I think the problem with this thread is it follows the old adage, if you can't construct a good argument against it then, the best thing to do is discredit it.
Everyone who knows anything about science knows that in the end truth will out. Sure the road will be bumpy and their be lots of disagreements about competing ideas, but in the end the one that works will be the one left standing. In addition science discovers new things that add to our knowledge that gives us a better understanding of how our world and the universe operates.
Religion love it or hate it does not operate like science, evidence, experimental data, p,any no part. In contrast religion operates on belief, in that you either believe it or not. In religion you also have a very wide choice from the many religions currently on offer. But mostly what religion you follow is based on either your parents or postcode/zip code.
In down town Islamabad you are much more likely to be a follower of Islam than Judaism for example, why?....because that's were you were brought up, that's were you live, nothing to do with which ones most attractive, or has the better god. Science does not operate in that way.
The initial question was a vain attempt to pull science down into the mire of confusion where religion reigns supreme.
I've never heard about murders or killings being done in the name of science, but unfortunatly it appears to be a daily occourance when it comes to religion.