What is the origin of earth?

Quote from: Resistance.is.Futile on August 11, 2017, 01:48:57 PM

Quote from: The Earth is a Pyramid on August 10, 2017, 04:26:23 PM

Well, with all the arguing that i have been doing in this thread (the first real debate of my life lmao) i think i have found my answer, the only answer i got (minus tessa yuri) is a supreme being creating it or something, im satisfied with the answers i got.

Since  Mr Resistance.Is.Futile wont accept any evidence, i think all my attempts will be futile. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I think im finished with this thread, i will still be answering if i want to though.

No Incorrect.

The Supreme being did NOT create the Earth.

GOD created the Earth.

That is GOD all mighty

That is GOD the Most high.

No being could possibly have enough power to create the Earth and the heavens.

Your Strange Heliocentric Religion is False.

Isn't God the supreme being i was talking about?

No the supreme being is the Biblical " Beast from the Pit "

God All Mighty is not a being.

According to scripture God All Mighty has already defeated the supreme being and the other Fallen Angels on two separate occasions but he has forgiven them.

He will not forgive them again this time they will be consumed along with all who follow them.

Your Strange Heliocentric Religion is False.

Quote from: The Earth is a Pyramid on August 11, 2017, 03:13:40 PM

Quote from: Resistance.is.Futile on August 11, 2017, 01:48:57 PM

Quote from: The Earth is a Pyramid on August 10, 2017, 04:26:23 PM

Well, with all the arguing that i have been doing in this thread (the first real debate of my life lmao) i think i have found my answer, the only answer i got (minus tessa yuri) is a supreme being creating it or something, im satisfied with the answers i got.

Since  Mr Resistance.Is.Futile wont accept any evidence, i think all my attempts will be futile. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I think im finished with this thread, i will still be answering if i want to though.

No Incorrect.

The Supreme being did NOT create the Earth.

GOD created the Earth.

That is GOD all mighty

That is GOD the Most high.

No being could possibly have enough power to create the Earth and the heavens.

Your Strange Heliocentric Religion is False.

Isn't God the supreme being i was talking about?

No the supreme being is the Biblical " Beast from the Pit "

God All Mighty is not a being.

According to scripture God All Mighty has already defeated the supreme being and the other Fallen Angels on two separate occasions but he has forgiven them.

He will not forgive them again this time they will be consumed along with all who follow them.

Your Strange Heliocentric Religion is False.

Interesting.  Can you show me the quote from the Bible that says that.  Actually not doubting you just interested in reading that part.

Quote from: Resistance.is.Futile on August 12, 2017, 08:18:07 AM

Quote from: The Earth is a Pyramid on August 11, 2017, 03:13:40 PM

Quote from: Resistance.is.Futile on August 11, 2017, 01:48:57 PM

Quote from: The Earth is a Pyramid on August 10, 2017, 04:26:23 PM

Well, with all the arguing that i have been doing in this thread (the first real debate of my life lmao) i think i have found my answer, the only answer i got (minus tessa yuri) is a supreme being creating it or something, im satisfied with the answers i got.

Since  Mr Resistance.Is.Futile wont accept any evidence, i think all my attempts will be futile. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I think im finished with this thread, i will still be answering if i want to though.

No Incorrect.

The Supreme being did NOT create the Earth.

GOD created the Earth.

That is GOD all mighty

That is GOD the Most high.

No being could possibly have enough power to create the Earth and the heavens.

Your Strange Heliocentric Religion is False.

Isn't God the supreme being i was talking about?

No the supreme being is the Biblical " Beast from the Pit "

God All Mighty is not a being.

According to scripture God All Mighty has already defeated the supreme being and the other Fallen Angels on two separate occasions but he has forgiven them.

He will not forgive them again this time they will be consumed along with all who follow them.

Your Strange Heliocentric Religion is False.

Interesting.  Can you show me the quote from the Bible that says that.  Actually not doubting you just interested in reading that part.

This is a flat earth forum not a bible study forum as it is still the sabbath here in the UK I will comply.

Do want all the references for the above ?

I have only referenced the first time they got filled in (Ass kicked  for yanks )

Revelation 12:7 -12:11

Then war broke out in heaven. Michael and his angels fought against the dragon, and the dragon and his angels fought back.

And the dragon lost the battle, and he and his angels were forced out of heaven.

This great dragon--the ancient serpent called the devil, or Satan, the one deceiving the whole world--was thrown down to the earth with all his angels.

"Woe to you, oh Earth and sea, for the Devil sends the Beast with wrath
Because he knows the time is short
Let him who hath understanding reckon the number of the Beast
For it is a human number, its number is six hundred and sixty six"

"Woe to you, oh Earth and sea, for the Devil sends the Beast with wrath
Because he knows the time is short
Let him who hath understanding reckon the number of the Beast
For it is a human number, its number is six hundred and sixty six"

Are you referring to this :

http://design-guidelines.web.cern.ch/outline-logo

Your Strange Heliocentric Religion is False.

Iron Maiden - The Number of the Best intro lyric.


Being from UK, I expect you to know this!

Quote from: Badxtoss on August 12, 2017, 08:55:22 AM

Quote from: Resistance.is.Futile on August 12, 2017, 08:18:07 AM

Quote from: The Earth is a Pyramid on August 11, 2017, 03:13:40 PM

Quote from: Resistance.is.Futile on August 11, 2017, 01:48:57 PM

Quote from: The Earth is a Pyramid on August 10, 2017, 04:26:23 PM

Well, with all the arguing that i have been doing in this thread (the first real debate of my life lmao) i think i have found my answer, the only answer i got (minus tessa yuri) is a supreme being creating it or something, im satisfied with the answers i got.

Since  Mr Resistance.Is.Futile wont accept any evidence, i think all my attempts will be futile. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I think im finished with this thread, i will still be answering if i want to though.

No Incorrect.

The Supreme being did NOT create the Earth.

GOD created the Earth.

That is GOD all mighty

That is GOD the Most high.

No being could possibly have enough power to create the Earth and the heavens.

Your Strange Heliocentric Religion is False.

Isn't God the supreme being i was talking about?

No the supreme being is the Biblical " Beast from the Pit "

God All Mighty is not a being.

According to scripture God All Mighty has already defeated the supreme being and the other Fallen Angels on two separate occasions but he has forgiven them.

He will not forgive them again this time they will be consumed along with all who follow them.

Your Strange Heliocentric Religion is False.

Interesting.  Can you show me the quote from the Bible that says that.  Actually not doubting you just interested in reading that part.

This is a flat earth forum not a bible study forum as it is still the sabbath here in the UK I will comply.

Do want all the references for the above ?

I have only referenced the first time they got filled in (Ass kicked  for yanks )

Revelation 12:7 -12:11

Then war broke out in heaven. Michael and his angels fought against the dragon, and the dragon and his angels fought back.

And the dragon lost the battle, and he and his angels were forced out of heaven.

This great dragon--the ancient serpent called the devil, or Satan, the one deceiving the whole world--was thrown down to the earth with all his angels.

Thanks for that.  Interesting stuff.  I guess what threw me was you calling the dragon the supreme being.  I'm not finding where it says that.

It's a simple choice.

You either believe God created the Earth.

Or

That a tiny spec of magic fairy dust exploded on it's own accord in an infinite vacuum;    and magically created by accident The Earth the Stars and the Sun and the moon and all life ; with a perfectly balanced food chain.

Which one is more believable ?

Are you actually asking people to choose between the process in wich something was created and it's creator?

That's like choosing between the recipe or the chef as an answer of how a lasagna was made.

Are you retarded or just very very dense?

Quote from: Lonegranger on August 07, 2017, 01:02:02 PM

Quote from: Resistance.is.Futile on August 06, 2017, 05:16:50 PM

Quote from: The Earth is a Pyramid on August 06, 2017, 05:11:00 PM

Quote from: Resistance.is.Futile on August 06, 2017, 04:31:32 PM

Quote from: The Earth is a Pyramid on August 06, 2017, 03:41:46 PM

Quote from: Silicon on August 06, 2017, 02:54:06 PM

Quote from: The Earth is a Pyramid on August 06, 2017, 02:38:23 PM

Quote from: Silicon on August 06, 2017, 02:32:41 PM

God created the earth, and the age I would guess being not much more than 4,117 years old.

Proof?

The Bible, book of Genesis.  You can lookup to see how they dated Abraham, and then work your way back from there since you are given specific information.

Yeah, no the flying spaguetti monster created the universe, the planets are shaped like meatballs!

No seriously, present scientific proof that the universe is 4,117 years old, a quote from the bible wont convince me.

What scientific proof do you have that this universe you speak of exists and is not simply lights in the sky.

What scientific evidence do you have the earth is 4.5 billion years old.

I would say you don't.

All you have is another man's word and computer generated images.

Your Strange Heliocentric Religion is False.

Well, here's some evidence that the earth is 4.5 billion years old.

- Fossils

- Continental drift, tectonic drift is a slow process, the separation of the two landmasses would have taken millions of years, satellite data has shown that the two continents are moving at a rate of roughly 2 cm per year which means that for the continents had to be together at some point in history, as all the evidence shows, the drift must have been going on for at least 200 million years.

- Impact craters, Asteroid strikes that can produce craters on the order of kilometers across are extremely infrequent occurrence, there is one large asteroid inpact every 310,000 years if the earth were young, there would be zero impact craters.

- Erosion, The Grand Canyon, took millions of years to form using the normal rate of erosion seen in water.

Those are just 4 of many other pieces of evidence that prove that the earth is indeed 4.5 billion years old, how about YOU present some scientific evidence for a young earth?

How do you consider another man's word to be evidence ?

How have you verified how old fossils are ?

Answer.

Because someone told you.


How have you verified that the continents have drifted ?

Answer.

Because someone told you.


How do you know asteroid strikes produced craters over 100000 of years.

Answer.

Because someone told you.

How do you know the grand canyon took millions of years to form with water erosion?

Answer.

Because someone told you.

For example :

Fossils could be 3500 years old they could 10 years old how would you be able to verify their age ?

The continents could be stationary how could you verify that they move an alleged 20 mm a year.?

These so called asteroid strikes you speak of could of been the battle scars of the ancients superior weapons.

The Grand canyon could be the result of the ancients mining with there superior machines and technology.

All your doing is repeating what you have been told you have yet to provide any evidence what so ever.

I all comes down to belief .

Do you believe what you have been told or not.

I do not.

Your Strange Heliocentric Religion is False.

Which ancients are these that you're on about? I take it you have proof of their existence. But please, tell me where did they live? How long did their society last for? Where was the capital city and what was its name? What language did they speak?
Please share.

Trust me.

You will not want me to go there.

I will take the readers from The Fallen Angels right up to your brethren building the the large hadron collider at Cern.

 They will then use this abomination to bring these entities back into this dimension and then claim that they are Aliens from " SPACE "

Lol.

Lol.

Do you want some more ?


Your Strange Heliocentric Religion is False.

Fuck yeah.  I write science fiction and that was some fun stuff.

Quote from: Resistance.is.Futile on August 06, 2017, 04:26:27 PM

It's a simple choice.

You either believe God created the Earth.

Or

That a tiny spec of magic fairy dust exploded on it's own accord in an infinite vacuum;    and magically created by accident The Earth the Stars and the Sun and the moon and all life ; with a perfectly balanced food chain.

Which one is more believable ?

Are you actually asking people to choose between the process in wich something was created and it's creator?

That's like choosing between the recipe or the chef as an answer of how a lasagna was made.

Are you retarded or just very very dense?

Why can't that be the way god created everything?  I mean the Bible is full of parables, why can't genesis be another one?

It's a simple choice.

You either believe God created the Earth.

Or

That a tiny spec of magic fairy dust exploded on it's own accord in an infinite vacuum;    and magically created by accident The Earth the Stars and the Sun and the moon and all life ; with a perfectly balanced food chain.

Which one is more believable ?

Spot on

Are you actually asking people to choose between the process in wich something was created and it's creator?

That's like choosing between the recipe or the chef as an answer of how a lasagna was made.

Are you retarded or just very very dense?

Pathetic analogy as it's based on your belief as being fact. "Process" is what believe to be fact. Theists don't so the analogy is one side. The fact remains that they're both religious beliefs so it's EXACTLY how simba put it.

And if you love lasagna so much then I'll help you out with a relative analogy.

The choices are:

a chef used ingredients as the building material and put it together in perfect manner to form a lasagna.

or

Nothing exploded and over billions of years the residue from that explosion formed a perfect tasty lasagna..

Indeed, what is more believable!!!!!

Indeed, what is more believable!!!!!

That bible God ceated this world of course !!!!!

You fail to present your cosmic accident correctly !

A cosmic pea without matter....only energy was present at the beginning.
No DNA, no plan, no nothing only maximal compressed ''energy''.
It explodes into all directions.
The nothingness the pea exploded in, inflated to enormous proportions
Then particles from the initial energy pea (that progressed from energy to matter ) started to cluster and stick together.
Then stars, planets and galaxies were formed
Then earth was formed and cooled down to a certain ideal temperature
Then accidentally life was formed
Then accidentally life became more complex
Then accidentally life became so complex that it was concious...a characterization that the initial pea did not possess.
Then concious life on earth thought about meaning and purpose, something that was never initiated to begin with.

Of course God is the creator of everything, i am glad He is ! Instead of some wacko hypothesis by narcissistic cosmologists ( Lawrence M. Krauss) that clearly have to much time doing nothing of any importance and meaning, but to seek the spotlights at every given oppertunity.

Quote from: simba on August 14, 2017, 07:08:52 AM

Quote from: Resistance.is.Futile on August 06, 2017, 04:26:27 PM

It's a simple choice.

You either believe God created the Earth.

Or

That a tiny spec of magic fairy dust exploded on it's own accord in an infinite vacuum;    and magically created by accident The Earth the Stars and the Sun and the moon and all life ; with a perfectly balanced food chain.

Which one is more believable ?

Are you actually asking people to choose between the process in wich something was created and it's creator?

That's like choosing between the recipe or the chef as an answer of how a lasagna was made.

Are you retarded or just very very dense?

Why can't that be the way god created everything?  I mean the Bible is full of parables, why can't genesis be another one?

The big bang doesn't contradict the existence of a creator, nor evolution. By the way, you may consider me as an agnostic.

Quote from: observer on August 14, 2017, 11:54:06 AM

Indeed, what is more believable!!!!!

That bible God ceated this world of course !!!!!

You fail to present your cosmic accident correctly !

A cosmic pea without matter....only energy was present at the beginning.
No DNA, no plan, no nothing only maximal compressed ''energy''.
It explodes into all directions.
The nothingness the pea exploded in, inflated to enormous proportions
Then particles from the initial energy pea (that progressed from energy to matter ) started to cluster and stick together.
Then stars, planets and galaxies were formed
Then earth was formed and cooled down to a certain ideal temperature
Then accidentally life was formed
Then accidentally life became more complex
Then accidentally life became so complex that it was concious...a characterization that the initial pea did not possess.
Then concious life on earth thought about meaning and purpose, something that was never initiated to begin with.

Of course God is the creator of everything, i am glad He is ! Instead of some wacko hypothesis by narcissistic cosmologists ( Lawrence M. Krauss) that clearly have to much time doing nothing of any importance and meaning, but to seek the spotlights at every given oppertunity.

You say accidentally like it is a bad thing 

Many things were created by accident, popsicles, even babies (everyone in this forum might have been an accidents tho )

Quote from: Badxtoss on August 14, 2017, 11:31:02 AM

Quote from: simba on August 14, 2017, 07:08:52 AM

Quote from: Resistance.is.Futile on August 06, 2017, 04:26:27 PM

It's a simple choice.

You either believe God created the Earth.

Or

That a tiny spec of magic fairy dust exploded on it's own accord in an infinite vacuum;    and magically created by accident The Earth the Stars and the Sun and the moon and all life ; with a perfectly balanced food chain.

Which one is more believable ?

Are you actually asking people to choose between the process in wich something was created and it's creator?

That's like choosing between the recipe or the chef as an answer of how a lasagna was made.

Are you retarded or just very very dense?

Why can't that be the way god created everything?  I mean the Bible is full of parables, why can't genesis be another one?

The big bang doesn't contradict the existence of a creator, nor evolution. By the way, you may consider me as an agnostic.

That's what I'm saying.  Science, at least as far as I have seen, doesn't contradict the existence of a creator.  Only the interpretation of some believers.

You say accidentally like it is a bad thing 

Many things were created by accident, popsicles, even babies (everyone in this forum might have been an accidents tho )

I meant accidentally as in ''highly improbable''.

some accidents are indeed accidents, like making a baby, but some cosmic accidents are impossible when you try to wrap your head around the currently supported hypothesis.
More so,....they are getting absurder every decade.........if we follow the evolution of our universe back in time we get an infinite density and infinitly strong gravity into a singularity that causes all current equations and models to collaps.

Something is not right here.....or should i say improbable ? 
Back to the drawing board,....or like i do, live by faith ?

Quote from: simba on August 14, 2017, 12:31:05 PM

Quote from: Badxtoss on August 14, 2017, 11:31:02 AM

Quote from: simba on August 14, 2017, 07:08:52 AM

Quote from: Resistance.is.Futile on August 06, 2017, 04:26:27 PM

It's a simple choice.

You either believe God created the Earth.

Or

That a tiny spec of magic fairy dust exploded on it's own accord in an infinite vacuum;    and magically created by accident The Earth the Stars and the Sun and the moon and all life ; with a perfectly balanced food chain.

Which one is more believable ?

Are you actually asking people to choose between the process in wich something was created and it's creator?

That's like choosing between the recipe or the chef as an answer of how a lasagna was made.

Are you retarded or just very very dense?

Why can't that be the way god created everything?  I mean the Bible is full of parables, why can't genesis be another one?

The big bang doesn't contradict the existence of a creator, nor evolution. By the way, you may consider me as an agnostic.

That's what I'm saying.  Science, at least as far as I have seen, doesn't contradict the existence of a creator.  Only the interpretation of some believers.

Science cannot contradict nor prove the existence of God. In the same way Science has not proven Evolution at all. In fact, the progress of Science has been a huge deterrent for Evolution. Both religions and any other trying to prove their beliefs with Science simply doesn't understand the basic concept of what Science actually is.

Also, the BIG BANG absolutely contradicts a creator because the "big bang" is something from and by nothing. You cannot spin a "big bang" with a "creator" because every religion has their scriptures and the "big bang" is in none. The big bang belief is part of the most recent religion.

Quote from: simba on August 14, 2017, 12:39:17 PM

You say accidentally like it is a bad thing 

Many things were created by accident, popsicles, even babies (everyone in this forum might have been an accidents tho )

I meant accidentally as in ''highly improbable''.

some accidents are indeed accidents, like making a baby, but some cosmic accidents are impossible when you try to wrap your head around the currently supported hypothesis.
More so,....they are getting absurder every decade.........if we follow the evolution of our universe back in time we get an infinite density and infinitly strong gravity into a singularity that causes all current equations and models to collaps.

Something is not right here.....or should i say improbable ? 
Back to the drawing board,....or like i do, live by faith ?

I think the key statement there is the wrapping your head around it part. 

Quote from: Badxtoss on August 14, 2017, 01:15:03 PM

Quote from: simba on August 14, 2017, 12:31:05 PM

Quote from: Badxtoss on August 14, 2017, 11:31:02 AM

Quote from: simba on August 14, 2017, 07:08:52 AM

Quote from: Resistance.is.Futile on August 06, 2017, 04:26:27 PM

It's a simple choice.

You either believe God created the Earth.

Or

That a tiny spec of magic fairy dust exploded on it's own accord in an infinite vacuum;    and magically created by accident The Earth the Stars and the Sun and the moon and all life ; with a perfectly balanced food chain.

Which one is more believable ?

Are you actually asking people to choose between the process in wich something was created and it's creator?

That's like choosing between the recipe or the chef as an answer of how a lasagna was made.

Are you retarded or just very very dense?

Why can't that be the way god created everything?  I mean the Bible is full of parables, why can't genesis be another one?

The big bang doesn't contradict the existence of a creator, nor evolution. By the way, you may consider me as an agnostic.

That's what I'm saying.  Science, at least as far as I have seen, doesn't contradict the existence of a creator.  Only the interpretation of some believers.

Science cannot contradict nor prove the existence of God. In the same way Science has not proven Evolution at all. In fact, the progress of Science has been a huge deterrent for Evolution. Both religions and any other trying to prove their beliefs with Science simply doesn't understand the basic concept of what Science actually is.

Also, the BIG BANG absolutely contradicts a creator because the "big bang" is something from and by nothing. You cannot spin a "big bang" with a "creator" because every religion has their scriptures and the "big bang" is in none. The big bang belief is part of the most recent religion.

I think he meant that a creator could have used the big bang to create the universe instead of creating it supernaturally.

Quote from: Resistance.is.Futile on August 09, 2017, 01:42:33 AM

Quote from: Lonegranger on August 07, 2017, 01:02:02 PM

Quote from: Resistance.is.Futile on August 06, 2017, 05:16:50 PM

Quote from: The Earth is a Pyramid on August 06, 2017, 05:11:00 PM

Quote from: Resistance.is.Futile on August 06, 2017, 04:31:32 PM

Quote from: The Earth is a Pyramid on August 06, 2017, 03:41:46 PM

Quote from: Silicon on August 06, 2017, 02:54:06 PM

Quote from: The Earth is a Pyramid on August 06, 2017, 02:38:23 PM

Quote from: Silicon on August 06, 2017, 02:32:41 PM

God created the earth, and the age I would guess being not much more than 4,117 years old.

Proof?

The Bible, book of Genesis.  You can lookup to see how they dated Abraham, and then work your way back from there since you are given specific information.

Yeah, no the flying spaguetti monster created the universe, the planets are shaped like meatballs!

No seriously, present scientific proof that the universe is 4,117 years old, a quote from the bible wont convince me.

What scientific proof do you have that this universe you speak of exists and is not simply lights in the sky.

What scientific evidence do you have the earth is 4.5 billion years old.

I would say you don't.

All you have is another man's word and computer generated images.

Your Strange Heliocentric Religion is False.

Well, here's some evidence that the earth is 4.5 billion years old.

- Fossils

- Continental drift, tectonic drift is a slow process, the separation of the two landmasses would have taken millions of years, satellite data has shown that the two continents are moving at a rate of roughly 2 cm per year which means that for the continents had to be together at some point in history, as all the evidence shows, the drift must have been going on for at least 200 million years.

- Impact craters, Asteroid strikes that can produce craters on the order of kilometers across are extremely infrequent occurrence, there is one large asteroid inpact every 310,000 years if the earth were young, there would be zero impact craters.

- Erosion, The Grand Canyon, took millions of years to form using the normal rate of erosion seen in water.

Those are just 4 of many other pieces of evidence that prove that the earth is indeed 4.5 billion years old, how about YOU present some scientific evidence for a young earth?

How do you consider another man's word to be evidence ?

How have you verified how old fossils are ?

Answer.

Because someone told you.


How have you verified that the continents have drifted ?

Answer.

Because someone told you.


How do you know asteroid strikes produced craters over 100000 of years.

Answer.

Because someone told you.

How do you know the grand canyon took millions of years to form with water erosion?

Answer.

Because someone told you.

For example :

Fossils could be 3500 years old they could 10 years old how would you be able to verify their age ?

The continents could be stationary how could you verify that they move an alleged 20 mm a year.?

These so called asteroid strikes you speak of could of been the battle scars of the ancients superior weapons.

The Grand canyon could be the result of the ancients mining with there superior machines and technology.

All your doing is repeating what you have been told you have yet to provide any evidence what so ever.

I all comes down to belief .

Do you believe what you have been told or not.

I do not.

Your Strange Heliocentric Religion is False.

Which ancients are these that you're on about? I take it you have proof of their existence. But please, tell me where did they live? How long did their society last for? Where was the capital city and what was its name? What language did they speak?
Please share.

Trust me.

You will not want me to go there.

I will take the readers from The Fallen Angels right up to your brethren building the the large hadron collider at Cern.

 They will then use this abomination to bring these entities back into this dimension and then claim that they are Aliens from " SPACE "

Lol.

Lol.

Do you want some more ?


Your Strange Heliocentric Religion is False.

Fuck yeah.  I write science fiction and that was some fun stuff.

I agree everything you write is fiction.

I did not say the supreme being was the dragon referenced in the Bible.

The supreme being is the anti Christ biblically known as the Beast from the Pit.

I ask you why Cern have 666 in there logo?

http://design-guidelines.web.cern.ch/outline-logo

I ask you why Cern have a statue of the abomination SHIVA THE DESTROYER  in front of their head quarters.

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-maha-shivratri-why-cern-the-world-s-largest-particle-physics-lab-has-a-statue-of-lord-shiva-2186655

Let's look at the facts:

http://www.stfc.ac.uk/research/particle-physics-and-particle-astrophysics/large-hadron-collider/

The LHC is the biggest machine ever made weighing 38000 tonnes.

The LHC Runs for 27 km

The LHC accelerates particles to 11000 circuits a second of the 27 km run.

The LHC had 111 Nations involved in it's construction.

The LHC cost 3.74 Billion.

Let's look at the numbers:

We have 666 the mark of the Beast in the Cern logo.

We have 9 11 in the description of the LHC.

We also have a 33 in the description of the LHC.

It's difficult to believe these reoccurring numbers are nothing to do with the occult.

Your Strange Heliocentric Religion is False.

Don't these religious nuts know that a priest was the first to come up with what later became known as the big bang?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lema%C3%AEtre

RIF, ok first of all props for the come back, that was funny.
As for the dragon, the quote you cited did say dragon but didn't say supreme being or anti christ.
Now then, I'm not at the moment going to read all the links, maybe later, but please go on with your story.  I really want to hear it.

Quote from: simba on August 14, 2017, 07:08:52 AM

Quote from: Resistance.is.Futile on August 06, 2017, 04:26:27 PM

It's a simple choice.

You either believe God created the Earth.

Or

That a tiny spec of magic fairy dust exploded on it's own accord in an infinite vacuum;    and magically created by accident The Earth the Stars and the Sun and the moon and all life ; with a perfectly balanced food chain.

Which one is more believable ?

Are you actually asking people to choose between the process in wich something was created and it's creator?

That's like choosing between the recipe or the chef as an answer of how a lasagna was made.

Are you retarded or just very very dense?

Why can't that be the way god created everything?  I mean the Bible is full of parables, why can't genesis be another one?

I think most creationists have a problem with this because it teaches about death before the fall:







From the experts themselves:
https://answersingenesis.org/death-before-sin/biblically-could-death-have-existed-before-sin/
https://www.icr.org/article/295/
http://www.creationliberty.com/articles/ageisdoctrine.php

I also found these:




On the other side of the coin though:







from http://www.godofevolution.com/

Don't these religious nuts know that a priest was the first to come up with what later became known as the big bang?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lema%C3%AEtre

Lol, was gonna say that, you got me.

Quote from: Badxtoss on August 14, 2017, 11:31:02 AM

Quote from: simba on August 14, 2017, 07:08:52 AM

Quote from: Resistance.is.Futile on August 06, 2017, 04:26:27 PM

It's a simple choice.

You either believe God created the Earth.

Or

That a tiny spec of magic fairy dust exploded on it's own accord in an infinite vacuum;    and magically created by accident The Earth the Stars and the Sun and the moon and all life ; with a perfectly balanced food chain.

Which one is more believable ?

Are you actually asking people to choose between the process in wich something was created and it's creator?

That's like choosing between the recipe or the chef as an answer of how a lasagna was made.

Are you retarded or just very very dense?

Why can't that be the way god created everything?  I mean the Bible is full of parables, why can't genesis be another one?

I think most creationists have a problem with this because it teaches about death before the fall:







From the experts themselves:
https://answersingenesis.org/death-before-sin/biblically-could-death-have-existed-before-sin/
https://www.icr.org/article/295/
http://www.creationliberty.com/articles/ageisdoctrine.php

I also found these:




On the other side of the coin though:







from http://www.godofevolution.com/

Quote from: Albert Wesker on August 14, 2017, 02:28:48 PM

Don't these religious nuts know that a priest was the first to come up with what later became known as the big bang?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lema%C3%AEtre

Lol, was gonna say that, you got me.

I've pointed that little tidbit out in his other ridiculous threads but I believe he just ignores it.

Don't these religious nuts know that a priest was the first to come up with what later became known as the big bang?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lema%C3%AEtre

Jesuites are part of the illuminati, together with the freeemasons of the scottish rite the main cause of a hypothetical world that kicked God out existence.

The globe and the heliocentric inventions are invented during the total reign of the Roman Catholic church not independent science, because that has never existed.
If the Catholic church demanded a flatearth,....it was going to be a flatearth all the way.
Copernicus lived in a private estate instaed of being burned at the stake as a heretic, the stake which trinity deniers did receive.

The Castholic church/order of the Jesuites invented the heliocentric model and the big bang.
The pope has recently stated to baptise aliens at the Vatican if they would visit earth.

Like i have pointed out in another topic it is all about the alien/evil entities that will be introduced as inhabitants of the vast universe we have become so familiar with through the Hollywood film industry.
By creating a hypothetical vast universe, life somewhere else seems very likely.
And those life forms could look like anything.

This way the devil can clog behind the ''space fantasies'' when revealing himself and his armees upon the face of this world.
All meticulously described in the bible for the one with eyes to see and ears to hear.

Quote from: Albert Wesker on August 14, 2017, 02:28:48 PM

Don't these religious nuts know that a priest was the first to come up with what later became known as the big bang?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lema%C3%AEtre

Jesuites are part of the illuminati, together with the freeemasons of the scottish rite the main cause of a hypothetical world that kicked God out existence.

The globe and the heliocentric inventions are invented during the total reign of the Roman Catholic church not independent science, because that has never existed.
If the Catholic church demanded a flatearth,....it was going to be a flatearth all the way.
Copernicus lived in a private estate instaed of being burned at the stake as a heretic, the stake which trinity deniers did receive.

The Castholic church/order of the Jesuites invented the heliocentric model and the big bang.
The pope has recently stated to baptise aliens at the Vatican if they would visit earth.

Like i have pointed out in another topic it is all about the alien/evil entities that will be introduced as inhabitants of the vast universe we have become so familiar with through the Hollywood film industry.
By creating a hypothetical vast universe, life somewhere else seems very likely.
And those life forms could look like anything.

This way the devil can clog behind the ''space fantasies'' when revealing himself and his armees upon the face of this world.
All meticulously described in the bible for the one with eyes to see and ears to hear.

Wasn't Galileo imprisoned by the roman catholic church for supporting the heliocentric model?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_affair

"The Roman Inquisition tried Galileo in 1633 and found him "vehemently suspect of heresy", sentencing him to indefinite imprisonment. Galileo was kept under house arrest until his death in 1642."

Quote from: dutchy on August 14, 2017, 03:05:01 PM

Quote from: Albert Wesker on August 14, 2017, 02:28:48 PM

Don't these religious nuts know that a priest was the first to come up with what later became known as the big bang?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lema%C3%AEtre

Jesuites are part of the illuminati, together with the freeemasons of the scottish rite the main cause of a hypothetical world that kicked God out existence.

The globe and the heliocentric inventions are invented during the total reign of the Roman Catholic church not independent science, because that has never existed.
If the Catholic church demanded a flatearth,....it was going to be a flatearth all the way.
Copernicus lived in a private estate instaed of being burned at the stake as a heretic, the stake which trinity deniers did receive.

The Castholic church/order of the Jesuites invented the heliocentric model and the big bang.
The pope has recently stated to baptise aliens at the Vatican if they would visit earth.

Like i have pointed out in another topic it is all about the alien/evil entities that will be introduced as inhabitants of the vast universe we have become so familiar with through the Hollywood film industry.
By creating a hypothetical vast universe, life somewhere else seems very likely.
And those life forms could look like anything.

This way the devil can clog behind the ''space fantasies'' when revealing himself and his armees upon the face of this world.
All meticulously described in the bible for the one with eyes to see and ears to hear.

Wasn't Galileo imprisoned by the roman catholic church for supporting the heliocentric model?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_affair

"The Roman Inquisition tried Galileo in 1633 and found him "vehemently suspect of heresy", sentencing him to indefinite imprisonment. Galileo was kept under house arrest until his death in 1642."

His house arrest was for his agressive behaviour not his views.
He presented his theory in Italian instead of Latin which offended a lot of Roman Catholics....there is much more to it though.....

In the end he was imprisoned for the rest of his life.....9 years.
They didn't kill him, if they really thought the world was flat, because it was in the bilbe, they surely would have done so.
Roman Catholics are heretics and our current cosmological model has it roots solely in the order of the Jesuits.

I don't understand why most people claim as if the Catholic church was a flatearth bastion ?

Don't these religious nuts know that a priest was the first to come up with what later became known as the big bang?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lema%C3%AEtre

Priests are not Christians they rape little boys.


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_sexual_abuse_cases


http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/evil-catholic-priest-raped-young-10220240

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/06/22/priest-raped-and-molested-boy-more-than-100-times-new-lawsuit-alleges/419807001/

Your Strange Heliocentric Religion is False.

Quote from: The Earth is a Pyramid on August 14, 2017, 03:15:10 PM

Quote from: dutchy on August 14, 2017, 03:05:01 PM

Quote from: Albert Wesker on August 14, 2017, 02:28:48 PM

Don't these religious nuts know that a priest was the first to come up with what later became known as the big bang?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lema%C3%AEtre

Jesuites are part of the illuminati, together with the freeemasons of the scottish rite the main cause of a hypothetical world that kicked God out existence.

The globe and the heliocentric inventions are invented during the total reign of the Roman Catholic church not independent science, because that has never existed.
If the Catholic church demanded a flatearth,....it was going to be a flatearth all the way.
Copernicus lived in a private estate instaed of being burned at the stake as a heretic, the stake which trinity deniers did receive.

The Castholic church/order of the Jesuites invented the heliocentric model and the big bang.
The pope has recently stated to baptise aliens at the Vatican if they would visit earth.

Like i have pointed out in another topic it is all about the alien/evil entities that will be introduced as inhabitants of the vast universe we have become so familiar with through the Hollywood film industry.
By creating a hypothetical vast universe, life somewhere else seems very likely.
And those life forms could look like anything.

This way the devil can clog behind the ''space fantasies'' when revealing himself and his armees upon the face of this world.
All meticulously described in the bible for the one with eyes to see and ears to hear.

Wasn't Galileo imprisoned by the roman catholic church for supporting the heliocentric model?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_affair

"The Roman Inquisition tried Galileo in 1633 and found him "vehemently suspect of heresy", sentencing him to indefinite imprisonment. Galileo was kept under house arrest until his death in 1642."

His house arrest was for his agressive behaviour not his views.
He presented his theory in Italian instead of Latin which offended a lot of Roman Catholics....there is much more to it though.....

In the end he was imprisoned for the rest of his life.....9 years.
They didn't kill him, if they really thought the world was flat, because it was in the bilbe, they surely would have done so.
Roman Catholics are heretics and our current cosmological model has it roots solely in the order of the Jesuits.

I don't understand why most people claim as if the Catholic church was a flatearth bastion ?

The Romans where pagans.

The Romans worshipped the Sun God Helios.

The Roman Catholic Church would of welcomed the Heliocentric model with open arms as they do today.

The Roman Catholic Church changed the sabbath from Saturday to the Pagan day of the Sun which is when the Pagans would worship Helios.

Your Strange Heliocentric Religion is False.

Quote from: dutchy on August 14, 2017, 03:26:21 PM

Quote from: The Earth is a Pyramid on August 14, 2017, 03:15:10 PM

Quote from: dutchy on August 14, 2017, 03:05:01 PM

Quote from: Albert Wesker on August 14, 2017, 02:28:48 PM

Don't these religious nuts know that a priest was the first to come up with what later became known as the big bang?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lema%C3%AEtre

Jesuites are part of the illuminati, together with the freeemasons of the scottish rite the main cause of a hypothetical world that kicked God out existence.

The globe and the heliocentric inventions are invented during the total reign of the Roman Catholic church not independent science, because that has never existed.
If the Catholic church demanded a flatearth,....it was going to be a flatearth all the way.
Copernicus lived in a private estate instaed of being burned at the stake as a heretic, the stake which trinity deniers did receive.

The Castholic church/order of the Jesuites invented the heliocentric model and the big bang.
The pope has recently stated to baptise aliens at the Vatican if they would visit earth.

Like i have pointed out in another topic it is all about the alien/evil entities that will be introduced as inhabitants of the vast universe we have become so familiar with through the Hollywood film industry.
By creating a hypothetical vast universe, life somewhere else seems very likely.
And those life forms could look like anything.

This way the devil can clog behind the ''space fantasies'' when revealing himself and his armees upon the face of this world.
All meticulously described in the bible for the one with eyes to see and ears to hear.

Wasn't Galileo imprisoned by the roman catholic church for supporting the heliocentric model?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_affair

"The Roman Inquisition tried Galileo in 1633 and found him "vehemently suspect of heresy", sentencing him to indefinite imprisonment. Galileo was kept under house arrest until his death in 1642."

His house arrest was for his agressive behaviour not his views.
He presented his theory in Italian instead of Latin which offended a lot of Roman Catholics....there is much more to it though.....

In the end he was imprisoned for the rest of his life.....9 years.
They didn't kill him, if they really thought the world was flat, because it was in the bilbe, they surely would have done so.
Roman Catholics are heretics and our current cosmological model has it roots solely in the order of the Jesuits.

I don't understand why most people claim as if the Catholic church was a flatearth bastion ?

The Romans where pagans.

The Romans worshipped the Sun God Helios.

The Roman Catholic Church would of welcomed the Heliocentric model with open arms as they do today.

The Roman Catholic Church changed the sabbath from Saturday to the Pagan day of the Sun which is when the Pagans would worship Helios.

Your Strange Heliocentric Religion is False.

I don't think that's how that worked.  I think it was to celebrate the risen Christ, which happened on the first day, Sunday.  I also think that change came before there was a Roman Catholic Church.