Model inputs aren't required to understand or support their conclusions. (Made in their model)
That's just wrong Rayzor and I think you know. It would be the same as Einstein not giving us the maths behind GR and telling us to just believe it.
Now.
Please admit the public doesn't have access to the inputs needed to test the NIST conslusions made from the official model.
If I gave you the files and software what would you do with it? Let's assume that their collapse simulation is in fact correct. What model inputs would you look at and why?
They do in fact describe in detail, all their assumptions and modelling, you just don't want to accept that your world view is wrong.
I likened arguing with 9/11 conspiracy theorists to arguing with flat earthers, no matter what you say or what evidence you show them, nothing will ever convince them.
You are going to go bat shit crazy when Hulsey's report changes nothing. Sorry, but you need to prepare to be disappointed.