Ok, here's what I've got.
Four FEers responded. I'll post the interesting results, though it's not much to draw a conclusion on.
Seventeen REers responded, so a bit more analysis is possible there.
One hollow earther responded, so I can't do much with that, though I can include them in an alternative-earther group, along with FEers.
As far as terminology goes, REer is one who believes the model of a globe Earth, AEer is one who does not, a FEer specifically believes in a flat Earth model of some description.
One who is marked as non-religious is either an atheist, or responded to 'other' with a non-theistic title, not believing in a God or holy book.
The questions asked someone's view of the Earth, their political stance, their religion, and their view on conspiracy theories. It then asked their opinion of those that disagreed, and how much of their views of the Earth shape they developed and verified.
In the next section they were asked about what was most important to them, ranking political views, religion, scientific views, conspiracy views, and employment. They then said which of their views they doubted, and which they sometimes lost their temper when discussion.
General Demographics
Not all percentages match up, as not everyone answered all questions. Potential trolls are included in the data.
As said, 17/22 respondents are REers, 4/22 FEers, 5/22 AEers.
90.9% believed in an old Earth, leaving 9.1% who believed in a young Earth.
The spread of political viewpoints was diverse. 2 identified themselves as far left, 1 as far right, and as there wasn't much under those labels we'll simplify to a three-point scale of left/right/center. 36.4% identified as left, 36.4% as center. 27.2% as right.
On religion, 4 identified as some denomination of Christianity, 1 as a Pagan, leaving 17 who were non-religious.
Of those that answered, 5 believe in a conspiracy of some kind beyond just FET, 6 could not give a firm answer, 8 firmly reject them.
When it comes to degree of belief, a person's scientific views were overwhelmingly more likely to be either the first or second most important thing to them on the list, in first place 50% of the time, and in second place 42.1% of the time. Religion occurred in first place 20% of the time, political views 15%, employment 10% of the time, and conspiracy related views just once at 5%.
Over to second place, religion appears substantially less at just 5.3%, while employment (26.3%) and political views (21.1%) are a more notable second to scientific views. Conspiracy views again appeared with just one person, at 5.3%.
In third place, we have a much more open spread. Scientific views appear 10% of the time, political views 35%, employment 30%, conspiracy 20%, religion 5% with again one respondent.
Fourth most important, of the five options, religion makes a return with the largest single section at 36.8%. Conspiracy views are at 31.6%. Employment is at 15.8%, scientific views at 10.5%, and political views at just 5.3%.
When it comes to doubting the Earth's shape, religious views, scientific views, and conspiracy views, we have a fair bit of variation.
A grand 72.7% of people say they never or almost never doubt the Earth's shape. 22.6% doubt it sometimes, one person at 4.5% doubts often.
63.6% never or almost never doubt their religious position, 31.8% doubt sometimes, with another one person at 4.5% doubting often.
Interestingly, just 27.3% say they never or almost never doubt their political views, 63.6% doubt their political views sometimes, 9.1% often.
Then 27.3% doubt their position on conspiracy theories never or almost never, 54.5% doubt it often, while 18.2% felt the question did not apply to them.
4.5% of people regularly lost their temper when discussing scientific theories, 9.1% did so often, 59.1% do so rarely, while 27.3% say they never do.
4.5% lose their temper often when discussing religion, 45.5% do so rarely, 50% never do.
13.6% lose their temper often when discussing politics, 63.6% do so rarely, 22.7% never do.
On the topic of conspiracy theories, 9.1% lose their temper often, 45.5% rarely, 45.5% never.
These are the raw facts. There are some obvious things to point out, such as the fact people are more likely to lose their temper if the subject is more important to them. People are angriest discussing politics and scientific matters, such as the Earth's shape, and value their scientific views overwhelmingly.
This roughly describes the respondents to the survey. I've got some more detailed analysis spotting correlations which I'll try to find time to write up properly later, but in the mean time let me know if there is any correlation in particular you want me to look for.