Total Members Voted: 23
Voting closed: March 06, 2017, 10:56:40 PM
Do you stand by your claim that the NIST model looks like the collapse?
Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.
The findings thus far are that fire did not bring down this building. Building failure simulations show that, to match observation, the entire inner core of this building failed nearly simultaneously.
Let's just consider the NIST model.[youtube][/youtube]Compared to reality.[youtube][/youtube]Do you stand by your claim that the NIST model looks like the collapse?
I'm anti-judaism.
Whose narrative is it to not believe the government?
speech should be a privilege. Not a right.
Let me repeat..I think Leroy Hulsey just shot himself in the foot. Quote from: http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7The findings thus far are that fire did not bring down this building. Building failure simulations show that, to match observation, the entire inner core of this building failed nearly simultaneously.The observations are that inner core didn't fail simultaneously, it failed progressively left to right, so if his failure simulation shows simultaneous failure of the inner core. He's wrong.Whoops.
Wtc 7 had at least 18 vertical support columns remaining at the point of the roof line collapse. That's just an unpleasant fact.
There is a clear and distinct difference between the roofline and failing structure on the NIST model compared to reality.
I'm a recovering CIA agent, we take 24 step programs, the first twelve steps are learning how to tell the truth again.
As soon as the main penthouse fails the whole building comes down. You are getting desperate mate.
See how I can be honest?It's a really good feeling man.
We have the failure of column 79, this is not a core column. I'd actually think all three (79, 80, 81) collapsed when we saw the initial failure. Again. These are not core columnsThen, the entire core fails nearly simultaneously and causes a 2.25 second symmetrical free-fall.[youtube][/youtube] @24So many of you are going to jail.
The ""left to right collapse"" of the interior of the core we saw was the failure of columns 79, 80, 81. These are not core columns
you realize that for the penthouse to collapse, that everything underneath it has already collapsed. All the internal structural support had gone by the time the facade started to buckle inward.
Quote from: disputeone on September 19, 2017, 06:24:33 AMThe ""left to right collapse"" of the interior of the core we saw was the failure of columns 79, 80, 81. These are not core columnsNot true. it starts with columns 79,80,81, and then the collapse progresses all the way across, the interior support has collapsed and is falling which appears to pull the facade inwards and it then buckles and the whole facade collapses down. It's crystal clear on the video that the interior did not collapse simultaneously, as Hulsey claims.Why are you choosing to lie about what is obvious to everyone on the video?
Quote from: Rayzor on September 19, 2017, 06:35:46 AMQuote from: disputeone on September 19, 2017, 06:24:33 AMThe ""left to right collapse"" of the interior of the core we saw was the failure of columns 79, 80, 81. These are not core columnsNot true. it starts with columns 79,80,81, and then the collapse progresses all the way across, the interior support has collapsed and is falling which appears to pull the facade inwards and it then buckles and the whole facade collapses down. It's crystal clear on the video that the interior did not collapse simultaneously, as Hulsey claims.Why are you choosing to lie about what is obvious to everyone on the video?Because I am not lying. The left to right / east to west collapse of the penthouse was caused by the failure of column 79, 80, and 81 (not part of the core) happening a few seconds before the near simultaneous failure of the entire core causing the 2.25 second symmetrical free fall.Check it.[Youtube][/youtube]
I'm expecting to start seeing arrests.
Your video is bogus. This is clear and concise logic, backed up by all video evidence.The left to right / east to west collapse of the penthouse was caused by the failure of column 79, 80, and 81 (not part of the core) Happening a few seconds before the near simultaneous failure of the entire core causing the 2.25 second symmetrical free fall.Check it.[Youtube][/youtube]
I'm getting slightly erect thinking about what Trump might do with Hulseys report. It's a very powerful weapon against nearly all of his enemies. Like you say, the man looks out for himself.Sleep tight, Rayzor.
Let's just consider for a moment who Trumps greatest enemies are, it's the deep state / fake news media and the intelligence agencies / shadow governemt.Now let's give this wildcard a weapon based on sound physics that could take down all his enemies and quite literally drain the swamp in one foul swoop.The enemy of my enemy is far more useful than my enemy.Sleep tight Rayzor.
Quote from: jroa on April 30, 2014, 09:05:37 AMmarkjo, what force can not pass through a solid or liquid? Magnetism for one and electric is the other.
markjo, what force can not pass through a solid or liquid?
Dammit Rayzor, you beat me to the punch. If we suppose the Hulsey report is true, giving it to Trump would be like giving silver to a vampire.
Poll