Absolute proof of NASA’s fake videos

Quote

So you've just stated that the moon doesn't rotate. Surely that means that the same face of the moon is still facing the earth.....

If the earth is a sphere and not a flat plane, the moon has to rotate in order to see the same side all over the earth as it is stated in the time 2:12

Quote

No, each of those things were addressed, you just didn't like the answers because they went against your baseless beliefs.

Maybe this can help you

In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.

In a few words it talks about the creation of time, space, matter and energy, in a time when everybody believed that the earth always existed without ever having a beginning.

Like it or not, God created the Earth, he owns it, he makes the rules and he will judge us once we die.

Bottom line, you will never, ever find out when you die that their was not a God, but me on the other hand, when I die, I will neve , ever find out that their was never a God.

Who will be the real loser at the end, not me!!!

I've made no mention of god at all.  It is the height of arrogance for you to assume you know my spiritual beliefs.

I've made no mention of god at all.  It is the height of arrogance for you to assume you know my spiritual beliefs.

But you have in an indirect way when you stated

This is not science but a religion on your part.

My religion is God, and thus I responded in a manner that I thought was proper. If talking about God and final Judgment makes you feel uncomfortable, I can understand that, but the truth to be told, No Christian can believe in a heliocentric hypothesis and Jesus. Maybe this can be a new thread in the religious section.

Quote

I've made no mention of god at all.  It is the height of arrogance for you to assume you know my spiritual beliefs.

But you have in an indirect way when you stated

Quote

This is not science but a religion on your part.

My religion is God, and thus I responded in a manner that I thought was proper. If talking about God and final Judgment makes you feel uncomfortable, I can understand that, but the truth to be told, No Christian can believe in a heliocentric hypothesis and Jesus. Maybe this can be a new thread in the religious section.

I don't recall saying that, nevertheless it says nothing about my spiritual beliefs.  You have zero idea what I believe.

Maybe this can help you

In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.

In a few words it talks about the creation of time, space, matter and energy, in a time when everybody believed that the earth always existed without ever having a beginning.

Like it or not, God created the Earth, he owns it, he makes the rules and he will judge us once we die.

And like it or not those words say nothing about the shape of the Earth. Don't presume to know the mind of God. He will be the judge, not you.

You have zero idea what I believe.

And I don’t care!

And like it or not those words say nothing about the shape of the Earth.

But latter on it states that the sun, moon and starts moves around the earth which had been also proven by the Airy's Failure Experiment. Know if you combine that experiment with the Michelson-Morley Experiment and the Sagnac’s experiment, then it validates what the bible states as being true, that everything revolves around the earth and that we are stationary.

Quote

You have zero idea what I believe.

And I don’t care!

Quote

And like it or not those words say nothing about the shape of the Earth.

But latter on it states that the sun, moon and starts moves around the earth which had been also proven by the Airy's Failure Experiment. Know if you combine that experiment with the Michelson-Morley Experiment and the Sagnac’s experiment, then it validates what the bible states as being true, that everything revolves around the earth and that we are stationary.

So now are you saying the earth is round but stationary?

Wow, it seems there is nobody that can prove the globe Earth like a flattard!

Also, That book you worship was written by men!

So now are you saying the earth is round but stationary?

There is a big difference between a sphere and a circle, just like there is a difference between a rod and a ball.

The earth is on a flat plane.

On this plate plane there is a circle which the earth is located in.

The plane is stationary and over the circle there is a dome that all objects that emit light are under the dome.

Above the dome there is water.

Time only exist in the Dome. Outside the dome, there is no such thing as time.

That book you worship was written by men!

I worship GOD, not a historical book that timelines GOD’s work.

What book do you worship, the one’s that taught about the Piltdown Man as being true…

Bottom line, I could have made the same video in after effects and claim that it was real.

So your "absolute proof of NASA's fake videos"
has changed into "I can make a fake one"

Good job.
Going to admit you can't prove NASA faked it?

Also, what did you use to fake it? Where did you source the image of Earth?

It only took me 10 minutes to make this video and in my fake video of the earth, the clouds also move independent from the earth. A more believable video than what trash that NASA puts out.

No, it is far less believable. The clouds are moving way to fast and the massive difference in brightness of the stars and Earth should render it either impossible to see the stars or have Earth be so bright you can't see any detail.

But the more important point is you can receive the images directly from EPIC.

OK, in this 0.45 degrees view, I can clearly distinguish the clouds and the trails that they have. What I can’t see in these clearly distinguished cloud, the movement  of them.

Yet I pointed out that they are changing, and you just ignored it.

This is nothing more than an animation that cost millions of dollars to the American tax payer.

Prove it.

No it has not. The video clearly shows the clouds, but it does not show any movement on their part.

The animation clearly show the rotation of the earth, but their is no rotation of the moon, which means that from the earth facing the Moon, they would see a different side of the Moon, than what we actually see.

No. That's not true, you have baselessly asserted that yet failed to back it up.
This has been addressed and it has been pointed out that the clouds are actually moving. It was also pointed out that your attempt to show no rotation of the moon was pure BS.

So no, it is you that has proven nothing.

Like it or not, God created the Earth, he owns it, he makes the rules and he will judge us once we die.

That is just your baseless delusional beliefs.

Bottom line, you will never, ever find out when you die that their was not a God, but me on the other hand, when I die, I will neve , ever find out that their was never a God.

No, but you might find out that there is a different god that you pissed off and that your god was fake.

We will never find out that we wasted out lives worshipping an imaginary evil piece of shit, but you can.

Who will be the real loser at the end, not me!!!

Only for one specific case. In general, you are far more likely to lose than me.
In any case, you have lost now and are hoping to make up for it later.

But how about you keep this kind or religious delusional crap to yourself and instead focus on trying to do what you came here for? Provide the absolute proof of NASA's fake videos.
Can you provide any, or just dishonest crap?

But latter on it states that the sun, moon and starts moves around the earth which had been also proven by the Airy's Failure Experiment.

No it wasn't. Airy's failure was just a complete failure which was unable to conclude anything.

Know if you combine that experiment with the Michelson-Morley Experiment and the Sagnac’s experiment, then it validates what the bible states as being true, that everything revolves around the earth and that we are stationary.

No it doesn't. Airy's failure was based upon prior observations, which showed in an aether model, Earth was moving relative to this aether.
This result is also shown by Sagnac's experiment. However, neither of these could show if the aether is stationary and Earth is moving through it or if Earth is stationary and the aether is moving around us.
The Michelson-Morley experiment however showed Earth to be stationary relative to the aether.

This produced a direct contradiction showing that the aether model was wrong.

So no, these do not show that Earth is stationary and everything revolves around us.

In fact, Sagnac's experiment, when considered along with the others, leaves relativity as the only known model which works which shows Earth to be rotating, rather than the fixed centre of the universe.
Also, when you consider Sagnac's experiment carried out over numerous locations it shows Earth to be round, not flat.

Again, how about leaving out the delusional religious crap and either proving NASA faked that gif or admitting that you were wrong and that you can't prove that?

So your "absolute proof of NASA's fake videos" as changed into "I can make a fake one"

If I can make fake videos with a zero budget, then how many can NASA make with a $20 billion budget…

No, it is far less believable. The clouds are moving way to fast and the massive difference in brightness of the stars and Earth should render it either impossible to see the stars or have Earth be so bright you can't see any detail.

If you were only so observant of NASA’s fake videos…

But the more important point is you can receive the images directly from EPIC.

NO, you receive images directly from a server, not the satellite. If I upload this video on a server but create days of footage, you too could download it and believe to be real…

Yet I pointed out that they are changing, and you just ignored it.

May I point out that the cloud remain stationary relative to the Earth.

Prove it.

The animation speaks for its self…

No. That's not true, you have baselessly asserted that yet failed to back it up.
This has been addressed and it has been pointed out that the clouds are actually moving. It was also pointed out that your attempt to show no rotation of the moon was pure BS.

No you are baselessly asserted that yet failed to back it up that the clouds are moving.

So no, it is you that has proven nothing.

Any intelligent human will agree with me, that is those that are not blind beleivers that NASA never lied. It’s like CNN, just because CNN said that Trump colluded with Russia, it must be true….

That is just your baseless delusional beliefs.

And that we evolved from a rock is not a delusional belief….

No, but you might find out that there is a different god that you pissed off and that your god was fake.

But there will be a GOD, which you deny!!!!!!

Airy's failure was just a complete failure which was unable to conclude anything.

Yes, it has a complete failure for the Heliocentric worshipers, because it destroyed their religion!!!

It concluded that the stars revolve around the Earth and that we are stationary.

It was pure science, which when it goes against your religion, and you dismiss it as incorrect!!!!

No it doesn't. Airy's failure was based upon prior observations, which showed in an aether model, Earth was moving relative to this aether.
This result is also shown by Sagnac's experiment. However, neither of these could show if the aether is stationary and Earth is moving through it or if Earth is stationary and the aether is moving around us.

But it proves that there is aether, which Einstein dismissed, so Einstein equation is wrong, since these experiment prove that aether excists.

The Michelson-Morley experiment however showed Earth to be stationary relative to the aether.

This produced a direct contradiction showing that the aether model was wrong.

Wrong, the Michelson-Morley experiment had only two conclusions, either

1) The Earth is stationary with the presence of Aether
2) Or the Earth is in motion and there is NO Aether.

The Sagnac's experiment proved that there is Aether, therefore the Earth has to be stationary.

Bottom line, Einstein was wrong, just like the scientist that believed that the Piltdown Man was real….

How many decades did the scientific community believe in the Piltdown Man?

Why were they fooled?

Because he gave them something that they wanted to believe in, and did not bother to investigate it. The same thing applied with Einstein’s equation, he gave you something that confirmed the heliocentric hypothesis.

Quote

So your "absolute proof of NASA's fake videos" as changed into "I can make a fake one"

If I can make fake videos with a zero budget, then how many can NASA make with a $20 billion budget…

Again, you being able to fake it is not absolute proof of NASA's fake videos.

Do you have this proof you claim to have?
If not, are you going to admit you have no proof the video is fake?

If you were only so observant of NASA’s fake videos…

Which fake videos would that be? You are yet to show any.

NO, you receive images directly from a server, not the satellite. If I upload this video on a server but create days of footage, you too could download it and believe to be real…

No, you can receive them straight from the satellite if you have a receiver for it. You don't need to get it from the server.

Quote

Yet I pointed out that they are changing, and you just ignored it.

May I point out that the cloud remain stationary relative to the Earth.

Only if you can prove it, including stating the uncertainty of it.
I have shown that the cloud patterns change.

Quote

Prove it.

The animation speaks for its self…

Yes, it does to some extent, and not a single bit of it indicates it is fake.
So if you are going to claim it is fake, PROVE IT!
If you can't, then admit you have no proof and just came here lying to everyone.

No you are baselessly asserted that yet failed to back it up that the clouds are moving.

Except I did back it up, pointing out where they do move. That figure of 8, starts complete, yet ends up with a section of the bottom missing.
So how about you cut out the lies and start responding to what people have said?

Any intelligent human will agree with me, that is those that are not blind beleivers that NASA never lied. It’s like CNN, just because CNN said that Trump colluded with Russia, it must be true….

No they wont. Any intelligent human that actually analyses your claims will see them to be pure bullshit.

Quote

That is just your baseless delusional beliefs.

And that we evolved from a rock is not a delusional belief….

Who is claiming we evolved from a rock?

And remember, you are happy for a massively complex being to just exist without any cause at all. So who really has the delusional beliefs?

But there will be a GOD, which you deny!!!!!!

Who cares?
You would still be wrong.
Also, I deny specific gods which can be shown to be impossible. Not gods in general.
I just don't have any evidence or rational reason to believe in a god so I don't.

On the other hand, you believe in one specific magic sky fairy and deny all others.

Quote

Airy's failure was just a complete failure which was unable to conclude anything.

Yes, it has a complete failure for the Heliocentric worshipers, because it destroyed their religion!!!

No, it was a complete failure because it failed to prove anything as the reasoning behind it was fundamentally flawed.

It concluded that the stars revolve around the Earth and that we are stationary.

No it didn't.
It failed to take into account the effect of the moving medium.

In order for it to not be a failure (and assuming the aether model was right), you would need to have the water not effect the propagation of the light through the aether in order to not drag it along with it, but in order to do so, you would then not have the water slow down the light at all, meaning there would be no difference.

So no, it was a failure and failed to show anything.

Quote

No it doesn't. Airy's failure was based upon prior observations, which showed in an aether model, Earth was moving relative to this aether.
This result is also shown by Sagnac's experiment. However, neither of these could show if the aether is stationary and Earth is moving through it or if Earth is stationary and the aether is moving around us.

But it proves that there is aether, which Einstein dismissed, so Einstein equation is wrong, since these experiment prove that aether excists.

No, it assumed there was an aether. It didn't prove that there was one.
The experiments combined showed that there is no aether.

Quote

The Michelson-Morley experiment however showed Earth to be stationary relative to the aether.
This produced a direct contradiction showing that the aether model was wrong.

Wrong, the Michelson-Morley experiment had only two conclusions, either
1) The Earth is stationary with the presence of Aether
2) Or the Earth is in motion and there is NO Aether.

No it didn't.
You could have it as 2 conclusions:
1) There is no aether.
2) Earth is stationary relative to the aether.

It was an experiment which was meant to detect the motion of Earth through the aether, i.e. motion of Earth relative to the aether.
A stationary Earth with a moving aether would produce the same results as a moving Earth with a stationary aether.

So it showed there was no motion of Earth relative to the hypothetical aether if this aether existed. This was a result contradicted (assuming aether) by other results which showed that there was motion relative to the hypothetical aether if this aether existed. These results collectively showed there was no aether.

The Sagnac's experiment proved that there is Aether, therefore the Earth has to be stationary.

No, it didn't.
It proved that light was not ballistic in nature and that if there was an aether Earth had to be moving relative to it, specifically rotating.
Once again, under the aether model it was unable to determine if it was Earth that was moving or the aether.

And once again, under the aether model it contradicted MM, showing there was no aether.

Bottom line, Einstein was wrong, just like the scientist that believed that the Piltdown Man was real….

No, bottom line: THERE IS NO AETHER!

Do you have any rational argument or just continued repetition of refuted crap?

InFlatEarth: which year, month, day and hour of the Earth from space is your video suppose to show?

Also, which light band(s), and how many hours is the video suppose to span?

Again, you being able to fake it is not absolute proof of NASA's fake videos.

But it does not mean that every video you see on the TV and the Internet is real also…

Which fake videos would that be? You are yet to show any.

The ones with the use of Green screens and the ones that the woman have place a ton of hair spray on their head to make it appear to be floating, but it remains fixed

" class="bbc_link" target="_blank">

where as in a real environment is like this

" class="bbc_link" target="_blank">

No, you can receive them straight from the satellite if you have a receiver for it.

You mean to tell me I can get a signal from a satellite that is over 1,5 million km away…

How strong is the transmitter in order to make that distance…

Only if you can prove it

Already done that…

So if you are going to claim it is fake, PROVE IT!

If NASA taxes my tax dollars, they have to prove that their video are real. Let them place their images in HD on the internet to let very body examine them…

Who is claiming we evolved from a rock?

Hello there, have you heard of evolution, because if we did not evolve from a rock, then we had a creator and thus GOD!!!!

InFlatEarth: which year, month, day and hour of the Earth from space is your video suppose to show?

It was on February 30, 2017 at 7am Walt Disney time

Also, which light band(s), and how many hours is the video suppose to span?

Oh I don’t know, but whatever you tell me I will agree with you…

Quote

So now are you saying the earth is round but stationary?

There is a big difference between a sphere and a circle, just like there is a difference between a rod and a ball.

The earth is on a flat plane.

On this plate plane there is a circle which the earth is located in.

The plane is stationary and over the circle there is a dome that all objects that emit light are under the dome.

Above the dome there is water.

Time only exist in the Dome. Outside the dome, there is no such thing as time.

But you said sun, moon etc revolved around the earth.  Which could explain a lot of observable phenomenon.  However earth being flat and such things just floating over does not.

However earth being flat and such things just floating over does not.

read the bible

Earth has a Dome (Firmament)
 
Genesis 1:6 - And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.
Isaiah 13:13 - Therefore I will shake the heavens, and the earth shall remove out of her place, in the wrath of the Lord of hosts, and in the day of his fierce anger.
Isaiah 24:18 - And it shall come to pass, that he who fleeth from the noise of the fear shall fall into the pit; and he that cometh up out of the midst of the pit shall be taken in the snare: for the windows from on high are open, and the foundations of the earth do shake.
Isaiah 44:24 - Thus saith the Lord, thy redeemer, and he that formed thee from the womb, I am the Lord that maketh all things; that stretcheth forth the heavens alone; that spreadeth abroad the earth by myself;
Psalm 18:9 - He bowed the heavens also, and came down: and darkness was under his feet.
2 Samuel 22:10 - He bowed the heavens also, and came down; and darkness was under his feet.

Earth is on Pillars
1 Samuel 2:8 - He raiseth up the poor out of the dust, and lifteth up the beggar from the dunghill, to set them among princes, and to make them inherit the throne of glory: for the pillars of the earth are the Lord's, and he hath set the world upon them.
Job 9:6 - Which shaketh the earth out of her place, and the pillars thereof tremble.
Psalm 75:3 - The earth and all the inhabitants thereof are dissolved: I bear up the pillars of it. Selah.
The Earth is Still
 
1 Chronicles 16:30 - Fear before him, all the earth: the world also shall be stable, that it be not moved.
Psalm 93:1 - The Lord reigneth, he is clothed with majesty; the Lord is clothed with strength, wherewith he hath girded himself: the world also is stablished, that it cannot be moved.
Psalm 96:10 - Say among the heathen that the Lord reigneth: the world also shall be established that it shall not be moved: he shall judge the people righteously.

Earth Has Four Corners
 
Isaiah 11:12 - And he shall set up an ensign for the nations, and shall assemble the outcasts of Israel, and gather together the dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth.
Revelation 7:1 - And after these things I saw four angels standing on the four corners of the earth, holding the four winds of the earth, that the wind should not blow on the earth, nor on the sea, nor on any tree.
Revelation 20:8 - And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog, and Magog, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea.

Earth has Four Winds
 
Jeremiah 49:36 - And upon Elam will I bring the four winds from the four quarters of heaven, and will scatter them toward all those winds; and there shall be no nation whither the outcasts of Elam shall not come.
Daniel 7:2 - Daniel spake and said, I saw in my vision by night, and, behold, the four winds of the heaven strove upon the great sea.
Matthew 24:31 - And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.
Revelation 7:1 - And after these things I saw four angels standing on the four corners of the earth, holding the four winds of the earth, that the wind should not blow on the earth, nor on the sea, nor on any tree.

Height, Depth, Length & Width
 
Job 11:8 - It is as high as heaven; what canst thou do? deeper than hell; what canst thou know?
Job 11:9 - The measure thereof is longer than the earth, and broader than the sea
Day & Night
 
Job 26:10 - He hath compassed the waters with bounds, until the day and night come to an end.

Yay another hypocrite.  I know this time you are using cherry picked verses to try to claim it says the Earth is flat.  There are also many that could easily be shown to say the Earth is round too.  Although I do not do that cherry picking thing with the Bible, I read ALL of it and actually pay attention to the message it conveys, rather than single words and verses. 

Quote

However earth being flat and such things just floating over does not.

read the bible

Earth has a Dome (Firmament)
 
Genesis 1:6 - And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.
Isaiah 13:13 - Therefore I will shake the heavens, and the earth shall remove out of her place, in the wrath of the Lord of hosts, and in the day of his fierce anger.
Isaiah 24:18 - And it shall come to pass, that he who fleeth from the noise of the fear shall fall into the pit; and he that cometh up out of the midst of the pit shall be taken in the snare: for the windows from on high are open, and the foundations of the earth do shake.
Isaiah 44:24 - Thus saith the Lord, thy redeemer, and he that formed thee from the womb, I am the Lord that maketh all things; that stretcheth forth the heavens alone; that spreadeth abroad the earth by myself;
Psalm 18:9 - He bowed the heavens also, and came down: and darkness was under his feet.
2 Samuel 22:10 - He bowed the heavens also, and came down; and darkness was under his feet.

Earth is on Pillars
1 Samuel 2:8 - He raiseth up the poor out of the dust, and lifteth up the beggar from the dunghill, to set them among princes, and to make them inherit the throne of glory: for the pillars of the earth are the Lord's, and he hath set the world upon them.
Job 9:6 - Which shaketh the earth out of her place, and the pillars thereof tremble.
Psalm 75:3 - The earth and all the inhabitants thereof are dissolved: I bear up the pillars of it. Selah.
The Earth is Still
 
1 Chronicles 16:30 - Fear before him, all the earth: the world also shall be stable, that it be not moved.
Psalm 93:1 - The Lord reigneth, he is clothed with majesty; the Lord is clothed with strength, wherewith he hath girded himself: the world also is stablished, that it cannot be moved.
Psalm 96:10 - Say among the heathen that the Lord reigneth: the world also shall be established that it shall not be moved: he shall judge the people righteously.

Earth Has Four Corners
 
Isaiah 11:12 - And he shall set up an ensign for the nations, and shall assemble the outcasts of Israel, and gather together the dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth.
Revelation 7:1 - And after these things I saw four angels standing on the four corners of the earth, holding the four winds of the earth, that the wind should not blow on the earth, nor on the sea, nor on any tree.
Revelation 20:8 - And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog, and Magog, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea.

Earth has Four Winds
 
Jeremiah 49:36 - And upon Elam will I bring the four winds from the four quarters of heaven, and will scatter them toward all those winds; and there shall be no nation whither the outcasts of Elam shall not come.
Daniel 7:2 - Daniel spake and said, I saw in my vision by night, and, behold, the four winds of the heaven strove upon the great sea.
Matthew 24:31 - And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.
Revelation 7:1 - And after these things I saw four angels standing on the four corners of the earth, holding the four winds of the earth, that the wind should not blow on the earth, nor on the sea, nor on any tree.

Height, Depth, Length & Width
 
Job 11:8 - It is as high as heaven; what canst thou do? deeper than hell; what canst thou know?
Job 11:9 - The measure thereof is longer than the earth, and broader than the sea
Day & Night
 
Job 26:10 - He hath compassed the waters with bounds, until the day and night come to an end.

None of that changes the fact that your model does not fit observable facts.
A sun hovering over a flat earth does not work with things we no to be true.  It just doesn't.  Use the brain God gave you.

He is just trying to set up the science is a religion argument again. 
These people who come in here spouting bible verses and trying to say that if the bible says it is this certain way, then all observations must match what the bible says are just delusional lost children who are leading themselves even further away.  Religion requires faith.  Faith in religious terms require there to be very little to no evidence for and alot of evidence against the premise of that faith.  If there was a ton of evidence to support it, it would not be faith. 
Science is not faith, it is based off conclusions from evidence and the search for more evidence and questions.
Religion is faith, it is based off of an emotional need for answers to the currently unanswerable.  To be a true test of faith, it requires that you cannot provide evidence, even better if all evidence points away.   
Religion is irrational, science is rational. 
They are two different things, almost opposites.  Some idiots will take this to mean religion is good and science is evil, this is not what that means.  Religion houses both good and evil by itself.
I think that may be one reason many pretend religious people hate science so much.  They really do not have any faith so they attack what they perceive as evil.
They cannot make that connection that it is their own failure of faith. 

InFlatEarther, why did you not give my question a serious answer?

If you can really make an earth as real as you say, I would like to compare it to data of sattelites, weather stations and other optical verifications.

I hope you are willing to help me on my research.

Quote

Again, you being able to fake it is not absolute proof of NASA's fake videos.

But it does not mean that every video you see on the TV and the Internet is real also…

I don't care.
You are claiming to have absolute proof of NASA's fake video.
Are you going to provide this absolute proof or are you going to admit you don't have any.

The ones with the use of Green screens

How about you stick to the topic at hand rather than trying to run away to a different one and show a different bit of ignorance?

Quote

No, you can receive them straight from the satellite if you have a receiver for it.

You mean to tell me I can get a signal from a satellite that is over 1,5 million km away…
How strong is the transmitter in order to make that distance…

Yes, you can. The transmitter doesn't need to be all that strong as it isn't omnidirectional.
It also requires a decent receiver.

Quote

Only if you can prove it

Already done that…

No you didn't.
You spouted a bunch of childish crap which got refuted.

Quote

So if you are going to claim it is fake, PROVE IT!

If NASA taxes my tax dollars, they have to prove that their video are real. Let them place their images in HD on the internet to let very body examine them…

No they don't.
You are claiming it is fake, you prove it is fake.
Why would they waste other people's tax dollars trying to convince delusional nuts like you that don't care about the truth.

They already do place loads of their images online for everyone to examine.

Quote

Who is claiming we evolved from a rock?

Hello there, have you heard of evolution, because if we did not evolve from a rock, then we had a creator and thus GOD!!!!

Yes, I have heard of evolution. It doesn't start with a rock.
A rock and god are not the only 2 options. Try again.

Quote

InFlatEarth: which year, month, day and hour of the Earth from space is your video suppose to show?

It was on February 30, 2017 at 7am Walt Disney time

Quote

Also, which light band(s), and how many hours is the video suppose to span?

Oh I don’t know, but whatever you tell me I will agree with you…

See, this information is needed to verify it.
You can then try and match the weather patterns, moon location and so on.

read the bible

So read a book filled with bullshit which contradicts reality. How is that meant to help your case?

Are you trying to show that you don't give a shit about reality and instead just want to focus on your delusional fantasy and reject anything that disagrees with it?

What is this formula of , for optics?

2*atan(diameter/distance)

A little common sense helps, but I've noted that "common sense" is in very short supply around here.

Just apply a little common sense and honesty and admit that you stuffed up again.

Does your common sense tell you that this bitch didn't perm her hair? 



You conformist retards are a veritable cancer.

Bottom line, I could have made the same video in after effects and claim that it was real.

Bottom line. You bombed out big time in your "Absolute proof of NASA’s fake videos" and aren't man enough to admit it!

Does your common sense tell you that this bitch didn't perm her hair? 



You conformist retards are a veritable cancer.

So you are still attacking characters with "this bitch" and "conformist retards".

Guess you've given up any logical arguments and have nothing to fall back on but ad hominem - ever heard of that?

By the way we conformist retards have a heliocentric globe that works!
What have you got? At last count I found  5 "Flat Earth" maps and 7 explanations for gravity! 
See Re: Flat earth, spherical, the most conclusive proof: « Reply #392 on: February 22, 2017, 11:47:02 AM »

So, oh great Logickal One, I'll leave it to your  undoubted superior Logickal capabilities.  Should we rate
The other great logical one, Spock, seemed to rate the many as worth more than the one - but this is a different kettle of fish, as it were.

PS I've seen many "real hairstyles" that look worse that that!
      What's up with you today? Get out of bed on the wrong side or are you having a bad hair day too. Give my regards to the gals at the salon.

Does your common sense tell you that this bitch didn't perm her hair? 

You conformist retards are a veritable cancer.

I don't particularly care what she did to her hair. It is irrelevant to the topic at hand, which is the gif/video made by combining images from EPIC.

Yay another hypocrite.  I know this time you are using cherry picked verses to try to claim it says the Earth is flat.  There are also many that could easily be shown to say the Earth is round too.  Although I do not do that cherry picking thing with the Bible, I read ALL of it and actually pay attention to the message it conveys, rather than single words and verses.

The bible does say the the earth is round, but not a sphere...

What you don't understand, you put to the side

He is just trying to set up the science is a religion argument again. 
These people who come in here spouting bible verses and trying to say that if the bible says it is this certain way, then all observations must match what the bible says are just delusional lost children who are leading themselves even further away.  Religion requires faith.  Faith in religious terms require there to be very little to no evidence for and alot of evidence against the premise of that faith.  If there was a ton of evidence to support it, it would not be faith. 
Science is not faith, it is based off conclusions from evidence and the search for more evidence and questions.
Religion is faith, it is based off of an emotional need for answers to the currently unanswerable.  To be a true test of faith, it requires that you cannot provide evidence, even better if all evidence points away.   
Religion is irrational, science is rational. 
They are two different things, almost opposites.  Some idiots will take this to mean religion is good and science is evil, this is not what that means.  Religion houses both good and evil by itself.
I think that may be one reason many pretend religious people hate science so much.  They really do not have any faith so they attack what they perceive as evil.
They cannot make that connection that it is their own failure of faith.

The bible is not a religious book, the bible is a HISTORICAL book

InFlatEarth: which year, month, day and hour of the Earth from space is your video suppose to show?

Also, which light band(s), and how many hours is the video suppose to span?

I thought I had answered your question.

My video was taken on February 30, 2017 at 12 pm Walt Disney Standard time

As for the light band, I will agree with whatever you like

How many hours does it span?

How many pictures were taken?