No, you are completely wrong. Your thoughts are garbage. Water is an concrete, but beliefs are abstract. Their calculate method is different.
For example you use x3 method but it is only valid for beliefs.
You can compare water with something in its category. There is only one thing we can compare water; well known and liquid: oil.
I type water: 5.400.000.000
Oil: 1.600.000.000
about 3 times more. It means, people interest water 3 times more than oil.
We can calculate how many people interest with oil:
7,5 x 1,6 / 5,4 = 2.200.000.000
In other say, 30% of world population interest the oil and rest people do not interest.
You can not the statistic of water to comparing any belief.
But you can compare beliefs around themselves.
You can compare countries by themselves. Look. I type some countries.
France: 4,3 billions.
Spain: 1, billion
USA: 3,91 billions
China: 2,79 billions
italy: 1,64 billions
Turkey: 825 million
Sounds like there is a coreleation, true? Only spain seems on wrong place. This is the list of "touristy countries". France is the world leader and most searched. Turkey is 6th place and 6th in searching list inside this 6 countries.
For example Russia: 855 million. Why it is so? Because Russia is a big country but have less tourists. You can compare non touristy countries between themselves.
For example:
egypt: 582m
kenya: 501m
Tanzania: 355m
chad: 373m
gabon: 237m
botswana: 264m
Lets type their population:
egypt: 582m 99m
kenya: 501m 51m
Tanzania: 355m 59m
chad: 373m 15m
small countries:
gabon: 237m 2m
botswana: 264m 2m
There may be some exceptionals but generally works.
First, quit with the insults. This is the last chance you get with me being nice. Insult me again, and I will go back to splitting your posts up to make it clear to everyone else what I am responding to.
No. I'm not wrong in the slightest.
Yes, water is real. But you claim a flat Earth is real. So they would be directly comparable. The Christian claims Jesus is real. The Muslims claim Muhammed is real. And so on.
Your method relies upon their being a direct linear correlation between belief in something and the search results for it.
Water is something people can believe in so it should work as well.
But now you admit that other things can influence link interest.
This is an admission that your method DOES NOT WORK!
It shows that it is not a simple linear correlation.
You are admitting that there are other factors and at best you can only compare like things. If that is the case, only compare like things.
This would give you a list of things like religions, where you can compare Islam, Christianity, Hinduism and Judaism, a list of religious figures, a list of various conspiracy nutter garbage. Note this would mean that FE is not in the same group as religions and religious figures, unless you wanted to claim FEism is just a religion. Also note that it would put NASA in a completely different category. NASA would be in the same group as water, a real thing that no one can rationally deny exists.
Yet you have had no objection to mixing completely different things before. It is only now that it shows your method to be pure garbage that you do; but you don't make any correction by providing things you can compare FE to.
Speaking of religions lets try that.
Christianity: 221 000 000
Islam: 742 000 000
Judaism: 43 900 000
Hinduism: 52 600 000.
Notice how that doesn't even work? Not only does it get the numbers completely wrong it gets the order wrong as well.
This shows there are a multitude of factors, like interest and what type of subject it is.
Do you know why that is? Because there are many reasons people will make pages.
Some will do it because they want to criticise it, some will do it because they believe and want to convince others, some will do it to report on news.
Also note that none of these will imply a linear correlation.
One which is very unlikely to be linear is people trying to convince others to believe.
You don't find articles trying to show that water is real, because everyone accepts it is.
If there is only a small portion of people beleiving in something, it will have vastly more results than you would expect from a simple linear correlation.
What this all shows is that you cannot simply say search results correlates to the number of believers.
i.e. YOUR METHOD IS GARBAGE AND NOT SCIENTIFIC IN ANY WAY!
Again, for your method to work (and be scientific in any way) you need to have the number of believers in X being a direct linear correlation to the number of search results, with no complicating factors. This means you need to have twice as many people as exist on Earth beleiving in water.
In order to avoid that massive failure you need to perform a multidimensional analysis (i.e. lots of variables), with lots of different things to show what the true relationship is between search results and these factors. i.e. you need to be able to predict what the number of search results will be for a given thing based upon what it has for these variables. Until you do that, you have nothing except garbage.