AT THE SAME TIME, BOAT Y IS PULLING on the rope WITH FORCE -AB. Reaction: the rope is pulling boat y with force AB.[/i]
Copying and pasting like that removes the key formatting, such as where I have crossed out B.
You do not know how to count forces.
No, that would be you, that seems to continually double them rather than just counting them once.
In a very simple example.
Yet even with it being so simple, you still get it wrong.
You can't even do something as simple as clearly identify the action/reaction pairs.
First, you do not understand that there ARE TWO FORCES ACTING ON BOAT X.
That is because there isn't.
There is a single force, that of the rope pulling on boat x.
What an unbelievable dexterity with which you pull of out the hat a -A and then proceed to REPLACE B WITH -A.
UNBELIEVABLE.
You mean how I explain quite clearly that B must equal -A, where you are unable to refute it at all?
It is quite believable, at least if you which to believe reality instead your delusional bullshit.
You have already exhausted each and every possibility here.
And with each one, I completely refuted you, pointing out how your analysis was wrong.
And all you can do in response is spout crap.
You cannot explain a very simple fact.
No, I can explain the facts.
I can also explain why you are full of shit, as I have done so repeatedly. You are yet to refute anything or be able to justify your nonsense in any rational way.
THERE ARE TWO FORCES ACTING ON BOAT X: BOTH THE MAN PULLING IN BOAT X (THE ANCHORED FORCE IN BOAT X) AND THE PULLING FROM BOAT Y (FORCE B).
No. There is not.
There is a single force.
The man pulling in boat x is not acting on boat x. It is acting on the rope. This force, along with the person in boat y creates tension on the rope.
The only force acting on boat x is that from the rope. Yes, the person in boat y is pulling on the rope creating tension in it, but the only force pulling on boat x is the rope.
If you think there are 2 forces then do what I have asked repeatedly. Clearly state what each action/reaction pair is, including the force involved and the entities involved.
You continually not doing this indicates you likely know you are full of shit and just don't give a damn, or that you truly have no idea what you are talking about.
Which is it?
Make sure your read these words carefully, because the people are tired of you.
No. I'm sure we are all getting tired of your useless childish bullshit.
Yes, boat Y is pulling on boat X (through the rope/string), BUT ALSO BOAT X ITSELF (THE MAN DOING THE PULLING) IS APPLYING A PULLING FORCE ON THE ROPE AT THE SAME TIME.
Yes, which is the person pulling back on the string. Notice how it is applying a force to the string/rope, not to the boat?
Perhaps you should learn to identify things before trying to count them?
Again.
Like I said, clearly state the action/reaction pairs. Not this vauge crap.
Boat X is pulling with force A the rope/boat Y.
The rope will react with force A.
Boat X will actually thrust forward from this force (and also force B).
At the same time boat Y IS ALSO PULLING WITH FORCE B on the rope/boat X.
TWO FORCES RIGHT THERE ON BOAT X.
No. Not 2 forces on boat x. You are counting the same force twice.
You have the force of the rope pulling on X, which you say is A.
And you have the force of the rope pulling on X which you say is B.
It is the same force.
You can't even decide if it is pulling the rope or the other boat.
You can deny all you want, but your equations do not add up to anything: just take a look at how easy it is for me to debunk your each message.
But you are yet to debunk a thing.
So far all you have done is say I am wrong and repeat the same refuted bullshit.
Yet each time you do so, I debunk it.
You can't even do something as simple as provide the action/reaction pairs in a entirely unambiguous way.
A TOTAL PERFECT BALANCE.
ALL THE FORCES BALANCE OUT PERFECTLY.
But they don't. You can't even decide what is pulling what.
BUT THEY ARE TWICE THE NUMBER NEEDED IN NEWTONIAN MECHANICS.
Because you are counting them twice, or counting the wrong force.
Now then, can you do like I asked?
Provide the action/reaction pairs in a way which clearly identifies the entities the pair is acting between and the associated force and its direction.
I will continue to ask for this until you provide it or until you grow tired of being refuted and flee.