History of Globularism

  • 61 Replies
  • 169554 Views
?

LordByron

  • 116
  • +0/-0
Juan Sebastian Del Cano
« Reply #30 on: December 13, 2006, 07:34:59 AM »
Juan Sebastian Del Cano (1476-1526)

  Juan Sebastian Del Cano, the Captain of the Victoria which returned to Spain in Ad 1522 is widely reguarded as the first Sea Captain to circumnavigate the World, but he was almost definitely not the first to accomplish this.  Only one prior example from all of world history of an individual or group (Inuit or Eskimoes, for example) circumnavigating the Arctic would invalidate Del Cano's claim to fame:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juan_Sebastian_Elcano

?

LordByron

  • 116
  • +0/-0
Jews and Rosicrucians Chart the World
« Reply #31 on: December 13, 2006, 07:38:33 AM »
Jewish Cartographers and Rosicrucians

Globularist Error Charts the World

New Cartography - Disciples of Ptolemy

?

LordByron

  • 116
  • +0/-0
Gerhardus Mercator
« Reply #32 on: December 13, 2006, 07:41:05 AM »

?

LordByron

  • 116
  • +0/-0
Nicolaus Copernicus
« Reply #33 on: December 13, 2006, 07:45:24 AM »
Nicolaus Copernicus (1473-1543)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copernicus

Nicolaus Copernicus - Disciple of the Kabbalist Jews of Poland

  Nicolaus Copernicus was from Krakow, Poland, the same city of the ecumenist pope Karol Wojtyla (John Paul II).
www.dayofgod.net/Malachy/malachy.htm
  Copernicus was selected to advance the heresy of heliocentrism by the Kabbalist jews of Poland as that country was the capitol of European jewry for eight centuries - ashkenazi judaism.   Poland was chosen as such because it is located on the border between Orthodoxy and papist lands.  The same applies to the sephardic jews of Spain located on the border between papism and mohammedanism.

Copernicus's Scholastic Mentor

?

LordByron

  • 116
  • +0/-0
Christopher Clavius
« Reply #34 on: December 13, 2006, 07:46:21 AM »
Christopher Clavius
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Clavius

Kabbalah and Jesuit Philosophy

Pope Gregory XIII
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Gregory_XIII

http://www.12x30.net/gregory.html

Refutation of the Gregorian Calendar

Gregorian Calendar and the Heresy of Ecumenism

?

LordByron

  • 116
  • +0/-0
Giordano Bruno
« Reply #35 on: December 13, 2006, 07:49:25 AM »
Giordano Bruno (1548-1600)

  The Elizabethan era Italian occultist Giordano Bruno may be reguarded as the father of the false concept of outer space for the simple reason that he authored the false notion of an infinite cosmos, or limitless space - the belief that the Sun, Moon, and Stars are far away rather than close as most men had believed prior to the seventeenth century.  The truth of the issue is that "outer space" as depicted in science fiction and modern astronomy does not exist as the theory of infinity is false and the Stars are close as the ancients correctly believed.

  Widely considered the authoritative work on Giordano Bruno's history including his deep involvement in the occult is Frances Yates's study of his life and influence 'Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition' (1964):
http://www.amazon.com/Giordano-Bruno-Hermetic-Tradition-Frances/dp/0226950077

  Frances Yates also authored other books significant to occultism in renaissance Britain and its relation to modern science such as 'The Occult Philosophy in the Elizabethan Age' (1979):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frances_Yates
http://www.robotwisdom.com/jorn/yates.html

  Focusing more exclusively on Bruno's contribution to falsehoods of modern science such as atomism and heliocentrism is 'Giordano Bruno and Renaissance Science' by Hilary Gatti:
http://books.google.mu/books?id=9cYumhwTQP8C&dq=giordano+bruno,+frances+yates&pg=PP11&ots=SLLN75A14a&sig=WbS-tY9NvkGEnso0mcQe8CD91_I&prev=http://www.google.mu/search%3Fhl%3Den%26q%3Dgiordano%2Bbruno%252C%2Bfrances%2Byates%26btnG%3DGoogle%2BSearch&sa=X&oi=print&ct=result&cd=1

   An excellent history of the Elizabethan era in which Bruno lived by a traditional roman catholic historian is 'Philip II' by William Thomas Walsh (1930):
http://www.tanbooks.com/index.php/page/shop:flypage/product_id/285/

  Bruno was the contemporary of Tycho Brahe's assistant, the occult astronomer Johannes Kepler.  Bruno was himself the student of the most notorious occultist of the age.  Not surprisingly Bruno was welcome at the revolutionary protestant Court of Queen Elizabeth of Britain where controversial Anglican priest and Jewish occultist John Dee (Francis Bacon's mentor) was one of his greatest allies.

  And Bruno is of course most significant as a mentor of Galileo Galilei (despite any dishonest attempt of Galileo to distance himself from Bruno's unattractive reputation for political survival) and especially of Rene Descartes.  The mentor of the founders of modern scientism and false astronomy was the most notorious occultist of the renaissance who died at the hands of the papist Inquisition which executed him in Rome in the year of the Lord 1600 and subsequently outlawed his books:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giordano_Bruno

?

LordByron

  • 116
  • +0/-0
The Occult Philosopher
« Reply #36 on: December 13, 2006, 07:51:26 AM »
John Dee (1527-1608)

The Occult Philosopher

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Dee

  John Dee was the most significant occultist in Britian during the centuries of the renaissance and the protestant revolt.  In particular, Dee represented the occult in the vast political conspiracy of William Cecil that overtook Britain in the late sixteenth century.
 
  Historian Michael Hoffman is currently planning to publish a book which delves deeply into exposing the occultism of Queen Elizabeth's Court which is to say William Cecil's political machine which founded the British Empire.  Hoffman currently sells a recorded Lecture (on Compact Disc) he gave on the subject:
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/cgi-bin/store/agora.cgi?cart_id=9571129.21214a26WQ2&product=Audio_CDs

  John Dee was Francis Bacon's friend and mentor.  Francis Bacon (1561-1626) is widely (if mistakenly) credited as the founder of the Rosicrucian order of which later famous occultists such as Rene Desartes and Isaac Newton were members.  Bacon was doubtless a Rosicrucian and a major link in one of its most major phases - the British Rocisrucians of the sixteenth and especially the seventeenth centuries.  However, the Rocicrucian order is far older than the time of Dee and Bacon.  For example, in addition to the well known traditonally ascribed fourteenth century German founder Chrstian von Rosencreuz, when French King Philip Le Bel (the contemporary of King Edward who expelled the Jews from Britain) outlawed the Knights Templars in AD 1306, two French members of that Order went to Scotland in that year where they were offered protection by Robert the Bruce who founded (in 1306) the Scottish Order of the Rosy Crux.  Besides this considerable evidence exists that Dante Alighieri was a Rosicrucian and in that capacity promoted non-Biblical and non-Christian cosmological doctrines (obtained from Mohammedan philosophers, chiefly those of ismaili sects like the Fatimids) such as those contained in his three volume 'Divine Comedy,' a papist work which promotes globularism and other doctrines like concentric circles of Hell which were unknown to the early Christians of both East and West.  Never the less, Dee was the guide of the founder (Bacon) of that phase of Rosicrucianism which saw heliocentrism rise to popularity through the medium of the universities of western Europe.

  John Dee was a Jewish occultist which signifies the principle conduit through which occult doctrines flow.  The significance of occult Jewish religious figures to the history and fortunes of the  the British empire is shown by the life of John Dee as well as by Rabbi Falk, the Baal Shem of London and perhaps the most powerful man in the British Empire during the reigns of King George II and III including the time of the American revolution and who was even denounced by other Jewish leaders as an occultist and follower of the seventeenth century Jewish false messiah Shabettai Tzvi:
http://www.kheper.net/topics/Kabbalah/Falk.htm

  Isaac D'Israeli was the father of Benjamin D'Israeli, the nineteenth century Jewish Tory prime minister of Britian who promoted racist colonialism and the opium trade during the height of the empire's power,  In 1842, Isaac D'Israeli wrote a biography ofJohn Dee entitled 'The Occult Philosopher' which reveals much detail of the controversial aspects of Dee's career.  Dee was very controversial during his own lifetime among other reasons for the fact that it was a public outrage for a notorious occultist to be made an Anglican priest.  

  Mrs. Solange Hertz, a roman catholic historian and geocentrist who writes for the traditionalist Remnant newspaper, has written several books critical of John Dee and the "scientific" revolution of the seventeenth century:
http://fp1.centurytel.net/RemnantBookstore/book_review.htm

  John Dee is a striking example of the immorality and in particular the occultism associated with protestantism.  Erudite historian David Stannard (author of the definitive and exhaustive 'The American Holocaust:  Columbus and the Voyages of Discovery' published appropriately in 1992) wrote a book exposing the occult practices of early protestantism characeristic of protestant ministers such as John Dee entitled 'The Puritan Way of Death':
http://books.google.mu/books?id=0YbLIHMDtlYC&printsec=frontcover&dq=puritan+way+of+death,+david+stannard

  Of interest to cosmography is the fact that Dee was the author of the globularist world maps which took the form in the late sixteenth century which cartographers have followed ever since.

?

LordByron

  • 116
  • +0/-0
Francis Bacon
« Reply #37 on: December 13, 2006, 07:52:15 AM »
Francis Bacon (1561-1626)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Bacon

Quote from: "Erasmus"
Actually, Rowbotham discarded the scientific method, replacing it with something more restrictive -- the scientific method allows for indirect observation, like one of the methods used to detect planets around distant stars.  You're not detecting the planet directly; you're detecting the effect it has on its star.  That doesn't mean there's a planet there, says Rowbotham: it just means that the thing that you observed happening is happening.

The modern so-called "scientific" method was invented by the Elizabethan occultist Francis Bacon, who along with Rene Descartes and Isaac Newton figures prominently in the history of Rosicrucianism.

  Bacon's method allows for an unlimited number of interpretations of each observation.  Similar to Luther's doctrine which allows for conflicting individual interpretations of Scripture, Baconian hypothetical interpretations inevitably conform to a given scientist's arbitrary prejudice.  Unfortunately, modern educational institutions are used as a forum for the presentation of certain schools of opinions as if these opinions were the truth, and the masses seldom discern that these interpretations are merely hypothetical opinions rather than what was exclusively observed.
  (The masses are certainly not presented with the alternative traditional explanations because Francis Bacon's method was invented in order to destroy the popularity of traditional science.)

  Bacon's innovative method is also at variance with the strict logic of the ancient Greek mathematician Euclid.  Samuel Rowbotham quotes Euclid in his book 'Earth Not a Globe.'  In fact Rowbotham's Zetetic Astronomy is a return to the simplicity and strictness of Euclidean math and logic.  Euclid was in fact the most studied mathematician in ancient Greece, Rome, and medieval Europe.  He is also well known to the Arabs.

Quote from: "Cinlef"
haven't you forgot to mention that (under Bacon style science) a hypothesis that is contradicted by observations must be discarded?

  No.  Both methods discard that which is observably false, but the Baconian method adds the POSSIBILITY OF FALSEHOOD which is absent in the ancient and honourable Euclidean logic which only admits that which is obeserved.  Therefore, Baconian logic is speculative whereas Euclidean logic is reliable.

  Frances Yates wrote an informative history of Rosicrucianism and the influence it had on the "elightenment" and modern science:
http://www.amazon.com/Rosicrucian-Enlightenment-Frances-Yates/dp/0415109124

http://books.google.mu/books?id=MTvjkifGp04C&dq=seventeenth+century+rosicrucians,+frances+yates&pg=PR11&ots=naeymxHiJf&sig=7hGVSZoCDUKaGtSw-NmLfp7dm8s&prev=http://www.google.mu/search%3Fhl%3Den%26q%3Dseventeenth%2Bcentury%2Brosicrucians%252C%2Bfrances%2Byates&sa=X&oi=print&ct=result&cd=1

Euclid of Alexandria (Fourth Century BC):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclid
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/Euclid.html

Euclid's 'Elements'
http://aleph0.clarku.edu/~djoyce/java/elements/toc.html

?

LordByron

  • 116
  • +0/-0
Johannes Kepler
« Reply #38 on: December 13, 2006, 07:53:16 AM »
Johannes Kepler (1571-1630)

  John Kepler is an outstanding example of the bond between modern astronomy and the occult.  This founder of modern astronomy - elliptical heliocentrism - claims to have conducted a voyage to the moon in the late 1500's.  

  Johannes Kepler, who founded modern astronomy and particularly the elliptical form of heliocentrism which is the basis of modern heliocentrical astronomy,  claimed to have conducted astral travel to the moon in the company of a demon who revealed to him the alleged secrets of the stars.  Astral travel means that his soul departed from his body for a brief period.  His acompaniment by a demon almost certainly did occur as Kepler himself claimed.  Whether or not the demon actually took him to the moon is another question.  During this time Kepler was guided by this demon who doubtless spake much clever falsehood to the gullible and spellbound man as is the case in all such incidents, and such doctrines as the elliptical orbits of planets which Kepler subsequently propagated to the world are the result of this experience:
http://geocities.com/levelwater/mathlies05.html

  Astronomer Johannes Kepler wrote in his autobiography that "A BENEVOLENT DEMON TOOK ME TO THE MOON AND SHOWED ME THE LAWS OF THE UNIVERSE."

  The founder of modern astronomy thus revealed the demonic source of modern heliocentric doctrine.   PERSONS WHO DO NOT FIND KEPLER'S STORY ABOUT HIS JOURNEY TO THE MOON TO BE BELIEVEABLE SHOULD LIKEWISE DOUBT THE HELIOCENTRIC ASTRONOMY OF WHICH HIS DEMONIC ENCOUNTER FORMS THE BASIS.  

  This information is also contained with references in 'Geocentricity' by Gerhardus Bouw.  As a matter of fact, Bouw provides references for the life of Johannes Kepler life which state that he was not only a Rosicrucian but regualrly took part in occult rituals which involved drinking blood of sacrificed persons from skull cups.  Kepler is widely acknowledged to have been an astrologer and prognosticator.  The demon with which Kepler himself claimed to have been acquainted was evidently the source of the prognostications that he made.  As far as astrology, there are in fact extant 800 natal charts drawn by Kepler himself:
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_Kepler

  As Kepler's occult beliefs with reguards to heliocentrism have been so wildly popular and influential (he succeeded where Copernicus had failed during the preceeding century), it would be interesting to learn more about the influence he had on other fantasies of interstellar travel like those of H.G. Wells and Arthur C. Clarke.

  It should be borne out that Kepler was the assistant to the geocentric Danish astronomer Tycho Brahe, reguarded by most as the greatest astronomer of the sixteenth century partly due to the fact that this geocentrist recorded the the most accurate astronomical data of his time:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tycho_Brahe

?

LordByron

  • 116
  • +0/-0
Galileo Galilei
« Reply #39 on: December 13, 2006, 07:54:36 AM »
Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)

The false conventional heliocentric view of Galileo:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei

Galileo Versus the Geocentric Theory of the Universe by Nathan Martin Gwynne
http://hometown.aol.com/thomasaquinas87/origins/pdf/galileo.pdf

?

LordByron

  • 116
  • +0/-0
Rene Descartes
« Reply #40 on: December 13, 2006, 07:55:28 AM »
Rene Descartes (1596-1650)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ren%C3%A9_Descartes

  Widely viewed as the founder of modern science, Rene Descartes was a student of Giordano Bruno and close associate of fellow heliocentrist Galileo.  Descartes came to such prominence through his activity as a member of the Rosicrucian order.   The details of his involvement with the Rosmembership are recorded in a CESHE paper on Ether and many issues of its journal 'Science et Foi' ('Science and Faith').
www.chez.com/ceshe/

  The aspect of Descartes most often mentioned is his dualist views, but his reduction of all matter to quantitative description has arguably had the greatest influence on the World.  A key figure in the ascendance of nominalist philosophy over realism during the renaissance, the application of Descartes nominalist philosophy to the real World has been catastrophic.  Author Denis Fahey describes the corrosive effect which the application of Descartes's nominalist philosophy has had on food, farming, human health, and nature.
www.catholictreasures.com/cartdescrip/10123.html

Possibly the most broadly and well reflected critique of Rene Descartes is Rene Guenon's epic refutation of modern science 'The Reign of Quantity and the Signs of the Times':
www.sophiaperennis.com/guenon_reign.html
www.sophiaperennis.com/guenon_reign_toc.html

  In 'Characters of the Reformation' catholic historian Hilaire Belloc laments the profound and horrible effect which Descartes's influence has had on society by REDUCING ALL MATTER TO QUANTITY and ended by saying that "A man who asserts that the proof that man is related to apes through genealogy is a scientific fact stands at the end of a process begun by Rene Descartes."
www.shvoong.com/f/books/110117-characters-reformation-historical-portraits-of-the-23-men-women-and-place-the/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibnitz (1646-1716)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gottfried_Leibniz

  The geocentric German scientist and philosopher Wilhelm Leibnitz was a contemporary of Newton and another prominent critic of Rene Descartes.  (Large numbers of German scientists were geocentrists publicly through to the twentieth century as Robert Schadewald's research attests.)  Modern scientists usually describe Leibnitz in language which disguises the fact that he is one of their opponents.  A follower of sophia perennis (perennial wisdom), Leibnitz's works are a significant testimony against the founders of modern science (Descartes in particular) by one of their contemporaries.

?

LordByron

  • 116
  • +0/-0
Baruch Spinoza
« Reply #41 on: December 13, 2006, 07:57:00 AM »
Baruch Spinoza (1632-1677)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spinoza

Dutch Jews and Calvinists Spread Heliocentrism
http://www.press.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/hfs.cgi/00/16185.ctl

?

LordByron

  • 116
  • +0/-0
Isaac Newton
« Reply #42 on: December 13, 2006, 07:58:01 AM »
Isaac Newton (1643-1727)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton

Sir Isaac Newton and Modern Astronomy by Nathan Martin Gwynne
http://hometown.aol.com/thomasaquinas87/origins/pdf/newton.pdf

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Rosicrucianism procured the rise of heliocentrism to popularity through the medium of universities.  In that connection it is significant that the influence and power of traditional Roman Catholicism was eliminated from the most imporatant universities in Britain such as Oxford and Cambridge.  That is where Isaac Newton (1643-1727), a pawn who was made and instructed by the Jewish controlled Rosicrucian Order, was peculiarly significant.  An unnamed shadowy figure periodically visited Newton throughout his life.  Of interest in this connection is the role Jews played in British politics from the 1660's onwards after Cromwell and Charles I (otherwise deadly enemies) allowed Jews into Britain for the first time since King Edward.  The above mentioned fact and many inglorious details of Isaac Newton's life are given by his admiring but homest biographer including but far from limited to his lifelong dedication to the study of occult alchemy.  In 1685, Britain found itself under a Roman Catholic King - Charles II who adopted the program of restoring to Britain its medieval heritage.  Many Jewish merchants opposed this policy for the threat that it posed to the monopoly which they were in process of acquiring (which soon enough manifested itself after they overthrew him as in 1696 the Bank of Englandwas formed as essentially a branch of the Central Bank of Holland, the same country where the new kings were to come from.  In 1687, a huge controversy developed around a certain papist priest whom Charles II apointed to teach history at Cambridge.  Well, Newton was called upon to use his influence at Cambridge against the confirmation of the priest and he complied.  The merchants used the incident was used as a rallying cry towards their ultimate objective - the overthrow of the papist King Charles II who had so many medieval inclinations.  The King was overthrown in 1688, and with protestant control of the universities assured, Newton published his heliocentric 'Principia Mathematica' the following year (1689).  Groups of traditional geocentric opposers developed during the eighteenth century, most significantly the followers of John Hutchinson (the Hutchinsonians), but the protestants and heliocentrists had control of the universities and the teaching of doctrines to new generations of leaders.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton

  An article on John Hutchinson, one of Newton's most dedicated British critics who authored several Theological and geocentric works including 'Moses's Principia' (1724) and a refutation of Newton's 'Principia Mathematica' entitled 'Power Esential and Mechanical, or What Power Belongs to God and What to His Creatures, in Which the Design of Sir Isaac Newton and Dr Samuel Clarke is Laid Open' (1732):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hutchinson_%28writer%29

?

LordByron

  • 116
  • +0/-0
Ascendance of Nominalism
« Reply #43 on: December 13, 2006, 08:00:14 AM »
Pervasiveness of Nominalist Philosophy in the Renaissance

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dominance of Nominalism Procured Through Rosicrucianism

Rene Descartes (1596-1650)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

John Locke (1632-1704)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Locke

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

George Berkeley (1685-1753)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Berkeley

Fascination of Mohammedans With the Fantasy World of George Berkeley

?

LordByron

  • 116
  • +0/-0
James Cook
« Reply #44 on: December 13, 2006, 08:05:34 AM »
James Cook

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Cook

  James Cook (1728-1779), the famous eighteenth century colonialialist whose Sea travels established the worldwide naval basis of the British Empire, was a globularist like his Spanish and Portuguese predecessors.  

  The assumption that Cook accurately charted the Indian and Pacific Oceans is an error.  Cook began and conducted all his travel with the erroneous assumption that the World is a globe.  Large areas of the Indian and Pacific Oceans remain uncharted as a result of the globular ideology followed by globularist cartographers since the renaissance.  Most of these uncharted areas are not depicted on globes which misleads most persons to never even take thought of their existence.  

  James Cook's conception of geography was limited by the globularist doctrine by which he was guided.  As a consequence, Cook's explorations were also limited to only those regions which were compatible with cartography restricted by globularist theory en vogue since the renaissance.  In particular, James Cook in no way disproved the existence of Terra Australis for this very reason.  Cook claims that having crossed areas of latitude as far south on a globe as he thinks disproves the existence of land (i.e. Terra Australis, a major segment of the outer edge of Land), but his brainwashed thinking wrongly assumes that the world is globular and his conclusions do not apply to the real world which is flat.  Doubtless Captain James Cook was selected only after examination of his mind to ensure that his voyages would not venture into those regions in which Terra Australis does indeed exist (and I do not mean the continent Australia):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terra_Australis

  If any land should be named Australia, it should be what goes by the name Antarctica;  certainly the large island which goes by the name of Australia today does not merit the name as this is not that land to which the ancients referred when they used the word "Terra Australis."  The confusion is due to British navigator Matthew Flinders who misnamed the large Pacific island "Australia" in order to deliberately deter further interest in locating the real Terra Australis.  Flinders apparently comes from a prolifically anti-religious family as his grandson is the famous Egyptologist William Matthew Flinders Petrie:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Flinders
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Flinders_Petrie

  Never the less many specific observations that Cook did make have only confirmed that the World is flat and have been appropriately quoted to that end especially in the works of some nineteenth century flat Earther researchers such as Alexander Gleason in 'Is the Bible From Heaven?  Is the Earth a Globe?'

  All of the logbooks of Cook's voyages (and those of the other travellers mentioned above) have been translated into British and reprinted by the Hakluyt Society:
http://www.hakluyt.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hakluyt_Society

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Occult Dominance of Military Through Rosicrucianism and Freemasonry

?

LordByron

  • 116
  • +0/-0
The Philosophes and the Illuminati
« Reply #45 on: December 13, 2006, 08:08:15 AM »
Illuminist and Masonic War on Christian Knowledge

  Frances Yates wrote an informative history of Rosicrucianism and the influence it had on the "elightenment" and modern science:
http://www.amazon.com/Rosicrucian-Enlightenment-Frances-Yates/dp/0415109124

  An exhaustive and definitive book on the subject of the faulty science and history of the misnamed "enlightenment" and its philosophes including Voltaire, D'Alembert, Diderot, and King Frederick II of Prussia was written during the course of the 1790's and published in 1798 as a four volume masterpeice by the Jesuit historian, the Abbe Augustin Barruel (1743-1820).  The 800+ page book entitled 'Memoirs Illustrating the History of Jacobinism' is also the most authoritative historical account of Ingolstadt University professor Adam Weishaupt and the Illuminati Order which he founded and headed:
http://pirate.shu.edu/~jakistan/rvb/jacobinism.html

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Frederick II of Prussia (1712-1786)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_II_of_Prussia

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Francois-Marie Arouet Voltaire (1694-1778)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voltaire

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jean Le Rond d'Alembert (1717-1783)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_le_Rond_d'Alembert

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Denis Diderot (1713-1784)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diderot

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Immanuelle Kant (1724-1804)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kant

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Adam Weishaupt (1748-1830)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Weishaupt

?

LordByron

  • 116
  • +0/-0
Catastrophism Versus Uniformitarianism
« Reply #46 on: December 13, 2006, 08:09:14 AM »
Catastrophism Versus Uniformitarianism

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catastrophism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniformitarianism_(science)

  Before uniformitarianism (before the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries), the dominant belief in many cultures of the creation and development of the world was essentially catastrophism.  The biblical account of the Great Flood is a prime example of these beliefs.  The Earth's history was viewed as the result of an accumulation of catastrophic events over a relatively short time period.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Conspiracy of the Royal Geographic Society

Charles Lyell (1797-1875)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Lyell
William Whewell (1794-1866)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Whewell

Charles Lyell, considered by some as the founder of modern geology, was involoved along with William Whewell in a successful conspiracy of the Royal Geographic Society during the nineteenth century to supplant catastrophism with uniformitarianism.  The details of this conspiracy are described with a bibliography in 'The Geocentric Papers' by Gerhardus Bouw.
www.geocentricity.com/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  The conspiracy of the Royal Geographic Society is the continuation of a branch of an older conspiracy which existed during the 1700's.  The older conspiracy is described by Abbe Augustin Barruel in his book 'Memoirs Illustrating the History of Jacobinism' in part one, a two hundred page essay entitled 'Anti-Christian Conspiracy' which is based on the correspondence of Voltaire, King Frederick II of Prussia, d'Alembert, and Diderot and their decades long effort to spread propaganda against the Bible.   James Hutton (1726-1797) and John Playfair (1748-1819) were the principle adepts of these French philosophes.
http://pirate.shu.edu/~jakistan/rvb/jacobinism.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Hutton
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Playfair

?

LordByron

  • 116
  • +0/-0
The Ice Age Theory Exploded
« Reply #47 on: December 13, 2006, 08:11:01 AM »
The Ice Age Theory Exploded

Louis Agassiz (1807-1873)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Agassiz

?

LordByron

  • 116
  • +0/-0
The Pendulum Dissected
« Reply #48 on: December 13, 2006, 08:12:17 AM »

?

LordByron

  • 116
  • +0/-0
Mind Control and Manipulation
« Reply #49 on: December 13, 2006, 08:18:11 AM »
Mind Control and Manipulation

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Spiritism, Theosophy & Demonic Manifestations

'The Spiritist Fallacy' by Rene Guenon
www.sophiaperennis.com/guenon_spiritistfallacy.html
www.sophiaperennis.com/guenon_spiritistfallacy_toc.html


International Theosophical Network

'Theosophy:  History of a Pseudo-Religion' by Rene Guenon
www.sophiaperennis.com/guenon_theosophy.html
www.sophiaperennis.com/guenon_theosophy_toc.html

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sigmund Freud and Occult Judaism (1856-1939)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigmund_Freud

Zohar Kabbalah the Centrepeice of Modern Psychiatry
www.cyberummah.org/english/index.htm

  Many writers (from varied backgrounds such as Rene Guenon and Dave Breese) have noted that most of the founders and leading persons of modern disciplines are Jewish.  The truth of the matter is this is not an accident.  The fact that the founder of modern psychiatry was Jewish is due to the fact that he was given this position by a Jewish secret society which effectively controls most of the modern world.  The most authoritative biography of Sigmund Freud is 'Sigmund Freud and the Jewish Mystical Tradition' by David Bakan.  In addition to significant biographical information about Freud such as his zionist philosophy and activism, agnosticism, and cocaine addiction, the thesis of this detailed and informative book is the solidly documented case that Freud did not invent modern psychoanalysis, but modeled it as a practical extension of the Kabbalah of esoteric judaism, the zohar in particular.  As Freud was jewish and familiar with the kabbalah from his own education these facts of the origin of psychiatry should surprise no one:
http://store.yahoo.com/doverpublications/0486437671.html
The Reign of Quantity and the Signs of the Times by Rene Guenon (1945)
Chapter 34 - The Misdeeds of Psychoanalysis
www.sophiaperennis.com/guenon_reign_toc.html

Masonic Control of Universities and Secret Chambers of Horror

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Carl Jung and Pagan Occultism (1875-1961)

Carl Jung and Nazi Eugenics

Jung and Occult Sex Rituals

  As with the founders of the Bolshevik government of Russia (including Lenin), the founders of modern psychiatry were overwhelmingy Jewish.  Carl Gustav Jung was chosen as a public figure to present psychiatry to the world in order to obscure the thoroughly Jewish origin of modern psychiatry.  Sigmund Freud actually verbalised this purpose.  'The Aryan Christ' by psychiatrist Richard Noll is the defintive account of Carl Jung, and the book exposes in great detail the occult origins and nature of modern psychiatry.  Professor Noll is an atheist which gives him credibility against any accusation that the book would be written with a religious motive.  The following link is a detailed description of 'The Aryan Christ' by Richard Noll and contains a great deal of unseemly information concerning Carl Jung:
www.dhushara.com/book/jung/archr.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

International Congress on Mental Health (1944-1948)

Toxic Psychiatry

  Psychiatrist Professor Peter Breggin's excellent books are so well established they can be obtained from book dealers like Barnes & Noble and Borders.  'Toxic Psychiatry' is perhaps his best book, but he has authored and collaborated on many (including one book on psychiatry's historical association with National Socialist Germany and a number of other dictatorships).  The book has references to much other useful information on the subject, by Breggin and others.  The following link to a dealer of autographed books by Peter Breggin:
www.breggin.com/prbbooks.html
www.breggin.com/Toxicpsych.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mind Control
www.mindcontrolforums.com/project-paperclip4.htm

Central Intelligence Agency and Mind Control
www.wanttoknow.info/mindcontrol

CIA's Project MK-ULTRA
http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~alb/misc/mindControlDenial.html
http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/ckln-hm.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MK-ULTRA
http://www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and%20History/CIA_MK-ULTRA_experiments_on_children.htm

'History of MK-ULTRA' by Eric Jewell
www.wintersteel.com/files/ShanaArticles/MKULTRA.htm

MK-ULTRA and Manchurian Candidates
http://spychiatrists.cyberummah.org/eir_british_psychiatry_eugenics.htm

NASA and CIA Mind Control Research Facilities
www.trance-formation.com

  The CIA's MK- ULTRA mind control program was functioning before NASA was founded as a surrogate of the CIA.  NASA and the CIA brainwashed certain men from the United States military as mind control subjects.  The weak mindedness of many of these "astronauts" is apparent in their lives.  Buzz Aldrin's fragile mentality and his time spent in mental institutions is a case in point:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buzz_Aldrin
Also noteworthy in this respect is Neil Armstrong's reclusiveness.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Armstrong  

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disinformation and Propaganda

İnformation Control
War Propaganda
Zionist Propaganda - Holocaust Claims & Other Disinformation
Founts of Propaganda:  Churches

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conduits of Mind Control - Universities and Government Education Systems

  The university system throughout the World is a social and mind control mechanism of the CIA and allied organizations.  Universities were used for this purpose throughout the renaissance as well.  The policies of Oxford and Cambridge during the reign of Queen Elizabeh I were subject to approval and influence by Francis Walsingham, William Cecil's chief agent and the founder of the British secret service.  Modern universities were first created by papist scholastics (who were in turn modeled on Saracen schools of learning) who were distinguished by virtue of the fact that they separated Theology from reason - creating a new way of thinking and philosophy unknown to early Christians.  

  Universities are the scabs western europe has imposed on the modern World.  Universities were initially imposed throughout the world by way of colonialism.  Colonialism continues through the conquest of the mind and soul as when most of the countries of the World were freed from the shackles of European colonialism during the latter twentieth century, most of them received neocolonial dictatorships in its palce as the leaders of the new governments were first trained and indoctrinated in european and american universities.
The CIA On Campus
www.cia-on-campus.org

The CIA Off Campus
www.southendpress.org/2005/items/CIAcl

  Unitarian Universalists, perhaps the most anti-Christian form of protestantism, has controlled government schools in the United States since the mid-nineteenth century to such an extent that american schools are effectively Unitarian parochial schools.
National Education Association and Unitarianism
www.sntp.net/education/education_mafia.htm

Is Public Education Necessary?
www.howtotutor.com/sam-bks.htm

Through control of education, secret societies exercise great control of the minds of most people - particularly the so-called educated.  The upper crust - the top 20% - of a modern society like america's are the most thoroughly brainwashed in order that the principle levers of power and influence are in the hands of persons who will not be an obstacle to the sect which directs the whole.

'Necessary Illusions:  Thought Control and Democratic Societies' by Noam Chomsky:
www.zmag.org/Chomsky/ni/ni-overview.html

?

LordByron

  • 116
  • +0/-0
Michelson and Morley
« Reply #50 on: December 13, 2006, 08:20:00 AM »
Albert Michelson (1852-1931)
&
Edward Morley (1838-1923)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson-Morley_experiment
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Abraham_Michelson
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Morley

  Professors Albert Michelson and Edward Morley of Case Western Reserve University in Ohio conducted a famous experiment in 1887 which proved that the Earth is stationary - thereby disproving the heliocentric theory of astronomy.  This occurred during an era when geocentrism was popular in several religious denominations and an expanding and thriving flat Earth movement existed.  The experiment sought to determine at what speed the Earth travels through Aether and concluded that the speed was zero (i.e. the geocetrists were right after all).  The Michelson Morley experiment is significant in that even official establishment science recognizes it as the basis of Einstein's theory of relativity.

  Besides much other rubbish, Einstein's theory held that viewpoints are relative and that the truth is not absolute.  As the Sun transits the Sky, Einstein stated that this is only apparent to a viewer from the Earth.  He states that from the perspective of the Sun, the Earth appears to move.  Needless to say, Einstein incorrectly assumed that the Earth is a globe and neglected the true ancient cosmography that the Sun, Moon, and Stars all revolve in the expanse between Heaven and Earth as objects between the floor and the roof of a House.  

  In the midst of Einstein's vault to fame via uncritical american institutions, Michelson conducted a repeat of his experiment in 1925 which reconfirmed that the Earth does not move, but this inconvenience has been neglected as the american "scientific" community is not actually concerned with spreading the truth.  Rather than accept the simple conclusion that the Earth is stationary and does not travel through Aether, masonic american scientific institutions which were guided by their sponsors' funding rather than by the conclusions of objective research ignored Michelson's 1924 experiment by trashing the age old proven concept of Aether and concluded that the Earth travels through Aether at a speed of zero only because Aether does not exist.  Completely contrary to all evidence, Einstein yet concluded that the Earth does indeed move.
http://ro.altermedia.info/opinii/creationismul-un-altfel-de-revizionism_988.htmlprint/
http://perso.orange.fr/thomiste/ynourel.htm

?

LordByron

  • 116
  • +0/-0
Atomism
« Reply #51 on: December 13, 2006, 08:20:55 AM »
Atomism

Lord Rutherford (1871-1937)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atom
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Rutherford
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rutherford_model

  Ernest Rutherford founded nuclear physics, or rather the modern form of the false theory of atomism which teaches that atoms are composed of subatomic particles - namely protons, neutrons, and electrons.  Not only is this absurd, but the very theory that matter is composed of atoms is an ancient falsehood.  Like Albert Einstein (with whose relativity theories he rejected), Rutherford's science is unsubstatiated theory which clouds the truth.  One might ask why such theories were even invented - and promoted at the time they were.  The answer is that technology has been rapidly growing, and the sources of technology are rather closely guarded secrets as technical research is tightly controlled.  The explanations of Rutherford and Einstein have little to do with the truth.  This new atomism has been used to hide the truth about "nuclear" reactions (both "fission" and "fusion") from the general public.  A system of indoctrination in Rutherfordian atomism has been adopted by the university system which initiates pass through before they are bequeathed rather closely guarded secrets of technical research.  This is the structure of the engineering industry and its inseparable ties with the scientific educational establishment as described in 'America By Design' by David Noble:
www.umsl.edu/~rkeel/280/class/ambydesn.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_F._Noble

  Rutherford is perhaps most comparable to Copernicus in that he added great confusion to a simple falsehood.  Western european universities had already accepted globularism insterad of flat Earth doctrine by the time of Copernicus who added a great obstacle to understanding cosmographical truth by promoting heliocentrism.  Rutherford did likewise with reguard to physics by adding theories of subatomic particles to the false theory of atoms.

  The false doctrine that atoms constitute matter is ancient.  Certain schools (but not all) in India held this doctrine which was adopted by many Buddhists and ultimately by certain Hellenes of the late pagan pre-Christian era, namely Leucippus and Democritus.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leucippus
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democritus

  The atomism of Democritus and Leucippus was thoroughly rejected by the Orthodox Christian Church Fathers.  Among them, Lactantius was influential in the Court of Constantine the Great as tutor to the Emperor's son:
www.earlychurch.org.uk/lactantius.php
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lactantius

The papist scholastics continued the rejection of atomism which the Church Fathers held.  As with so many aspects of science, the Hellenic pagan philosophy of atoms (of Leucippus and Democritus) found its stronghold among Mohammedans.  Atomism reentered western science during the renaissance primarily (but not exclusively) through Galileo.  Adoption of atomism in western europe encountered significant resistance until at least well into the twentieth century.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pierre Duhem (1861-1916)

http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/billramey/duhem.htm
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Biographies/Duhem.html
http://pirate.shu.edu/~jakistan/JakisBooks/PierreDuhem.htm

  French chemist Pierre Duhem was the greatest scientist of France in the modern era, and perhaps the greatest chemist the modern World has produced.  His learned books prove the truth and superiority of medieval chemistry.  He never accepted belief in atoms, and this fact aided greatly to his understanding of scientific truth.  After the manner of monks, he spent long hours mastering his subjects in a cell in the French countryside, and he never accepted the indoctrination imposed by well connected and funded official science.

?

LordByron

  • 116
  • +0/-0
Albert Einstein
« Reply #52 on: December 13, 2006, 08:26:00 AM »
Albert Einstein (1879-1955)

The Protocols of the Elders of Zion

  As most of the founders and leaders of modern disciplines are Jewish, this state of affairs is neither natural nor a conincidence.  This phenomenon has been artificially and successfully brought about by millenia of focused effort.  Jewish men like Einstein and Freud among others do not hold the positions or status they have because the things that they assert are true (their doctrines are in fact false).  That is not how the modern World functions.

  Jewish men like Einstein, Freud, and Churchill owe their fame to a secret order which they serve and which granted them their status because of their service and loyalty.  This order has a vast network of tentacles and levels (including demons, or fallen angels in its upper echelons) which comprise the modern World.  The Devil is served by hordes of demons arranged in a remarkeble order and which have various accomplices in the realm of men.  Politically speaking, that society which is at the head of all such bodies of men is a small and necessarily most secretive order of Hebrew leaders - the Kahal, or Sanhedrin which is in these latter days the most politically powerful organization in the World.  The reason that men of Jewish extraction dominate all disciplines is that the Sanhedrin has contrived this state of affairs over many centuries.  All these men like Albert Einstein indirectly serve the Sanhedrin whether they realize it or not.  The 'Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion' is one of the most significant and revealing examples of the literature of this order to ever be published:
www.radioislam.org/protocols/index.htm
www.biblebelievers.org.au/przion1.htm
www.aztlan.net/protocolos.htm
http://ddickerson.igc.org/The_Protocols_of_the_Learned_Elders_of_Zion.pdf

  When the Kahal decided that political conditions were conducive to Jewish mgration to Palestine, Theodore Herzl convened convened the first World Zionist Congress in 1897 in Basel, Switzerland, a country from which much activity by this Order has been directed.  The implementation of the Protocols referenced above was the actual agenda of the conference.  According to a Russian policeman, a copy of this document was used considerably among those at the speakers' podium.  This history is contained in the informative introduction that the Russian Orthodox Madame Paquita de Shishmareff wrote to her translation of the 'Protocols of the Elders of Zion':
www.fromthehousetops.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=166

  There have been attempts by Jewish organizations since the Protocols of Zion were first published to disown them by asserting that they are a racist forgery:
http://ddickerson.igc.org/protocols.html

  The phenomenon that the press (the Jewish Kahal controlled media) assigned as the definitive proof that the Protocols were a forgery in the early 1920's was the fact that much of the text of the 'Protocols of the Elders of Zion' is identical to many chapters of a book by a revolutionary (Maurice Joly who protested Napoleon III) published in French in 1864 entitled 'Dialogue Aux Enfers Entre Machiavel et Montesquieu':
www.gutenberg.org/catalog/world/readfile?fk_files=87686&pageno=1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurice_Joly

  However, 'Secret Societies and Subversive Movements' by Nesta Webster (1924) which contains lengthy side by side comparions of text from each book states that Joly's book was also published in Geneva (where the Protocols are accused of having been first published as their original edition is also in French and the city of Geneva was the nerve centre of revolutionary activity during the nineteenth century as well as where the zionist movement was launched; and Voltaire's and the United Nations and World Bank's headquarters for that matter).  Websta does not deny that the Protocols copies Joly's book, but she presents the credible argument that the same Order produced both.  Masterpeices of any art form including great speeches, dissertations, or plans are seldom contrived in a single day.  The 'Protocols of the Elders of Zion' is the culmination of years of work:
http://books.google.com/books?id=7_qGS7PpG0gC&printsec=frontcover&dq=nesta+webster,+secret+societies+and+subversive+movements&psp=1
http://hiddenmysteries.com/xcart/product.php?productid=16186
http://ellhn.e-e-e.gr/books/assets/secret_societies.pdf

  It is due to publication by Russian Orthodox faithful that the modern World has this valuable document.  Sergei Nilus is the pious savant who published this document in Russian translation in 1901 as part of a little book entitled 'The Great Within the Small:  The Coming of AntiChrist and the Rule of Satan on Earth':
www.biblebelievers.org.au/truth.htm
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Sergei_nilus.jpg

  Beginning particularly with Peter the "Great," Russian civilization apostatized in the direction of western apostasy during the eighteenth century.  During the course of the nineteenth century, many Russians sought to regain the Christian piety which was common in Russia prior to Peter.  The centre of this Russian Orthodox revival was Optina Monastery.  Both Tolstoy and Dostoevsky visited and wrote about Optina.  Dostoevsky's 'The Brothers Karamazov' is based on Optina.  Father Barsanuphios was the Abbot of Optina at the emd of the nineteenth century.  Father Barsanuphios was Sergei Nilus's spiritual father:
www.sainthermanpress.com/catalog/chapter_six/barsanuphius_book.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Albert Einstein (1879-1955)

www.adelaideinstitute.org/newsletters/n254.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einstein

Einstein and Modern Physics by Nathan Martin Gwynne
http://hometown.aol.com/thomasaquinas87/origins/pdf/einstein.pdf

  ALBERT EINSTEIN, A LOYAL ZIONIST JEW OF MODERATE INTELLIGENCE WAS CHOSEN BY THE JEWISH KAHAL CHIEFLY TO MAINTAIN THE LEGITMIACY OF HELIOCENTRIC ASTRONOMY IN THE MINDS OF MEN AS IT HAD BECOME ENDANGERED WHEN THE WELL KNOWN MICHELSON / MORLEY EXPERIMENT OF 1887 BACKFIRED BY BLATANTLY AND IRREFUTABLY PROVING THAT THE EARTH IS STATIONARY.  The jewish relativity farce has maintained its popularity because it has been supported by universitites and other institutions and influential persons which are controlled by masonic fraternities.  Einstein's fame was not due to any scientific investigations or conclusions that he made which were all disproven by his contemporaries.  Einstein's theories only became widely accepted through american propaganda and dominance of scientific institutions, and america is dominated by masonry more than any country in the World.  The widespread acceptance of relativity has had nothing to do with truth or genuine science.
http://press.princeton.edu/titles/8165.html
www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip063/2005032681.html

  Albert Einstein performed the work of creating confusion and disinformation that was assigned to him by the Kahal.  Einstein's complicity with the Elders of Zion is evidenced among other things by the facts that he co-wrote a book with fellow jewish zionist Sigmund Freud entitled 'Why War?:  A Correspondence Between Albert Einstein and Sigmund Freud':
www.wordit.com/why/why_war.html
  Einstein was publicly offered the presidency of the terrorist state of Israel when Chaim Weizmann died in 1952.  Einstein was very politically active all his life.  He essentially performed the Marxist role of ensuring that the worldwide political left (including revolutionaries who legitimately wanted freedom for their peoples from colonialism) remained faithful to the oppressive World system of the zionists.  Einstein helped ensure that only those revolutionaries first indoctrinated in american and western universities would rise to power as native representatives (i.e. dictators) of the colonial powers which had officially withdrawn.  An example of this was Einstein's close relationship with Jawaharlal Nehru of India.  Nehru's hypocritical and oppressive policies against native and traditional peoples throughout "greater India" like the Nagas and many other peoples as well as the anti-traditional and unnatural secularization of India are effectively extensions of the worst of British rule (under brutal colonialist prime ministers like the jew Disraeli) and the furthering of demonic conquest of the soul of India due to the influence of close "friends" of Nehru's like Albert Einstein in particular.  Recognizing his malevolent infuence, Einstein was deported by the Nazis in 1934 due to his Stalinist agitation within Germany.  Giving the lie to his peace rhetoric by his actions, Einstein imported German technology to the United States and played a crucial role in the development of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) by way of assistance rendered to J. Robert Oppenheimer and Vannevar Bush.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Oppenheimer
www.doug-long.com/bush.htm
http://ohst.berkeley.edu/oppenheimer/exhibit/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_bomb
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Charles Lane Poor (1866-1951)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Lane_Poor

  Astronomer Charles Poor wrote the earliest refutations of Einstein's relativity theory.  Professor Poor wrote books refuting the relativity theory both before and after it was well publicized.

Pope Pius XII and Traditional Papism Conflicts With Relativity
'The Derailment of Einstein' by Fritz Albers
http://members.iinet.net.au/~raphael/sc_1_2.html

THE CASE AGAINST EINSTEIN
  'The Case Against Einstein' by Sir Artrhur Lynch (1932) is the definitive refutation of the relativity theory.  A sharp contrast to the vagueness of its pro-Einstein detractors, the book is very clear and makes perfect sense.

  'Euclid Versus Einstein' by J. J. Johnson illustrates how relativity theory flies in the face of common sense and the 'Elements' of Euclid, the Alexandrian mathematician whose laws have served as the basis of math from the fourth centruy before Christ throughout the Middle Ages and until the twentieth century.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclid
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/Euclid.html
www.mathpages.com/rr/s3-01/3-01.htm

Euclid's 'Elements'
http://aleph0.clarku.edu/~djoyce/java/elements/toc.html

Herbert Dingle (1890-1978)

  Herbert Dingle was Albert Einstein's colleague and enthusiastic early promoter who authored early books which explained and promoted the relativity theories.  Dingle was more familiar with the details of the relativity theories than Einstein himself.  During the late 1950's an inconsistency in the relativity theory became apparent to Dingle which he wrote about in a scientific journal entitled 'Nature' throughout the 1960's.  Dingle ended by writing a book published in 1971 which completely refutes the relativity theory entitled 'Science at the Crossroads.'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Dingle

'Herbert Dingle Was Correct' by Harry H. Ricker III:
www.wbabin.net/science/ricker23.pdf

www.holoscience.com/news/slow_light.html

'Reflections on Relativity'
www.mathpages.com/rr/rrtoc.htm

?

LordByron

  • 116
  • +0/-0
Contribution of Science Fiction to the Adoption of Falsehood
« Reply #53 on: December 13, 2006, 08:28:27 AM »
The Contribution of Science Fiction Propaganda to the Adoption of Falsehood

H. P. Lovecraft
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._P._Lovecraft

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
H.G. Wells
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._G._Wells

'The War of the Worlds' (1898)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_War_of_the_Worlds_%28novel%29

'The First Men in the Moon' (1901)
This book was made into a motion picture about Moon travel released in 1964.  
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_First_Men_in_the_Moon

Orson Welles
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orson_Welles#Renown_in_theatre_and_radio_.281936_to_1939.29

  Orson Welles 30 October 1938 broadcast of H. G. Wells' The War of the Worlds. This brought Welles fame on an international level, as the program's realism created widespread panic among listeners (who believed an actual Martian invasion was underway), a panic reported around the world (and disparagingly mentioned by Adolf Hitler in a public speech a few months later.) Because of the notoriety of the production, Hollywood offers soon came Welles' way, and The Mercury Theatre on the Air, which had been a 'sustaining show' (without sponsorship) was picked up by Campbell Soup and renamed The Campbell Playhouse.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  In the 1960's, the novel 'Star Trek' television series was propaganda directed at the american public to make the space program and the Moon hoax in particular appear less strange, more familiar, and therefore more believable.

Arthur C. Clarke
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Clarke

  '2001:  A Space Odyssey' was a NASA propaganda film based on Clarke's book which appeared within one year before NASA enacted the Moon landing hoax in order to prepare the public for acceptance of the hoax.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Heinlein
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_A._Heinlein

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Isaac Asimov
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Asimov

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen Spielberg

'Close Encounters of the Third Kind'

  Motion Picture Industry a Branch of Jewish Propaganda
'An Empire of Their Own:  How the Jews Invented Hollywood' by Neal Gabler
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v09/v09p243_Wikoff.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

George Lucas
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Lucas

  George Lucas is a CIA agent, and his movies are NASA propaganda.  'Star Wars' which appeared in 1977 shortly after 'Close Encounters of the Third Kind' successfully focused the public's attention away from critical thinking about the Moon landing hoax.  The fact that George Lucas's career has been organized by the US Central Intelligence Agency is confirmed in 'Trance' by Cathy O'Brien and Mark Phillips.
www.trance-formation.com

?

LordByron

  • 116
  • +0/-0
Sputnik
« Reply #54 on: December 13, 2006, 08:29:57 AM »
Sputnik

  The details of the fabrication of the entire Russian Space program from Sputnik onwards is described in 'Russia's Space Hoax' by astronomy historian Lloyd Mallan.  Mallan authored many books on the space programs during the 1960's:

'Russia's Space Hoax' first appeared in 1966 as a series of technical articles in the Journal 'Science and Mechanics' which were combined and published later that year as a book.  Copies of this book are still available through the following publisher:
www.weirdvideos.com/index2.html

Zionist Control of Soviet and Russian "Space" Program

Soyuz

Detente Projects

Mir

?

LordByron

  • 116
  • +0/-0
The Myth of Orbitting Satellites
« Reply #55 on: December 13, 2006, 08:33:57 AM »
The Myth of Orbiting Satellites

Satellites which allegedly orbit the World according to masonic NASA propaganda are cited as proof that the World is a globe primarily for two reasons:

1) Many fake pictures of globes are claimed to be photographs of Earth taken by orbiting satellites.  

2) The actual existence of satellites orbiting the world has been claimed since the late 1950's.  A major buttress for the widespread acceptance of this hoax is the claim that mobile phones, radio, television, and other technologies rely on orbiting satellites.

  The first aspect of phony pictures has been dealt with in part by several investigators over the years such as Bill Kaysing and David Percy among others whose works are described in posts above.

  As to the alleged existence of orbiting satellites, the origin of the hoax is said to begin with the Soviet Sputnik of 1956 which is often stated to be the first satellite, but it was preceeded by an american attempt to launch a satellite earlier in the year which failed.  'Science and Mechanics' magazine ran a series of articles by Lloyd Mallan in 1966 entitled 'Russia's Space Hoax.'  These were then combined and published as a book.  The thesis of 'Russia's Space Hoax' is that Sputnik as well as the entire Soviet space program was faked.  Lloyd Mallan was an astronomer and author of multiple books on modern astronomy.  As one might infer from the title of the journal in which the articles first appeared, 'Russia's Space Hoax' is a highly technical book.  A bound photocopy of the 1966 edition is available through the following website:
http://www.weirdvideos.com/index2.html

   It is not a coincidence that the space age has parrelled the era of UFO's.  The two phenomena occupy the same field of interest and are connected.  Any investigator which doubts the reports of UFO sightings should apply the same skeptical attitude and rigorously unbiased investigation towards claims of interstellar travel.

  The investigators mentioned in posts above have shown that most information published by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is dubious propaganda.  NASA was founded in 1958 in order to make belief in interstellar travel widespread and commonly accepted.  Two of the pillars of this belief are the faked moon missions and the existence of orbiting satellites.

  A flat Earth book published in the 1920's explained the technical feasibility of radio transmissions across a flat world (as radio transmission AROUND a globe is impossible).  Radio signals have been transmitted through antennas since radio was invented.  Ever higher transmitting antennas have been built throughout the world ever since Nikola Tesla introduced radio a century ago.  While "satellite" dishes can technically receive radio signals from transmitting antennas located in far away places, systems of Earth based relay stations receive and retransmit radio signals owing to the fact that great distances often serve to weaken radio signals.  Other methods for sending and receiving signals include most significantly cable and wire, and also airplane radio obviously facilitates airborne reception and transmission of radio signals.  Airborne transmision of radio signals is largely limited to airplanes, helicopters and other airborne objects such as weather balloons.  Cable and wire obviously do not involve "radio" signals but accomplish the same objective.  "Orbiting" satellites are not a means of transmission or reception of signals of any kind for the simple reason that orbiting satellites do not exist.  Transmissions from Earth based transmitters such as radio antennas and transmitting "satellite" dishes are the principle method used to transmit radio signals.  

  Many people falsely claim all the time to have observed satellites, or an international space station, or Russian spaceships, and similar things.  These claims are false and have three principle causes:
 
1) outright lies

2) wishful thinking which ascribes a falsehood to a star, airplane, or other relatively insignificant object or even invents the sighting

3) actual sightings of demonic beings who imitate the objects in question whether they be spaceships, satellites, or otherwise as the outward physical form assumed by a demon is usually one of its most convincing characteristics, particularly to unsuspecting and persons WANTING to see something particular the form of which the demon proceeds to assume.

  The vast amounts of well cataloged aerial photographs of houses and other geographical areas taken by airplanes and helicopters which are available on-line and elsewhere only evidence ever decreasing personal privacy.

  The myth of orbiting satellites is the father of more recent and often more dubious propaganda such as the allegedly orbiting international space station.  The claim of "orbiting" satellites is a hoax, an old myth from the 1950's properly viewed in the same vane as popular science fiction and UFO sightings.

?

LordByron

  • 116
  • +0/-0
NASA
« Reply #56 on: December 13, 2006, 08:35:11 AM »
NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)

www.nasa.gov/home/index.html?skipIntro=1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA

  NASA is an organization which spreads various forms of disinformation in order to achieve specific objectives;  like many "government" organizations, NASA usually has ulterior motives for the information which it issues.  In this respect, NASA (founded in 1958) essentially functions as one of many branches of the Central Intelligence Agency founded in 1949.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CIA (Central Intelligence Agency)
www.google.jo/search?hl=en&q=central+intelligence+Agency&meta=

  Three of the best truthful histories of the CIA are:
1) 'The Secret Team:  The CIA and Its Allies in Control of the United States and the World' by Fletcher Prouty (1973;1997):
www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/ST/
www.blackopradio.com
2) 'Killing Hope' by Willaim Blum (originally published in 1986 as 'A Forgotten History of the CIA'; revised edition 2005):
http://members.aol.com/Bblum6/American_holocaust.htm
3) 'The CIA's Black Ops' by John Jacob Nutter:
www.akpress.org/2000/items/ciasblackops

The CIA and Mind Control

http://spychiatrists.cyberummah.org/eir_british_psychiatry_eugenics.htm
www.mindcontrolforums.com/project-paperclip4.htm
www.wanttoknow.info/mindcontrol
http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~alb/misc/mindControlDenial.html
http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/ckln-hm.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MK-ULTRA
http://www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and%20History/CIA_MK-ULTRA_experiments_on_children.htm


'History of MK-ULTRA' by Eric Jewell
www.wintersteel.com/files/ShanaArticles/MKULTRA.htm

Rabbi Maurice Davis and the "Cult Awareness Network"

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

US Navy and Human Research

Official Naval Instruction Authorizing Human Research
SECNAVINST 3900.39C
www.fas.org/irp/doddir/navy/secnavinst/3900_39d.pdf

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NASA and Mind Control
www.rense.com/general2/astro.htm

  Horrific mind control research in many NASA facilities throughout the United States including NASA's headquarters in Huntsville, Alabama was experienced first hand by Cathy O'Brien as described in great detail in her autobiographical 'Trance-Formation of America':
www.trance-formation.com

  The CIA's MK- ULTRA mind control program was functioning before NASA was founded as a surrogate of the CIA.  NASA and the CIA brainwashed certain men from the United States military as mind control subjects.  The weak mindedness of many of these "astronauts" is apparent in their lives.  Buzz Aldrin's fragile mentality and his time spent in mental institutions is a case in point:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buzz_Aldrin
Also noteworthy in this respect is Neil Armstrong's reclusiveness.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Armstrong  

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Technology and Engineering

  Technical research in all branches of modern engineering controlled and managed by a secret society, apparently a derivative of the renaissance era rosicrucians.  Closely associated with comparatively more political freemasonry, the preeminent emphasis of rosicrucianism has ben the occult sciences.  This secret society has crafted the engineering industry in such a way that technical engineering knowledge is primarily dispensed to initiates who have been indoctrinated through a tightly controlled educational system at universities and institutes which constitute one branch of the engineering industry.  This state of affairs is described in 'America By Design:  Science, Technology, and the Rise of Corporate Capitalism' by the erudite and perceptive labor historian and former MIT Professor David Noble, one of the radical social science classics of the 1970's:
www.umsl.edu/~rkeel/280/class/ambydesn.html
www.amazon.com/America-Design-Technology-Corporate-Capitalism/dp/0195026187
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_F._Noble

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
William Cooper

The following article by author and US Navy Intelligence veteran William Cooper contains a lengthy section exposing the Apollo hoax including the fact that Masonic symbolism is used by NASA and the fact that the first actors to play parts in the Apollo hoax were masons:
www.hourofthetime.com/majestyt.htm

  Cooper blatantly states that NASA was founded in order to make interstellar travel believable.  It is therefore primarily a disinformation agency founded in 1958.  Cooper also points out that the reason the moon landing hoax only continued a few years was because prolonging it would have made detection and popular disbelief in the hoax more likely.  This is why the moon missions only lasted about five years.  NASA claimed that it cannot go back to the moon for at least a hundred years for the same reason.

  Of interest is Cooper's indication of disbelief in UFO's.  However, in other writings Cooper has indicated the likelihood of their existence.  The common denominator throughout his writing (as believer and disbeliever in UFO's) is that he believes UFO's are evil.  He has gone so far as to state that UFO's are not extraterrestrial but come from the underworld and are the source of most modern technology.  All this certainly corroborates the assertion that UFO's are very real demonic manifestations as well as the research conclusions of the most accomplished UFOologists like Jacques Vallee that UFO's are indeed real but not extraterrestrial (i.e. like demons, they emanate from this world).

  This is not to say that fakery has NEVER played a part in the history of UFO's.  In the essay above Cooper furnishes evidence that the alleged alien taken from the Roswell crash was nothing more than a shaved monkey planted by the CIA.  Asa matter of fact, there is overwhelming evidence that the CIA has actively prevented dissemination of the truth about the UFO phenomenon.  For example, the shaved monkey fabrication
of Roswell only reinforces belief in false cosmology and that "aliens" come from "outer space" rather than from this world.  Demons are fallen angels
(often referred to as DISEMBODIED spirits which means spirits without
bodies), and anyone who (correctly) accepts that UFO's are real but uncritically accepts that the animal found at Roswell was an alien from outer space has only exchanged one false belief for another courtesy of  the CIA.

  William Cooper's expose of the nefarious activities of numerous intelligence agencies was doubtless connected to the reason that Copper was assasinated less than a month after the 11 September 2001 World Trade Centre bombing.
www.hourofthetime.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NASA Collusion With Europe in Technology and Thought Control Research

  CERN, the European Organization For Nuclear Research,  is NASA's european counterpart which employs half of the world's nuclear physics community and unofficially requires masonic membership for its higher positions:
http://public.web.cern.ch/Public/Welcome.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CERN

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operation Paperclip
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip

  'Secret Agenda: The United States Government, Nazi Scientists, and Project Paperclip ' by Lında Hunt and 'The Paperclip Conspiracy' by Tom Browser details the history of the importation and of "Nazi" scientists from europe to the United States by the CİA for work in two specific fields:  
1) Rocketry
2) Mind Control
www.mindcontrolforums.com/project-paperclip4.htm

  The two books' emphasis on "Nazi" scientists merits an observation.  Germany has been at the forefront of technology in the modern era both well before and after the brief twelve year epoch of Nazi power which manifested a measure of discontent with the Jewish oriented power that has dominated Germany for centuries.  Focusing myopically in "Nazi" scientists (or classifying them as such) rather than German scientists, especially German jewsand certain masonic fraternities which control technical research in organizations like NASA and CERN  tends towards a jaundiced perspective for investigation into these matters which prevents fully understanding them.

Werner von Braun
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Werner_von_Braun

?

LordByron

  • 116
  • +0/-0
Myth of Interstellar Travel
« Reply #57 on: December 13, 2006, 08:36:46 AM »
Myth of Interstellar Travel - The Apollo Era

  The NASA Apollo Moon travel "missions" of 1969 to 1974 were fake as demonstrated by the information presented below.  The movies were produced and televised in order to buttress widespread belief in the myth of interstellar travel for which purpose the National Aeronautics and Space Administration was founded.  

  Such propaganda would not have been as successful if the minds of people had not been conditioned beforehand to make such rubbish believable to them.  Science fiction was a major part of such propaganda.  The late Flat Earth Society president Charles K. Johnson asserted that science fiction author Arthur C. Clarke was a major collaborator in the propagation of the Moon travel hoax.  It is not coincidence that his most famous book '2001:  A Space Odyssey' premiered as a motion picture in 1968 - one year before NASA's initial Moon travel hoax movie starring Neil Armstrong, Mike Collins , and "Buzz" Aldrin was internationally televised:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_C._Clarke

  The classic expose of the Apollo moon travel hoax is 'We Never Went to the Moon' by Bill Kaysing (1975).  Bill Kaysing worked for the "space" program (specifically SECRET security clearance level work for the Rocketdyne Corporation) back in the 1950's and 1960's, and he was a well informed authority on the subject having studied it for decades.  The following website distributes many older books and videos debunking the space hoax by Bill Kaysing and others including 'We Never Went to the Moon' (1975 and subsequent editions) by Bill Kaysing, informative interviews of Bill Kaysing, official NASA "space" videos including all of the Apollo videos and several relevant contemporaneous NASA publications.  This website along with David Percy's website listed below are the best two websites debunking NASA's Apollo Moon travel hoax that we have come across:
http://www.weirdvideos.com/index2.html

  The following link is a synopsis of the case debunking the moon landing hoax by the late Bill Kaysing (1922-2005):
http://www.carpenoctem.tv/cons/moon.html

  Bill Kaysing's expose of the Moon landing hoax was first published by Eden Press in 1975, and the Moon landing hoax has not been repeated since.  NASA stopped producing Apollo video movies depicting alleged interstellar travel to the Moon after 1974.

  'Capricorn One,' written and directed by Peter Hyams (an associate of Arthur Clarke who collaborated with him for the movie 2010), is a 1978 movie starring Elliott Gould and O.J. Simpson about a faked mission to the Moon.  'Capricorn One' is also available through the aforementioned website:
http://www.weirdvideos.com/index2.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capricorn_One

  'Dark Moon:  Apollo and the Whistle Blowers' by British authors David Percy and Mary Bennett is the most comprehensive expose (well in excess of 500 pages) I have encountered concerning the moon landing hoax.  They also produced a two-and-a-half hour documentary movie entitled 'What Happened On the Moon.'  The 'Fortean Times' states that David Percy's 1997 'Astro-Nots' article generated more feedback than any other article in the journal's history.  David Percy's books and videos can be obtained through the Aulis Publishers website.  The website also contains many articles debunking the Apollo program and other space related material by Percy, Bennett, and other writers:  
http://www.aulis.com/index.htm

  'Dark Moon' can also be obtained through its american publisher:
http://store.adventuresunlimitedpress.com/store.lasso?sub=detail&sid=C1943459A9EA45&item=1245

  Bart Sibrel, an american producer, directed the documentary movie 'A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon.'  The documentary is available through his website which also contains information exposing moon landing propaganda:
http://www.moonmovie.com/moonmovie/default.asp

  'Was It Only A Paper Moon?' is a DVD video documentary that debunks the moon landing claims. It can be obtained from the following website which also has articles by James Collier exposing the moon landing fraud:
http://www.buzzcreek.com/grade-a/moon/

  Ralph Rene's website which includes his book 'NASA Mooned America':
http://www.rene-r.com/

  Masonic symbolism used by NASA is also part of the subject of the following essay by the Venezuelan flat earther:
http://geocities.com/levelwater/mathlies03.html

  Goddard's Journal is a website which has a section exposing the Moon landing hoax:
http://users.erols.com/igoddard/moon01.htm

  An informative article by Byron Lebeau who investigated the other exposes listed here is contained on the MAAR website:
http://www.maar.us/nasa_mooned_us.html

'Moongate: Suppressed Findings of the U.S. Space Program' by William Brian
www.amazon.com/Moongate-Suppressed-Findings-Space-Program/dp/0941292002

'How America Faked the Moon Landings' by Charles T. Hawkins
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6477886391235654973&q=faked+moon
www.amazon.com/How-America-Faked-Moon-Landings/dp/images/0974940526
 
'Moon Landings: Did NASA Lie?' and
'Lumières sur la Lune (Lights on the Moon): La NASA a t-elle menti!'
by Philippe Lheureux
www.world-mysteries.com/nasa1.htm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/monitoring/media_reports/1399132.stm
 
Jan Lundberg - Hasselblad technician
 
Howard McCurdy - American University space historian
 
Jack White - American photo historian known for his attempt to prove forgery in photos related to the assassination of U.S. President John F. Kennedy

Marcus Allen - British publisher of Nexus magazine said that photographs of the lander would not prove that the US put men on the Moon. "Getting to the Moon really isn't much of a problem - the Russians did that in 1959 - the big problem is getting people there."

'Did We Go?' documentary directed by Aron Ranen and produced by Benjamin Britton
www.moonhoax.com

Clyde Lewis - Ground Zero Radio
www.clydelewis.com
 
Dr. David Groves - (who works for Quantech Image Processing) and worked on some of the NASA photos. He said he can pinpoint the exact point at which the artificial light was used. Using the focal length of the camera's lens and an actual boot, he has calculated (using ray-tracing) that the artificial light source is between 24 and 36 cm to the right of the camera

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  The following sites of interest have already been posted courtesy of "Goodfriend."  They are reposted here with the objetive of consolidating the space hoax resources in one post:

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/moon.htm
http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/cosmicapollo.html
http://batesmotel.8m.com/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  The following article is a synopsis of the controversy over the existence of Moon travel:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_moon_landing_hoax_accusations

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

'How the CIA Manufactures History'

A study of how false history is manufactured and propagated by the US Central Intellignce Agency has been written by former agent Victor Marchetti (author of The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence, 1973):
www.vho.org/GB/Journals/JHR/9/3/Marchetti305-320.html

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  As part of the hoax, the following sites endorse the moon landing propaganda:

  As can be inferred from its name, the website of Phil Plait, the most prominent of this lot of NASA apologists, consists of unsubstantiated claims, faulty logic, and generally all around "bad astronomy":
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html

 Other defenders of the fantasy of Moon travel:
http://www.clavius.org/
http://www.apollo-hoax.me.uk/index.html
http://www.redzero.demon.co.uk/moonhoax/
http://www.lunaranomalies.com/fake-moon.htm
http://pirlwww.lpl.arizona.edu/~jscotti/NOT_faked/
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23feb_2.htm?list45245

  The Project Apollo Archive sells the NASA Apollo videos:
http://www.apolloarchive.com/

  Last and certainly least is NASA's official website:
http://www.nasa.gov/home/index.html?skipIntro=1

?

LordByron

  • 116
  • +0/-0
Prevention of Exposure
« Reply #58 on: December 13, 2006, 08:37:35 AM »
Prevention of Exposure

  Lieutenant Colonel Virgil "Gus" Grissom, USAF was the leader of the crew of Apollo 1 that burned on the launch pad at Cape Kennedy in 1967 killing all three astronauts.  Bill Kaysing has stated that Grissom had major misgivings about the "space program" and has even stated that Grissom was murdered to prevent him from exposing the entire "space" farce.  Both Kaysing and Grissom's son Scott Grissom, a pilot like his father, have requested investigation into the Apollo I tragedy claiming that the death of those astronauts was not accidental and that Scott's father was murdered.  Investigator Thomas Ronald Barron actually conducted a revealing investigation and compiled a corresponding 500-page Congressional Report back in 1967.  He was murdered the same year and the report kept from public view, but Bill Kaysing managed to obtain a 46-page summary of the report from Senator Alan Cranston which deals with the sabotage of Apollo I and which is available through the initial website listed above containing much of the older material exposing the space hoax.

  A bound photocopy of the summary of the 1967 US Congress Barron Report on the murder of Gus Grissom and the other Apollo I astronauts is available from the following website:
http://www.weirdvideos.com/index2.html

  The following article gives a summary biography of Gus Grissom:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gus_Grissom  

  The following link provides the official Congressional explanation for the cause of the deaths of the Apollo I crew with links to the Accident Review Board Reports:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_1

Partial List of NASA Murders

  The following article contains a list of several Apollo personnel and also civilians who mysteriously died often shortly before they were to make publicly known certain facts of which they were privy but which not consistent with official NASA propaganda:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_moon_landing_hoax_accusations

?

LordByron

  • 116
  • +0/-0
What "Space" Shuttles Accomplish
« Reply #59 on: December 13, 2006, 08:40:21 AM »
What "Space" Shuttles Accomplish

  'The Challenger Launch Decision' by Diane Vaughan (University of Chicago Press, 1996),  the work referenced above is an expose of the corruption of the National Aeronautics and Space Administrationin the post-Apollo era with a focus onthe multiple space shuttle disasters and the 1986 Challenger explosion in particular:
http://www.press.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/hfs.cgi/00/13075.ctl

'Challenger's Shadow:  Did Government and Industry Mangement Kill Seven Astronauts' by John C. Macidull contians previously unrelased information which confirms the allegation that the Challenger crew was murdered:
http://www.amazon.fr/Challengers-Shadow-Government-Management-Astronauts/dp/1932047395

  Space shuttles are nothing more nor less than airplanes.  Part of their purpose of "space shuttles" has always been to buttress the myth of interstellar travel after the fake moon travel movies disseminated primarily via television in the early 1970's in the guise of NASA's Apollo space travel trips were cancelled after 1974 due to increasing critical analysis (such as Bill Kaysing's 1975 book 'We Never Went to the Moon.')  This was especially thepurpose that the shuttles served from 1980 to 1986 when space shuttle launches and missions were far more widely televised and publicised than they have been since the Challenger incident of 1986.

  The late Charles Johnson, outspoken editor of the Flat Earth News (1971-2000), stated that the space shuttles during this period were also actually involved in illicit operations including supplying arms to terrorist organizations and drug running, or shuttling narcotics in particular while fake images of the world purportedly video cammed from these allegedly orbiting airplanes were widely televised.

  Indeed.  Many studies of narcotics and arms trading by the american government and the CIA in particular conducted while Ronald Reagan was president of the United Stateshave only tended to confirm Johnson's allegations.  Perhaps one of the most sensational aspects of Johnson's accusations against NASA was his assertion that the shuttles' delivery heroine and related opium derivatived narcotics from Honduras to California was almost exposed from the blowback from the John Delorean Affair of 1982:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_DeLorean

  The basic pattern of central american narcoics trafficking during the Reagan-Bush era was for american provided planes to fly arms and other military supplies to anti-Sandinista "Contra" terrorists who were largely but not exclusively based in Honduras in order to overthrow the left leaning Sandinista government of Nicaragua.  The Somoza family were american backed dictators who had ruled Nicaragua in the interest of america's ruling elite since the 1920's (they were originally installed by a coup d'etat by US Marine special forces).  They were overthrown in 1979 after which the US sought to reinstall a neocolonialist government.

  The planes returned to the United States with drugs like opium grown by farmers paid by the CIA.  

  The principle american airbase from which the planes departed was the airport in Mena, Arkansas provided to Bush specifically for this use by Governor Clinton.  

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Among other sources, these facts are disclosed in:

1) 'The Flat Earth News' Charles Johnson, The Flat Earth Society, (Lancaster, CA)

2) 'The Senator John Kerry (D-MA) Report' of 1986
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/ARCHIVE/KERRY.html

3) 'The Politics of Heroine:  CIA Complicity in the World Drug Trade' by Alfred McCoy (Third Edition, 2003 - over 700 pages) covers the narcotics trade on a worldwide scale.  It begins with an informative background on the Opium trade in preceeding centuries and continues through to the present day.  The Roosevelts are a Jewish family whose fortune comes from the British Opium trade.  In this respect, there is no coincidence that the United States became involved in Chinese affairs via Open Door Policy (like NAFTA with Mexico) in 1900 when Theodore Roosevelt became president.  McCoy's greatest expertise is on the Far Eastern Drug Trade (after Mao eliminated narcotics from China) centered on Hong Kong and its pro-British affiliates such as Australia (on which McCoy has also written the definitive account of Australia's Mafia), Taiwan, and the Golden Triangle.  He also gives very full accounts of the formation of the modern narcotics trade in other parts of the world like Mexico and Central America, Peru and Columbia, Marseilles and Turkey, et cetera. Perhaps the single best book on the subject.
http://www.drugtext.org/library/books/McCoy/default.htm

4) 'Whiteout' by the outstanding Washington based Irish journalist Alexander Cockburn of Counterpunch covers much the same territory.  It gives a somewhat more attention to details of the Central American drug trade in question:
http://www.easycartsecure.com/CounterPunch/CounterPunch_Books.html

5)  'Cocaine Politics' by University of California (Berkely) Professor Peter Dale Scott focuse exclusively on US government involvement in the Mexican and Central American narcotics trade:
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Drug_War/Cocaine_Politics.html

6) 'Covert Action Intelligence Quarterly' of Washington, D.C. since 1978 is one of the best journals which exposes the CIA and its nefarious activities such as narcotics trafficking:
http://www.namebase.org/sources/CK.html

7) 'The Strength of the Wolf:  The Secret History of America's War on Drugs' by Douglas Valentine covers the early history of United States government involvement in narcotics trafficking during the early and middle parts of the twentieth century.  Much of the book is concerned with the era of Harry Anslinger (largely contemporary with equally repugnant John Edgar Hoover's FBI) who secretly promoted narcotics and befriended its beneficiaries like Meyer Lansky while blaming it on communists like the Chinese government (who had actually suppressed it) while being the US government executive agency head primarily responsible for prosecuting narcotics traffickers.  Another government agency, the honest and genuinely anti-drug Narcotics Burea (predecessor of the DEA), was a victime of its own success.  Its many enemies like the FBI and CIA succeeded in having it demolished in 1968 which is precisely when drug use in the US skyrocketed:
http://www.versobooks.com/books/tuvwxyz/tuv-titles/valentine_d_wolf.shtml

8) 'Barry and the Boys:  The CIA, the Mob, and America's Secret History' by Daniel Hopsicker is an outstanding book which covers the drug trade in the US in detail from the 1970's forward including the Reagan/Bush era:
http://www.madcowprod.com/books.html

9) 'The Secret Life of Bll Clinton' by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
http://www.weyrich.com/book_reviews/secret_life_clinton.html
http://www.think-aboutit.com/conspiracy/secret_life_of_bill_clinton.htm

10) 'Compromised:  Bush, Clinton, and the CIA' by Terry Reed
http://www.ftrbooks.net/conspiracy/cia/clinton_bush_cia.htm

11) A warning that some of the material concerning the following book may be offensive to some persons.  

  'Trance:  Formation of America' by Cathy O'Brien and Mark Phillips
is the arguably the most damning book about Ronald Reagan, Gerald Ford, the Bush family, and the Clintons ever published.  Cathy O'Brien was a subject of the CIA psychiatric mind control operation 'MK Ultra ' during the 1970's who became a "Presidential Model," and her uncensored autobiography is easily the most damning of the scandal books published during the Clinton era.  It is quite likely that the most of the Clinton era scandal books were published en masse in order to obscure O'Brien's book.  It contains lots of first hand information about presidential (and other heads of state) involvement in large scale narcotics and slave trading, ritual murder, unmitigated sexual degeneracy, as well as details about numerous NASA facilities used for mind control and the propagation of myths to the public at large.  The facts in the book are derived from first hand experience.

  A few of the many revolting facts recorded in 'Trance' by Cathy O'Brien include first hand knowledge of:
a) Ronald Reagan's snorting of cocaine and use of prostitutes such as Cathy herself while in office as well as his friendship with Larry Flynt which caused the pornography industry to increase during Reagan's terms in office as well as details about Reagan's love for bestiality and bestiality pornography
b)  Hilary Clinton's homosexuality;  the bestiality of Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau
c) confirmation of the fact that both the Clinton's and Reagan worked for George Bush and Cheney during their terms in office
d) similar revelations concerning Gerald Ford's use of Presidential prostitutes
e) George W. Bush (Jr.) and his dad George, Sr. actively participate in pedophilia (sexual intercourse with young girls even under the age of ten) including Cathy's daughter Kelly in addition to other perversions
f)  underground bases for sexual abandon, unlimited perversion, and (secret) filming of the American elite (like Bill Bennet who wrote the so-called 'Book of Virtues') such as Bohemian Grove in Northern California or Dick Cheney and the rest of the American elite and selected important foreigners
g) CIA drug operatives in the entertainment industry whose careers were created and promoted by the CIA like musician Jimmy Buffet, country singer Jerry Reed, Barbara and Louise Mandrell, the Oak Ridge Boys, baseball manager Tommy Lasorda, et cetera
h) the sharing of certain approved mind controlled prostitutes like Cathy O'Brien with other heads of state like King Fahd of Saudi Arabia, and de la Madrid and Salinas of Mexico who cooperate in the narcotics trade;  
i) exposes many well known US government persons and US Congressmen like Senator Byrd of West Virginia who Cathy workled for (who like so many others nowadays publicly opposes the Iraqi invasion for public consumption in order to appear as an opponent of Bush)
 - et cetera.

Much of this information is confirmed in 'Dark Secrets:  Inside Bohemian Grove' and 'The Order of Death':
www.infowars.com/bg1.html

  'Trance' explicitly shows that mind controlled persons are used for a great deal of nefarious ends, and NASA is an integral part of the process.  As a matter of fact Cathy O'Brien specifically states that the most advanced technology she encountered was always at NASA labs over everything else including the CIA and the military.  This esablishes the groundwork of evidence for the fact that Gemini and Apollo astronauts are victims of mind control.  To this end, it is not surprising that Neil Armstrong saw action in the Korean War.  A general conception of this is depicted in the original 'Manchurian Candidate' starring Frank Sinatra and Angela Lansbury.

  To quote two examples of Trance's nefarious information concerning NASA:

a)  Movie producer George Lucas is named as a CIA operative which evidences that all science fiction (literature and movies) including Lucas's movies has an ulterior purpose other than mere entertainment.  In the case of all the 'Star Wars' movies and all other space movies (like '2001' and all the 'Star Trek' movies and series) one of the main purposes is to buttress the myth of interstellar travel.  Other purposes include promoting false hopes which includes false religion.  It is not an exagerration to state that 'Star Wars' and all space movies are CIA propaganda.  This fact is also corroborated as NASA and the CIA themselves constantly cooperate and have so much in common as anyone familiar with well informed exposes of each of them can attest.   A well informed study of CIA influence in the movie industry would be revealing.

b)  The following verbatim quote is a grotesque example illustraing how "alien" propaganda is filmed from the chapter 'The Lizard of AHS' on pages 208 and 209 of 'Trance' by Cathy O'Brien (this book is full of this kind of disgusting information):

  '"That's the way the Chief fells about it," Byrd agreed.  "He's already in deep anyway, but this order (for slaves) hits him closer to home since they'll be serving him personally."'
  'We walked to a clinical, sanitized area that had a maze of small rooms where I was undressed and prepped for the lab.  A nurse of sorts injected me with the NASA "Tranquility" drug and instructed me to put my lab coat back on.  "Walk this way," she ordered as she led me down the hall, swinging her hips in an exagerrated manner.  I immediately complied.  The Tranquility drug had no recreational effects, but produced an attitude of peaceful compliance to all orders given.  As we approached the theatre-type lab, a small group of men who would be in attendance were talking with Byrd and the so-called Commander.  They looked at us and laughed at my literal compliance to walk like the nurse.'
  'I was then led by the Commander to a "backstage" entrance which was actually a glass-encased lab surrounded by seats in ascending rows.  Scientists in NASA lab coats looked down on the lab table where I lay as the Commander wired me up to a computerized machine.  A camera was positioned high in one corner of the room, filming all that transpired.  I was aware through conversations between Byrd and the Commander that de la Madrid had requested a video of the latest advancements in mind-control technique being used to create his seven slaves.  In reality, the camera was filming scientific methodisms salted with "comic" misinformationas a humorous "no" to his request.'
  'Since I was considered "used up" and my death was imminent, the Commander told the scientists to "feel free to f--- the lab specimen."  "But first," he said,"before you satisfy your mental and physical curiosities sampling the President's (Reagan's) wares, we must satisfy El Presidente's (de la Madrid's) perverse intellect with a little space humor."  He turned to one of the technical workers and said, "You're going to have to edit this tape for de la Madrid's benefit and take this part out while we prepare her for an 'off color' chameleon joke."'
  'A live lizard encased in a glass test tube of sorts was inserted in my vagina.  The camera was focused on the area while my legs were spread in a berthing position.  Acting as though I had conceived while having sex with de la Madrid, the Commander said, "Now for the finished product, which in layman's terms equates to the reproductive offspring of a Lizard breeding machine."  He dramatically snapped on a rubber glove and probed me as though he were giving me a gynecological exam.  In fact, he was opening the trap door of the Lizard's tube to turn him out.  Very slowly, the sluggish lizard poked his head out of my vagina and crawled out onto the metal table.  "This concludes all of the experimentation demonstration of the cloning of a Presidential model," the Commander said.'
  'I apparently had been selected as the prototype for the seven programmed slaves de la Madrid had requested.  De la Madrid was interested in NASA programmed slaves that would be vaginally mutilated like I was.  He was sexually obsessed with the hideous carving.  I have no way of knowing what, if any, technological advancements were provided to de la Madrid via the film.  I only know that deliberate misinformation tainted the methodologies depicted, and that I had never experienced programming or testing before or at the time by any such methods.'
  'This video created for "his Royal Lizardry" was one of many cryptic lizard themes that NASA used in its Mexican operations.'

www.trance-formation.com/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  It should be noted in connection with the unspeakbly perverse quote above that it and other passages about NASA in 'Trance' support the fact
that NASA effectively functions as a branch of the Central Intelligence Agency among other inglorious operations as a disinformation organization.  The fact that NASA is involved in narcotics trafficking makes sense when one examines critiques of its history by by persons with first hand experience like Cathy O'Brien which expose its use of drugs and other techniques for mind control purposes.  Not to ignore th4e fact that NASA's documented obsession with deception and mind control fits very comfortably with the narcotics business.

  The Space Shuttles were launched at Cape Canaveral, Florida.  They ended their missions by landing in California, a major centre of narcotics dissemination (which became so during Ronald Reagan's governship of that state during the late 1960's).  

  Johnson's allegation that the shuttles were airplanes used for arms and narcotics trafficking makes sense in the context of the era when the shuttles primarily operated:  1980 to 1986 (i.e from Coluimbia's initial launch in 1980 to the Challenger incident of 1986 - which coincided with the height of the Nicaraguan Contra war and the narcotics trade with which it was associated).  

  If the allegation is true then the shuttles would have either departed with arms from Florida or received them at an undisclosed location.  After delivering the arms to right wing terrorists in central america and likely Honduras in particular, the shuttles concluded their missions by returning narcotics to the United States.  They could have easily landed at an airstrip provided by Deukmajin, the Republican governor of the time, before the televised landings at Edwards Air Force Base.

  The possibility also definitely exists that the shuttles were used for the same purpose in other parts of the world as Afghanistan and the Golden Triangle.  Such nefarious opportunities are increased these days when shuttle missions are far less publicized than they once were.

  The following article contains a history of the Space shuttle Columbia and an explanation of its destruction which follows the disinformation typical of NASA:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_Columbia

  While not presently commentingon its complete accuracy, the following link presents the case that the Space Shttle Columbia was shot down along with other related information:
 http://www.weeklyuniverse.com/skies/skies5.htm

  Charles Johnson's underlying reasoning is accurate.  People who uncritically accept alleged images of space and Earth broadcast on television and gullibly believe announcements that such images are filmed from "space" shuttles will tend to be rather clueless as to what these airplanes actually accomplish.