Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!

  • 492 Replies
  • 103889 Views
?

totallackey

  • 4526
  • +0/-0
Re: Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!
« Reply #180 on: July 23, 2017, 02:52:24 PM »
Plus the tennis ball has no gravity. It's utter nonsense what these people come up with - I wonder how they function in day to day life.
You do of course realize your own science to which you appeal states you are a - - - - - - -liar when you make the claim the tennis ball has no gravity.

That's okay though.

Knew you were a liar coming in...

you'll make yourself ill with all that anger
I cleaned up the profanity adjective in the response.

You are still left with choosing between your claim (no gravity) and that of science (does have gravity).

I suggest you keep on with no gravity as it will get you closer to the truth...

?

totallackey

  • 4526
  • +0/-0
Re: Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!
« Reply #181 on: July 23, 2017, 02:56:47 PM »
Assuming the weight of a water drop to be 0.05 gramms...
Do not assume anything...what is the fucking weight of a water drop...it weighs what it weighs...
the rotational force upon it...
Rotational force upon what?
...at the equator of the Earth with the angular velocity of 0.00007292115 rad/s (or rotational velocity of 465 m/s) would be as much as 0.000001789 N. To break it down to a tennis ball with the diameter of roughly 6.7 cm and the same force applied to the water drop we get 0.8389 rad/s, 0.0281 m/s, 0.1335 rev/s or just a bit over 8 rev/min.
Dunno about you guys but in my book that's not even remotely sufficient to throw the water drop off the tennis ball.  ???
Oh...I see...you are now trying to fucking claim a scaled down representation of the amount of water on the Earth as to a tennis ball is one fucking drop of water is to a tennis ball as the oceans/lakes/rivers, etc., is to the Earth...

Are you dense?

71 percent of the tennis ball would be covered by water at the same relative depth.

One fucking drop of water will not cut the mustard, you hayseed.

0.05 gramms was a rough estimation, see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drop_(unit)

And it doesn't really matter if I calculated that example for one drop of water only, it would work the same way if the tennis ball was actually covered with water drops by 71 percent of it's surface or even a 100 percent.
And yes, any similar effect of gravity isn't even considered in my calculations, so the effective revolution speed would be even much higher to actually draw the water drops off the tennis ball.
Of course, no way to actually represent this in real time or life...

Real easy to make up shit on the one hand when on the other hand you can say, "Of course I cannot show it to you! JUST BELIEVE!"

*

Sentinel

  • 575
  • +0/-0
  • Open your eyes...
Re: Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!
« Reply #182 on: July 23, 2017, 03:04:35 PM »
Assuming the weight of a water drop to be 0.05 gramms...
Do not assume anything...what is the fucking weight of a water drop...it weighs what it weighs...
the rotational force upon it...
Rotational force upon what?
...at the equator of the Earth with the angular velocity of 0.00007292115 rad/s (or rotational velocity of 465 m/s) would be as much as 0.000001789 N. To break it down to a tennis ball with the diameter of roughly 6.7 cm and the same force applied to the water drop we get 0.8389 rad/s, 0.0281 m/s, 0.1335 rev/s or just a bit over 8 rev/min.
Dunno about you guys but in my book that's not even remotely sufficient to throw the water drop off the tennis ball.  ???
Oh...I see...you are now trying to fucking claim a scaled down representation of the amount of water on the Earth as to a tennis ball is one fucking drop of water is to a tennis ball as the oceans/lakes/rivers, etc., is to the Earth...

Are you dense?

71 percent of the tennis ball would be covered by water at the same relative depth.

One fucking drop of water will not cut the mustard, you hayseed.

0.05 gramms was a rough estimation, see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drop_(unit)

And it doesn't really matter if I calculated that example for one drop of water only, it would work the same way if the tennis ball was actually covered with water drops by 71 percent of it's surface or even a 100 percent.
And yes, any similar effect of gravity isn't even considered in my calculations, so the effective revolution speed would be even much higher to actually draw the water drops off the tennis ball.
Of course, no way to actually represent this in real time or life...

Real easy to make up shit on the one hand when on the other hand you can say, "Of course I cannot show it to you! JUST BELIEVE!"

Since you flat Earthers came up with the notion about a tennis ball and the faulty believe water would be thrown off a tennis ball when it's spinning at the same speed as the Earth in SHM I provided you with a calculation why that isn't true.
Dunno what else to say here, take it however you want.  ???
"No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible."

Stanislaw Jerzy Lec

?

kennykirklan

  • 397
  • +0/-0
Re: Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!
« Reply #183 on: July 23, 2017, 03:05:15 PM »
Plus the tennis ball has no gravity. It's utter nonsense what these people come up with - I wonder how they function in day to day life.
You do of course realize your own science to which you appeal states you are a - - - - - - -liar when you make the claim the tennis ball has no gravity.

That's okay though.

Knew you were a liar coming in...

you'll make yourself ill with all that anger
I cleaned up the profanity adjective in the response.

You are still left with choosing between your claim (no gravity) and that of science (does have gravity).

I suggest you keep on with no gravity as it will get you closer to the truth...

I'm a low hours private pilot - but my training and experience to date has shown there can only be a round earth. Conversely there is a highly experienced commercial pilot on this thread saying the earth is round. All the other genuine pilots that have ever posted on this forum say the earth is round. These are all individuals with 1000s of hours of training and experience based on a round earth. A bunch of poorly educated souls watch a couple of spurious YouTube videos and they begin to labour under the misapprehension they have advanced knowledge? Mental.

You can swear and rant all you want - as long as you argue the ridiculous case for a flat earth you will always come across as the loser. You've backed the wrong horse. Keep swearing - its all you've got.

?

totallackey

  • 4526
  • +0/-0
Re: Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!
« Reply #184 on: July 23, 2017, 03:10:57 PM »
Assuming the weight of a water drop to be 0.05 gramms...
Do not assume anything...what is the fucking weight of a water drop...it weighs what it weighs...
the rotational force upon it...
Rotational force upon what?
...at the equator of the Earth with the angular velocity of 0.00007292115 rad/s (or rotational velocity of 465 m/s) would be as much as 0.000001789 N. To break it down to a tennis ball with the diameter of roughly 6.7 cm and the same force applied to the water drop we get 0.8389 rad/s, 0.0281 m/s, 0.1335 rev/s or just a bit over 8 rev/min.
Dunno about you guys but in my book that's not even remotely sufficient to throw the water drop off the tennis ball.  ???
Oh...I see...you are now trying to fucking claim a scaled down representation of the amount of water on the Earth as to a tennis ball is one fucking drop of water is to a tennis ball as the oceans/lakes/rivers, etc., is to the Earth...

Are you dense?

71 percent of the tennis ball would be covered by water at the same relative depth.

One fucking drop of water will not cut the mustard, you hayseed.

0.05 gramms was a rough estimation, see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drop_(unit)

And it doesn't really matter if I calculated that example for one drop of water only, it would work the same way if the tennis ball was actually covered with water drops by 71 percent of it's surface or even a 100 percent.
And yes, any similar effect of gravity isn't even considered in my calculations, so the effective revolution speed would be even much higher to actually draw the water drops off the tennis ball.
Of course, no way to actually represent this in real time or life...

Real easy to make up shit on the one hand when on the other hand you can say, "Of course I cannot show it to you! JUST BELIEVE!"

Since you flat Earthers came up with the notion about a tennis ball and the faulty believe water would be thrown off a tennis ball when it's spinning at the same speed as the Earth in SHM I provided you with a calculation why that isn't true.
Dunno what else to say here, take it however you want.  ???
That calculation is not based on real life application or applied science as demonstrated through repeatable example and it never can be and you know it and all of mankind knows it, so that calculation might as well be pulled from your rectal orifice.

Have a nice day.

?

totallackey

  • 4526
  • +0/-0
Re: Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!
« Reply #185 on: July 23, 2017, 03:14:02 PM »
I'm a low hours private pilot - but my training and experience to date has shown there can only be a round earth. Conversely there is a highly experienced commercial pilot on this thread saying the earth is round. All the other genuine pilots that have ever posted on this forum say the earth is round. These are all individuals with 1000s of hours of training and experience based on a round earth. A bunch of poorly educated souls watch a couple of spurious YouTube videos and they begin to labour under the misapprehension they have advanced knowledge? Mental.

You can swear and rant all you want - as long as you argue the ridiculous case for a flat earth you will always come across as the loser. You've backed the wrong horse. Keep swearing - its all you've got.
Nothing in your pilot training or anything else in your life experience shows you there can only be a round earth.

Keep telling lies.

It is what liars do.

Have a nice day, liar.

Meanwhile, this question remains:
Again, not making any sense... You were talking about a ball in a plane, that would get back to your hand as long as the plane stayed on its course. The same applies for Earth. Of course if the plane moves abruptly, the ball will not get back in your hand, and then the comparison with Earth ends because it does not move abruptly.

Also, this 3D video of the solar system sporting a vortex has been flagged as wrong many times.

The planets do not drag behind the sun. They sometimes pass in front of it (relatively to its own motion around the center of the galaxy). That is because the solar system (direction of the ecliptic) makes an angle with the direction of the Sun. So planets are sometimes in front of the Sun, sometimes behind.

If all you want to remember is that planets in orbit make fancy helicoids when their star moves, then yes that is true.

But in reality it looks more like this :
http://i.imgur.com/rLr8Swh.mp4

Join the planets with a line to draw the ecliptic, you can see the angle I was talking about.
Hey, finally a RE-tard that claims to have the CGI of the Solar System in motion through the Universe!!!

Do you have the math that was utilized to render this CGI and can you verify it is legitimate, sourcing Keplar, et.al.?
« Last Edit: July 23, 2017, 03:17:01 PM by totallackey »

?

kennykirklan

  • 397
  • +0/-0
Re: Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!
« Reply #186 on: July 23, 2017, 03:23:31 PM »
I'm a low hours private pilot - but my training and experience to date has shown there can only be a round earth. Conversely there is a highly experienced commercial pilot on this thread saying the earth is round. All the other genuine pilots that have ever posted on this forum say the earth is round. These are all individuals with 1000s of hours of training and experience based on a round earth. A bunch of poorly educated souls watch a couple of spurious YouTube videos and they begin to labour under the misapprehension they have advanced knowledge? Mental.

You can swear and rant all you want - as long as you argue the ridiculous case for a flat earth you will always come across as the loser. You've backed the wrong horse. Keep swearing - its all you've got.
Nothing in your pilot training or anything else in your life experience shows you there can only be a round earth.

Keep telling lies.

It is what liars do.

Have a nice day, liar.


Instruments, navigation, meteorology, planning all use round earth. You probably download illegally - get hold of the pilot training manuals and look for yourself.

That's all you Flat Earthers have. When you get done, you just call "liar" or "conspiracy". I've not heard one round earth argument that's ever needed to resort to that. Speaks volumes.

?

totallackey

  • 4526
  • +0/-0
Re: Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!
« Reply #187 on: July 23, 2017, 03:29:46 PM »
I'm a low hours private pilot - but my training and experience to date has shown there can only be a round earth. Conversely there is a highly experienced commercial pilot on this thread saying the earth is round. All the other genuine pilots that have ever posted on this forum say the earth is round. These are all individuals with 1000s of hours of training and experience based on a round earth. A bunch of poorly educated souls watch a couple of spurious YouTube videos and they begin to labour under the misapprehension they have advanced knowledge? Mental.

You can swear and rant all you want - as long as you argue the ridiculous case for a flat earth you will always come across as the loser. You've backed the wrong horse. Keep swearing - its all you've got.
Nothing in your pilot training or anything else in your life experience shows you there can only be a round earth.

Keep telling lies.

It is what liars do.

Have a nice day, liar.


Instruments, navigation, meteorology, planning all use round earth. You probably download illegally - get hold of the pilot training manuals and look for yourself.

That's all you Flat Earthers have. When you get done, you just call "liar" or "conspiracy". I've not heard one round earth argument that's ever needed to resort to that. Speaks volumes.
You were told they utilize round earth.

Therefore, you believe it.

Nothing you have written indicates to me you have the intelligence or wherewithal to investigate that proposition to a finer degree in order to actually confirm what you were told.

If you lie, then I will call you out on it.

You still have not addressed your hypocritical stance of a tennis ball having no gravity and your high priests of science claiming it does.

Choose your side now.
« Last Edit: July 23, 2017, 03:32:56 PM by totallackey »

?

kennykirklan

  • 397
  • +0/-0
Re: Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!
« Reply #188 on: July 23, 2017, 03:33:25 PM »
I'm a low hours private pilot - but my training and experience to date has shown there can only be a round earth. Conversely there is a highly experienced commercial pilot on this thread saying the earth is round. All the other genuine pilots that have ever posted on this forum say the earth is round. These are all individuals with 1000s of hours of training and experience based on a round earth. A bunch of poorly educated souls watch a couple of spurious YouTube videos and they begin to labour under the misapprehension they have advanced knowledge? Mental.

You can swear and rant all you want - as long as you argue the ridiculous case for a flat earth you will always come across as the loser. You've backed the wrong horse. Keep swearing - its all you've got.
Nothing in your pilot training or anything else in your life experience shows you there can only be a round earth.

Keep telling lies.

It is what liars do.

Have a nice day, liar.


Instruments, navigation, meteorology, planning all use round earth. You probably download illegally - get hold of the pilot training manuals and look for yourself.

That's all you Flat Earthers have. When you get done, you just call "liar" or "conspiracy". I've not heard one round earth argument that's ever needed to resort to that. Speaks volumes.
If you lie, then I will call you out on it.

You still have not addressed your hypocritical stance of a tennis ball having no gravity and your high priests of science claiming it does.

Choose your side now.

Like you, I know the earth is round. But maybe one day I'll play the game and pretend otherwise - see if I can do any better than you.

?

totallackey

  • 4526
  • +0/-0
Re: Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!
« Reply #189 on: July 23, 2017, 03:38:12 PM »
Like you, I know the earth is round. But maybe one day I'll play the game and pretend otherwise - see if I can do any better than you.
I do not know the Earth is round or flat.

I happen to believe the Earth is flat.

The reason I believe it is flat is because everywhere I have been on this Earth it has always appeared flat to me.

I choose to view the evidence of my own eyes.

Now, care to address your hypocritical and opposing stance you have to your priests of RE-tardness?

*

Sentinel

  • 575
  • +0/-0
  • Open your eyes...
Re: Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!
« Reply #190 on: July 23, 2017, 03:43:31 PM »
Assuming the weight of a water drop to be 0.05 gramms...
Do not assume anything...what is the fucking weight of a water drop...it weighs what it weighs...
the rotational force upon it...
Rotational force upon what?
...at the equator of the Earth with the angular velocity of 0.00007292115 rad/s (or rotational velocity of 465 m/s) would be as much as 0.000001789 N. To break it down to a tennis ball with the diameter of roughly 6.7 cm and the same force applied to the water drop we get 0.8389 rad/s, 0.0281 m/s, 0.1335 rev/s or just a bit over 8 rev/min.
Dunno about you guys but in my book that's not even remotely sufficient to throw the water drop off the tennis ball.  ???
Oh...I see...you are now trying to fucking claim a scaled down representation of the amount of water on the Earth as to a tennis ball is one fucking drop of water is to a tennis ball as the oceans/lakes/rivers, etc., is to the Earth...

Are you dense?

71 percent of the tennis ball would be covered by water at the same relative depth.

One fucking drop of water will not cut the mustard, you hayseed.

0.05 gramms was a rough estimation, see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drop_(unit)

And it doesn't really matter if I calculated that example for one drop of water only, it would work the same way if the tennis ball was actually covered with water drops by 71 percent of it's surface or even a 100 percent.
And yes, any similar effect of gravity isn't even considered in my calculations, so the effective revolution speed would be even much higher to actually draw the water drops off the tennis ball.
Of course, no way to actually represent this in real time or life...

Real easy to make up shit on the one hand when on the other hand you can say, "Of course I cannot show it to you! JUST BELIEVE!"

Since you flat Earthers came up with the notion about a tennis ball and the faulty believe water would be thrown off a tennis ball when it's spinning at the same speed as the Earth in SHM I provided you with a calculation why that isn't true.
Dunno what else to say here, take it however you want.  ???
That calculation is not based on real life application or applied science as demonstrated through repeatable example and it never can be and you know it and all of mankind knows it, so that calculation might as well be pulled from your rectal orifice.

Have a nice day.

Go and calculate it yourself then, it's def no rocket science.
And as if the FE mockery about a tennis ball was based on anything remotely realistic in the first place, so stop whining about the mockery being ridiculed by the numbers.  ;)
"No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible."

Stanislaw Jerzy Lec

?

kennykirklan

  • 397
  • +0/-0
Re: Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!
« Reply #191 on: July 23, 2017, 03:47:26 PM »
Like you, I know the earth is round. But maybe one day I'll play the game and pretend otherwise - see if I can do any better than you.
I do not know the Earth is round or flat.

I happen to believe the Earth is flat.

The reason I believe it is flat is because everywhere I have been on this Earth it has always appeared flat to me.

I choose to view the evidence of my own eyes.

Now, care to address your hypocritical and opposing stance you have to your priests of RE-tardness?

So bacteria doesn't exist? You can't see it with your own eyes so I guess it's not there?

*

rabinoz

  • 26528
  • +0/-0
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!
« Reply #192 on: July 23, 2017, 03:48:15 PM »
Plus the tennis ball has no gravity. It's utter nonsense what these people come up with - I wonder how they function in day to day life.
You do of course realize your own science to which you appeal states you are a - - - - - - -liar when you make the claim the tennis ball has no gravity.

That's okay though.

Knew you were a liar coming in...

you'll make yourself ill with all that anger
I cleaned up the profanity adjective in the response.

You are still left with choosing between your claim (no gravity) and that of science (does have gravity).

I suggest you keep on with no gravity as it will get you closer to the truth...
OK the "gravity" at the surface of a tennis ball due to its own mass is 0.00000037 N,
Would Mr Totally Scrappy care to measure that and prove it's not zero?
Did you graduate from the same Flatard Indoctrination Academy as jroa,
though seem to have done the Post Graduate Course in diverting attention away from any sensible discussion.

?

totallackey

  • 4526
  • +0/-0
Re: Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!
« Reply #193 on: July 23, 2017, 03:53:02 PM »
Assuming the weight of a water drop to be 0.05 gramms...
Do not assume anything...what is the fucking weight of a water drop...it weighs what it weighs...
the rotational force upon it...
Rotational force upon what?
...at the equator of the Earth with the angular velocity of 0.00007292115 rad/s (or rotational velocity of 465 m/s) would be as much as 0.000001789 N. To break it down to a tennis ball with the diameter of roughly 6.7 cm and the same force applied to the water drop we get 0.8389 rad/s, 0.0281 m/s, 0.1335 rev/s or just a bit over 8 rev/min.
Dunno about you guys but in my book that's not even remotely sufficient to throw the water drop off the tennis ball.  ???
Oh...I see...you are now trying to fucking claim a scaled down representation of the amount of water on the Earth as to a tennis ball is one fucking drop of water is to a tennis ball as the oceans/lakes/rivers, etc., is to the Earth...

Are you dense?

71 percent of the tennis ball would be covered by water at the same relative depth.

One fucking drop of water will not cut the mustard, you hayseed.

0.05 gramms was a rough estimation, see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drop_(unit)

And it doesn't really matter if I calculated that example for one drop of water only, it would work the same way if the tennis ball was actually covered with water drops by 71 percent of it's surface or even a 100 percent.
And yes, any similar effect of gravity isn't even considered in my calculations, so the effective revolution speed would be even much higher to actually draw the water drops off the tennis ball.
Of course, no way to actually represent this in real time or life...

Real easy to make up shit on the one hand when on the other hand you can say, "Of course I cannot show it to you! JUST BELIEVE!"

Since you flat Earthers came up with the notion about a tennis ball and the faulty believe water would be thrown off a tennis ball when it's spinning at the same speed as the Earth in SHM I provided you with a calculation why that isn't true.
Dunno what else to say here, take it however you want.  ???
That calculation is not based on real life application or applied science as demonstrated through repeatable example and it never can be and you know it and all of mankind knows it, so that calculation might as well be pulled from your rectal orifice.

Have a nice day.

Go and calculate it yourself then, it's def no rocket science.
And as if the FE mockery about a tennis ball was based on anything remotely realistic in the first place, so stop whining about the mockery being ridiculed by the numbers.  ;)
Can the math be applied to something observable AND repeatable, yes or no?

The answer = no?

Result = shove the math up your ass and STFU.

?

totallackey

  • 4526
  • +0/-0
Re: Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!
« Reply #194 on: July 23, 2017, 04:00:26 PM »
Like you, I know the earth is round. But maybe one day I'll play the game and pretend otherwise - see if I can do any better than you.
I do not know the Earth is round or flat.

I happen to believe the Earth is flat.

The reason I believe it is flat is because everywhere I have been on this Earth it has always appeared flat to me.

I choose to view the evidence of my own eyes.

Now, care to address your hypocritical and opposing stance you have to your priests of RE-tardness?

So bacteria doesn't exist? You can't see it with your own eyes so I guess it's not there?
Ah, the good ole for shit argument...

Tennis ball, Fenster, as a reminder, is the subject...

Does a tennis ball have gravity? Yes or no...

?

kennykirklan

  • 397
  • +0/-0
Re: Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!
« Reply #195 on: July 23, 2017, 04:03:47 PM »
Like you, I know the earth is round. But maybe one day I'll play the game and pretend otherwise - see if I can do any better than you.
I do not know the Earth is round or flat.

I happen to believe the Earth is flat.

The reason I believe it is flat is because everywhere I have been on this Earth it has always appeared flat to me.

I choose to view the evidence of my own eyes.

Now, care to address your hypocritical and opposing stance you have to your priests of RE-tardness?

So bacteria doesn't exist? You can't see it with your own eyes so I guess it's not there?
Ah, the good ole for shit argument...

Tennis ball, Fenster, as a reminder, is the subject...

Does a tennis ball have gravity? Yes or no...

An irrelevant amount of gravity for the purposes of any useful discussion. Is that all you could latch onto in this thread - you're a joke.

?

kennykirklan

  • 397
  • +0/-0
Re: Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!
« Reply #196 on: July 23, 2017, 04:07:25 PM »
Plus the tennis ball has no gravity. It's utter nonsense what these people come up with - I wonder how they function in day to day life.
You do of course realize your own science to which you appeal states you are a - - - - - - -liar when you make the claim the tennis ball has no gravity.

That's okay though.

Knew you were a liar coming in...

you'll make yourself ill with all that anger
I cleaned up the profanity adjective in the response.

You are still left with choosing between your claim (no gravity) and that of science (does have gravity).

I suggest you keep on with no gravity as it will get you closer to the truth...
OK the "gravity" at the surface of a tennis ball due to its own mass is 0.00000037 N,
Would Mr Totally Scrappy care to measure that and prove it's not zero?
Did you graduate from the same Flatard Indoctrination Academy as jroa,
though seem to have done the Post Graduate Course in diverting attention away from any sensible discussion.

Yep - inFlatEarth got routinely pummelled and then the commercial pilot struck the death blow. He's tag teamed with TotallyLacking who can only swear and latch onto a pedantic point about a tennis ball having gravity. Pathetic - they have no idea how much damage they are doing to their precious flat earth with such rubbish.

?

totallackey

  • 4526
  • +0/-0
Re: Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!
« Reply #197 on: July 23, 2017, 04:08:48 PM »
Like you, I know the earth is round. But maybe one day I'll play the game and pretend otherwise - see if I can do any better than you.
I do not know the Earth is round or flat.

I happen to believe the Earth is flat.

The reason I believe it is flat is because everywhere I have been on this Earth it has always appeared flat to me.

I choose to view the evidence of my own eyes.

Now, care to address your hypocritical and opposing stance you have to your priests of RE-tardness?

So bacteria doesn't exist? You can't see it with your own eyes so I guess it's not there?
Ah, the good ole for shit argument...

Tennis ball, Fenster, as a reminder, is the subject...

Does a tennis ball have gravity? Yes or no...

An irrelevant amount of gravity for the purposes of any useful discussion. Is that all you could latch onto in this thread - you're a joke.
So you admit you are a liar.

Cool.

I for one think you should have stuck with the "no gravity," response.

Would have been more accurate.

But at least you are honest in your ignorance.

*

Sentinel

  • 575
  • +0/-0
  • Open your eyes...
Re: Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!
« Reply #198 on: July 23, 2017, 04:09:53 PM »
Can the math be applied to something observable AND repeatable, yes or no?

The answer = no?

Result = shove the math up your ass and STFU.

I just scaled the rotational force upon a water drop on Earths equator down to a tennis ball, so the answer should be yes. Why would you say it's no, you think there's something wrong in my calculations?
"No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible."

Stanislaw Jerzy Lec

*

JackBlack

  • 26157
  • +51/-79
Re: Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!
« Reply #199 on: July 23, 2017, 04:10:12 PM »
If you don't understand why it is required, then don't participate in the thread, it is too advanced for you.
If you can't explain why something as useless and inapplicable why that should be required, don't assert that it is.
If you can't understand why it isn't required, perhaps this thread is too advanced for you?

Very clearly you said that you never dip the airplane.
No he didn't. He stated that he doesn't dip it down to specifically follow the curve of Earth.
That doesn't mean he never dips it down.

The altimeter does not control the dipping automatically; the pilot manually controls the level of the flight.
The autopilot can do it as well. You can also use the thrust to control the altitude.

BUT the instruments that keep you level while your flying is the gyroscope, which is nothing more than a disk that spins at very high speeds.
No, it is much more than that.
They also include a self-righting mechanism.

In the airplanes they pass compress air to have the disk spin all the times and this technology is from the early 50’s
So you even admit it is more than a simple spinning disk.
Yes, they have the disk continue to spin, but it also has vanes in it which open and close automatically based upon effective gravity resulting in it righting itself.

So since you have told us that you don’t dip the airplane and since in order for you to land your gyroscope has to be level, how does it always become perpendicular to the ground on a spherical Earth model?
What makes you think the gyroscope needs to be level to land?

What forces make it to always be sync to the ground, which will not violate basic physics…
You have already been told the answer repeatedly DRAG/air resistance.

Maybe you have been lied too…
Yes, by you, repeatedly.

Question, would the altimeter readings be the same if the earth was flat and you were flying level?
I see you appear to be backing down again like a cowardly child.
Remember you started this thread claiming to have disproven a spherical Earth.

If all you can do is show you get the same result on a spherical and flat Earth, you haven't disproven the spherical Earth.

?

totallackey

  • 4526
  • +0/-0
Re: Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!
« Reply #200 on: July 23, 2017, 04:15:50 PM »
Plus the tennis ball has no gravity. It's utter nonsense what these people come up with - I wonder how they function in day to day life.
You do of course realize your own science to which you appeal states you are a - - - - - - -liar when you make the claim the tennis ball has no gravity.

That's okay though.

Knew you were a liar coming in...

you'll make yourself ill with all that anger
I cleaned up the profanity adjective in the response.

You are still left with choosing between your claim (no gravity) and that of science (does have gravity).

I suggest you keep on with no gravity as it will get you closer to the truth...
OK the "gravity" at the surface of a tennis ball due to its own mass is 0.00000037 N,
Would Mr Totally Scrappy care to measure that and prove it's not zero?
Did you graduate from the same Flatard Indoctrination Academy as jroa,
though seem to have done the Post Graduate Course in diverting attention away from any sensible discussion.

Yep - inFlatEarth got routinely pummelled and then the commercial pilot struck the death blow. He's tag teamed with TotallyLacking who can only swear and latch onto a pedantic point about a tennis ball having gravity. Pathetic - they have no idea how much damage they are doing to their precious flat earth with such rubbish.
Rab admitted somewhere else he likes the occasional sticky gauge and reach around, so there's another tip for you.

The commercial pilot was shown to be a douche bag by making this statement: "The Earth is a big place, and what seems like insurmountable forces are actually quite weak when given the scale.  Take, for example, the FE meme of a wet spinning tennis ball, trying to estimate it moving at 1000 mph and watching the water go flying in all directions.  But that’s not an equivalent model.  The Earth rotates once per day.  So spin the tennis ball at one revolution per day, and see how much water goes flying off.  None."

False comparison and I had to call him out on it.

You then tried to lend support and got called out on your asshattery...

Go get soused with Rab and the pilot...get a nice tight circle jerk, aided by inertia and the Coriolis, and then try breathing slower as climax approaches...

?

totallackey

  • 4526
  • +0/-0
Re: Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!
« Reply #201 on: July 23, 2017, 04:18:20 PM »
Can the math be applied to something observable AND repeatable, yes or no?

The answer = no?

Result = shove the math up your ass and STFU.

I just scaled the rotational force upon a water drop on Earths equator down to a tennis ball, so the answer should be yes. Why would you say it's no, you think there's something wrong in my calculations?
Do a video of the tennis ball covered in water showing the water remaining on the surface, spinning or not spinning.

*

JackBlack

  • 26157
  • +51/-79
Re: Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!
« Reply #202 on: July 23, 2017, 04:19:20 PM »
Everyone knows that if you trying to represent the Earth at the size of the tennis ball for modeling purposes, any claimed rotational speed for the Earth would be represented as FASTER as the size of the model DECREASES.
That depends entirely upon what you are trying to model.
But thanks for admitting all those spinning the ball at 1000 mph are full of shit.

If you just want to focus on the centrifugal forces then you note that the apparent acceleration is given by a=v*omega=v^2/r=omega^2*r
So if you go from a massive Earth to a tiny tennis ball, you need to reduce the linear velocity and increase the angular velocity.

Scaling the radius by a factor of 1/1000 000  will require scaling by either 1000 or 1/1000 (depending upon which you scale).
That means the rotational speed would go from 0.25 degrees a minute up to 250 degrees per minute, still quite slow, not even a revolution per second, while the velocity drops from 1000 miles per hour to 1 mile per hour, quite slow, slowing than walking pace. But that is for a 6.4 m radius object, so still larger than a tennis ball.
Dropping it to a 6.4 cm object, (i.e. radius scaled by a factor of 1/100), you need to scale the angular velocity by 10, increasing it to 2500 degrees per minute or roughly 7 revolutions per minute or 42 degrees per second, and the linear velocity by a factor of 1/10, or dropping it to 0.1 mile per hour, 0.16 km/hr or roughly 4.4 cm/s (if my math is right).


It is nothing like the tennis ball spinning tens or hundreds of times per second.

However, if you wanted to compare that to gravity, you also need to note that the force of gravity would be reduced.
If you keep the density constant, then M=p*4/3*pi*r^3, so ag=G*p*4/3*pi*r^3/r^2, which can simplify to ag=k*r.
Notice how this is proportional to r, just like the centrifugal acceleration in the form of omega*r.
So if you wish to compare centrifugal force to gravity, you keep the density constant and simply scale R. Omega remains the same.

So if you want to compare gravity holding water to a spinning Earth overcoming the centrifugal forces, to doing the same on a tennis ball (a metal ball would be better for the density), you spin it at the same angular velocity.

*

Crutchwater

  • 2151
  • +0/-0
  • Stop Indoctrinating me!
Re: Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!
« Reply #203 on: July 23, 2017, 04:23:18 PM »
Can the math be applied to something observable AND repeatable, yes or no?

The answer = no?

Result = shove the math up your ass and STFU.


I just scaled the rotational force upon a water drop on Earths equator down to a tennis ball, so the answer should be yes. Why would you say it's no, you think there's something wrong in my calculations?
Do a video of the tennis ball covered in water showing the water remaining on the surface, spinning or not spinning.

To construct a scale model of the earth, don't you think you would need to remove the influence of earths gravity??
« Last Edit: July 23, 2017, 04:26:57 PM by Here to laugh at you »
I will always be Here To Laugh At You.

?

totallackey

  • 4526
  • +0/-0
Re: Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!
« Reply #204 on: July 23, 2017, 04:23:52 PM »
totallackey is right. If I am going to model the Earth as a spinning ball, and the ball I am using is smaller than the Earth, the spin would be faster.
Fixed that long drawn out bullshit for you.

?

kennykirklan

  • 397
  • +0/-0
Re: Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!
« Reply #205 on: July 23, 2017, 04:24:28 PM »
Plus the tennis ball has no gravity. It's utter nonsense what these people come up with - I wonder how they function in day to day life.
You do of course realize your own science to which you appeal states you are a - - - - - - -liar when you make the claim the tennis ball has no gravity.

That's okay though.

Knew you were a liar coming in...

you'll make yourself ill with all that anger
I cleaned up the profanity adjective in the response.

You are still left with choosing between your claim (no gravity) and that of science (does have gravity).

I suggest you keep on with no gravity as it will get you closer to the truth...
OK the "gravity" at the surface of a tennis ball due to its own mass is 0.00000037 N,
Would Mr Totally Scrappy care to measure that and prove it's not zero?
Did you graduate from the same Flatard Indoctrination Academy as jroa,
though seem to have done the Post Graduate Course in diverting attention away from any sensible discussion.

Yep - inFlatEarth got routinely pummelled and then the commercial pilot struck the death blow. He's tag teamed with TotallyLacking who can only swear and latch onto a pedantic point about a tennis ball having gravity. Pathetic - they have no idea how much damage they are doing to their precious flat earth with such rubbish.
Rab admitted somewhere else he likes the occasional sticky gauge and reach around, so there's another tip for you.

The commercial pilot was shown to be a douche bag by making this statement: "The Earth is a big place, and what seems like insurmountable forces are actually quite weak when given the scale.  Take, for example, the FE meme of a wet spinning tennis ball, trying to estimate it moving at 1000 mph and watching the water go flying in all directions.  But that’s not an equivalent model.  The Earth rotates once per day.  So spin the tennis ball at one revolution per day, and see how much water goes flying off.  None."

False comparison and I had to call him out on it.

You then tried to lend support and got called out on your asshattery...

Go get soused with Rab and the pilot...get a nice tight circle jerk, aided by inertia and the Coriolis, and then try breathing slower as climax approaches...

Out of everything the pilot posted, the only thing you could call out was a an extremely minor debatable technicality about a tennis ball that in no way detracted from the main topic of inFlatEarth having his ass handed to him.

The anger, the swearing, the aggressive sexual metaphors - you are coming across as somewhat disturbing in character.

?

totallackey

  • 4526
  • +0/-0
Re: Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!
« Reply #206 on: July 23, 2017, 04:26:41 PM »
Out of everything the pilot posted, the only thing you could call out was a an extremely minor debatable technicality about a tennis ball that in no way detracted from the main topic of inFlatEarth having his ass handed to him.

The anger, the swearing, the aggressive sexual metaphors - you are coming across as somewhat disturbing in character.
Of course, outright and proven liars such as yourself are perfectly normal in character.

GFY.

And there has been nothing the pilot nor anyone else here has posted, demonstrating that InFlatEarth has had his ass "handed," to him.

Nothing you can verify anyway.

All you do is parrot....

Now go away, little parrot...
« Last Edit: July 23, 2017, 04:29:12 PM by totallackey »

*

Sentinel

  • 575
  • +0/-0
  • Open your eyes...
Re: Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!
« Reply #207 on: July 23, 2017, 04:30:10 PM »
Can the math be applied to something observable AND repeatable, yes or no?

The answer = no?

Result = shove the math up your ass and STFU.

I just scaled the rotational force upon a water drop on Earths equator down to a tennis ball, so the answer should be yes. Why would you say it's no, you think there's something wrong in my calculations?
Do a video of the tennis ball covered in water showing the water remaining on the surface, spinning or not spinning.

Could be tricky to show because I would need a zero gravitational enviroment in order to do it as far as my calculations are concerend. The point still stands that no water would be thrown off the ball at a mere 8 revolutions per minute.
"No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible."

Stanislaw Jerzy Lec

*

Crutchwater

  • 2151
  • +0/-0
  • Stop Indoctrinating me!
Re: Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!
« Reply #208 on: July 23, 2017, 04:31:34 PM »
Out of everything the pilot posted, the only thing you could call out was a an extremely minor debatable technicality about a tennis ball that in no way detracted from the main topic of inFlatEarth having his ass handed to him.

The anger, the swearing, the aggressive sexual metaphors - you are coming across as somewhat disturbing in character.
Of course, outright and proven liars such as yourself are perfectly normal in character.

GFY.

And there has been nothing the pilot nor anyone else here has posted, demonstrating that InFlatEarth has had his ass "handed," to him.

Nothing you can verify anyway.

All you do is parrot....

Now go away, little parrot...

He got his ass kicked so hard, it went into geostationary orbit!
I will always be Here To Laugh At You.

?

totallackey

  • 4526
  • +0/-0
Re: Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!
« Reply #209 on: July 23, 2017, 04:34:43 PM »
Can the math be applied to something observable AND repeatable, yes or no?

The answer = no?

Result = shove the math up your ass and STFU.


I just scaled the rotational force upon a water drop on Earths equator down to a tennis ball, so the answer should be yes. Why would you say it's no, you think there's something wrong in my calculations?
Do a video of the tennis ball covered in water showing the water remaining on the surface, spinning or not spinning.

To construct a scale model of the earth, don't you think you would need to remove the influence of earths gravity??
Get with your friend Sentinel.

Ask him.

This has all been discussed and beaten to death before,many many times, with all you RE-tards fucking bloodied and simply stating "NO U!" or "NUH UH," many many times.

You are left admitting the claim cannot be replicated, either in zero g or one g.

Water in zero g will not stick to a sphere either.