As for your 15 mile high sun and 25 mile high stars, you are one of a kindThen, you be the first REtard to explain the acceleration of the rate of axial precession as it applies to the Earth - Sirius distance:
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg1795032#msg1795032Basic information the subject:
The greatest American mathematician of the 19th century, Simon Newcomb, discovered that the axial precession of the Earth is accelerating.
Simon Newcomb included a “constant” in his precession formula to get it to match the increasing rate of precession that was observed leading up to his era.
The “constant” amount was .000222 arc seconds per year.
In 1900 the precession rate was 50.2564 (USNO).
In 2000 the precession rate was 50.290966 (AA).
This shows us the precession rate has increased over the past 100 years by .0346 for an average of .000346” per/year. Comparing this to Newcomb’s 0.000222” figure, we can see the actual rate of change has not simply increased at a “constant” rate – it has increased at an “exponential” rate.
This, by itself, is enough to shatter to pieces Newtonian mechanics:
The mass of the Sun/Moon/planets has not increased (we all know that the mass of the Sun is actually constantly decreasing).
The orbital distances are the same (and the Moon is constantly receding from the Earth).
Precession has nothing to do with the law of attractive gravitation.
Then you, the REtard, have a huge problem on your hands.
HOW or WHY does Sirius keep up so precisely with the exponentially increasing rate of precession?
How can Sirius' proper motion stay synched up so precisely with precession, when the rate of precession itself is changing?
If any local force in here the "heliocentrical" solar system drove up the rate of precession, it would NOT also drive up the proper motion of Sirius across the sky. In the official theory of astrophysics, Sirius is 8.6 LIGHT YEARS from Earth.
THAT IS 81 TRILLION KILOMETERS.
And yet it keeps up precisely with the exponential increase of the rate of precession.
Dr. Jad Buchwald (Caltech):
Sirius remains about the same distance from the equinoxes—and so from the solstices— throughout these many centuries, despite precession.
".... despite precession, Sirius and the solstice must remain about the same distance in time from one another during most of Egyptian history."
It is recognized that from the beginning of the empire and during the entire dynastic period the rising of Sirius with the Sun always occurred around the time of the Summer solstice.
The implication of this astronomical fact is best explained by Jed Z. Buchwald, a distinguished Professor of History and Science, in his paper “Egyptian Stars under Paris Skies” (Caltech, Engineering & Science No. 4, 2003), where he discusses the meaning of the Zodiac that has been engraved in the ceiling of the temple of Dendera in Egypt:
“The solstice is, after all, extraordinarily hard to pin-point by observation, and in any case it was known from Greek texts that the Egyptians were particularly concerned with the heliacal rising of the brightest star in the sky, Sirius—that is, with the night when Sirius first appears, just before dawn. In Egyptian prehistory this event certainly preceded the annual flooding of the Nile, which was of obvious agricultural importance. Would not precession have moved Sirius along with the zodiacal stars, eventually decoupling its heliacal rising from the solstice, and so from the annual inundation? We know today that the inundation occurs after the June beginning of the rainy season in Ethiopia, where the Blue Nile rises. And yet Sirius’ heliacal rising remained a central marker of the year throughout Egyptian history.” (p 25)
".... despite precession, Sirius and the solstice must remain about the same distance in time from one another during most of Egyptian history. Indeed they do, though it’s doubtful that Burckhardt and Coraboeuf had thought it through. Because of Sirius’ position, and the latitudes at which the Egyptians observed the sky, both Sirius’ heliacal rising and the summer solstice remained nearly the same number of days apart throughout Egyptian history even though the zodiac moves slowly around the ecliptic." (pp 29)
Buchwald, who produced a revealing diagram on the ‘Heliacal Risings of Sirius’ in relation to the vernal points (for the period of 2900 BCE to 2941 CE at intervals of 1460 years) using TheSky software, makes it very clear that
"Sirius remains about the same distance from the equinoxes - and so from the solstices - throughout these many centuries, despite precession".
Unless you can explain this paradox, you should shut the fuck up, and accept that the distance from Earth is Sirius is much smaller than we have been led to believe.
The black sun and shadow moon pass through the dome? Only a high school dropout like yourself could have made such an inference.
I never said anything of the kind.
On the contrary.
Each and every heavenly body orbits OUTSIDE the first dome.
Here is the basic proof that the Moon cannot and does not cause the solar eclipse: the Allais effect.
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg760382#msg760382Your scientific reach is way beyond your grasp, you dullard.