Curve of earth proved valid by FE youtuber in graphic detail

  • 20 Replies
  • 4488 Views
?

Semnomic

  • 172
  • +0/-0

have you ever come across thriveandsurvive on yt ? he is a perspective expert and if you want to see some real funny stuff go check him out. Debunked ball earth with beauties like  "Final Nail in the coffin for ball earth" etc, etc.

I can guarantee you will be in fits at some of the stuff he comes up with. He has many on FE geometry and gets so much basic geometry, math, perspective wrong.
On this one he PROVES the curve of the earth but is simply to far gone to realize it?
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

Watch it all if you have time,the first five or so minutes are off topic. He proves the curve of the earth at 11:08 >>> oil rig on left is the main culprit.
I think the main problem he had on this was not knowing an oil rig is a very large contraption many hundreds of feet high.


?

sir_awesome123

  • 277
  • +0/-0
  • proud NASA shill
Re: Curve of earth proved valid by FE youtuber in graphic detail
« Reply #1 on: March 27, 2017, 11:48:31 PM »
"look there's a swell here" and it just looks a whole lot like the curve of the earth, that's pretty funny.
"hey what are you doing?"
"nothing, just arguing with this dude, he thinks the earth is flat"
"no really, what are you doing?"

?

Semnomic

  • 172
  • +0/-0
Re: Curve of earth proved valid by FE youtuber in graphic detail
« Reply #2 on: March 28, 2017, 04:02:15 AM »
"look there's a swell here" and it just looks a whole lot like the curve of the earth, that's pretty funny.

Its not a swell its a clear obstruction, 25-40% the legs are hidden and not only that he says does this look like 42ft, no where near... meaning he did see a difference but it was not as much as he thought he should of seen based on his own calcs.

Why did he admit to seeing ANY difference?   ;D
« Last Edit: March 28, 2017, 04:07:53 AM by Semnomic »

Re: Curve of earth proved valid by FE youtuber in graphic detail
« Reply #3 on: March 28, 2017, 04:07:52 AM »

have you ever come across thriveandsurvive on yt ? he is a perspective expert and if you want to see some real funny stuff go check him out. Debunked ball earth with beauties like  "Final Nail in the coffin for ball earth" etc, etc.

I can guarantee you will be in fits at some of the stuff he comes up with. He has many on FE geometry and gets so much basic geometry, math, perspective wrong.
On this one he PROVES the curve of the earth but is simply to far gone to realize it?
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

Watch it all if you have time,the first five or so minutes are off topic. He proves the curve of the earth at 11:08 >>> oil rig on left is the main culprit.
I think the main problem he had on this was not knowing an oil rig is a very large contraption many hundreds of feet high.

I think this will explain the natural phenomenon at 11:08:


?

Canadabear

  • 2525
  • +0/-0
Re: Curve of earth proved valid by FE youtuber in graphic detail
« Reply #4 on: March 28, 2017, 04:11:14 AM »

have you ever come across thriveandsurvive on yt ? he is a perspective expert and if you want to see some real funny stuff go check him out. Debunked ball earth with beauties like  "Final Nail in the coffin for ball earth" etc, etc.

I can guarantee you will be in fits at some of the stuff he comes up with. He has many on FE geometry and gets so much basic geometry, math, perspective wrong.
On this one he PROVES the curve of the earth but is simply to far gone to realize it?
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

Watch it all if you have time,the first five or so minutes are off topic. He proves the curve of the earth at 11:08 >>> oil rig on left is the main culprit.
I think the main problem he had on this was not knowing an oil rig is a very large contraption many hundreds of feet high.

I think this will explain the natural phenomenon at 11:08:



really, the best thing you can come up with is a drawing?
where is your real evidence?

?

Semnomic

  • 172
  • +0/-0
Re: Curve of earth proved valid by FE youtuber in graphic detail
« Reply #5 on: March 28, 2017, 04:20:07 AM »

have you ever come across thriveandsurvive on yt ? he is a perspective expert and if you want to see some real funny stuff go check him out. Debunked ball earth with beauties like  "Final Nail in the coffin for ball earth" etc, etc.

I can guarantee you will be in fits at some of the stuff he comes up with. He has many on FE geometry and gets so much basic geometry, math, perspective wrong.
On this one he PROVES the curve of the earth but is simply to far gone to realize it?
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

Watch it all if you have time,the first five or so minutes are off topic. He proves the curve of the earth at 11:08 >>> oil rig on left is the main culprit.
I think the main problem he had on this was not knowing an oil rig is a very large contraption many hundreds of feet high.

I think this will explain the natural phenomenon at 11:08:




Whats this got to do with perspective? You have two shots from different angles on the screen? Why use perspective 
 to get answers, you can use perspective to explain the shortening of the legs on the image taken at a lower ALT.
Yes from the lower perspective point a hump of water is in the way. ?

You can also use a ruler and measure it if you like, its much easier and takes no brain power whatsoever to quickly see the problem. Im glad you used perspective as a way to describe the problem as your confirming there is one.

perspective is not the magic get out for any time FE theory does not hold up. 
 

Re: Curve of earth proved valid by FE youtuber in graphic detail
« Reply #6 on: March 28, 2017, 04:47:18 AM »

have you ever come across thriveandsurvive on yt ? he is a perspective expert and if you want to see some real funny stuff go check him out. Debunked ball earth with beauties like  "Final Nail in the coffin for ball earth" etc, etc.

I can guarantee you will be in fits at some of the stuff he comes up with. He has many on FE geometry and gets so much basic geometry, math, perspective wrong.
On this one he PROVES the curve of the earth but is simply to far gone to realize it?
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

Watch it all if you have time,the first five or so minutes are off topic. He proves the curve of the earth at 11:08 >>> oil rig on left is the main culprit.
I think the main problem he had on this was not knowing an oil rig is a very large contraption many hundreds of feet high.

I think this will explain the natural phenomenon at 11:08:




Whats this got to do with perspective? You have two shots from different angles on the screen? Why use perspective 
 to get answers, you can use perspective to explain the shortening of the legs on the image taken at a lower ALT.
Yes from the lower perspective point a hump of water is in the way. ?

You can also use a ruler and measure it if you like, its much easier and takes no brain power whatsoever to quickly see the problem. Im glad you used perspective as a way to describe the problem as your confirming there is one.

perspective is not the magic get out for any time FE theory does not hold up. 
 

"Why use perspective to get answers,..."

Because it debunks the video creator's claim! 

What are oceans but large lakes. These RC boat videos clearly show the water surface is flat and level as the boats sail over them. There is absolutely no evidence to suggest the ocean water is not the same as lake water across the surface, flat, level and horizontal to plane earth:



With this evidence in mind, there has to be another reason we assume the surface of ocean water curves to match earth's assumed curvature, and there is, perspective. Perspective operates the same over water surface.

Look, I use to argue the same as you when I encountered the flat earth idea 3 years ago, I thought it was laughably hilarious. Then I made the mistake of trying to disprove the idea, I thought it would be a piece of cake. It took about 2.5 years of research, and getting over my denialism ego, before I finally accepted what the physical evidence from earth shows, a motionless plane, not a spinning speeding ball.
 

?

Canadabear

  • 2525
  • +0/-0
Re: Curve of earth proved valid by FE youtuber in graphic detail
« Reply #7 on: March 28, 2017, 04:54:57 AM »

Look, I use to argue the same as you when I encountered the flat earth idea 3 years ago, I thought it was laughably hilarious. Then I made the mistake of trying to disprove the idea, I thought it would be a piece of cake. It took about 2.5 years of research, and getting over my denialism ego, before I finally accepted what the physical evidence from earth shows, a motionless plane, not a spinning speeding ball.

looks like you got brainwashed.

?

Semnomic

  • 172
  • +0/-0
Re: Curve of earth proved valid by FE youtuber in graphic detail
« Reply #8 on: March 28, 2017, 05:07:10 AM »

have you ever come across thriveandsurvive on yt ? he is a perspective expert and if you want to see some real funny stuff go check him out. Debunked ball earth with beauties like  "Final Nail in the coffin for ball earth" etc, etc.

I can guarantee you will be in fits at some of the stuff he comes up with. He has many on FE geometry and gets so much basic geometry, math, perspective wrong.
On this one he PROVES the curve of the earth but is simply to far gone to realize it?
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

Watch it all if you have time,the first five or so minutes are off topic. He proves the curve of the earth at 11:08 >>> oil rig on left is the main culprit.
I think the main problem he had on this was not knowing an oil rig is a very large contraption many hundreds of feet high.

I think this will explain the natural phenomenon at 11:08:




Whats this got to do with perspective? You have two shots from different angles on the screen? Why use perspective 
 to get answers, you can use perspective to explain the shortening of the legs on the image taken at a lower ALT.
Yes from the lower perspective point a hump of water is in the way. ?

You can also use a ruler and measure it if you like, its much easier and takes no brain power whatsoever to quickly see the problem. Im glad you used perspective as a way to describe the problem as your confirming there is one.

perspective is not the magic get out for any time FE theory does not hold up. 
 

"Why use perspective to get answers,..."

Because it debunks the video creator's claim! 

What are oceans but large lakes. These RC boat videos clearly show the water surface is flat and level as the boats sail over them. There is absolutely no evidence to suggest the ocean water is not the same as lake water across the surface, flat, level and horizontal to plane earth:



With this evidence in mind, there has to be another reason we assume the surface of ocean water curves to match earth's assumed curvature, and there is, perspective. Perspective operates the same over water surface.

Look, I use to argue the same as you when I encountered the flat earth idea 3 years ago, I thought it was laughably hilarious. Then I made the mistake of trying to disprove the idea, I thought it would be a piece of cake. It took about 2.5 years of research, and getting over my denialism ego, before I finally accepted what the physical evidence from earth shows, a motionless plane, not a spinning speeding ball.


can you see a clear 25ft+ shortening of the legs?(the bottom of them is missing)

Lets say the legs are 100 ft high, 9 miles away, are you suggesting a perspective change of Y=36ft on  an X axis of 9 miles can decrease the length of the legs by 25%+ ?

Is that your understanding of perspective? Try Pythagoras on those two triangles and see how wrong you are.
your talking about a camera angle change of less than 1 deg.

The change in apparent height between the two shots should be about 1cm ? not 20+ ft?

Perspective ? As for the toy boat in a lake ? is that pond anywhere near 9 miles wide? Talk about apples and oranges :) 

I know 1,2,3 point perspective so its not new on me and its of NO use in this situation as the view of one image is obscured by a body of water rendering part of the legs invisible.

*

disputeone

  • 27998
  • +110/-92
  • Or should I?
Re: Curve of earth proved valid by FE youtuber in graphic detail
« Reply #9 on: March 28, 2017, 05:20:03 AM »

Look, I use to argue the same as you when I encountered the flat earth idea 3 years ago, I thought it was laughably hilarious. Then I made the mistake of trying to disprove the idea, I thought it would be a piece of cake. It took about 2.5 years of research, and getting over my denialism ego, before I finally accepted what the physical evidence from earth shows, a motionless plane, not a spinning speeding ball.

looks like you got brainwashed.

I love it how apparently there is no possible way we can be brainwashed by government and the media.

Yet debunkers claim a 5 minute youtube video or two is all it takes.

>Pick one.
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.

?

kennykirklan

  • 397
  • +0/-0
Re: Curve of earth proved valid by FE youtuber in graphic detail
« Reply #10 on: March 28, 2017, 05:35:58 AM »

What are oceans but large lakes. These RC boat videos clearly show the water surface is flat and level as the boats sail over them. There is absolutely no evidence to suggest the ocean water is not the same as lake water across the surface, flat, level and horizontal to plane earth:



With this evidence in mind, there has to be another reason we assume the surface of ocean water curves to match earth's assumed curvature, and there is, perspective. Perspective operates the same over water surface.

Look, I use to argue the same as you when I encountered the flat earth idea 3 years ago, I thought it was laughably hilarious. Then I made the mistake of trying to disprove the idea, I thought it would be a piece of cake. It took about 2.5 years of research, and getting over my denialism ego, before I finally accepted what the physical evidence from earth shows, a motionless plane, not a spinning speeding ball.

I count myself lucky in that I don't believe I have denialism ego. I just look at everything presented and see how it balances out. There are many coherent substantiated arguments on here against FE. Zero quality answers to support FE. Thats just how the balance tips for me.

The fact you didn't find disproving FE a piece of cake in the same way others here effortlessly seem to manage it suprises me if that was truly your stance. I'd be interested in your process undertaken to attempt to disprove and subsequently fail. I'm not being sarcastic, I genuinely would like to get that insight as I do want to respectfully get an appreciation for where FE is coming from. As so far all I've seen is a combination of not understanding how big the earth is, stubborn denial and, when all else fails, pulling CGI and things like gravity doesn't exist rabbits out of the hat.


Re: Curve of earth proved valid by FE youtuber in graphic detail
« Reply #11 on: March 28, 2017, 06:05:21 AM »

What are oceans but large lakes. These RC boat videos clearly show the water surface is flat and level as the boats sail over them. There is absolutely no evidence to suggest the ocean water is not the same as lake water across the surface, flat, level and horizontal to plane earth:



With this evidence in mind, there has to be another reason we assume the surface of ocean water curves to match earth's assumed curvature, and there is, perspective. Perspective operates the same over water surface.

Look, I use to argue the same as you when I encountered the flat earth idea 3 years ago, I thought it was laughably hilarious. Then I made the mistake of trying to disprove the idea, I thought it would be a piece of cake. It took about 2.5 years of research, and getting over my denialism ego, before I finally accepted what the physical evidence from earth shows, a motionless plane, not a spinning speeding ball.

I count myself lucky in that I don't believe I have denialism ego. I just look at everything presented and see how it balances out. There are many coherent substantiated arguments on here against FE. Zero quality answers to support FE. Thats just how the balance tips for me.

The fact you didn't find disproving FE a piece of cake in the same way others here effortlessly seem to manage it suprises me if that was truly your stance. I'd be interested in your process undertaken to attempt to disprove and subsequently fail. I'm not being sarcastic, I genuinely would like to get that insight as I do want to respectfully get an appreciation for where FE is coming from. As so far all I've seen is a combination of not understanding how big the earth is, stubborn denial and, when all else fails, pulling CGI and things like gravity doesn't exist rabbits out of the hat.

"I count myself lucky in that I don't believe I have denialism ego."

That's part of denialism syndrome.

"I'd be interested in your process undertaken to attempt to disprove and subsequently fail."

Start here, let's see if you can make it fail. I have two other threads that go along with this very topic.

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=69299.0
« Last Edit: March 28, 2017, 06:08:55 AM by physical observer »

?

Semnomic

  • 172
  • +0/-0
Re: Curve of earth proved valid by FE youtuber in graphic detail
« Reply #12 on: March 28, 2017, 06:10:01 AM »

What are oceans but large lakes. These RC boat videos clearly show the water surface is flat and level as the boats sail over them. There is absolutely no evidence to suggest the ocean water is not the same as lake water across the surface, flat, level and horizontal to plane earth:



With this evidence in mind, there has to be another reason we assume the surface of ocean water curves to match earth's assumed curvature, and there is, perspective. Perspective operates the same over water surface.

Look, I use to argue the same as you when I encountered the flat earth idea 3 years ago, I thought it was laughably hilarious. Then I made the mistake of trying to disprove the idea, I thought it would be a piece of cake. It took about 2.5 years of research, and getting over my denialism ego, before I finally accepted what the physical evidence from earth shows, a motionless plane, not a spinning speeding ball.

I count myself lucky in that I don't believe I have denialism ego. I just look at everything presented and see how it balances out. There are many coherent substantiated arguments on here against FE. Zero quality answers to support FE. Thats just how the balance tips for me.

The fact you didn't find disproving FE a piece of cake in the same way others here effortlessly seem to manage it suprises me if that was truly your stance. I'd be interested in your process undertaken to attempt to disprove and subsequently fail. I'm not being sarcastic, I genuinely would like to get that insight as I do want to respectfully get an appreciation for where FE is coming from. As so far all I've seen is a combination of not understanding how big the earth is, stubborn denial and, when all else fails, pulling CGI and things like gravity doesn't exist rabbits out of the hat.

The very fact you are observing the way difficult questions are handled means your basically BE in my eyes. If you ever get in  a tipping position ask yourself these question,your in a court of law your on the bench.... which group would seem to be more deceptive? Which group has more math / science to back up its claims, which group is more academic, which group has jobs / positions in science education , which group seems to do its best to answer all questions, which group has a standard model, which group is more tied to religious beliefs/unverifiable fiction, which group has several variations of the globe, which group trys to educate the other using proven math formula, which group uses proven laws, which group was disbanded hundreds of years ago, which group is based on modern discoveries/science, which group is stuck in a time when powerful telescopes,physics,etc was yet to be discovered, which group seems more organized.

Which group would you put on your CV if you had to. 

Re: Curve of earth proved valid by FE youtuber in graphic detail
« Reply #13 on: March 28, 2017, 06:12:03 AM »

Look, I use to argue the same as you when I encountered the flat earth idea 3 years ago, I thought it was laughably hilarious. Then I made the mistake of trying to disprove the idea, I thought it would be a piece of cake. It took about 2.5 years of research, and getting over my denialism ego, before I finally accepted what the physical evidence from earth shows, a motionless plane, not a spinning speeding ball.

looks like you got brainwashed.

I love it how apparently there is no possible way we can be brainwashed by government and the media.

Yet debunkers claim a 5 minute youtube video or two is all it takes.

>Pick one.

The natural physical state, the physical condition we experience about our earth, that is the conclusive proof. You can find that expressed in many 5 minute youtube videos, something wrong with that?

?

Canadabear

  • 2525
  • +0/-0
Re: Curve of earth proved valid by FE youtuber in graphic detail
« Reply #14 on: March 28, 2017, 06:14:32 AM »

Look, I use to argue the same as you when I encountered the flat earth idea 3 years ago, I thought it was laughably hilarious. Then I made the mistake of trying to disprove the idea, I thought it would be a piece of cake. It took about 2.5 years of research, and getting over my denialism ego, before I finally accepted what the physical evidence from earth shows, a motionless plane, not a spinning speeding ball.

looks like you got brainwashed.

I love it how apparently there is no possible way we can be brainwashed by government and the media.

Yet debunkers claim a 5 minute youtube video or two is all it takes.

>Pick one.

The natural physical state, the physical condition we experience about our earth, that is the conclusive proof. You can find that expressed in many 5 minute youtube videos, something wrong with that?

The natural physical state, the physical condition we experience about our earth, that is the conclusive proof.

and all natural physical observable condition show that the earth is a globe.

?

Semnomic

  • 172
  • +0/-0
Re: Curve of earth proved valid by FE youtuber in graphic detail
« Reply #15 on: March 28, 2017, 06:37:11 AM »

What are oceans but large lakes. These RC boat videos clearly show the water surface is flat and level as the boats sail over them. There is absolutely no evidence to suggest the ocean water is not the same as lake water across the surface, flat, level and horizontal to plane earth:



With this evidence in mind, there has to be another reason we assume the surface of ocean water curves to match earth's assumed curvature, and there is, perspective. Perspective operates the same over water surface.

Look, I use to argue the same as you when I encountered the flat earth idea 3 years ago, I thought it was laughably hilarious. Then I made the mistake of trying to disprove the idea, I thought it would be a piece of cake. It took about 2.5 years of research, and getting over my denialism ego, before I finally accepted what the physical evidence from earth shows, a motionless plane, not a spinning speeding ball.

I count myself lucky in that I don't believe I have denialism ego. I just look at everything presented and see how it balances out. There are many coherent substantiated arguments on here against FE. Zero quality answers to support FE. Thats just how the balance tips for me.

The fact you didn't find disproving FE a piece of cake in the same way others here effortlessly seem to manage it suprises me if that was truly your stance. I'd be interested in your process undertaken to attempt to disprove and subsequently fail. I'm not being sarcastic, I genuinely would like to get that insight as I do want to respectfully get an appreciation for where FE is coming from. As so far all I've seen is a combination of not understanding how big the earth is, stubborn denial and, when all else fails, pulling CGI and things like gravity doesn't exist rabbits out of the hat.

"I count myself lucky in that I don't believe I have denialism ego."

That's part of denialism syndrome.

"I'd be interested in your process undertaken to attempt to disprove and subsequently fail."

Start here, let's see if you can make it fail. I have two other threads that go along with this very topic.

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=69299.0


All your videos show stuff that is plausible on FE and BE, not one of those videos shows any evidence against BE, you do understand you do not feel a change in motion when spinning or during simple motion unless its a deceleration, acceleration and or change in direction.
If you have been researching this for 2.5 years and you still dont get why we dont feel forces of this type then?

Has anyone ever explained jumping, walking in a airplane to you?, throwing a coin up in a moving car?, standing on the floor and jumping up?. All basic physics and all play out as expected.

*

Copper Knickers

  • 904
  • +0/-0
Re: Curve of earth proved valid by FE youtuber in graphic detail
« Reply #16 on: March 28, 2017, 07:11:29 AM »
Look, I use to argue the same as you when I encountered the flat earth idea 3 years ago, I thought it was laughably hilarious. Then I made the mistake of trying to disprove the idea, I thought it would be a piece of cake. It took about 2.5 years of research, and getting over my denialism ego, before I finally accepted what the physical evidence from earth shows, a motionless plane, not a spinning speeding ball.

Lol. I found this very funny. You spent two hand a half years trying to disprove the flat earth and failed!

I understand you are trolling, but to do it by pretending to be so credulous is going the extra mile. Well done!

*

JackBlack

  • 26157
  • +51/-79
Re: Curve of earth proved valid by FE youtuber in graphic detail
« Reply #17 on: March 28, 2017, 01:45:52 PM »
I think this will explain the natural phenomenon at 11:08:
Nope.
That would explain it if it had simply shrunk. It hasn't, instead the bottom is gone.

"Why use perspective to get answers,..."
Because it debunks the video creator's claim!
Except it does no such thing.
Perspective results in objects appearing smaller the further away they are. It doesn't result in them disappearing from the bottom up.

These RC boat videos clearly show the water surface is flat and level as the boats sail over them.
No. They don't.
You cannot tell if they are flat or ever so slightly curved.

There is absolutely no evidence to suggest the ocean water is not the same as lake water across the surface, flat, level and horizontal to plane earth:
Or following Earth's curvature.

There is absolutely no evidence indicating that lake does not follow Earth's curvature.

With this evidence in mind, there has to be another reason we assume the surface of ocean water curves to match earth's assumed curvature, and there is, perspective. Perspective operates the same over water surface.
No. There is just the same reasons as there have always been as your video is not evidence.
Like I said, perspective doesn't explain it.
Objects disappearing from the bottom up indicates something is obstructing the view, which requires the surface of Earth to curve.

Look, I use to argue the same as you when I encountered the flat earth idea 3 years ago, I thought it was laughably hilarious.
Sure you did.
See, we are using rational arguments, which you have no refutation for.
As such, I highly doubt you argued the same.
At best you probably just laughed it off and were too ignorant to actually be able to explain anything.

Then I made the mistake of trying to disprove the idea, I thought it would be a piece of cake.
While we don't make that mistake and instead actually disprove it. It is a piece of cake.

It took about 2.5 years of research
See, that's the big issue with you, you knew nothing and were a gullible fool.
We are not that stupid or ignorant.

before I finally accepted what the physical evidence from earth shows, a motionless plane, not a spinning speeding ball.
Except that isn't what it shows.
It shows Earth to be a spinning ball.
There is no evidence that shows Earth to be flat or motionless.

"I'd be interested in your process undertaken to attempt to disprove and subsequently fail."

Start here, let's see if you can make it fail. I have two other threads that go along with this very topic.
You have had your ass handed to you repeatedly in that thread and have been completely unable to defend your bullshit, but others have shown that Earth is round and spinning.

So you must have really sucked if you weren't able to refute that pile of bullshit you bring up now.

The natural physical state, the physical condition we experience about our earth, that is the conclusive proof. You can find that expressed in many 5 minute youtube videos, something wrong with that?
Yes, conclusive proof that Earth is a spinning ball.

?

Twerp

  • Gutter Sniper
  • Flat Earth Almost Believer
  • 6540
  • +0/-0
Re: Curve of earth proved valid by FE youtuber in graphic detail
« Reply #18 on: March 29, 2017, 01:42:27 AM »
There is absolutely no evidence to suggest the ocean water is not the same as lake water across the surface,

Finally! Common ground.
“Heaven is being governed by Devil nowadays..” - Wise

Re: Curve of earth proved valid by FE youtuber in graphic detail
« Reply #19 on: March 29, 2017, 07:55:37 AM »
There is absolutely no evidence to suggest the ocean water is not the same as lake water across the surface,

Finally! Common ground.

When this "proof" first came out I put the following image on the comments section as it was stated that there was no deformation or distortion of the Habitat platform.



Yeah, totally zero distortion or hidden platform! Based on the distortions, at least 25 feet of the platform is hidden.

Here is the original video,
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
and at time 1:28 it gives a weather report which includes the following, Significant Wave Height 5.6 feet (probably in the bay itself around the platforms, but video does not really show much wave action). The camera was not at one foot above sea level, it looks at least 3 feet above at time 1:59, it was probably 1 foot above the beach where the waves were reaching up to. So hidden amount would drop to at least 35 feet but would be subject to the true sea level away from the effects of the beach. With the lack of true measurements and the effects of looming (as there is great evidence of distortion top to bottom of the platform, it is fair to say that this "proof" can be blown out of the water, pun intended.

?

Semnomic

  • 172
  • +0/-0
Re: Curve of earth proved valid by FE youtuber in graphic detail
« Reply #20 on: March 29, 2017, 08:28:21 AM »
There is absolutely no evidence to suggest the ocean water is not the same as lake water across the surface,

Finally! Common ground.

When this "proof" first came out I put the following image on the comments section as it was stated that there was no deformation or distortion of the Habitat platform.



Yeah, totally zero distortion or hidden platform! Based on the distortions, at least 25 feet of the platform is hidden.

Here is the original video,
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
and at time 1:28 it gives a weather report which includes the following, Significant Wave Height 5.6 feet (probably in the bay itself around the platforms, but video does not really show much wave action). The camera was not at one foot above sea level, it looks at least 3 feet above at time 1:59, it was probably 1 foot above the beach where the waves were reaching up to. So hidden amount would drop to at least 35 feet but would be subject to the true sea level away from the effects of the beach. With the lack of true measurements and the effects of looming (as there is great evidence of distortion top to bottom of the platform, it is fair to say that this "proof" can be blown out of the water, pun intended.
Your video.
10:12
11:27
No difference to portion of legs of platform visible?