I am a flat earther genius.
Do you have any evidence to support that outlandish claim? Such as a working, testable FE model that explains the intricate motions of the celestial bodies?
Maybe I didn't punctuate correctly. "I am a flat earther, genius."
And yes, I have evidence. It is that I (that's me) believe (meaning think based on evidence and my observations of reality) that the earth (the place we live) is flat (as in a plane) and not a ball as I was taught.
Nope, I do not have a workable testable model as that will take time and more people seeing what they have been led and bamboozled into believing. Do you know that neither do you? So, you call 95% of the known universe being unobserved workable? Dark matter and dark energy are made up terms that have NEVER BEEN OBSERVED... go look into science for me and tell me if observations are important.
Then ask yourself why people like Edwin Hubble said things like,
“Such a condition would imply that we occupy a unique position in the universe, analogous, in a sense, to the ancient conception of a central earth. The hypothesis cannot be disproved but it is unwelcome and would be accepted only as a last resort in order to save the phenomena. Therefore, we disregard this possibility and consider the alternative, namely, a distribution which thins out with distance.”
“A thinning out would be readily explained in either of two ways... Both explanations seem plausible, but neither is permitted by the observations. The apparent departures from uniformity in the World Picture are fully compensated by the minimum possible corrections for redshifts on any interpretation. No margin is left for a thinning out. The true distribution must either be uniform or increase outward, leaving the observer in a unique position. But the unwelcome supposition of a favoured location must be avoided at all costs….Such a favoured position, of course, is intolerable … Therefore, in order to restore homogeneity, and to escape the horror of a unique position, the departures from uniformity, which are introduced by the recession factors, must be compensated by the second term representing effects of spatial curvature. There seems to be no other escape.“
Sure sounds like great science to me