beast, I'm going to caution you to not dismiss the beliefs of theists so quickly.
It could be that the universe is designed, but there is absolutely no evidence of that
Keep in mind that you don't mean "there's no evidence to suggest that," as there surely is. There are 'objective facts' about the universe that can be interpreted a number of ways, and can thus be used as evidence for a number of positions (including ID). However, the situation is not whether or not there's any evidence backing up an Intelligent Designer, it's whether or not we have a better explanation.
Evidence for the existence of any gods: nothing.
Once again, there is evidence for the existence of a god, but the evidence might be better explained by another means. For example, I take it as evidence for the existence of a god that I used to carry out intra-mental conversations with such a character. These conversations were very real, don't get me wrong. However, I now am no longer sure that my intra-mental conversations best suggest an actual conversation with a god. Instead, perhaps, a better explanation is that I was simply fooling myself into thinking the conversation was mutual, whereas I was simply answering all of my own questions (praying/talking to myself). Perceived 'miracles' are the same way. They can be evidence of a god, even if they're better explained another way. So that's just something to keep in mind. We're not arguing that people don't have evidence to suggest that their god is correct, we're appealing to a principle called the 'inference to the best explanation' (IBE).