Still no proof of a single NASA lie. Before you bring up Tyson again, he wasn't there and doesn't work for NASA.
Yes i do bring up Neil deGrasse Tyson AGAIN !!!
After all of you denied any inconsistancy at all when i first meticulously posted the exact quotes from NASA liars, you all denied any inconsistancy whatsoever.
After my hard work we have reached the point that some of you understand that indeed Neil deGrasse Tyson's idea's about the daylight surface of the moon are incompatible with what Neil Armstrong claims about the daylight side of the moon and seeing stars.
Now all of a sudden "Neil deGrasse Tyson wasn't there and doesn't work for NASA".
Neil deGrasse Tyson one of the smartest majors in astrophysics , NASA promotor and spokesman.
Yes, yes Neil deGrasse Tyson simply gave it not enough thought and the nono's and amatures around the www understand much better what it is like on the daylight side on the moon.
You 've got your proof of a NASA lie, you may not consider it important enough, that's up to you.
But please don't let your ego get in the way this much to try to suggest it is "really nothing"".
You guys are so extremely stubborn, we could have reached that conclusion about Neil de Grasse Tyson pages ago.
Why do you make discussion so damned difficult ? Is it so important to hold on to the fabrications of men ?
Let us progress from here :
Why does NdGT who gave it a lot of thought ( do to the fact that he knows so much more about all aspects in the heliocentric hypothetical universe compared to the average online poster.) ...... claim we can easily see the stars on the daylight side of the moon ??
We have fully dismissed the option that Neil Grasse Tyson simply babbled about things he doesn't really understand. It his is job and he has all the cridentials possible to know what it's like on the daylight side of the moon from a scientific point of view.
That opens the door to the other possibilty,....... Neil Armstrong is talking shit.
I personally think that is the truth !
The interviews of Neil Armstrong are from the early seventies. They didn't really define what it is like on the daylight side of the moon without an atmosphere. It is indeed weird to imagine how light, despite being very bright, simply cannot scatter or reflect like it does on earth without an atmosphere.
Neil deGrasse Tyson knows this and his enthousiasm and expertise took the better of him.
Oeps..... there were those silly interviews from the early seventies by scientifically illiterate astronauts...... again oeps.. they talk about the properties of light as if they were still on earth..... oeps.
Poll