Yes, I have been up in the air, numerous times. The videos I provided shows the earth is a motionless plane.
No. They don't. Not a single one.
I dare you, show me an airplane that is designed to move sideways in a 1,000 MPH moving atmosphere. BET YOU CAN'T!!!!!!!! Do you really think aircraft are moving sideways at 1,000 MPH when they fly north or south?
No. They aren't. That would only be the speed when going near the equator. And they are still moving quite fast forwards.
Regardless, planes are designed to move through/relative to an atmosphere. So they can fly in an atmosphere moving at any speed.
Perhaps you will like this video:
No, because the atmosphere inside the aircraft is motionless. Go ahead, take an air velocity meter in an aircraft with you, let the craft reach any height and speed you wish. Seal off any airflow and take your readings, I bet you get 0 MPH inside the craft on the meter. This is an atmosphere in motion:
We have already explained why this is crap so many times it isn't funny.
If it the atmosphere was stationary then you wouldn't be able to stand or walk or anything in the MOVING plane.
The reason you don't have an issue is because the atmosphere is moving with you.
Air velocity meters only measure relative velocity.
Relative to you the atmosphere in the plane is stationary, just like relative to you (ignoring wind) the atmosphere on Earth is stationary because it is moving with Earth.
Remember your wing walker videos?
Is the atmosphere in motion there? Guess what would happen if someone on the ground and the wing walker both too air velocity measurements?
They would be different, because of their relative motion.
You have yet to show any visual evidence that water can obey gravity and centrifugal forces at the same time.
We have, both with visual evidence and explanations. You even did so.
Remember your videos of water in a rotating container, where the water surface was curved?
That was water obeying both forces, gravity and apparent centrifugal forces.
How about instead of ignoring all that you provide evidence that they can't?
And no, having one completely dominate the other is not evidence.
I showed you two bodies of water right on the equator, where said centrifugal forces are said to be the strongest, yet the surface of those bodies of water are horizontally flat to plane earth across their surfaces
You are yet to demonstrate that they do not follow Earth's curve.
All you have is an empty unprovable assertion about water, with absolutely no visual evidence from earth's physical condition to support your claim.
No. That would be you.
You have repeatedly asserted it is flat and that it can't obey both forces at once, but you are yet to demonstrate either, but have demonstrate the exact opposite.
Put up, or shut up, stop making false accusations to save face with your peers.
Good idea. Why don't you?
Put up your evidence or shut up.
Fact, there is no visual evidence from earth's water that it is being subjected to centrifugal forces anywhere, you can only show it on a fabricated globe model.
Fact, there is no visual evidence to show that it is not. Fact, there is no visual evidence to show that water on Earth is flat across its surface or motionless.
Show me a body of water, ON EARTH, like a lake, a river, the ocean, that is being subjected to centrifugal forces and gravity at the same time. What is happening on earth is the issue, not what is going on in some man-made machine.
So you want us to show you Earth, where it isn't easily detectable due to how weak the centrifugal forces are?
Exactly how do you expect us to show you this 0.15%?
Especially when you dismiss the only possible evidence as fake/CGI?
Your only hope would be extremely accurate measurements of Earth's curvature at various locations to show it follows an ellipse instead of a circle, or viewing an image of Earth, such as one from EPIC:
https://epic.gsfc.nasa.gov/archive/natural/2017/04/05/png/epic_1b_20170405002712_02.pngWhere the equator is roughly 1647 pixels wide, while the distance between the poles is only 1640 pixels. This means it bulges at the equator. But like I said, you will dismiss it as fake/CGI, but the evidence is there for those who want it.
How about this, you show us where water on Earth CAN'T be being subjected to both centrifugal forces and gravity at the same time, where the water on Earth cannot physically match that.
Can you do that?
Do you have evidence form a body of water, resting in an earthly vessel, that is being subjected to centrifugal forces? If you can show that, then we can see if it is also falling to a lowest spot on earth at the same time. You don't have it, do you?
We have, but you will dismiss it as fake/CGI.
And you again misrepresent gravity.
Also, why can't it be in a man-made apparatus?
Isn't the goal to show that these 2 forces can act on water at once?
Show me a body of water, ON EARTH, like a lake, a river, the ocean, that is being subjected to centrifugal forces and gravity at the same time. I don't care what happens in a machine. Show it to me from earth's nature. It is earth's nature that you'll claim is dealing with these forces, it should be there, like the centrifuge machine, right?
Yes, it should be there, but nothing like in a centrifuge.
A typical centrifuge will spin at several thousand or tens of thousands of RPM, generating massive g-forces, where the acceleration is massive compared to gravity.
On Earth, with it's rotational speed of 15 degrees an hour, you have tiny accelerations involved, where at the equator, with the greatest acceleration, it is still only 0.03 m/s^2.
So yes, it will be there, but not in any easily detectable way.
If you want to detect it, here is an experiment that will let you, but it will be impossible to do:
Get 2 containers of water, linked together such that water is free to flow between them.
Now, leave one attached to Earth in a fixed spot (on the equator). Then, take the other one and race around Earth with it (around the equator), at a speed of 1000 miles per hour. Then stop and go around the other way.
If what you are saying is true, and Earth is a motionless plane (or even just motionless), the 2 directions should produce the same result.
If it isn't, and instead it is rotating at 1000 miles per hour at the equator, then going against that rotation will result in the water level in your moving cup dropping while it raises in the other cup, while rotation with Earth produces the opposite effect, with the cup spinning getting more water.
You can also do this at other speeds.
If you go at 2000 miles per hour, then when going against Earth, the water level in the 2 cups will be the same.
Otherwise, how do you suggest people measure this bulge/effect?
What do you think the effect should be?
What do you think should happen to this water if it was obeying both forces at once, with it being accelerated by gravity at a rate of ~ 9.8 m/s^2 and by the apparent centrifugal force at 0.03 m/s^2, which couldn't simply be a slight variation in gravity?
I can't leave earth, 99.99.99.99% of the people on earth can't leave earth. One person did, and you'll don't believe a word he said about what he saw about earth. All I can go by, is what I physical see earth physically experiencing, and it does not jive with a spinning speeding globe. Sorry that's the case, but it is what it is, nothing I can do about it.
No. Piccard didn't leave Earth. He just went really high. Plenty of people have been to space. Some even too the moon. I don't know of any of them that say Earth is flat.
Also, I accept what Piccard said, that it looks like that, not that it is that.
Everything about Earth is completely consistent with it being a spinning speeding ball. There is not a single thing that is inconsistent with it.
However, there is plenty that is inconstant with Earth being a motionless plane, both natural things on Earth, like objects disappearing over the horizon and tropical storms, as well as other things, like stars, Foucault's pendulum, laser ring gyroscopes, pictures from space and so on.
You have also been yet to demonstrate anything that doesn't "jive" with Earth being a spinning speeding ball.