Why did Grummann not build a working LM? they were paid to do so by NASA. Grumman of course did not know about the hoax, why would they know? It would be retarded for NASA to spill the beans without any reason to do so.
Why would NASA tell Grumman about the hoax? that would make no sense.
You want the hoax to be as small as possible.
By telling Grumman that everything is a hoax for no reason, you enlarge the hoax for no reason.
Which makes no sense.
You are right, Grumman tried to built a working LM,.....but that's not all ....
Don Pettit clearly said,...we have destroyed the technologies to go back to moon, we don't have them anymore.
Did Don Pettit contact Grunman and other contractors ?
Did all contractors destroy their part in the greatest achievements of mankind too ?
Are there induviduals that understand the WHOLE LM and how it functions ?
Clearly the mars curiousity teamleader can't answer any specific questions that were extremely related to the mission.
A teamleader of the mars mission does not know in what format curiousity sends it's data back to earth and many more questions the guy does not KNOW in the press conference!!!!!
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Do i have to believe there were induviduals at Grumman who could tell about each and every part and it's functionality of the LM ?
Answer.....no !!!!! Only NASA insiders knew and Grumman did their part ..after delivery of a LM capable of those things required by NASA, NASA took it to the ''next level''.
How the hell could Grumman know it was really capable of going to the moon ?
Did Grumman make the propellant, shielding, computers, spacesuits, air conditioning etc. etc. ?
That is why every TEAM/INDUVIDUAL does their best to make single part(s) functional, but rarely oversees the bigger picture.
Like my ''mars'' example proves is that teamleaders don't know specific details either.
The saturn 5 rocket alone was made by several contractors only responsible for one stage or something else
Of course the rocket could go upwards and the LM could probably do all sorts of things after assembly of all the specific parts made by specific teams/induviduals.
But if the saturn 5 could lift the LM into outerspace whichthen went to the moon 380.000 km away with enough speed, executing a perfect landing is extremely debatable.
I heard some NASA top figure claim that they did a double dip during re-entry to prevent a burning capsule.
An Apollo astronaut claimed they never performed the double dip during re-entry.
There are very few induviduals in the know of every important detail, just like during the Manhattan project. Compartmentalisation at it's most functional.
I have researched the moonlandings for years and did not encounter a single astronaut, spokesman or scientists who could remotely explain what they had achieved during Apollo....all made remarks that showed they did not really know and only knew about stuff related to their very unique and specific part of the Apollo project.
Yes after the nineties till now, the NASA ''repair team'' did a ''good'' job explaining away many inconsistancies, but still the smoking gun is huge....
Poll