The one I am referencing explains tides by the influence of the sun and moon.
Some "quotes" of the post you are referencing would help a great deal.
By the "one I am referencing" are you referring back to this post?
I agree with the above statements concerning gravitational influence of the sun and moon. I would also mention there has been some interest in looking into the existence of a submoon that with these two other bodies would help describe the motions.
I want to know how, on a flat earth, any gravitational influence of the sun and moon can cause the usual
semi-diurnal tides.
Not only that but if there is "gravitational influence of the sun and moon" on objects on earth (the oceans), why isn't the gravitational influence of the much more massive earth the cause of "gravity".
Of course, you will drag the infinite plane model out of your
little bottom drawer and say that "Newtonian gravitation does".
So when it comes to satellites and maps you seem to bandy around your "non-Euclidean earth",
when it comes to gravity, you push the "infinite plane model"
then if all else fails you say you prefer denspressure over UA.
It must be so handy to have a model for each occasion.
Us poor
Globularists seem to be restricted to the
Heliocentric Globe - it's so confining this
reality stuff
!