Once again...
The moon's shadow will only be 70 miles wide on the 21.08.17 Solar Eclipse.
That's about right.
It should be at least 2400 miles wide.
Nope. The umbra should be roughly 70 miles wide where it intersects the surface of the earth. This has been explained in detail many times.
Someone else posted that the penumbra will be more than 6000 miles wide. That sounds about right. Do you know the difference between the umbra and penumbra?
Light travels in straight lines .
That's correct, but not all flat-earthers believe it. Some rely on "bendy light" to cause sunsets and other ordinary phenomena more simply and elegantly explained by a rotating spherical earth and light traveling in straight lines.
The Eclispe is caused by the moon passing between the sun and the earth.
The Sun has to be directly behind the Moon and the Earth has to be directly in front of the Moon.
Yes, but that second sentence is simply a less-clear restatement of the first.
An object shadow will follow the object when the light source is directly behind it.
Sure does. Remember this fact.
You are now claiming the Moon moves in the opposite direction to what is observed
No one is claiming that. The moon moves from west to east with respect to the sun. Because of this, it moves across the sky a little more slowly than the sun.
this would be the only possible way that the Moon's shadow can move west to East when the light source which is the Sun is directly behind it.
The moon moves from west to east with respect to the sun. Because, as you just noted, "an object shadow will follow the object when the light source is directly behind it", the moon's shadow crossing the earth also moves from west to east.
<description of earth's angular speed of rotation, which is not an issue>
You are fooling no one with your heliocentric nonsense model.
Nope. No foolin' at all. Just the facts.
It is impossible for the path of the solar eclipse to move in completely the opposite direction to the moon.
This is correct.
The moon rises in the East and sets in th[e] west.
The Solar Eclipse starts in the west and finishes if the East.
Both of those statements are right. The first occurs because the earth rotates from west to east. The second because the moon crosses in front of the sun from west to east, and the linear velocity of the shadow is roughly 2000 miles/hr from west to east (same direction as the moon is traveling) while points on the surface are rotating from west to east no faster than about 1000 miles/hr.
The Earth's angular velocity which Is one rotation every 24 hrs is 27 times faster than the Moon's velocity.
This is why the moon allegedly rises in the east and sets in the west.
Allegedly? You haven't noticed this for yourself?
Since the moon moves about 1/27 of its orbit in a day, in the same time the earth makes a complete rotation, it takes about 1/27 of a day longer (about 50 minutes) between meridian transits of the moon than meridian transits of the sun. This is well known and easy to see for yourself; note when the moon rises one evening, then see if it rises about 50 minutes later each successive evening.
If the Moon's [angular] velocity was greater than the angular velocity of the earth the Moon would rise in the West and set in the East it would also have to orbit the earth more than once every 24 hours to achieve this.
True, as corrected. I suspect this is where your argument is going off the rails, though. You insist on comparing the moon's tangential velocity (distance per unit time) with earth's angular velocity (change of angle per unit time). These are different types of quantities and cannot be compared. Are you doing this intentionally to mislead people, or are you just confused?
Here is a description of a solar eclipse on your model.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_eclipse
It clearly says the eclipse is caused when the moon passes in front of the sun.
The moon takes 27 days to orbit the earth.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbit_of_the_Moon
On your model the Sun is stationary regarding it's position to the earth and the moon
.http://kidseclipse.com/sun-earth-moon-move/
I choose this link so you Stupid and gullable Heliocentric's can try to understand how and why the upcoming Solar Eclipse is impossible on your model.
Very thoughtful of you, but it's not working well, even after pausing Ghostery (tracker blocker) and enabling flash. It has lots of broken links, too.
It is impossible for an objects shadow to move in the opposite direction to the said object when the light source is stationary.
Yes, you already said that. As far as I know, no one disagrees. Maybe some of the flat earthers disagree; there's no telling what some of them will believe.
The only way this would be possible on your model would be if the Sun was moving millions of miles in relation to the earth and did not maintain it's alleged position in the centre of the solar system.
<irrelevant link>
Nope. All it takes is for the moon to be orbit in the same direction as the earth is rotating, but more slowly.
So I will tell you again it is impossible for the Moon to cast a shadow on the Earth that is 24 times smaller than itself.
So I will tell you again it is impossible for the Solar Eclipse to move across the Earth west to East which is the opposite direction to the moon on your Heliocentric model.
So you think repeating something wrong often enough will make it right? It doesn't work that way, and only makes your posts tiresome.
Your Heliocentric model does not match reality as such your Heliocentric model is false.
Nope. The heliocentric model of the solar system matches reality quite well. It's your strawman argument that is false.
<links to youtube videos>
The readers will make their own minds up .
Perhaps. That's why someone always bothers to give rational replies to your incorrect ideas.