Your prediction that the solar eclipse would debunk known science failed. In fact, since the eclipse occurred exactly as predicted by science, it strongly supports the heliocentric solar system and geoidal earth models as being accurate. This would be obvious to everyone but you and a handful of others who believe what they want despite obvious facts to the contrary.
Now you want to talk about something else. Good idea. Maybe it should be another thread since...
This thread is called Eclipse 21.08.17 will debunk the globe.
You'd be better off just letting this thread slide into oblivion.
You are delusional.
Your explanation is pure fantasy.
The only reason NASA could predict the eclipse is because they have learnt how to use the 4000 year old Ancient Babylonian Saros Cycle.
You're getting cause and effect reversed. We can explain
why a Saros cycle happens using the modern (i.e. last few centuries) models of the earth and solar system. Without a better understanding than:
The Saros is a period of approximately 223 synodic months (approximately 6585.3211 days, or 18 years, 11 days, 8 hours), that can be used to predict eclipses of the Sun and Moon. One saros period after an eclipse, the Sun, Earth, and Moon return to approximately the same relative geometry, a near straight line, and a nearly identical eclipse will occur, in what is referred to as an eclipse cycle. A sar is one half of a saros.
The saros is not an integer number of days, but contains the fraction of 1⁄3 of a day. Thus each successive eclipse in a saros series occurs about 8 hours later in the day. In the case of an eclipse of the Sun, this means that the region of visibility will shift westward about 120°, or about one third of the way around the globe, and the two eclipses will thus not be visible from the same place on Earth. In the case of an eclipse of the Moon, the next eclipse might still be visible from the same location as long as the Moon is above the horizon. Given three saros eclipse intervals, the local time of day of an eclipse will be nearly the same. This three saros interval (19,755.96 days) is known as a triple saros or exeligmos (Greek: "turn of the wheel") cycle.
Each saros series starts with a partial eclipse (Sun first enters the end of the node), and each successive saros the path of the Moon is shifted either northward (when near the descending node) or southward (when near the ascending node) due to the fact that the saros is not an exact integer of draconic months (about one hour short).
[Emphasis added]
there's no way to predict where a total solar eclipse will be visible with any real accuracy.
The upshot is that, from some point on earth, if there was a lunar eclipse, another lunar eclipse would be highly likely at the same point three Saros cycles (about 54 years), later. Similarly, if there was a solar eclipse, another was likely (but not certain) at the same place a similar period later. There was a better than even chance that two lunar eclipses in a row would be visible one Saros cycle (about 18 years) apart.
Considering that modern predictions are accurate to about a second (uncertainty depending mostly on the topography of the lunar limb) and the edges of totality on the order of a km or so (for the same reason), predictions based on Saros alone are
way too crude to be considered useful. In fact, identification of the Saros cycle a particular eclipse is part of is simply an interesting side note. The predictions come from the numerical model of the (heliocentric) solar system (including perturbations to the orbits of the earth and moon due to other solar system objects) and geoidal model of the earth's shape - and, in the highest-precision cases, ground topography.
Saros alone provides a reasonably good prediction that an eclipse will be visible at all from a particular place on a particular day or night. Little more.
Predicting the Eclipse Has nothing at all to do with your Heliocentric fairytale.
You wish!
From some of the footage online I would say their timing was out aswell.
Do tell! Details in the form of facts and numbers, please.
In other words, how do you know
anything about the timing of "footage online" and its veracity?
Their are many people online asking where the Moon was so I think you and your brethren are in for a surprise.
Yeah, sure. There are many people online wondering what the Kardashians are doing right now. So?
Flat earthers are not professional's so it will take them a while to edit and compile their footage.
Edited? How about some raw footage? If true, this would literally be earth-changing! Or do they have to gin something up to make it say what they want it to say? If that's it, they should have started ahead of time in order to deliver on your promise.
This is the difference between someone normal like me and you Strange Heliocentric 's.
This I why I'm giving you a count down you now have eight days left.
Eight days until a video from a high altitude weather balloon shows the Moon is not eclipsing the Sun.
So far, it's been more than ten days since you started that eight-day countdown. Still no video(s), still nothing "debunking the globe" [topic].
There are few videos out already ; I'm going to wait so I can pick.
Yeah... sure.
So far we have only your word for that. Call me a skeptic.
I notice your sticking up for your boyfriend the Badxtosser it's too late to save him I have already destroyed him and his reputation.
Why not save the comic routine and armchair psychology for the times you're looking in the mirror and spare the rest of us; it's not a good shtick. Instead, pony up some actual data to back your claims if you have any - I bet you have none? Let's see... from this post alone you've claimed you have evidence for:
"Timing is out" based on online video. Can you show how you've verified what you hope you see is accurate?
Videos from high-altitude balloons that show... something... "proving" that the moon is not what is between earth and sun?
All we get from you is bluster. No data, no facts.
Two days overdue and counting. We're waiting. I predict a very long wait.
[Edit] Punctuation.