I never said that supersonic flight is impossible.
I said that transonic effects are extremely problematic for your shpayze doohickeys...
The silly fake shuttle for example, clearly has a subsonic wing section.
Which would make it uncontrollable in the transonic regime.
So it would crash.
Incorrect! The shuttle has been designed to handle the transonic range. Earlier designs did not direct the shockwave correct and would have forced the nose down, but this was corrected.
The shuttle's drag was huge so its glide angle was very steep.
But, all this is way outside the understanding of a
deluded Voodoo Priest, so
stop pretending that you know anything about it.As for photographing the silly fake ISS, don't be ridiculous.
It has never been done.
Incorrect, as usual!
There are plenty of photos and videos out there and if you weren't so deluded and useless you could easily take some of your own.
If it were possible, every telescope manufacturer would use examples of it in their advertising.
But they don't, do they?
What totally idiotic logic! You're slipping
Mr Deluded Voodoo Priest!
Only weirdo YouTube amateurs seem capable of the feat.
Really. You are again totally
incorrect! Go and look at this site for just one example,
Thierry Legault, SOLAR TRANSIT OF ISS AND ATLANTISThierry Legault is a very capable professional photographer.
And rockets with fixed geometry nozzles can not throttle down, rabbibot.
They are either on or off.
Again totally
incorrect. That is one of the big advantages of liquid-fueled rocket engines.
Many cannot be restarted, but the J-2 engine in the Saturn V third stage could be restarted for the trans-lunar injection.
As usual, a vile gish-gallops of lies from the rabbibot.
Incorrect! At least you are consistent - always wrong.
Funny how the ignorant
deluded Voodoo Priest accuses everyone of lying when they say something outside its the understanding of its limited intelligence.
I'm afraid your score for this post is atrocious!
You will just have to study your homework much better.