Hm, personally I think my five Challenges (http://heiwaco.com/chall.htm ) are serious and fun. But plenty persons are not able to understand it. Poor, shitty people!
It's not at all serious because you know as well as everyone else it's unwinnable. I know people who were there and saw the towers come down exactly as it was seen on TV. My brother-in-law is a firefighter in NJ and spent a lot of time at ground zero.
However, you won't except any eye witness accounts, you will contend that every photo and video is fake so short of bringing down another skyscraper there is not one single piece of evidence you would ever consider credible and that is why it is unwinnable.
So, why even make the challenge?
Mike
Hm, re my weak top part C crushes strong, intact bottom part A Challenge - the 911 Challenge - you do not win it by saying you know people seeing C crushing A or that your sister's husband was cleaning up after C crushing A.
Thanks Dr. Obvious. I already said you wouldn’t except eye witness accounts in my post.
BTW, there were the tens of thousands of eye witnesses. All of whom, according to you, are liars.
No, you just have to read the rules - http://heiwaco.com/chall1.htm .
They are not difficult!
Just take any structure A+C you have! Disconnect top C of this structure and drop it on bottom A of the structure!
If C crushes A I will pay you €1M!
That’s already been done. Several engineering firms and universities ran finite element modeling proving how the collapse happened. You can download them yourself, including all the input data.
Since you’re and engineer and you profess to be an expert in 3D modeling and dynamic analysis on a level that is more difficult that nuclear physics, you should easily be able to determine whether or not the analyses are accurate.
Which begs the question, since you are an
expert in dynamic analysis, why is it that the graphics on your website are so simplistic? Where are the stress plots, deflection plots, and 3D simulations? With your expertise you could easily produce the necessary finite element analyses to prove your theory.
If your theory is true is should be child’s play for someone with your expertise to provide analytical proof. Instead you provide the kind of graphics my grand-niece could have made on her iPad.
Mike