The real debating issue here is, whether the earth is rotating, causing the star trails, or whether it is the stars above us rotating, causing the trails. The only real way to settle the issue of what is rotating, is to find the clues from the platform of observation. I have been exhaustive in giving my clues we are on a motionless plane with visual evidence from plane earth itself. Allow me to ask, what is your evidence from the physical planet, the platform we observe from, that it is it that is doing the spinning on its axis at 1,000 MPH?
Well, you started out good. You need to determine which is rotating, but then one back to your typical dishonest self.
The stars don't give the option of rotating globe vs motionless plane. The motion of the stars is only possible with them being in an apparent spherical shell around a much smaller spherical Earth. A key factor is the apparent angle of the stars, where they are consistent with very distant stars viewed from a sphere, where, for example, the angle of Polaris is based upon your latitude just as you would expect for a sphere and a very distant star, the angle of elevation is equal to your latitude (with North being positive), instead of the more complicated trig functions for a plane, which predicts Polaris should still be in view even all the way at 90 degrees south, and there are plenty of other examples of stars matching this circular pattern, including the sun.
Another, I would say far more damning one, is the fact that there are 2 celestial poles which the stars appear to rotate about, which are always located 180 degrees apart, regardless of where you are, with one due north and one due south, only possible on a spherical Earth (with Earth's surface being smooth).
So the options we are reduced to are a motionless globe with stars rotating above, a rotating globe with stars motionless above, or a rotating globe with stars moving above.
You haven't given any clues we are on a motionless plane (or that we are motionless).
So far every piece of evidence you have provided has been consistent with Earth being a rotating globe.
A lot was consistent with both. But some, like your pictures of tropical storms and some pictures and videos showing either the curvature itself or the effects of curvature, clearly indicate Earth is a rotating globe and are inconsistent with Earth being a motionless plane.
Again, stop using that bullshit unit. It is not a unit for rotation.
Earth is rotating about its axis at a rate of 15 degrees an hour.
Rotation about an axis is given in units of angle, not length.
We have provided plenty of evidence, which you are yet to refute.
We have tropical storms, Foucault's pendulum, satellites (including geostationary ones) and laser ring gyroscopes.
Of course, your dishonest criteria excludes all bar tropical storms, but why shouldn't we use the rest?
You are yet to provide any evidence which refutes Earth being a rotating globe.