Ps i have completely debunked NASA fakery of a pretentious live musical event between guitar hero and earth.
Are you serious? You never even showed that NASA was a part of that event (other than that it happened on the ISS), let alone that it was ever presented as a live event.
This "debunking" shows clearly how hypocritical he is.
I for one can debate on my own, contrary to most of you.
Complaining about me to markjo,....how old are you dude ?
For FE and other theories he says that not everything has to be explained and gaping holes are allowed to be there. But in RE and NASA videos he wants everything to be perfect and explained. If there is some glitch then video is surely faked. If he doesn't get something, then its faked. And most importantly he have absolutely no idea how things work in space and in weightlesness because he hasn't been there but he claims with iron certainty that what he thinks is true. Gosh.
Yes NASA receives an enormous budget on behave of the taxpayer.
Everything has to be crystal clear/ transparent !!!
But this isn't the case !!!!
Many interviews with Apollo astronauts were scripted and because at least 1/5 of the population ( also taxpayers) don't believe we went to the moon they have a certain responsability towards the sceptici.
They should answer all questions of the 'shareholders' so to speak, but those who wrote books about a moon hoax like Bill Kaysing and Ralph Renee were demonised instead !!!
The truth does not fear critics and is happy to explain everything !
Reality has rarely seen astronauts participating in such a setting that allows for critical questions that cannot be rehearsed, but will never harm those who simply speak the truth.
Bart Sibrel has shown how paperthin the knowledge and emotional mindset of most astronauts really is ( was) without preperation to mislead the general public.
Flatearthers do not receive taxpayers money, therefor i am willing to accept more flaws because it is still in it's infancy !
NASA has to live up to expectations and cgi crap doesn't cut it 2017.
A photoshop expert can make a quality video of a 'dark moon' passing in front of earth that is equall or supercedes the NASA attempts.
It is all a matter of responsabilities....... NASA has to be without any flaw !!!!
And i don't mean mechanical failures that will always happen.
I mean that all communication with the general public must always be honest and transparent.
Video's and photographs from an Hollywood basement that pretend to be taken elswhere are a crime and so is a pretentious live event between earth and the ISS.
And most of all that ongoing 'silence+subtle hints' horse manure about 'Roswell' and alledged ufo's.
Not only did Edgar Mitchell spoke about it around the globe on numerous occasions, he also claimed to have his 'Roswell knowledge' from trustworthy friends working in the military/NASA( NASA is part of the military)
It was 1947 or something ? And we have never heard anything in a public announcement about Roswell and ufo's and neither did we hear bout ufo sightings from the iss or during Apollo.
All we get is insulting cartoon crap from a grey ball moving in front of 'earth'.
As long as people think this is money well spend those scumbags can continue their financial scams like the rover on 'mars'.
I believe non of it....... NASA is full of crap and the only reason the majority isn't ready to dump them yet is because of those stupid photographs with alien thingies hidden on mars and in space.
Sadly a large portion of the public want ufo's to be real so badly that it works in NASA's favour.
Just let some extraterrestrial stuff pass the carefully examined footage ::)and the ufo community goes wild.
'See NASA knows everything about UFO's, but they forgot to errase this scary alien mothership in front of the moon"