There is a difference between being sceptic and immediately discarding all visual evidence as faked, without reason (besides said evidence not lining up with your beliefs).
Not at all, can you determine why a picture with a satelite orbiting jupiter is fake (because no one can make such picture without a crew following the satelite) and some cgi pictures from planets are real ?
They have the same quality, colour and issues. ....so pictures from space rarely cut it as proof.
What do building 7 and certain scientific fields have to do with eachother? Also, the way in which you speak of science makes me think that you do not fully understand how it works and what it's for. Do you?
No i don't, but when our renown leading expert on demolitions is confronted with the footage of building 7 collapsing in the days after 9/11 he proclaims he is 100% certain that this is a controled demolition.
He is baffled when the reporter says this event occured during 9/11....''then they worked hard'' was his answer, while being extremely puzzled....
When reading that specific part of the official NIST report myself and the scientific ''explanation'' about how building 7 could collapse i became aware that scientific explanations are extremely flexible.
It is not about neutral testing most of the time, but preferred outcomes when it comes to 9/11 and the supposed moonlandings/space adventures
I am all for the scientific method, but we are not taking about working fridges here, but events that have not only billions of investment dollars and integrity at stake, but
the possibllity for outsiders to look around in the kitchen of those who hate the scientific methode themselves.
Why can universities not use NASA's near vacuum chambers to do some proper testing of alledge moonsuits and other equipment ?
Why don't rockets have multiple outboard camera's so that we can view all the viewing angles of the rockets step by step until they go in orbit ?
Why did they not use a specialised camera to record the stars from the moon surface ? Instead Buzz is stealing the show with pictures that one would take on a summer holliday trip....so much for scientific awareness of where you are and what you are looking at......
How convinient, we should test all there is, but not those things that beg for some real answers.
I am not particular educated in a specific scientific field, but i have a lot of experience dealing with people, groups, religion, cults and mental awereness of induviduals.
Mass indoctrination takes place on a large scale,....
Neil deGrasse Tyson who has great concerns for the overall level of education,...but at the same time he shows real signs of obesity, eating a hamburger on stage before dropping a microphone to proof how real gravity is.
What about his concerns for healthy food that every aldult should know by now ?
And this clown is presented all the time to convince the audience how precious the scientific discoveries of space exploration are.
The mind control is obvious,........you can be an unhealthy citizen participating in the ratrace of consumerism as long as you believe our stories about the cosmos.
To far fetched ? Not at all, because the moment people are living healthy, humble lives without too many personal desires, their whole reality is changing rapidly and they start asking questions about this absurd modern age wich includes our earth, our environment, our specific role, our future and more.
And then they come aware of the absurd matrix that has impregnated their existance for far to long with evil desires, falsities and nihilistic world views.