A similar model as can be seen in use for the management of the 'Antarctica tourism industry' will likely be implemented for future 'outer space tourism'.
Aspirationally expensive, barely promoted or marketed, regularly referenced as proof of existence for the destination itself.
Long, boring, uncomfortable journey in an austere vessel resulting in being shown something that vaguely fits the preconceived description of the claimed destination.
No real way of verifying where you are, but why would willing customers doubt the veracity of their bragging rights providing expedition?
No way of verifying where you are! Don't pretend such ignorance.
There is GPS, though no doubt you don't believe that works either.
But how of earth do you think sailors and even pilots navigated before GPS? They used Celestial Navigation.
Amundsen and Scott both used sun sights (though I suppose that you don't believe that the sun exists either) to verify that there were at the South Pole really does exist whatever you in your ignorance claim.
So these Antarctic visitors, if they are
DeniersOfFacts like you, could easily take their own sextants and check their location independently.
There is no outer space. There is no Antarctica. What lays beyond the limits of human exploration is unknown.
Really? "There is no Antarctica" what earth do you live on? Apparently not the
flat earth
!
What does the map of the Earth look like then?
As evidenced by the logo of the United Nations the Earth is a round disk of indefinite dimensions. The geographic North Pole is located in the center of the disk, and the Antarctic lies around the outer edges.
And certainly not on the Globe.
In fact there are a number of quite prominent Flat Earthers who are convinced of the reality of the South Pole itself that the claim a different "Continental Layout", such as:
So maybe you should not be quite so adamant in your claim that "There is no Antarctica",
unless, of course, you have some real evidence, other than your own meaningless words.