Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!

In the old day, when flying was new, it must have been very hard for the pilot to dip the airplane every 2 minutes to keep it level on a spherical earth. A trip of 10 hours would require 300 dips and no time for the pilot to get a coffee and talk to the passengers.
But in the airlines commercials they had the pilot talking to the passengers. Kinda makes you want to think about everything

Quote from: InFlatEarth on July 24, 2017, 11:08:18 AM

In the old day, when flying was new, it must have been very hard for the pilot to dip the airplane every 2 minutes to keep it level on a spherical earth. A trip of 10 hours would require 300 dips and no time for the pilot to get a coffee and talk to the passengers.
But in the airlines commercials they had the pilot talking to the passengers. Kinda makes you want to think about everything

Jesus Christ you guys and this false nose dip.  Do pilots have to keep turning the plane to the left when they fly east on a flat earth model?

And you would not trust a system that was forced to auto-correct its self every minute, in order for the airplane not to crash.

A gyroscopic AI has an erection mechanism, which continuously corrects the AI to be upright based on the local level, or downward acceleration vector. The correction rate is generally 3-5 degrees per minute. The way that the AI corrects itself is a system of pendulous vanes. When the gyro is not upright relative to the local level, centrifugal force pushes open vanes on the gyro's case. Air escapes through the uncovered holes, applying a force to the case, and correcting for precession.

In the old day, when flying was new, it must have been very hard for the pilot to dip the airplane every 2 minutes to keep it level on a spherical earth. A trip of 10 hours would require 300 dips and no time for the pilot to get a coffee and talk to the passengers.
But in the airlines commercials they had the pilot talking to the passengers. Kinda makes you want to think about everything

Quote from: InFlatEarth on July 24, 2017, 11:53:51 AM

But the bible also talks about the four angles that hold the 4 winds. This was BC time and the japans discovered the jet streams during WWII and their are 4 of them.

So fresh air could come inside the dome.

Come in from where?  Still doesn't address the fact the pressure would be equalized if there was a dome.  It is not.

The time occupied by the moon in returning to the same star is called the time of her sidereal revolution. At the beginning of this century it amounted to 27.32 mean solar days. Its value is not the same in every century. From the time of the most ancient observations until the present day, we find that the sidereal revolution has been gradually becoming shorter and shorter. Will this acceleration always continue? This is a question which observation is incapable of deciding.

Popular Astronomy by Francois Arago 1858 - Page 235

So far, I have asked from the Heliocentric priest to show me three mathematical models that defends the Heliocentric hypothesis, the first was a Free Body Diagram of the forces that keep the plane synchronized with the rotating Earth, the second one which I asked for a Convection Heat Transfer model of a radiating rotating Sphere with the thermal and velocity boundary layers in order for them to defend their hypothesis that the air pressure keeps the airplane in sync with the Earth's spin and now a model on a Heliocentric Model that explains why and how the Moon accelerates.

All I got in return was a bunch of essays and no math.

If a wanted to read a bunch of essays , I would go to a literature forum instead.

When somebody questions you on real scientific, all you know what to do is to right essays...

Quote from: InFlatEarth on July 25, 2017, 01:26:41 AM

So far, I have asked from the Heliocentric priest to show me three mathematical models that defends the Heliocentric hypothesis, the first was a Free Body Diagram of the forces that keep the plane synchronized with the rotating Earth, the second one which I asked for a Convection Heat Transfer model of a radiating rotating Sphere with the thermal and velocity boundary layers in order for them to defend their hypothesis that the air pressure keeps the airplane in sync with the Earth's spin and now a model on a Heliocentric Model that explains why and how the Moon accelerates.

All I got in return was a bunch of essays and no math.

If a wanted to read a bunch of essays , I would go to a literature forum instead.

When somebody questions you on real scientific, all you know what to do is to right essays...

Blah blah, you're just passing the buck - what is absent here is you providing anything to support your claim "spherical earth is disproved once and for all".

Quote from: kennykirklan on July 25, 2017, 01:44:53 AM

Quote from: InFlatEarth on July 25, 2017, 01:26:41 AM

So far, I have asked from the Heliocentric priest to show me three mathematical models that defends the Heliocentric hypothesis, the first was a Free Body Diagram of the forces that keep the plane synchronized with the rotating Earth, the second one which I asked for a Convection Heat Transfer model of a radiating rotating Sphere with the thermal and velocity boundary layers in order for them to defend their hypothesis that the air pressure keeps the airplane in sync with the Earth's spin and now a model on a Heliocentric Model that explains why and how the Moon accelerates.

All I got in return was a bunch of essays and no math.

If a wanted to read a bunch of essays , I would go to a literature forum instead.

When somebody questions you on real scientific, all you know what to do is to right essays...

Blah blah, you're just passing the buck - what is absent here is you providing anything to support your claim "spherical earth is disproved once and for all".

I have and asked for math and all you do, is to write essays, no math because your "science" is full of it!!!

Put up or shut up

So far, I have asked from the Heliocentric priest to show me three mathematical models that defends the Heliocentric hypothesis, the first was a Free Body Diagram of the forces that keep the plane synchronized with the rotating Earth, the second one which I asked for a Convection Heat Transfer model of a radiating rotating Sphere with the thermal and velocity boundary layers in order for them to defend their hypothesis that the air pressure keeps the airplane in sync with the Earth's spin and now a model on a Heliocentric Model that explains why and how the Moon accelerates.

All I got in return was a bunch of essays and no math.

If a wanted to read a bunch of essays , I would go to a literature forum instead.

When somebody questions you on real scientific, all you know what to do is to right essays...

So far, I have asked from the Heliocentric priest to show me three mathematical models that defends the Heliocentric hypothesis, the first was a Free Body Diagram of the forces that keep the plane synchronized with the rotating Earth, the second one which I asked for a Convection Heat Transfer model of a radiating rotating Sphere with the thermal and velocity boundary layers in order for them to defend their hypothesis that the air pressure keeps the airplane in sync with the Earth's spin and now a model on a Heliocentric Model that explains why and how the Moon accelerates.

When somebody questions you on real scientific, all you know what to do is to right essays...

Try this math for size:

Have you heard of leap year, every 4 years we add a date to the calendar (February 29).

There is also something called leap second.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second

Since this system of correction was implemented in 1972, 27 leap seconds have been inserted, the most recent on December 31, 2016 at 23:59:60 UTC

So the rate that the leap second is added is

27 seconds / 44 years = 0.613636364 seconds/year
.

What does that actually means?

Last year the earth needed 0.614 seconds to complete it’s revolution.

Than in turn means that last year was spinning faster than this year.

Let extrapolate the math at this rate:




We see that in the bible timeline, the earth rotation is very close to our about 23 hours in a day, but at 140,800 years, the earth spins at 60 RPM, that is 60 revolutions per minute.

At 1 million years ago, the earth rotated at a rate of about 480 RPM
At 100 million years ago, the earth rotated at a rate of 42,613.6 RPM

But let me guess, gravity was much stronger back them and kept everything in place…

Busted!!!

Yawn

Quote

Yawn

you go back to sleep in your heliocentric fair-tail. The big bad Flat Earth will just vanish when you wake up....

Quote from: InFlatEarth on July 25, 2017, 06:51:27 AM

Quote

Yawn

you go back to sleep in your heliocentric fair-tail. The big bad Flat Earth will just vanish when you wake up....

Flat earth is your handicap not mine - I'm just here for the giggles.

Try this math for size:

Quote from: kennykirklan on July 25, 2017, 09:47:56 AM

Quote from: InFlatEarth on July 25, 2017, 06:51:27 AM

Quote

Yawn

you go back to sleep in your heliocentric fair-tail. The big bad Flat Earth will just vanish when you wake up....

Flat earth is your handicap not mine - I'm just here for the giggles.

Try this math for size:

Have you heard of leap year, every 4 years we add a date to the calendar (February 29).

There is also something called leap second.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second

Since this system of correction was implemented in 1972, 27 leap seconds have been inserted, the most recent on December 31, 2016 at 23:59:60 UTC

So the rate that the leap second is added is

27 seconds / 44 years = 0.613636364 seconds/year
.

What does that actually means?

Last year the earth needed 0.614 seconds to complete it’s revolution.

Than in turn means that last year was spinning faster than this year.

Let extrapolate the math at this rate:




We see that in the bible timeline, the earth rotation is very close to our about 23 hours in a day, but at 140,800 years, the earth spins at 60 RPM, that is 60 revolutions per minute.

At 1 million years ago, the earth rotated at a rate of about 480 RPM
At 100 million years ago, the earth rotated at a rate of 42,613.6 RPM

But let me guess, gravity was much stronger back them and kept everything in place…

Busted!!!

Quote from: InFlatEarth on July 25, 2017, 09:52:23 AM

Quote from: kennykirklan on July 25, 2017, 09:47:56 AM

Quote from: InFlatEarth on July 25, 2017, 06:51:27 AM

Quote

Yawn

you go back to sleep in your heliocentric fair-tail. The big bad Flat Earth will just vanish when you wake up....

Flat earth is your handicap not mine - I'm just here for the giggles.

Even the band Eurythnmics in 1983 got wind of how fake NASA is
Look at what she is pointing out when see sings at time 0:012
"Sweet dreams are made of these"

Look again, I was talking about the fake moon rockets...

Look again, I was talking about the fake moon rockets...

On the screen she pointed to, when she was pointing to it, it was an image of Earth.

Draw me the FBD of the airplane landing with all forces or else accept the fact that the Earth is stationary.

This is physics 101

The earth does not move under a hovering helicopter because the earth is stationary!!!

How come a train moving at constant speed doesn't affect me when I jump?
How come a moving zero-g plane (meant to simulate zero-g) doesn't affect the floating passengers? The plane is moving hundreds of miles per hour(!!!). By your logic they occupants should be slammed to the back of the plane while floating.
How come a rotating earth doesn't affect flying planes?
Hint: the answer is the same for all 3.

Quote from: Badxtoss on July 24, 2017, 11:57:22 AM

Quote from: InFlatEarth on July 24, 2017, 11:53:51 AM

But the bible also talks about the four angles that hold the 4 winds. This was BC time and the japans discovered the jet streams during WWII and their are 4 of them.

So fresh air could come inside the dome.

Come in from where?  Still doesn't address the fact the pressure would be equalized if there was a dome.  It is not.

From the waters above the firmament.

But I have, the four angles open up the "windows" to let fresh air in and to create a pressure gradient.


But you have a more serious problem know on your hands, can you please provide a mathematical model to explain why the Moon Accelerates?

Quote

The time occupied by the moon in returning to the same star is called the time of her sidereal revolution. At the beginning of this century it amounted to 27.32 mean solar days. Its value is not the same in every century. From the time of the most ancient observations until the present day, we find that the sidereal revolution has been gradually becoming shorter and shorter. Will this acceleration always continue? This is a question which observation is incapable of deciding.

Popular Astronomy by Francois Arago 1858 - Page 235

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=bNAUAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA257&dq=Popular+astronomy+volume+2&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjUsPij6e7TAhWELcAKHQfdDo4Q6AEIJzAA#v=onepage&q=Popular%20astronomy%20volume%202&f=false

Quote from: JackBlack on July 26, 2017, 03:28:26 AM

On the screen she pointed to, when she was pointing to it, it was an image of Earth.

This image, to be precise:

http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/images/print/AS11/36/5353.jpg

Here it is in a newspaper published just after they landed back on Earth, my own copy.



The weather patterns in it match those that can be found on 3 weather satellites for the time it was taken, and the view could only be from waaaay out in cislunar space. Lovely and spherical it is.