Thank you for answering my question
Science is a religion we are all manipulated from a very early age into believing something we will never see (globe)
A religion is based on belief, by faith, without the necessity of physical evidence.
The essence of Christianity is "By grace are ye saved through faith and that not of yourselves, it is a gift of God".
If someone asks for physical proof of that, you can't give it - there is none.
All science is based on evidence and is definitely not a religion.
Whether you call it "physical evidence" or not depends on you own definition of "physical evidence", but it is all based on observations.
Some of these observations may be by microscope, X-ray diffraction, spectrography, astronomical telescope or radio telescope, but to the relevant scientist, they are all observations.
Now, I will grant you that a number of areas of science does enter into the realm of conjecture.
It is still based on some evidence, but many may regard it as straying too far from that evidence.
I would put much of cosmology under that heading, where maybe it is straying too far from the evidence that we have.
And to a large degree, the interpretation of the observations may depend on the "model of the universe" assumed.
Now, what one does with these situations is up to the individual - personally I just note that it not an area of science that I know much about and just read it with a passing interest, not necessarily believing or disbelieving it, till more evidence comes along.
But you say that "we are all manipulated from a very early age into believing something we will never see (globe)".
It is true that most will never see the whole Globe with our own unaided eyes.
Nevertheless, we can see so much evidence for the Globe with our own eyes, that for me there is no problem at all believing that the earth really is a huge Globe. Then the less direct evidence, say from astronomy or other branches of science just fits in with my own observations.
After all the development of the heliocentric Globe as the accepted shape of the earth has been a gradual progression right from Babylonian times (yes, I know they along with the Chinese etc, believed that the earth was flat), the Greek "period" through to the times of Copernicus to Newton.
Here is not the place to go into that in detail, but it is not "modern science" that decided on the heliocentric Globe.
If you and others feel that "we are all manipulated from a very early age into believing something we will never see (globe)", then maybe there is something lacking in our education systems. Maybe there should be more on the
reasons why, rather just the bare facts.
The deeper and darker question is why are you bothered what people believe If you are" NOT " Religious.
I am not "bothered what people believe", but I do get concerned when that belief leads them to claim that large numbers of who believe that the earth is a Globe are deceivers and liars.
I am not exaggerating, just look at the many videos on YouTube (esp by
Jeranism) and more particularly at the comment hard-line flat earthers make - don't talk to me about venom and hate from Globe supporters!
You have not been like some, but just look at hate that
Dutchy shows for NASA.
Like all religions non believers are insulted and called crazy.
Your religious leaders encourage this behaviour.
I know many flat earthers are said to be ignorant because of their abysmal understanding things like simple physics, optics and even elementary photography.
No, science is not a religion, so I have no "religious leaders" among scientists.