Notice 3, possibly 4 and 5, which can apply to geological formations akin to mountains?
How about you looking in the photo to show me the mountain top…
Again, how about you show me a picture of Australia, showing all of it and point out where Uluru is.
I can't see it at that scale.
That doesn't mean it isn't there.
It would be even harder when everything is covered in snow and ice.
WOW, you can't see an ice covered dome in a picture of an entire continent.
Yes but it is at the ground level, where the word dome would not be used. Do you say that you play basketball on the blacktop or on a dome…
No, dome is used, even at ground level. After all, these geographic features are at ground level.
Where do you expect these domes to be? Magically up in the sky?
The distance between the two point in your articles is over 244 km. which is equivalent distance between the cities of Washington DC and Morgantown, West Virginia. Do you now what is in between those two cities, the Appalachian mountains ...
Do you have anything rational to add, or just going to complain that the locations weren't perfectly accurate?
It stated 13,000 ft high not in an altitude of 13,000 ft
Big difference and why did they remove it in the 70's ...
No, not a difference.
Lots of objects are referred to like that, where is height is the elevation of the peak.
Again, you are yet to show it was removed in the 70's.
You keep on making baseless claims.
Yet to see a reference showing that this is the case.
Could not find any mention of a dome at the latitude of 80 S and Longitude 90 East, can you
https://www.britannica.com/place/Antarctica
So you go from Encyclopedia Americana to Encyclopedia Britannica?
You are aware they are different encyclopedias?
Do you have evidence that it was removed from the Encyclopedia Americana?
Regardless lets see what that link has?
Well, no mention of a dome in the introduction. Perhaps that is because it is more organised and has sections, oh look a section on physical geography, I wonder what will be in there?
Oh hey:
The vast ice sheets of East Antarctica reach heights of 11,500 feet or more in four main centres: Dome A (Argus) at 81° S, 77° E; Dome C at 75° S, 125° E; Dome Fuji at 77° S, 40° E; and Vostok station at 77° S, 104° E.
So rather than a mention of a single dome, it now has 4.
Yes, the original one was off, but that is understandable. It is quite easy to get locations wrong so close to the south pole when the difference between the geographic and magnetic south pole is significant.
It is obvious not Dome A, since it is located 263 km away from the point mentioned in the encyclopedia.
No it isn't.
Understand that locations are not always perfect, especially if you are trying to figure out the location of something merely by flying over it or near it and just using simple tools.
It is quite likely to be dome A.
Updating its location to a more accurate one would not be removing it.
Regardless, you still haven't shown that it has been removed.