Where do you get the numbers of 20,000 km from or the 5000 km high.
I have never given any numbers out. These numbers may be correct or may be incorrect....
I get the 5000 km from various FEers, or using similar methodology to the sun.
The 20 000 km I get from reality, from various sites which all agree, even some FEers agree.
Regardless, the exact numbers are irrelevant. The fact remains that Polaris should be easily visible in the southern hemisphere unless it is practically touching Earth.
You still have not provided photos of the stars from the 3 location in the Southern Hemisphere that show that they see the same stars at the same time on the same day of the year. As for the star, programs, it's just a program, junk in = junk out.
The burden is on you to provide the photographic evidence needed to continue this discussion.
That is completely irrelevant to Polaris.
If you wish to discuss the south pole and demand that evidence go make a new thread where that is the topic. Don't title it "The Polaris Question".
All that is, is a pathetic attempt to hide from the complete failure of the FE model.
The burden is on you to explain why Polaris cannot be seen from the southern hemisphere.
Read the first post that I did on this Thread. If you can't prove that you see the same stars in Australia as in Argentina, then of course you can't see Polaris from the Southern Hemisphere.
That makes no sense at all.
Explain the reasoning, and then provide evidence that you can't see the same stars in Australia and Argentina.
The Heliocentric High Priest, always bring up Polaris, but when I asked a very basic question, so we can discus about Polaris
The question had nothing at all to do with Polaris. It is not needed to discuss Polaris.
It is just a pathetic attempt to avoid defeat.