*Now as stated above Dayton Miller's work from Sandokhan's generous reference claimed a motion of the whole Heliocentric Solar System of some 10 km/s - Hardly stationary!*You haven't done your homework at all.

Just as usual.

"But we must pause at this juncture to critique Miller’s thinking process, for

he, being a Copernican, is basing his interpretation of data on his belief that

the Earth is moving at least 30 km/sec through space. Interestingly enough, it

is precisely because of this presupposition that Miller runs into some

unexplained difficulty, since his observations begin to conflict with his

mathematical calculations. The one anomaly in all past interferometer

experiments that Miller discovered was the experimenters assumed they knew the

precise velocity of the Earth through the ether in combination with the solar

system’s supposed motion toward the constellation of Hercules, but did they

really know? The geocentrist, of course, would answer that they did not know.

In any case, Miller’s 1925 experiment took into account this “anomaly” and he

made his calculations accordingly. Since he assumed the Earth was moving 30

km/sec, he combined this with the four positions (February, April, August,

September) that he examined of the Earth’s orbit around the sun and then used

Pythagorean geometry to determine the speed of the Earth toward the

constellation Draco, which came to 208 km/sec.[2] In other words, 208 km/sec is

what Miller believed to be the Earth’s absolute speed through the ether. Of

course, being a heliocentrist, Miller is assuming that the ether is motionless

and that the Earth is moving through it. In any case, Miller’s 1933 paper

reveals that his Pythagorean calculations do not match what he observed in the

fringe shifts. As we will recall, his experimental fringe shifts showed a

maximum of 10 km/sec, but this figure is less than his computed value by a

factor of twenty! Miller did not have an answer for this problem, and it is

left as an open-ended question in his 1933 paper. The answer, of course, is

that Miller’s Pythagorean calculations were based on a faulty premise (i.e.,

that the Earth was moving). If that factor were eliminated, his calculations

would be in accord with his observations. The same can be said of recent

experiments performed by Stefan Marinov, in the late 1970s, using

coupled-mirror interferometry.

Miller configured the four interferometer readings in the form of a

parallelogram (February, April, August, September), which assumes the Earth is

in orbit around the sun. The diagonal of each of the four parallelogram points

represents the apex of that period, while the long side represents the motion,

which is coincident with the center of orbit; the short side of the

parallelogram represents Earth velocity of 30 km/sec. Hence, knowing the

direction of the three sides of the triangle, and the magnitude of one side,

allows one to calculate the magnitude of the other sides, which for Miller was

208 km/sec toward Dorado."

As for the Consoli-Constanzo paper, they make a terrible blunder right from the start:

*it becomes convenient to normalize the experimental values of A¯*_{2} to the classical prediction for an Earth’s velocity of 30 km/sThey make the very same mistake evidenced above: they ASSUME that the 30 km/s velocity is true and proceed accordingly with further calculations based on a faulty hypothesis.

*Now, I'm hardly competent to judge the reliability of Dayton Miller's results and they have been queried as in:*Learn to research a subject before posting nonsense.

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=61637.msg1615011#msg1615011https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=61637.msg1615013#msg1615013https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=61637.msg1615015#msg1615015*For example, there is THE EXPERIMENTS OF DAYTON C. MILLER 1925-1926 AND THE THEORY OF RELATIVITY from Maurice, seriously questioning relativity and gravitation, but not casting any doubt on the accepted Heliocentric model!*ALLAIS EFFECT:

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg760382#msg760382A TOTAL DEFIANCE OF NEWTONIAN MECHANICS.

For the same masses/corresponding distances of the Earth, Sun and the Moon, during the Allais experiment, the pendulum's direction of rotation changed from clockwise to counterclockwise, at the end of the eclipse it resumed its normal direction of rotation.

In order to arrive at an explanation, M. Allais considered a wide range

of known periodic phenomena, including the terrestrial tides, variations in

the intensity of gravity, thermal or barometric effects, magnetic variations,

microseismic effects, cosmic rays, and the periodic character of human

activity. Yet, on close examination, the very peculiar nature of the

periodicity shown by the change in azimuth of the pendulum forced the

elimination of all of these as cause.

Dr. Maurice Allais:

In both cases, with the experiments with the anisotropic

support and with those with the isotropic support, it is found

that the amplitudes of the periodic effects are considerably

greater than those calculated according to the law of gravitation,

whether or not completed by the theory of relativity.

**In the case of the anisotropic support, the amplitude of**

the luni-solar component of 24h 50m is about twenty million

times greater than the amplitude calculated by the theory of

universal gravitation.

In the case of the paraconical pendulum with isotropic

support, this relation is about a hundred million.In other words, the pendulum motions Allais observed during his two eclipses – 1954 and 1959 -- were physically IMPOSSIBLE … according to all known “textbook physics!”