Proof earth is a globe... SERIOUSLY... from 2017 Solar eclipse.

NASA is slowly but steadily exposed as the photoshop institute that has never been to outerspace !!!

[youtube][/youtube]

blah blah, NASA, blah blah, ropey YouTube vid, blah blah, Eric Dubay, blah blah, perspective, blah blah, water can't bend

The FE act is getting tired.

NASA is slowly but steadily exposed as the photoshop institute that has never been to outerspace !!!

[youtube][/youtube]

As if you were in a position to debate just about anything on a solar eclipse, crappy YT vids won't help you out here since you repeatedly failed to grasp even the most basic concept of it. 

Quote from: dutchy on September 07, 2017, 11:37:05 AM

NASA is slowly but steadily exposed as the photoshop institute that has never been to outerspace !!!

[youtube][/youtube]

As if you were in a position to debate just about anything on a solar eclipse, crappy YT vids won't help you out here since you repeatedly failed to grasp even the most basic concept of it. 

Just look at the video and see how ´they´ photoshop ISS and other celstial bodies in their fabricated fantasy called outer space !

I do grasp the total concept of the ignorant heliocentric model and it was kinda fun...thanks for your contribution Sentinel.
Where there is no knowledge ignorance calls itself science. 

Quote from: Sentinel on September 07, 2017, 11:48:46 AM

Quote from: dutchy on September 07, 2017, 11:37:05 AM

NASA is slowly but steadily exposed as the photoshop institute that has never been to outerspace !!!

[youtube][/youtube]

As if you were in a position to debate just about anything on a solar eclipse, crappy YT vids won't help you out here since you repeatedly failed to grasp even the most basic concept of it. 

Just look at the video and see how ´they´ photoshop ISS and other celstial bodies in their fabricated fantasy called outer space !

Claiming images are "constructed" because they are analyzing compressed jpegs is especially funny.

Pure conspiritard bullshit, as usual.

He sure did say "in MY mind" a lot!

"In MY mind, there are no machines in outer space"

What a bunch of crap!

Quote from: Sentinel on September 07, 2017, 11:48:46 AM

Quote from: dutchy on September 07, 2017, 11:37:05 AM

NASA is slowly but steadily exposed as the photoshop institute that has never been to outerspace !!!

[youtube][/youtube]

As if you were in a position to debate just about anything on a solar eclipse, crappy YT vids won't help you out here since you repeatedly failed to grasp even the most basic concept of it. 

Just look at the video and see how ´they´ photoshop ISS and other celstial bodies in their fabricated fantasy called outer space !

I do grasp the total concept of the ignorant heliocentric model and it was kinda fun...thanks for your contribution Sentinel.
Where there is no knowledge ignorance calls itself science. 

You do know though that others than NASA have caught the ISS transit as well? So is their footage considered to be fake and photoshoped as well?
Are you even thinking before posting, you ridiculous idiot?

Quote from: dutchy on September 07, 2017, 11:37:05 AM

NASA is slowly but steadily exposed as the photoshop institute that has never been to outerspace !!!

[youtube][/youtube]

blah blah, NASA, blah blah, ropey YouTube vid, blah blah, Eric Dubay, blah blah, perspective, blah blah, water can't bend

The FE act is getting tired.

No it is not about the holocaust denier Eric Dubay, nor is it about curved water.
It is from someone who studies the moon with a real camera for years and years and he has examined many NASA pictures.
NASA uses photoshop and doctors with just about every ´´genuine´´ picture they release.
In this video the ISS is clearly photoshopped in front of the sun ...and more.

Of course you are getting tired but i prefer to call you insecure or scared.
We are slowly getting to the essence of things.
Outerspace is an invention just like David´s Icke reptillians and ´Niburu´are.
No vehicles went to outerspace and most certainly not to the moon and mars.

All the photograpic evidence is a pile of fabricated horse shit.
The maker of the video shows what great pictures can be achieved from earth without blurring and the use of photoshop.
But the moon doesn´t look like a rock floating through space at times when you record it with a real camera.
It becomes obvious more and more that the moon is way more special and unknown than what the NASA clowns claim it is.
The billion dollar machine called NASA solely relies on cgi, photoshop and fantasy accomplishments of the past.

You do know though that others than NASA have caught the ISS transit as well? So is their footage considered to be fake and photoshoped as well?
Are you even thinking before posting, you ridiculous idiot?

Angry because your little fantasies are threatened ?

If those amature astronomers and NASA supporters did not track Apollo all the way to the moon and back.........
You are quite something.....

Have you ever even watched a cresent moon with a telescope or even binoculars for yourself and then could tell the fucking craters on the surface would cast fucking shadows past the terminator line?
Are you seriously that dense, dutchy?

I'm just curious. Why flat earthers are so.. .well smart 

BTW, awesome job! I watched myself many transits of ISS through my telescope (sorry dutchy, yes anyone can watch it). You don't need a solar eclipse at all. Furthermore if you are not that lazy ass, go to the star party and watch it yourself. If you dare. 

Quote from: kennykirklan on September 07, 2017, 11:45:11 AM

Quote from: dutchy on September 07, 2017, 11:37:05 AM

NASA is slowly but steadily exposed as the photoshop institute that has never been to outerspace !!!

[youtube][/youtube]

blah blah, NASA, blah blah, ropey YouTube vid, blah blah, Eric Dubay, blah blah, perspective, blah blah, water can't bend

The FE act is getting tired.

No it is not about the holocaust denier Eric Dubay, nor is it about curved water.
It is from someone who studies the moon with a real camera for years and years and he has examined many NASA pictures.
NASA uses photoshop and doctors with just about every ´´genuine´´ picture they release.
In this video the ISS is clearly photoshopped in front of the sun ...and more.

Of course you are getting tired but i prefer to call you insecure or scared.
We are slowly getting to the essence of things.
Outerspace is an invention just like David´s Icke reptillians and ´Niburu´are.
No vehicles went to outerspace and most certainly not to the moon and mars.

All the photograpic evidence is a pile of fabricated horse shit.
The maker of the video shows what great pictures can be achieved from earth without blurring and the use of photoshop.
But the moon doesn´t look like a rock floating through space at times when you record it with a real camera.
It becomes obvious more and more that the moon is way more special and unknown than what the NASA clowns claim it is.
The billion dollar machine called NASA solely relies on cgi, photoshop and fantasy accomplishments of the past.

I'm sure NASA "enhance" images, I don't dispute that. NASA probably does lie, which agencies don't? If I had to believe there was a conspiracy to this I'd think maybe its shop window to show pretty things while behind the scenes budget is siphoned off to fund all manner of black projects. I could think of quite a few other reasons why NASA would lie - it would be a very long list before I got to the reason being that it's because the earth is flat.

Quote from: dutchy on September 07, 2017, 12:11:57 PM

Quote from: kennykirklan on September 07, 2017, 11:45:11 AM

Quote from: dutchy on September 07, 2017, 11:37:05 AM

NASA is slowly but steadily exposed as the photoshop institute that has never been to outerspace !!!

[youtube][/youtube]

blah blah, NASA, blah blah, ropey YouTube vid, blah blah, Eric Dubay, blah blah, perspective, blah blah, water can't bend

The FE act is getting tired.

No it is not about the holocaust denier Eric Dubay, nor is it about curved water.
It is from someone who studies the moon with a real camera for years and years and he has examined many NASA pictures.
NASA uses photoshop and doctors with just about every ´´genuine´´ picture they release.
In this video the ISS is clearly photoshopped in front of the sun ...and more.

Of course you are getting tired but i prefer to call you insecure or scared.
We are slowly getting to the essence of things.
Outerspace is an invention just like David´s Icke reptillians and ´Niburu´are.
No vehicles went to outerspace and most certainly not to the moon and mars.

All the photograpic evidence is a pile of fabricated horse shit.
The maker of the video shows what great pictures can be achieved from earth without blurring and the use of photoshop.
But the moon doesn´t look like a rock floating through space at times when you record it with a real camera.
It becomes obvious more and more that the moon is way more special and unknown than what the NASA clowns claim it is.
The billion dollar machine called NASA solely relies on cgi, photoshop and fantasy accomplishments of the past.

I'm sure NASA "enhance" images, I don't dispute that. NASA probably does lie, which agencies don't? If I had to believe there was a conspiracy to this I'd think maybe its shop window to show pretty things while behind the scenes budget is siphoned off to fund all manner of black projects. I could think of quite a few other reasons why NASA would lie - it would be a very long list before I got to the reason being that it's because the earth is flat.

In the case of the above video, the maker of the video is analyzing compressed jpeg images and is surprised when he finds compression artifacts and naively believes that is evidence they are "constructed".  Great humor value.

Quote from: Sentinel on September 07, 2017, 12:11:47 PM

You do know though that others than NASA have caught the ISS transit as well? So is their footage considered to be fake and photoshoped as well?
Are you even thinking before posting, you ridiculous idiot?

Angry because your little fantasies are threatened ?

If those amature astronomers and NASA supporters did not track Apollo all the way to the moon and back.........
You are quite something.....

You didn't address the question.  Lots of people have seen and photographed the ISS.  Are they all lying?  In fact you can look for it yourself if you are willing to challenge your own conspiracy fantasy.

NASA is slowly but steadily exposed as the photoshop institute that has never been to outerspace !!!

And you complain when I call you a  NASAphobic for the 101st time ! What do you expect when you post hogwash like this?

My name is Philip Smith. I am the person that imaged this ISS video from my backyard. I imaged on 8-19-15 the ISS pass was at 59°.  I used my Edge HD 14 OTA with a SKYnyx 2.2 Mono CCD camera that has global shutter. I also used a 2X Barlow with an Astrodon orange filter. All on an custom modified EQ-G and ER tracking software made for me and my mount. The SKYnyx 2.2 CCD recorder @ 12 fps. After I recorded the 59° ISS pass in SER. file. I take that file and align them in a software called RegiStax6.  I go and look for the best images I can stack in groups. Look at it like a deck of cards. Each picture card = 1 set of ISS images stacked together to get a best signal to noise ISS image. Then that stacked image has to be processed to bring out more detail. You need to know how astronomical images are processed. Then you take all your staked sets of ISS images into another software to make an avi file or or gif file at a frame rate that shows the motion in all the sets of processed ISS images. The word animate does not mean the images are not real. I am not making cartoons. When you image objects in the night sky you have to deal with atmospheric definition and sky seeing conditions. You can go look that up for yourself. If you image the ISS at 90°. The ISS will move from its starting point and then go straight overhead. Example: Rises in the West and Sets in the East. The ISS is about 250 miles above the Earth moving at about 17,500 mph and goes around the Earth every 90 minutes or so. My images are not fake. You can type  Philip Smith ISS on google and find a lot of my ISS images and video's. Look @ this video I did of the ISS from my backyard. The ISS pass was 82°. ATV-5 Docked To ISS 08-22-2014, Taken by Philip Smith on August 22, 2014 @ Manorville, NY USA   Kind Regards Philip Smith

And here is his image of the ATV-5 Docked To the ISS:
But accepting this, even from an amateur photographer would destroy your illusions!

Quote from: kennykirklan on September 07, 2017, 05:24:11 PM

Quote from: dutchy on September 07, 2017, 12:11:57 PM

Quote from: kennykirklan on September 07, 2017, 11:45:11 AM

Quote from: dutchy on September 07, 2017, 11:37:05 AM

NASA is slowly but steadily exposed as the photoshop institute that has never been to outerspace !!!

[youtube][/youtube]

blah blah, NASA, blah blah, ropey YouTube vid, blah blah, Eric Dubay, blah blah, perspective, blah blah, water can't bend

The FE act is getting tired.

No it is not about the holocaust denier Eric Dubay, nor is it about curved water.
It is from someone who studies the moon with a real camera for years and years and he has examined many NASA pictures.
NASA uses photoshop and doctors with just about every ´´genuine´´ picture they release.
In this video the ISS is clearly photoshopped in front of the sun ...and more.

Of course you are getting tired but i prefer to call you insecure or scared.
We are slowly getting to the essence of things.
Outerspace is an invention just like David´s Icke reptillians and ´Niburu´are.
No vehicles went to outerspace and most certainly not to the moon and mars.

All the photograpic evidence is a pile of fabricated horse shit.
The maker of the video shows what great pictures can be achieved from earth without blurring and the use of photoshop.
But the moon doesn´t look like a rock floating through space at times when you record it with a real camera.
It becomes obvious more and more that the moon is way more special and unknown than what the NASA clowns claim it is.
The billion dollar machine called NASA solely relies on cgi, photoshop and fantasy accomplishments of the past.

I'm sure NASA "enhance" images, I don't dispute that. NASA probably does lie, which agencies don't? If I had to believe there was a conspiracy to this I'd think maybe its shop window to show pretty things while behind the scenes budget is siphoned off to fund all manner of black projects. I could think of quite a few other reasons why NASA would lie - it would be a very long list before I got to the reason being that it's because the earth is flat.

In the case of the above video, the maker of the video is analyzing compressed jpeg images and is surprised when he finds compression artifacts and naively believes that is evidence they are "constructed".  Great humor value.

Like most of these videos, I got a few minutes and realised it was just bollocks. He's comparing his high res photos to compressed web graphics in photoshop and thinks he's on to something when he sees a difference in the levels histograms.

Dutchy - what do you know about Photoshop and levels? I presume you've delved into learning and understanding the contents about this before posting this video? Or, like many FE, have you just blindly regurgitated something you don't really understand but that's cool as long as the subject is contradictory to mainstream opinion?

Quote from: Sentinel on September 07, 2017, 11:48:46 AM

Quote from: dutchy on September 07, 2017, 11:37:05 AM

NASA is slowly but steadily exposed as the photoshop institute that has never been to outerspace !!!

[youtube][/youtube]

As if you were in a position to debate just about anything on a solar eclipse, crappy YT vids won't help you out here since you repeatedly failed to grasp even the most basic concept of it. 

Just look at the video and see how ´they´ photoshop ISS and other celstial bodies in their fabricated fantasy called outer space !

I do grasp the total concept of the ignorant heliocentric model and it was kinda fun...thanks for your contribution Sentinel.
Where there is no knowledge ignorance calls itself science. 

The guys that took the ISS footage passing by the eclipse are from SmarterEveryDay and are not from NASA. So NASA had nothing to do with the evidence collected by these guys in the SmarterEveryDay video. FE would probably believe they are agents from the FE cover up.

He's comparing his high res photos to compressed web graphics in photoshop and thinks he's on to something when he sees a difference in the levels histograms.

I haven't  seen anyone doing work on raw images. Like this famous picture with flag. They always use some small jpg/gif which is already processed(not faked) and not image which isn't processed and is also available - http://tothemoon.ser.asu.edu/data_a70/AS17/raw/AS17-134-20384.tif

The guy in the video is not even explaining what he is doing.
I know what a histogram is and obviously he is using JPEG compressed 24 bit (8 bit per component) images and comparing to a 42 bit (14 bit per component) 48 bit (16 bit/component) that comes direct from a professional camera.

What levels is he changing?