Live feed of 'weightless' 'astronaut' in front of window showing Spherical Earth

Don't see much of that kinda thing.
If it were real it would be the obvious choice of backdrop to cringe inducing iss cretinous displays.

Weightless morons always in front of static backdrop.
Moving earth images foreground consists of solar panel segments and various struts and girders.

Don't see much of that kinda thing.
If it were real it would be the obvious choice of backdrop to cringe inducing iss cretinous displays.

Weightless morons always in front of static backdrop.
Moving earth images foreground consists of solar panel segments and various struts and girders.

Because no one cares about pleasing a handful of idiots on a conspiracy internet forum.
"Why don't they settle things by-" Because no one cares. There's nothing to settle.

Dumb thread from dumb OP.

Don't see much of that kinda thing.
If it were real it would be the obvious choice of backdrop to cringe inducing iss cretinous displays.

Weightless morons always in front of static backdrop.
Moving earth images foreground consists of solar panel segments and various struts and girders.

And your point? Aren't you getting the attention that you think you deserve?
My advice it t get a good dog, they don't answer back, nor question your nonsense.

Don't see much of that kinda thing.
If it were real it would be the obvious choice of backdrop to cringe inducing iss cretinous displays.

Weightless morons always in front of static backdrop.
Moving earth images foreground consists of solar panel segments and various struts and girders.

So you're saying that live feeds of space walks don't count? 

Quote from: Antirockballtheorist on September 18, 2017, 03:54:17 PM

Don't see much of that kinda thing.
If it were real it would be the obvious choice of backdrop to cringe inducing iss cretinous displays.

Weightless morons always in front of static backdrop.
Moving earth images foreground consists of solar panel segments and various struts and girders.

And your point? Aren't you getting the attention that you think you deserve?
My advice it t get a good dog, they don't answer back, nor question your nonsense.

Very true. Fido.

Quote from: Antirockballtheorist on September 18, 2017, 03:54:17 PM

Don't see much of that kinda thing.
If it were real it would be the obvious choice of backdrop to cringe inducing iss cretinous displays.

Weightless morons always in front of static backdrop.
Moving earth images foreground consists of solar panel segments and various struts and girders.

So you're saying that live feeds of space walks don't count? 

When was the last live space wank feeding?
And no, they don't count.
Space suit wearing space man equates to inanimate foreground.

Quote from: markjo on September 18, 2017, 08:24:47 PM

Quote from: Antirockballtheorist on September 18, 2017, 03:54:17 PM

Don't see much of that kinda thing.
If it were real it would be the obvious choice of backdrop to cringe inducing iss cretinous displays.

Weightless morons always in front of static backdrop.
Moving earth images foreground consists of solar panel segments and various struts and girders.

So you're saying that live feeds of space walks don't count? 

When was the last live space wank feeding?
And no, they don't count.
Space suit wearing space man equates to inanimate foreground.

Ignorant ridicule is very poor logic in any argument.

Quote from: Antirockballtheorist on September 19, 2017, 09:03:31 PM

Quote from: markjo on September 18, 2017, 08:24:47 PM

Quote from: Antirockballtheorist on September 18, 2017, 03:54:17 PM

Don't see much of that kinda thing.
If it were real it would be the obvious choice of backdrop to cringe inducing iss cretinous displays.

Weightless morons always in front of static backdrop.
Moving earth images foreground consists of solar panel segments and various struts and girders.

So you're saying that live feeds of space walks don't count? 

When was the last live space wank feeding?
And no, they don't count.
Space suit wearing space man equates to inanimate foreground.

Ignorant ridicule is very poor logic in any argument.

Who's a good boy, eh? Have a choc drop, Fido.

Quote from: rabinoz on September 19, 2017, 09:53:26 PM

Ignorant ridicule is very poor logic in any argument.

Who's a good boy, eh? Have a choc drop, Fido.

Try real debate some time with actual evidence, etc etc instead of the usual FE tactic of argumentum ab absurdo.

PS Unless you are very careful, "Normal chocolate can be harmful to dogs;" Did someone feed you the wrong sort?

FE'er: Research flat earth
RE'er: I did. The earth is round. Pictures prove it.

FE'er: The pictures have been edited by NASA which runs a conspiracy to keep you uninformed.
RE'er: I am Chinese. The pictures were provided by the Chinese space agency

FE'er: They are part of the conspiracy. Research non- governmental sources
RE'er: I did. My local rocket club shot a go pro camera into the sky. It showed earth's curvature. Physics calculations from Aristotle and early Arabs show a round earth

FE'er: Their so-called proofs are all lies and can also show the earth is flat. They were all assuming it was round. It's all a conspiracy
RE'er: The electricity pylons where I live show a curvature with my own eyes

FE'er: It's all a conspiracy. You need to do proper research by reading some FE websites and watching some FE youtube videos all made by people who have no training to observe, calculate and interpret whatever date they are posting on the web. They are the only ones who speak the truth.
RE'er: huh?

FE'er: Do your research by reading and watching only what I give you. Everything else is part of the conspiracy

FE'er: Research flat earth
RE'er: I did. The earth is round. Pictures prove it.

FE'er: The pictures have been edited by NASA which runs a conspiracy to keep you uninformed.
RE'er: I am Chinese. The pictures were provided by the Chinese space agency

FE'er: They are part of the conspiracy. Research non- governmental sources
RE'er: I did. My local rocket club shot a go pro camera into the sky. It showed earth's curvature. Physics calculations from Aristotle and early Arabs show a round earth

FE'er: Their so-called proofs are all lies and can also show the earth is flat. They were all assuming it was round. It's all a conspiracy
RE'er: The electricity pylons where I live show a curvature with my own eyes

FE'er: It's all a conspiracy. You need to do proper research by reading some FE websites and watching some FE youtube videos all made by people who have no training to observe, calculate and interpret whatever date they are posting on the web. They are the only ones who speak the truth.
RE'er: huh?

FE'er: Do your research by reading and watching only what I give you. Everything else is part of the conspiracy

than its time for the question:
RE'er: and which of the many different flat earth models is the true one? for example i found different explanation how gravity works.

Quote from: rabinoz on September 19, 2017, 09:53:26 PM

Quote from: Antirockballtheorist on September 19, 2017, 09:03:31 PM

Quote from: markjo on September 18, 2017, 08:24:47 PM

Quote from: Antirockballtheorist on September 18, 2017, 03:54:17 PM

Don't see much of that kinda thing.
If it were real it would be the obvious choice of backdrop to cringe inducing iss cretinous displays.

Weightless morons always in front of static backdrop.
Moving earth images foreground consists of solar panel segments and various struts and girders.

So you're saying that live feeds of space walks don't count? 

When was the last live space wank feeding?
And no, they don't count.
Space suit wearing space man equates to inanimate foreground.

Ignorant ridicule is very poor logic in any argument.

Who's a good boy, eh? Have a choc drop, Fido.

You've managed to call everyone who isn't a dog 'Fido', good job.

With regards to your spacewalk comment: denial doesn't make you edgy.

Quote from: markjo on September 18, 2017, 08:24:47 PM

Quote from: Antirockballtheorist on September 18, 2017, 03:54:17 PM

Don't see much of that kinda thing.
If it were real it would be the obvious choice of backdrop to cringe inducing iss cretinous displays.

Weightless morons always in front of static backdrop.
Moving earth images foreground consists of solar panel segments and various struts and girders.

So you're saying that live feeds of space walks don't count? 

When was the last live space wank feeding?
And no, they don't count.
Space suit wearing space man equates to inanimate foreground.

I think that we have a difference of opinion as to the definition of "inanimate".

Came to the thread expecting some cool space vids ... Bad thread title, I am disappoint.

Leaving click bait thread, thanks for nothing OP 

Came to the thread expecting some cool space vids ... Bad thread title, I am disappoint.

Leaving click bait thread, thanks for nothing OP 

I guess you don't know Antirockballtheorist yet - you'll learn. Read and be educated:  Show Posts - Antirockballtheorist

Does anyone else feel like this when trying to explain why FE model doesn't work or is it just me ... ?

[youtube][/youtube]