Your derivation is THRASHED by the following mainstream papers.
You simply do not know how to calculate the orbital Sagnac.
Go ahead and mail your derivation to the IOP journal, the Europhysics Letters Journal, just like Dr. C.C. Su did, and see if they publish it.
Until then, my three mainstream bibliographical references destroy your piece of shit derivation.
These papers prove that the motion of the earth's orbit is also a Sagnac effect. We should see light path distance differentials caused by the orbit just like we see if for earth's rotation. The orbital path is simply longer and nothing else.
http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s2-07/2-07.htmIt is a loop and the earth is moving along the loop in its orbit around the sun.
If light travels at one speed c, then as the earth supposedly moves in it's revolution loop at 30k/s, while light moves c through space, the unit at the equator at noon would move with the earth' rotation and the earth's revolution cutting the distance the signal must travel to meet the unit.
"Let's say the unit is at the equator and the satellite is low on the horizon in the east at noon.
That means the unit is traveling at the orbital speed of the earth at 67,000 MPH.
The satellite emits at one speed c in space. While the light travels through space toward the unit at c, the unit moves with the earth at 67,000 MPH. The unit cuts the distance that the light must travel.
This is not being seen by any experiements nor GPS."
Yet, this same logic applies and works with the earth's supposed rotation.
This is exactly what these three papers prove.
Dr. Daniel Gezari must calculate the Sagnac in order to fully account for the shooting of the laser to the mirror on the moon and back.
Calculations performed at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center by Dr. Daniel Gezari:
https://arxiv.org/vc/arxiv/papers/0912/0912.3934v1.pdfPlease note the theoretical orbital sagnac shows up in these calculations, but is not picked up/registered/recorded by GPS satellites.
Motion of the Earth-Moon system in orbit around the Sun would average out in a two-way measurement, and only appear as a small (∼3 m/s) second-order residual.Because of the two-way averaging, the orbital Sagnac effect registered is smaller than usual, however it is not 1/365 of the rotational Sagnac effect, in fact even in the diluted form permitted by the two-way averaging calculation, it represents a significant percentage of the rotational Sagnac effect.
This calculations were done by none other than Dr. Daniel Gezari (CalTech, Goddard Space Flight Center).
For instance, the Earth’s full 30 km/s orbital velocity along the line-of-sight would produce a second-order residual velocity of only ~3 m/s, so we cannot preclude the possibility that some part of the 8.4 m /s difference between coand c measured here is a real second-order residual due to motion of the Earth-Moon system relative to an absolute frame.
3/8.4 = 0.357
1/365 = 0.00274
0.357/0.00274 = 130.3
You lose.
Shooting light to the moon has to do with the behavior of light like GPS.
The lunar laser ranging experiment is an astronomical version of the Sagnac experiment.
However, G. Sagnac used the fringe-shift method to measure indirectly light travel time;
while Dr. Daniel Gezari uses clocks to measure directly light travel time in both directions.
Please note the orbital sagnac shows up in these measurements.
Now, because of the vast distance, if you are correct, you should see 1/365 of the rotational sagnac in the measurements and that will show up on this vast distance.
So, if you are correct, then we should see your 1/365 conclusions in the measurements. Guess what. We do not.
That means you are wrong.
Your derivation is not even a joke, it is totally useless and worthless.
Please read.
http://qem.ee.nthu.edu.tw/f1b.pdfThis is an IOP article.
The author recognizes the earth's orbital Sagnac is missing whereas the earth's rotational Sagnac is not.
He uses GPS and a link between Japan and the US to prove this.
In GPS the actual magnitude of the Sagnac correction
due to earth’s rotation depends on the positions of
satellites and receiver and a typical value is 30 m, as the
propagation time is about 0.1s and the linear speed due
to earth’s rotation is about 464 m/s at the equator. The
GPS provides an accuracy of about 10 m or better in positioning.
Thus the precision of GPS will be degraded significantly,
if the Sagnac correction due to earth’s rotation
is not taken into account.
On the other hand, the orbital
motion of the earth around the sun has a linear speed of
about 30 km/s which is about 100 times that of earth’s
rotation. Thus the present high-precision GPS would be
entirely impossible if the omitted correction due to orbital
motion is really necessary.In an intercontinental microwave link between Japan and
the USA via a geostationary satellite as relay, the influence
of earth’s rotation is also demonstrated in a high-precision
time comparison between the atomic clocks at two remote
ground stations.
In this transpacific-link experiment, a synchronization
error of as large as about 0.3 µs was observed unexpectedly.
Meanwhile, as in GPS, no effects of earth’s orbital motion
are reported in these links, although they would be
easier to observe if they are in existence. Thereby, it is evident
that the wave propagation in GPS or the intercontinental
microwave link depends on the earth’s rotation, but
is entirely independent of earth’s orbital motion around
the sun or whatever. As a consequence, the propagation
mechanism in GPS or intercontinental link can be viewed
as classical in conjunction with an ECI frame, rather than
the ECEF or any other frame, being selected as the unique
propagation frame. In other words, the wave in GPS or the
intercontinental microwave link can be viewed as propagating
via a classical medium stationary in a geocentric
inertial frame.
The author actually present a local-ether model (MLET, Modified Lorentz Ether Theory) in order to account for the MISSING ORBITAL SAGNAC EFFECT.
I repeat: this is an IOP article, the highest standard of mainstream science.
The paper was peer reviewed and published.
Each and every scientist working at that journal understood the meaning of these words:
Meanwhile, as in GPS, no effects of earth’s orbital motion
are reported in these links, although they would be
easier to observe if they are in existence.Since the orbital Sagnac is missing, regardless of any ether/nonether model, the author provides a local-ether model, which was accepted not only by the peer reviewers, but also by the IOP journal.
The missing orbital Sagnac has nothing to do with a particular physical model: it is all over mainstream science, as documented here, that GPS satellites do not register/record the much larger orbital Sagnac.
As a consequence, relativists are forced to adopt the local ether model in order to account for the missing orbital Sagnac.
A total refutation of your failed derivation.
IOP published the article indicating they also agree the orbital Sagnac is missing, and is larger than the rotational Sagnac, or this article would never have gotten past peer review.
Again, Dr. C.C. Su, :
C.C. Su, "A Local-ether model of propagation of electromagnetic wave," in Bull. Am. Phys. Soc., vol. 45, no. 1, p. 637, Mar. 2000 (Minneapolis, Minnesota).
http://www.ee.nthu.edu.tw/ccsu/Published in one of the most prestigious scientific journals in the world: Bulletin of the American Physical Society.
Both the rotational and the orbital motions of the earth together with the orbital
motion of the target planet contribute to the Sagnac
effect. But the orbital motion of the sun has no effects
on the interplanetary propagation. On the other hand, as
the unique propagation frame in GPS and intercontinental
links is a geocentric inertial frame, the rotational motion
of the earth contributes to the Sagnac effect.
But the orbital
motion of the earth around the sun and that of the
sun have no effects on the earthbound propagation. By
comparing GPS with interplanetary radar, it is seen that
there is a common Sagnac effect due to earth’s rotation
and a common null effect of the orbital motion of the sun
on wave propagation.
However, there is a discrepancy in
the Sagnac effect due to earth’s orbital motion. Moreover,
by comparing GPS with the widely accepted interpretation
of the Michelson–Morley experiment, it is seen that
there is a common null effect of the orbital motions on
wave propagation, whereas there is a discrepancy in the
Sagnac effect due to earth’s rotation.
Based on this characteristic of uniqueness and switchability of the propagation frame,
we propose in the following section the local-ether model
of wave propagation
to solve the discrepancies in the in-
fluences of earth’s rotational and orbital motions on the
Sagnac effect and to account for a wide variety of propagation
phenomena.
Anyway, the interplanetary Sagnac effect is due to
earth’s orbital motion around the sun as well as earth’s
rotation. Further, for the interstellar propagation where
the source is located beyond the solar system, the orbital
motion of the sun contributes to the interstellar Sagnac
effect as well.
Evidently, as expected, the proposed local-ether model
accounts for the Sagnac effect due to earth’s rotation and
the null effect of earth’s orbital motion in the earthbound
propagations in GPS and intercontinental microwave link
experiments. Meanwhile, in the interplanetary radar, it accounts
for the Sagnac effect due both to earth’s rotation
and to earth’s orbital motion around the sun.
Based on the local-ether model, the propagation is entirely
independent of the earth’s orbital motion around
the sun or whatever and the velocity v for such an earthbound
experiment is referred to an ECI frame and hence
is due to earth’s rotation alone. In the original proposal,
the velocity v was supposed to incorporate earth’s orbital
motion around the sun. Thus, at least, v
2/c
2=~ 10
-8. Then the amplitude of the phase-difference variation
could be as large as π/3, when the wavelength is
0.6 µm and the path length is 10 m. However, as the velocity
v is the linear velocity due to earth’s rotation alone,
the round-trip Sagnac effect is as small as v
2/c
2∼ 10
-12 which is merely 10
-4 times that due to the orbital motion.
The Sagnac effect is a FIRST ORDER effect in v/c.
Even in the round-trip nature of the Sagnac effect, as it was applied in the Michelson-Morley experiment, thus becoming a second order effect within that context,
we can see that the ORBITAL SAGNAC IS 10,000 TIMES GREATER than the rotational Sagnac effect.Three papers written by some of the best physicists in the world today, Dr. Daniel Gezari and Dr. C.C. Su, which directly contradict your failed/miserable derivation.
It is as simple as this.
Please read:
In the original proposal,
the velocity v was supposed to incorporate earth’s orbital
motion around the sun.
Thus, at least, v2/c2
=~ 10-8. Then the amplitude of the phase-difference variation
could be as large as π/3, when the wavelength is
0.6 µm and the path length is 10 m. However, as the velocity
v is the linear velocity due to earth’s rotation alone,
the round-trip Sagnac effect is as small as v2/c2∼ 10-12 which is merely 10-4 times that due to the orbital motion.THE ORBITAL SAGNAC, EVEN IN THE CONTEXT OF THE ROUND TRIP MM EXPERIMENT, IS 10,000 TIMES GREATER THAN THE ROTATIONAL SAGNAC.
End of our discussion.
Your failed derivation has been shown for what it really is: a total piece of useless thrash.