it wont.
Appealing to pure fantasy doesn't help.
I'm not appealing to fantasy. You are adhering to pure fantasy.
No, I'm adhering to reality. You are the one stuck in fantasy, not me.
jane understand my atmospheric evacuation from a container and knows how the atmosphere can never be fully released.
No. She understood it. She knows it is wrong.
Just because your model says something, and people understand that, doesn't mean it is true.
No, she doesn't know it's wrong. She disagrees with it but cannot ever say it's wrong.
That is enough to show you were lying. She doesn't know that ic can never be fully released.
So thanks for showing you to be wrong regardless.
Also I'm not saying that all of what I say is the entire 100% truth but I'm arguing for it in favour of the lies we are told.
You are the one telling us lies.
I believe it's closer to the truth in some aspects and others require fine tuning.
You are yet to present a single aspect in which it is closer to the truth than current understanding.
Meanwhile people have presented numerous flaws in your model, which you cannot explain which current understanding can.
That's my arrogance and I'll keep it like that when up against the sheer arrogance of a nonsensical globe and all of it's nonsensical trimmings.
You are the one with nonsensical arrogance. Your model has been shown to be nonsense. You are yet to show a single problem with the globe.
Sometimes you have to look a bit deeper into answers.
Try it.
We do look deeper. That is why we realise your nonsense is nonsense.
Inertia explains it. Denspressure does not.
We've been through this. Inertia is meaningless.
Yes, we've been through this.
Inertia is resistance to change in motion. You were unable to provide any rational objection to this.
You do feel it. You just don't register it as anything like that.
No, we don't.
We know what wind feels like. We know what the air pushing us feels like.
This is not what happens in a car when you stop.
There is no push from behind as the air pushes us forwards.
Back to the tube and plunger.
Which fails to account for it.
Now imagine that plunger moving towards you a little bit faster.
If you weren't secured into your seat your body would start to be pushed further back until that plunger stops but more pressure would be on you and you would feel it and know it because of that environment.
If it was moving fast enough to do that we would feel the air moving past us as wind and pushing on us.
So no, that is not what is happening.
Not in a near sealed vehicle you wouldn't.
You would feel a pressure build not a wind.
And pressure building would not result in us being pushed forward as it would push from all directions.
The balloons in a vehicle should be more than enough to tell you what I'm telling you but you just don't see it and most don't.
No. They don't.
They tell the opposite.
When travelling at a constant speed, a helium filled balloon will go straight up. If there was some magic atmospheric compression, you would expect it to be pushed from vertical, but it isn't. Then when you stop, the balloon moves backwards, due to a pressure gradient formed due to the inertia of the air resulting in a force akin to the buoyant force.
Due to a pressure gradient.
You're answering your own queries then denying explanations.
Nope. A pressure gradient forms when you change speed.
This is due to the inertia of the air.
This pressure gradient pushes thing against it.
The helium balloon and us are both pushed back by the pressure gradient that forms when the car slows down.
But we move forwards, so this pressure gradient doesn't explain it.