I apologize, I have actually been having to do things instead of having everyone do them for me, so I have had less time to waste here... Also have been having to follow Texas time.
Also, to be honest, lost alot of interest for the most part. I was hoping for real debate, not yuppie nonsense, diversion and distraction.
One more thing, if people are going to attempt to call me out...Do so with actions, not empty words. Want to call me out on credentials or experience, say why you know better than I. Please, by all means, do so through actions and proof. I have already done much action and proof on proving what I am here...I will continue if need be. However, so far, it's the accusers who have the ground to be made up..Not I. So what have you?? (Sorry middle school math doesn't count)
As far as sources, nothing I have said so far is even remotely secret, research is easy (I have even told the material where it can be found) prerequisites come with study...Though unfortunately ..
Logic cannot be taught..
I know the reason people must focus on me is they must disqualify me, because someone like me cannot support what I do, it does not compute. If you remove me, there are 1000s like me and better that will be there to take my place. Good luck...
Rayzor brings out his A game on page 50 lol, nice work tho, credit where credit is due.
Assuming you are speaking of this?
Beware your beliefs of an "A" game..A house with no foundation can still look pretty on the outside, until you step inside or it falls under its own weight.
Saying this "proves" master's middle school math problem, is either out of ignorance or deliberately miss represented, from rayzor I would expect either.
The left leg has increased in load, pull that one out and see what happens..I also said depending on exact structure there could be a reduced or no load on a leg or two. Nor from the picture can we see how much sag is present at the missing leg. I never said you couldn't remove a leg and still not maintain stability (this only happened on 9/11)
Your dimensions are incorrect, the supports are under the circle, moved in, placed in direction of the weight transfer, not outside held on by a bolt. This changes pivot points and load transfer, not to mention the legs have increased the support footprint by 500+ times, as well as reduced leverage on the circle and seriously effected transfer (anyone remember the list of questions I asked master that he deemed useless?? This happened to be one of them..No way huh?)
I could continue...But it is not necessary right now, not to mention I believe it's pissing in the wind with the present company. Simple fact, master's equations are not reality in the real world.
Now unless someone would like to take up my wager for this test...Or... someone would like to start a pissing match with me on who is who in reality (instead of just running ones mouth with empty words), OR....someone would like to actually discuss 9/11 and truly is looking for the truth. I will spend any time I am in this thread (which will not be much) shit posting or stirring the pot.
I have wasted enough quality hours on yuppie nonsense.
(Also, it anyone would like to know how to solve master's bonus question in reality and have the estimated totals reflect correctly in a real life application, I have presented the needed math and flow chart on this thread to get you moving in the right direction)
Edited to add*
Toodle-pip
That's a must