The Same Number of People have Visited Antarctica as have Visited Outer Space...

Quote from: markjo on April 06, 2017, 05:39:16 AM

Quote from: Antirockballtheorist on April 06, 2017, 03:03:41 AM

Is Antarctica the southern pole containing area at the base of a spinning rock ball?

Umm... You may want to rephrase that so that it makes sense.

You may also want to study FET a little more as well.  The general consensus among FE'ers is that Antarctica does exist, generally as a rim continent that serves as a great ice wall. 

It's Australia that doesn't exist.  Many Australians will confirm this fact.

A new unit of measurement would need to be created, of a new smaller increment, in order for me to express how little I care about the general consensus.
Or fet.

As an Australian I can confirm that  Antirockballfruitcake doesn't have a single functioning braincell.   He's as loopy as they come.

As to whether Australia exists or not,  I require funding to mount an expedition.   Should I start a kickstarter,  or just ask  Hannibaal  to forward me the funds.   For a small additional fee I'll dig up a small amount and  post it to the address of your choice. 




   

Smaller than a planck length?

Quote from: Antirockballtheorist on April 06, 2017, 04:13:33 PM

Quote from: markjo on April 06, 2017, 05:39:16 AM

Quote from: Antirockballtheorist on April 06, 2017, 03:03:41 AM

Is Antarctica the southern pole containing area at the base of a spinning rock ball?

Umm... You may want to rephrase that so that it makes sense.

You may also want to study FET a little more as well.  The general consensus among FE'ers is that Antarctica does exist, generally as a rim continent that serves as a great ice wall. 

It's Australia that doesn't exist.  Many Australians will confirm this fact.

A new unit of measurement would need to be created, of a new smaller increment, in order for me to express how little I care about the general consensus.
Or fet.

As an Australian I can confirm that  Antirockballfruitcake doesn't have a single functioning braincell.   He's as loopy as they come.

As to whether Australia exists or not,  I require funding to mount an expedition.   Should I start a kickstarter,  or just ask  Hannibaal  to forward me the funds.   For a small additional fee I'll dig up a small amount and  post it to the address of your choice. 




   

Address it to me, at your mother's house.

Quote from: Rayzor on April 06, 2017, 04:57:42 PM

Quote from: Antirockballtheorist on April 06, 2017, 04:13:33 PM

Quote from: markjo on April 06, 2017, 05:39:16 AM

Quote from: Antirockballtheorist on April 06, 2017, 03:03:41 AM

Is Antarctica the southern pole containing area at the base of a spinning rock ball?

Umm... You may want to rephrase that so that it makes sense.

You may also want to study FET a little more as well.  The general consensus among FE'ers is that Antarctica does exist, generally as a rim continent that serves as a great ice wall. 

It's Australia that doesn't exist.  Many Australians will confirm this fact.

A new unit of measurement would need to be created, of a new smaller increment, in order for me to express how little I care about the general consensus.
Or fet.

As an Australian I can confirm that  Antirockballfruitcake doesn't have a single functioning braincell.   He's as loopy as they come.

As to whether Australia exists or not,  I require funding to mount an expedition.   Should I start a kickstarter,  or just ask  Hannibaal  to forward me the funds.   For a small additional fee I'll dig up a small amount and  post it to the address of your choice. 




   

Address it to me, at your mother's house.

You would have to be dead in order to visit her,   but maybe we can arrange something,  perhaps a seance? 

Can I put you down for $100 towards the Australia Exists Expedition?

Hanibaal is offering half price trips to Antarctica, maybe he should get on that!

A new unit of measurement would need to be created, of a new smaller increment, in order for me to express how little I care about the general consensus.
Or fet.

In other words, you're just here to troll.  Good to know.

Antirockballfruitcake doesn't have a single functioning braincell.   He's as loopy as they come.

Warning for gaslighting.

Please desist.

If you have an argument then present it.

Quote from: Rayzor on April 06, 2017, 04:57:42 PM

Antirockballfruitcake doesn't have a single functioning braincell.   He's as loopy as they come.

Warning for gaslighting.

Please desist.

If you have an argument then present it.

Telling the truth is not gaslighting.   Antirockfruitcake  is a nutter of the first order,   even by Flat earth standards he's a sandwich short of a loaf.

Oh, wait,  are you agreeing with him?

Quote from: disputeone on April 06, 2017, 09:03:21 PM

Quote from: Rayzor on April 06, 2017, 04:57:42 PM

Antirockballfruitcake doesn't have a single functioning braincell.   He's as loopy as they come.

Warning for gaslighting.

Please desist.

If you have an argument then present it.

Telling the truth is not gaslighting.   Antirockfruitcake  is a nutter of the first order,   even by Flat earth standards he's a sandwich short of a loaf.

Oh, wait,  are you agreeing with him?

gaslight
ˈɡaslʌɪt/
verb
gerund or present participle: gaslighting
manipulate (someone) by psychological means into doubting their own sanity.
"in the first episode, Karen Valentine is being gaslighted by her husband"

Mods can we give him some time to chill?

5. Flaming and Harassment
Do not use insulting or denigrating personal attacks against other members. Harassment or bullying of other members is forbidden.

7. Troublemaking
Do not post or behave in a manner obviously intended to start a fight, get a reaction, or cause problems.

8. Low-content Posting/Derailment
Do not make spammy, non-contributive or low-quality posts, or derail threads by deliberately dragging discussion away from the original topic.

Quote from: disputeone on April 06, 2017, 09:03:21 PM

Quote from: Rayzor on April 06, 2017, 04:57:42 PM

Antirockballfruitcake doesn't have a single functioning braincell.   

Warning for gaslighting.

Telling the truth is not gaslighting.   

That may or may not be true. But given your original statement above, how is that relevant?

5. Flaming and Harassment
Do not use insulting or denigrating personal attacks against other members. Harassment or bullying of other members is forbidden.

7. Troublemaking
Do not post or behave in a manner obviously intended to start a fight, get a reaction, or cause problems.

8. Low-content Posting/Derailment
Do not make spammy, non-contributive or low-quality posts, or derail threads by deliberately dragging discussion away from the original topic.

So does that mean you are going to change your crazy confrontational behaviour and stop spamming.  Or are you just going to keep acting like a looney?

Quote from: disputeone on April 06, 2017, 10:48:27 PM

5. Flaming and Harassment
Do not use insulting or denigrating personal attacks against other members. Harassment or bullying of other members is forbidden.

7. Troublemaking
Do not post or behave in a manner obviously intended to start a fight, get a reaction, or cause problems.

8. Low-content Posting/Derailment
Do not make spammy, non-contributive or low-quality posts, or derail threads by deliberately dragging discussion away from the original topic.

So does that mean you are going to change your crazy confrontational behaviour and stop spamming.  Or are you just going to keep acting like a looney?

Ban please.

Quote from: Rayzor on April 06, 2017, 10:57:54 PM

Quote from: disputeone on April 06, 2017, 10:48:27 PM

5. Flaming and Harassment
Do not use insulting or denigrating personal attacks against other members. Harassment or bullying of other members is forbidden.

7. Troublemaking
Do not post or behave in a manner obviously intended to start a fight, get a reaction, or cause problems.

8. Low-content Posting/Derailment
Do not make spammy, non-contributive or low-quality posts, or derail threads by deliberately dragging discussion away from the original topic.

So does that mean you are going to change your crazy confrontational behaviour and stop spamming.  Or are you just going to keep acting like a looney?

Ban please.

Another low content post.   Keep it up nuffnuff.  I'll keep responding in kind.

Quote from: disputeone on April 06, 2017, 09:03:21 PM

Quote from: Rayzor on April 06, 2017, 04:57:42 PM

Antirockballfruitcake doesn't have a single functioning braincell.   

Warning for gaslighting.

Telling the truth is not gaslighting.   

That may or may not be true. But given your original statement above, how is that relevant?

Quote from: Rayzor on April 06, 2017, 10:38:45 PM

Quote from: disputeone on April 06, 2017, 09:03:21 PM

Quote from: Rayzor on April 06, 2017, 04:57:42 PM

Antirockballfruitcake doesn't have a single functioning braincell.   

Warning for gaslighting.

Telling the truth is not gaslighting.   

That may or may not be true. But given your original statement above, how is that relevant?

I would have thought it obvious that someone who thinks Antarctica and Space don't exist is, ipso facto, a sandwich short of a loaf.   Or as Markjo notes, Antirockthingo,  is only here to troll. 

Either way it's nothing to do with dipstickone.   The way he inserts irrelevant comments into threads is quite frankly a bit creepy.

   
PS.  Your signature pretty much sums it up.

Quote from: Boots on April 06, 2017, 11:03:23 PM

Quote from: Rayzor on April 06, 2017, 10:38:45 PM

Quote from: disputeone on April 06, 2017, 09:03:21 PM

Quote from: Rayzor on April 06, 2017, 04:57:42 PM

Antirockballfruitcake doesn't have a single functioning braincell.   

Warning for gaslighting.

Telling the truth is not gaslighting.   

That may or may not be true. But given your original statement above, how is that relevant?

I would have thought it obvious that someone who thinks Antarctica and Space don't exist is, ipso facto, a sandwich short of a loaf.   Or as Markjo notes, Antirockthingo,  is only here to troll. 

Either way it's nothing to do with dipstickone.   The way he inserts irrelevant comments into threads is quite frankly a bit creepy.

   
PS.  Your signature pretty much sums it up.

Okay. But being "a sandwich short of a loaf" =/= not having a single functioning brain cell.

One might be true depending on what it actually means. The other is objectively false - unless he's a real dead zombie! But if you believe in zombies ....   

Quote from: Rayzor on April 06, 2017, 11:16:34 PM

Quote from: Boots on April 06, 2017, 11:03:23 PM

Quote from: Rayzor on April 06, 2017, 10:38:45 PM

Quote from: disputeone on April 06, 2017, 09:03:21 PM

Quote from: Rayzor on April 06, 2017, 04:57:42 PM

Antirockballfruitcake doesn't have a single functioning braincell.   

Warning for gaslighting.

Telling the truth is not gaslighting.   

That may or may not be true. But given your original statement above, how is that relevant?

I would have thought it obvious that someone who thinks Antarctica and Space don't exist is, ipso facto, a sandwich short of a loaf.   Or as Markjo notes, Antirockthingo,  is only here to troll. 

Either way it's nothing to do with dipstickone.   The way he inserts irrelevant comments into threads is quite frankly a bit creepy.

   
PS.  Your signature pretty much sums it up.

Okay. But being "a sandwich short of a loaf" =/= not having a single functioning brain cell.

One might be true depending on what it actually means. The other is objectively false - unless he's a real dead zombie! But if you believe in zombies ....   

I suspect you are doing a "Sheldon Cooper" impersonation,   so I'll leave you to research the phase "sandwich short of a loaf"  and I think you'll find it actually does co-relate to the number of connected neurons. 

Here are a few more for you to research

a fortune cookie short of a Chinese dinner
a fried chicken short of a church picnic
a little light in the belfry
a pepperoni short of a pizza
a photographic memory but with the lens cover glued on
a sandwich short of a picnic
a trifle short of custard

about as bright as a burnt out 20 watt light bulb.
about as useful as a chocolate fireguard

Choose the one that confuses you the least.

Rayzor, Boots is brighter than you will ever be, how dare you talk down to people here.

You are the one lacking intelligence from what I have seen.

Quote from: Boots on April 06, 2017, 11:22:45 PM

Quote from: Rayzor on April 06, 2017, 11:16:34 PM

Quote from: Boots on April 06, 2017, 11:03:23 PM

Quote from: Rayzor on April 06, 2017, 10:38:45 PM

Quote from: disputeone on April 06, 2017, 09:03:21 PM

Quote from: Rayzor on April 06, 2017, 04:57:42 PM

Antirockballfruitcake doesn't have a single functioning braincell.   

Warning for gaslighting.

Telling the truth is not gaslighting.   

That may or may not be true. But given your original statement above, how is that relevant?

I would have thought it obvious that someone who thinks Antarctica and Space don't exist is, ipso facto, a sandwich short of a loaf.   Or as Markjo notes, Antirockthingo,  is only here to troll. 

Either way it's nothing to do with dipstickone.   The way he inserts irrelevant comments into threads is quite frankly a bit creepy.

   
PS.  Your signature pretty much sums it up.

Okay. But being "a sandwich short of a loaf" =/= not having a single functioning brain cell.

One might be true depending on what it actually means. The other is objectively false - unless he's a real dead zombie! But if you believe in zombies ....   

I suspect you are doing a "Sheldon Cooper" impersonation,   so I'll leave you to research the phase "sandwich short of a loaf"  and I think you'll find it actually does co-relate to the number of connected neurons. 

Here are a few more for you to research

a fortune cookie short of a Chinese dinner
a fried chicken short of a church picnic
a little light in the belfry
a pepperoni short of a pizza
a photographic memory but with the lens cover glued on
a sandwich short of a picnic
a trifle short of custard

about as bright as a burnt out 20 watt light bulb.
about as useful as a chocolate fireguard

Choose the one that confuses you the least.

But you agree that antirockballtheorist must have at least a few functioning brain cells in order to post. Therefore, your original statement was false and your statement that, "it's not gas-lighting if it's true" is irrelevant and does not hold as a defense against Dispute's accusation of gas-lighting.

Rayzor, Boots is brighter than you will ever be, how dare you talk down to people here.

You are the one lacking intelligence from what I have seen.

He must think I'm pretty bright if he compared me to Sheldon Cooper! 

Quote from: disputeone on April 06, 2017, 11:36:54 PM

Rayzor, Boots is brighter than you will ever be, how dare you talk down to people here.

You are the one lacking intelligence from what I have seen.

He must think I'm pretty bright if he compared me to Sheldon Cooper! 

That's true I guess.

But you agree that antirockballtheorist must have at least a few functioning brain cells in order to post. Therefore, your original statement was false and your statement that, "it's not gas-lighting if it's true" is irrelevant and does not hold as a defense against Dispute's accusation of gas-lighting.

Literal interpretation leading to misunderstanding is something Sheldon Cooper would do,  but as you well know the only reason dipstickone is stalking me is because he had a melt down in the 9/11 thread and has been on edge ever since.   I've been fairly nice to him,  but the way he follows me around is pathetic.   

If he stops butting in all the time I'll leave him alone.  Otherwise will have to take whatever comes his way.

“But I don’t want to go among mad people," Alice remarked.
"Oh, you can’t help that," said the Cat: "we’re all mad here. I’m mad. You’re mad."
"How do you know I’m mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "or you wouldn’t have come here.”

Welcome to the other side of sanity. 

Literal interpretation leading to misunderstanding is something Sheldon Cooper would do

I suppose you're right.

BTW I am Sheldon Cooper irl.

BAZINGA!

Lol that's so Rayzor.

You're a gentleman and a scholar Boots.

Usually people comfortable with their intelligence don't need to constantly call others stupid.

You must be the exception Rayzor.

Bazinga.

Rayzor is just fucking pathetic.

Rayzor is just fucking pathetic.

Only on a good day.

Quote from: hoppy on April 07, 2017, 12:35:59 AM

Rayzor is just fucking pathetic.

Only on a good day.

Oh good,  the lead theorist for nutty ideas is back,   did you decide to contribute the $100 to my "Australia Exists Expedition"  if not why are you still here?

Rayzor is just fucking pathetic.

LOL,   I'll take that as a compliment.    I'm so pleased to have a loyal friend like you.  It's very comforting.

Quote from: hoppy on April 07, 2017, 12:35:59 AM

Rayzor is just fucking pathetic.

LOL,   I'll take that as a compliment.    I'm so pleased to have a loyal friend like you.  It's very comforting.

It is good having friends.